An Investigation and Analysis of Indoor Environment in Air-Conditioned Chinese Ship Vessel Cabins

Abstract

This paper focuses on the field measurement and evaluation of the indoor thermal environment in air-conditioned vessel cabins. Questionnaires were collected in this study to appraise thermal sensation vote (TSV) of crews and passengers in specific ship cabins environment during a hot season. Predicted mean vote (PMV) was calculated based on the field environmental data. The neutral temperature was 22.6°C for passengers, 22.9°C for the working crews and 20.9°C for resting crews based on calculation using TSV regression. From PMV regression, the neutral temperature was 24.0°C for passengers, 25.1°C for working crew and 24.7°C for resting crew. Predicted neutral temperature from PMV is higher than the neutral temperature from TSV. Human factors of crew, metabolism rate and clothing insulation were reasonably modified in order to minimise the differences between TSV and PMV and predict PMV accurately. Investigation of the thermal preference and productivity of the crews were also carried out during the field experiment. The results showed that female subjects or elderly subjects (above 40) preferred working in warmer environment and that neutral temperature can not ensure high productivity. Therefore, variance exists between thermal sensation and thermal preference. From the field data analysis, productivity of the crew in slightly cool or slightly warm environment was higher than that in the environment with neutral temperature. Productivity is 101.7% when TSV is 0 and reaches the peak of 105.1% in slightly cool environment. A TSV-Productivity polynomial regression equation was established based on field investigation data.

Keywords

Ship air-conditioning Thermal comfort TSV PMV Productivity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ISO7730: Moderate Thermal Environment- Determination of the PMV and PPD Indices and Specification of the Conditions for Thermal Comfort. Geneva, International Standard Organization , 1984.

Ansi / ASHRAE Standard 55-1992 : Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy . Atlanta, GA, ASHRAE, 1992.

Parsons KC : The effects of gender, acclimation state, the opportunity to adjust clothing and physical disability on requirements for thermal comfort in laboratory experiments: Energ Buildings 2002;34(6): 593-599.

Tanabe S. , Nishihara N. : Productivity and fatigue: Indoor Air 2004;14(Suppls7): 126-133.

Kosonen R. , Tan F. : Assessment of productivity loss in air-conditioned buildings using PMV index : Energ Buildings 2004;36(10): 987-993.

Ye XJ , Zhou ZP , Lian ZW , Liu HM , Li CZ , Liu YM : Field study of a thermal environment and adaptive model in Shanghai: Indoor Air 2006;16(4):320-326.

Bouden C. , Ghrab N. : An adaptive thermal comfort model for the Tunisian context: a field study results: Energ Buildings 2005;37(9): 952-963.

Li B. , Li W. , Liu H. , Yao R. , Tan M. , Jing S. , Ma X. : Physiological expression of human thermal comfort to indoor operative temperature in the non-HVAC environment: Indoor Built Environ 2010;19(2):221-229.

Li B. , Tan M. , Liu H. , Ma X. , Zhang W. : Occupant’s perception and preference of thermal environment in free-running buildings in China: Indoor Built Environ 2010 ;19(4): 405-412.

10.

Fong KF , Chow TT , Li C. : Comfort zone of air speeds and temperatures for air-conditioned environment in the sub-tropical Hong Kong: Indoor Built Environ 2010; 19(3):375-381.

11.

Wong LT , Fong KNK , Mui KW , Wong WWY , Lee LW : A field survey of the expected desirable thermal environment for older people : Indoor Built Environ 2009;18(4): 336-345.

12.

Daghigh R. , Adam NM , Sahari BB : Ventilation parameters and thermal comfort of naturally and mechanically ventilated offices: Indoor Built Environ 2009 ;18(2): 113-122.

13.

Budaiwi I. , Al-Homoud M. , Abdou A. : Implementation of a multi-phase approach for investigating and remedying a thermal comfort problem in an office building: Indoor Built Environ 2009;18(1):52-65.

14.

Park CS , Augenbroe G. : Normative thermal comfort assessment: Indoor Built Environ 2008;17(4):324-333.

15.

Von Grabe J. , Winter S. : The correlation between PMV and dissatisfaction on the basis of the ASHRAE and the McIntyre scale-Towards an improved concept of dissatisfaction: Indoor Built Environ 2008 ;17(2): 103-121.

16.

ISO International Standard 7726 : Thermal Environment-Instruments and Methods for Measuring Physical Quantities. Geneva, International Organization for Standardization, 1998.

17.

Ashrae. Thermal comfort: in ASHRAE Fundamentals Handbook 1997. Atlanta, American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers, 1997; 8.17-8.17.

18.

Fanger PO : Thermal Comfort. Malabar, Florida, Robert E Krieger Publishing Company, 1982.

19.

De Dear R. , Brager G. , Cooper D. : Developing an adaptive model of thermal comfort and preference: Final Report ASHRAE RP- 884, Atlanta, 1997.

20.

Oseland NA : Acceptable temperature ranges in naturally ventilated and air-conditioned offices: ASHRAE Trans 1998;104(1): 1018-1030.

21.

Fanger PO , Langkilde G. : Interindividual differences in ambient temperature preferred by seated persons ASHRAE Trans 1975;81(2):140-147.

22.

Jitkhajornwanich K. , Pitts AC : Interpretation of thermal responses of four subject groups in transitional spaces of buildings in Bangkok: Build Environ 2002;37(11):1193-1204.

23.

Mahdavi A. , Unzeitig U. : Occupancy implications of spatial, indoor-environmental, and organizational features of office spaces: Build Environ 2005 ;40(1):113-123.

24.

McIntyre DA : Indoor Climate. London , Applied Science Publishers Ltd, 1980.