Previous research reported that healthcare professionals rate the physical work environment more negatively than other characteristics of the environment. This study investigated salient dimensions of employees’ perceptions of healthcare facilities and differences across demographic groups. A total of 496 healthcare professionals from eight acute care hospitals participated in this cross-sectional study. Employees’ perceptions of 27 different architectural and physical features in patient areas, work spaces, and staff areas were measured. Common factors were extracted through principal component analysis, levels of association between employees’ perceptions and each architectural and physical feature were determined through confirmatory factor analysis, and differences across demographic groups were defined through invariance analysis. Findings of this study highlight the importance of attention to caregiver needs for a safe and comfortable work environment via finishing materials, indoor air quality, and furniture design. In comparison, features that address the visual quality of the work environment, such as window views and artwork, were found to have smaller associations with positive evaluations by employees. However, in non-clinical staff areas, employees appreciate features improving the visual quality of their rest area. The study also found that younger employees and those newer to the facility would appreciate improvements in the architectural/physical features to a greater extent.
AndradeCLimaMLFornaraFBonaiutoM. Users' views of hospital environmental quality: validation of the perceived hospital environment quality indicators (PHEQIs). J Environ Psychol2012; 32(2): 97–111.
2.
HamiltonDKWatkinsDH. Evidence-based design for multiple building types, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2009.
3.
UlrichRSZimringCZhuXDuboseJSeoHBChoiYSQuanXJosephA. A review of the research literature on evidence-based healthcare design. HERD2008; 1(3): 61–125.
4.
MroczekJMikitarianGVieiraEKRotariusT. Hospital design and staff perceptions: an exploratory analysis. Health Care Manager2005; 24(3): 233–244.
5.
GibsonJThe theory of affordances. In: ShawREBransfordJ (eds). Perceiving, acting, and knowing: toward an ecological psychology, Hillsdale, NJ: Elrbaum, 1977.
6.
SallisJOwenNFisherEEcological models of health behavior. In: GlanzKRimerBKLewisFM (eds). Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice, 4th ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2008, pp. 65–86.
7.
McAlexanderKMMamaSKMedinaAO'ConnorDPLeeRE. The concordance of directly and indirectly measured built environment attributes and physical activity adoption2011,London, UK: BioMed Central Ltd.http://www.ijbnpa.org/content/8/1/72 (2012, accessed 15 November 2013).
8.
Center for the Built Environment (CBE). Occupant indoor environmental quality (IEQ) survey and building benchmarking, Berkeley: Center for the Built Environment (CBE), 2011,. http://www.cbe.berkeley.edu/research/briefs-survey.htm (2011, accessed 15 November 2013).
9.
CohenRStandevenMBordassBLeamanA. Assessing building performance in use 1: the probe process. Build Res Inf2001; 29(2): 85–102.
HuckabayLMJaglaB. Nurses' stress factors in the intensive care unit. J Nurs Adm1979; 9(2): 21–26.
14.
KotzerAMZacharakisSKRaynoldsMBuenningF. Evaluation of the built environment: staff and family satisfaction pre- and post-occupancy of the children's hospital. Health Environ Res Des J2011; 4(4): 60–78.
15.
BerryLLParishJT. The impact of facility improvements on hospital nurses. HERD2008; 1(2): 5–13.
16.
QuanXBJosephAEnsignJC. Impact of imaging room environment: staff job stress and satisfaction, patient satisfaction, and willingness to recommend. HERD2012; 5(2): 61–79.
17.
ShepleyMMHarrisDDWhiteR. Open-bay and single-family room neonatal intensive care units: caregiver satisfaction and stress. Environ Behav2008; 40(2): 249–268.
18.
FournierM-A. Impact of a family-centered-care approach on the design of neonatal intensive-care units, Unpublished doctoral dissertation. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University, 1999.
19.
JanssenPAHarrisSJSoolsmaJKleinMCSeymourLC. Single room maternity care: the nursing response. Birth2001; 28(3): 173–179.
20.
DickensGSugarmanPRogersG. Nurses' perceptions of the working environment: a UK independent sector study. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs2005; 12(3): 297–302.
21.
KotzerAMKoeppingDMLeDucK. Perceived nursing work environment of acute care pediatric nurses. Pediatr Nurs2006; 32(4): 327–332.
22.
KotzerAMArellanaK. Defining an evidence-based work environment for nursing in the USA. J Clin Nurs2008; 17(12): 1652–1659.
23.
DjukicMKovnerCBudinWNormanR. Physical work environment: testing an expanded model of job satisfaction in a sample of registered nurses. Nurs Res2010; 59(6): 441–451.
HarrisPBMcBrideGRossCCurtisL. A place to heal: environmental sources of satisfaction among hospital patients. J Appl Soc Psychol2002; 32: 1276–1299.
26.
FolkinsCO'ReillyCRobertsKMillerS. Physical environment and job satisfaction in a community mental health center. Commun Ment Health J1977; 13(1): 24–30.
27.
ApplebaumDFowlerSFiedlerNOsinubiORobsonM. The impact of environmental factors on nursing stress, job satisfaction, and turnover intention. J Nurs Adm2010; 40(7/8): 323–328.
28.
AlimogluMKDonmezL. Daylight exposure and the other predictors of burnout among nurses in a University Hospital. Int J Nurs Stud2005; 42(5): 549–555.
29.
DendaasN. Environmental congruence and work-related stress in acute care hospital medical/surgical units: a descriptive, correlational study. HERD2011; 5(1): 23–42.
