Effects of interior wood finishes on the lighting ambiance and materiality of architectural spaces

Abstract

Wood is a material often used by architects to enhance the overall ambience of a space, but few researches have been reported to discuss its actual impact on visual impression and luminous effects. This research studies the influence of wood materiality in relation to creating specific lighting ambiances in architecture. In particular, it focuses on the impact of decorative wood indoor panels on the creation of daylighting diversity in interior space and the potential to improve daylighting quality and energy efficiency. The research uses scaled models for their accuracy in rendering complex daylighting ambiances. The photo-luminance meter enables the comparison between different settings of interior spaces created by a selection of wood type materiality: ratio (percentage), colour (Oak, Cape Cod Grey and Dark Walnut coatings) and gloss concerning illuminance patterns obtained from Ecotect software. The CIE L*a*b* colour space is used to classify luminous ambiances. Results indicate that bright colour Oak favours a deeper daylighting penetration and increases the colour temperature of the space by about 300% when applied on the floor. Cape Cod Grey coating provided a neutral colour balance even under sunlighting. High gloss Dark Walnut located on the ceiling produces the highest luminance values, enlarging the window-lighting pattern. The research underlines the role of wood materiality in achieving luminous diversity and creating visually comfortable interior ambiances.

Keywords

Daylight Architectural ambiance Wood finish Indoor decorative wood Image analysis Luminous diversity Brightness Colour of space Energy efficiency

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bodart

De Herde

. Global energy savings in office buildings by the use of daylighting. Energy Build 2002; 34: 421–429.

Baker

Steemers

. Daylight design of buildings, London: James & James, 2002, pp. 25–25.

Bennadji A, Bouchlaghem NM, Loveday DL, Holmes M, Holmes M, Shaffery J and van Zyl R. Friendly Interface and data transfer for engineering assessment of building design option at sketch design stage “Energysave”. In: Advanced in building technology conference, Hong Kong, China, 2–4 December 2002. ISBN: 0-08-044100-9.

Leslie

. Capturing the daylight dividend in buildings: why and how? Build Environ 2003; 38: 381–385.

Parpairi

. The luminance differences index: a new indicator of user preferences in daylit spaces. Light Res Technol 2002; 34: 53–68.

Boyce

. Lighting quality: the unanswered questions. In: 1st CIE symposium on lighting quality Ottawa, Canada, 9–10 May 1998, pp.37–43.

Tabet AK. Windows and lighting design for visual comfort. In: Light and lightning international conference. Proceedings of CIE conference, CNRI, Bucharest, Romania, 29 June–3 July, pp.21–28.

Redlich

Sparer

Cullen

. Sick-building syndrome. Lancet 1997; 349: 1013–1016.

Kellert

Dimensions, elements, and attributes of biophilic design. In: Kellert

Heerwagen

Mador

(eds). Biophilic design: the theory, science, and practice of bringing buildings to life, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley, 2008, pp. 24–35.

10.

Kellert

. Building for life: understanding and designing the human-nature connection, Washington, DC: Island Press, 2005, pp. 123–123.

11.

Kellert S and Finnegan B. Biophilic design: the architecture of life, www.bullfrogfilms.com (2011, accessed October 2014).

12.

Browning

Ryan

Kallianpurkar

Laburto

Watson

Knop

. The economics of biophilia, why designing with nature in mind makes financial sense, New York: Terrapin Bright Green, 2014.

13.

Harijaona Z, Cantin R and Guarracino G. Numerical modeling of impact of radiation exchanges between wood and building thermal comfort. In: 27th AIVC and 4th epic conference on technologies & sustainable policies for a radical decrease of the energy consumption in buildings, Lyon, France, 20–22 November 2009, pp.21–28.

14.

Wymelenberg KGVD. