Perceived Importance of the Quality of the Indoor Environment in Commercial Buildings

Abstract

Recognition of the importance of the quality of the indoor environment (IEQ) to health, comfort and productivity of building end users has produced increasing numbers of voluntary schemes whose assessment embraces a wide spectrum of environmental attributes. Studies which aim to derive appropriate weighting factors for these attributes through soliciting the perceived importance from experts are abundant. This article reports the findings of a study which, based on face-to-face interviews with 548 end users and 66 building professionals, processed their perceived importance of IEQ using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP). Attributes included were thermal comfort, air cleanliness, odor and noise associated with the air conditioning system of typical commercial buildings. Correlation analysis of the ranking results of the AHP weights revealed the difference in perceived importance of the attributes according to gender of the respondents. Other factors also found to have influence on the perceived importance of the IEQ were whether the respondents were professionals or other end users and the reason for them working or visiting the buildings and the duration of their stay. These all varied with psychophysical factors such as personal experiences, needs and expectations. Further work is needed to study whether the weighting factors should be derived from the perceptions of experts, end users, or a balance between the two.

Keywords

Perceived importance Psychophysical elements Indoor environment quality Assessment scheme Commercial building

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Godish T. : Indoor environmental quality, Boca Raton, Fla, Lewis Publishers, 2001.

Indoor environment: Health aspects of air quality, thermal environment, light, and noise, United Nations Environment Programme. World Health Organisation, 1990.

Seppänen O. , Fisk W. , Mendell MJ : Association of ventilation with health and other responses in commercial and institutional buildings: Healthy Buildings 2000 2000; 2: 327—332.

Hoskins JA : Health effects due to indoor air pollution: Indoor Built Environ 2003; 12: 427—433.

Liu J. , Liu GQ : Some Indoor Air Quality Problems and Measures to Control Them in China: Indoor Built Environ 2005; 14(1): 75—81.

A Guide on Indoor air quality certification scheme for offices and public places. Hong Kong, Indoor Air Quality Management Group, 2003.

Burnett J. : Indoor air quality certification scheme for hong kong buildings: Indoor Built Environ 2005; 14(3—4): 201—208.

Haghighat F. , Donnini G. : Impact of psychosocial factors on perception of the indoor air environment studies in 12 office buildings: Building Environ 1999; 34: 479—503.

Sommer R. : Psychology applied to the environment; in Stec AM , Bernstein DA (eds) Psychology - Fields of Applications, Boston, Houghton Mifflin Company, 1999.

10.

Leaman A. , Bordass B. : Assessing building performance in use 4 - the Probe occupant surveys and their implications: Building Res Inform 2001; 29(2): 129—143.

11.

BRE's Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM). Building Research Establishment, 2006. Available at: http://www.breeam.org/

12.

HK-BEAM: The Hong Kong Building Environmental Assessment Method . HK-BEAM Society, 2006. Available at: http://www.hk-beam.org.hk/general/home.php

13.

Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Green Building Rating System. US Green Building Council, 2006. Available at: http://www.usgbc.org/DisplayPage.aspx?CategoryID=19

14.

Chiang CM , Lai CM : A Study on the comprehensive indicator of indoor environment assessment for occupants' health in Taiwan: Building Environ 2002; 37: 387—392.

15.

Chau CK , Yung HK , Leung TM , Law MY : Evaluation of relative importance of environmental issues associated with a residential estate in Hong Kong: Landscape Urban Planning 2006; 77: 67—79.

16.

Ho Dcw , Leung HF , Wong SK , Cheung Akc , Lau Ssy , Wong WS , Lung Dpy , Chau KW : Assessing the health and hygiene performance of apartment buildings: Facilities 2004; 22(3/4): 58—69.

17.

Lee WL , Burnett J. : Customization of GBTool in Hong Kong: Building Environ 2006; 41: 1831—1846.

18.

Chang KF , Chiang CM , Chou PC : Adapting aspects of GBTool 2005 — searching for suitability in Taiwan: Building Environ 2007; 42(1): 310—316.

19.

Saaty TL : The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation , New York, McGraw-Hill, 1980.

20.

Bender A. , Din A. , Hoesli M. , Laakso J. : Environmental quality perceptions of urban commercial real estate: J Property Invest Finance 1999; 17(3): 280—296.

21.

Fowler FJ : Survey research methods, Thousand Oaks, California, Sage Publications, 2002.

22.

Fechner GT : Elements of psychophysics; Howes DH, Boring EG, Adler HE (trans.): Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1860/1966.

23.

Anson O. , Paran E. , Neumann L. , Chernichovsky D. : Gender differences in health perceptions and their predictors: Social Sci Med 1993; 36(4): 419—427.

24.

Manrai LA , Manrai AK : Effects of cultural-context, gender, and acculturation on perceptions of work versus social/leisure time usage J Business Res 1995; 32: 115—128.

25.

Gijsbers van Wijk Cmt , Kolk AM : Psychometric evaluation of symptom perception related measures: Personality Individ Diff 1996; 20(1): 55—70.

26.

Eisler AD , Eisler H. , Yoshida M. : Perception of human ecology: cross-cultural and gender comparisons: J Environ Psychol 2003; 23: 89—101.

27.

Lai Jhk , Yik Fwh : Knowledge and perception of operation and maintenance practitioners in Hong Kong about sustainable buildings: Facilities 2006; 24(3/4): 90—105.

28.

Vernon MD : The psychology of perception, London, University of London Press, 1962.

29.

Rookes P. , Willson J. : Perception: theory, development and organisation, Routledge , 2000.

30.

Plotnik R. : Introduction to psychology, Wadsworth, Pacific Grove, California, 2002.

31.

Sekuler R. , Blake R. : Perception, Boston, McGraw-Hill , 2002.

32.

Saaty TL : How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process: Eur J Operational Res 1990; 48: 9—26.

33.

Fire Service (Installations and Equipment) Regulations (Chapter 95B), Law of Hong Kong. The Hong Kong Government, 1997.

34.

Expert Choice, 2006. Available at: http://www.expertchoice.com/

35.

Saaty TL : Decision making for leaders: the analytic hierarchy process for decisions in a complex world, Pittsburgh, Pa, RWS Publications, 1995.

36.

Kendall M. , Gibbons JD : Rank Correlation Methods. New York, Oxford University Press, 1990.

37.

Gescheider GA : Psychophysical scaling: Ann Rev Psychol 1988; 39: 169—200.

38.

Goldstein EB : Sensation and perception, Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, CA, 1999.

39.

Lachman SJ : Processes in perception: Psychological transformations of highly structured stimulus material: Percept Motor Skills 1996 , 83: 411—418.

40.

National Advisory Mental Health Council: Basic behavioral science research for mental health: perception, attention, learning, and memory: Am Psychol 1996; 51: 133—142.

41.

Wade C. , Tavris C. : Invitation to psychology, Upper Saddle River, NJ, Prentice Hall, 2005.

42.

Peterson C. : Psychology: a biopsychosocial approach, New York, Longman, 1997.