30.
MonjurMYisongZ. Healthcare providers' perception of design factors related to physical environments in hospitals. J Environ Psychol2012; 32(4): 362–370.
31.
MichaelYBeardTChoiDFarquharSCarlsonN. Measuring the influence of built neighborhood environments on walking in older adults. J Aging Phys Activity2006; 14(3): 302–312.
32.
SadatsafaviHWalewskiJ. Corporate sustainability: the environmental design and human resource management interface in healthcare settings. HERD2013; 6(2): 98–118.
33.
United States Green Building Council (USGBC). LEED 2009 for healthcare new construction and major renovations rating system (Updated August 2011), U.S. Green Building Council, Inc, 2009,, 2009. http://www.usgbc.org/ShowFile.aspx?DocumentID=8878 (2011, accessed 15 November 2013).
BentlerPMBonettDG. Significance tests and goodness-of-fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychol Bull1980; 88: 588–600.
36.
CurranPJWestSGFinchJF. The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychol Methods1996; 1(1): 16–29.
37.
ReilingJGKnutzenBLStoeckleinM. Healthcare – FMEA – The cure for medical errors – Failure mode and effects analysis can be used when designing healthcare facilities to reduce errors and promote patient safety. Qual Progr2003; 36(8): 67–67.
38.
CattellRB. The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behav Res1966; 1(2): 245–276.
39.
KaiserH. The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educ Psychol Meas1960; 20(1): 141–151.
40.
PettMALackeyNRSullivanJJ. Making sense of factor analysis: the use of factor analysis for instrument development in health care research, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2003.
41.
HoR. Handbook of univariate and multivariate data analysis and interpretation with SPSS, Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2006.
42.
HinkinT. A review of scale development practices in the study of organizations. J Manage1995; 21(5): 967–988.
43.
NunnallyJCBernsteinIH. Psychometric theory, New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1995.
44.
KimJMuellerCW. Factor analysis: statistical methods and practical issues, Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE, 1978.
45.
KlineP. An easy guide to factor analysis, London; New York, NY: Routledge, 2002.
MarshHWBallaJRMcDonaldRP. Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: the effect of sample size. Psychol Bull1988; 103(3): 391–410.
48.
SchumackerRELomaxRG. A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2004.
49.
BrowneMWCudeckRAlternative ways of assessing model fit. In: BollenKALongJS (eds). Testing structural equation models, Newbury Park, CA: SAGE, 1993.
50.
HuL-tBentlerPM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equation Model1999; 6(1): 1–55.
51.
BrownTA. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research, New York, NY: Guilford Press, 2006.
52.
ByrneBM. Structural equation modeling with AMOS: basic concepts, applications, and programming, New York, NY: Routledge, 2010.
53.
KlineP. The handbook of psychological testing, London; New York, NY: Routledge, 1993.
54.
ThompsonB. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: understanding concepts and applications, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2004.
55.
BuchananTLBarkerKNGibsonJTJiangBCPearsonRE. Illumination and errors in dispensing. Am J Hosp Pharm1991; 48(10): 2137–2145.
56.
ShepleyM. Evidence-based design for infants and staff in the neonatal intensive care unit. Clin Perinatol2004; 31(2): 299–311.
57.
DalkeHLittleJNiemannECamgozNSteadmanGHillSStottL. Colour and lighting in hospital design. Opt Laser Technol2006; 38(4–6): 343–365.
58.
ReilingJHughesRMurphyMThe impact of facility design on patient safety. In: HughesR (eds). Patient safety and quality an evidence-based handbook for nurses, Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2008, pp. 700–726.
59.
ChambersMBowmanK. Finishes and furnishings: considerations for critical care environments. Crit Care Nurs Q2011; 34(4): 317–331.
60.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Number and rate of nonfatal occupational injuries and illnesses by selected industry, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, 2007.
61.
JosephAUlrichR. Sound control for improved outcomes in healthcare settings, Concord, CA: The Center for Health Design, 2007.
62.
BergerAMHobbsBB. Impact of shift work on the health and safety of nurses and patients. Clin J Oncol Nurs2006; 10(4): 465–465.
63.
CoffeyLCSkipperJK JrJungFD. Nurses and shift work: effects on job performance and job-related stress. J Adv Nurs1988; 13(2): 245–254.
64.
FitzpatrickJMWhileAERobertsJD. Shift work and its impact upon nurse performance: current knowledge and research issues. J Adv Nurs1999; 29(1): 18–27.
65.
BeyeaSC. Noise: a distraction, interruption, and safety hazard. AORN J2007; 86(2): 281–285.
66.
ParsonsRHartigTEnvironmental psychophysiology. In: CacioppoJTTassinaryLGBerntsonGG (eds). Handbook of psychophysiology, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2000, pp. 815–846.
67.
HunterCHowlettO. The benefits of daylight through windows, Troy, NY: Lighting Research Center, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 2003.
68.
JosephA. The impact of light on outcomes in healthcare settings, Concord, CA: Center for Health Design, 2006.
69.
KatsGBramanJJamesM. Greening our built world: costs, benefits, and strategies, Washington, DC: Island Press, 2010.
DjukicMKovnerC. Physical work environment: testing an expanded job satisfaction model in a sample of hospital staff registered nurses, Unpublished doctoral dissertation. New York, NY: New York University, 2009.
72.
MaloneEDellingerB. Furniture design features and healthcare outcomes, Concord, CA: The Center for Health Design, 2011.
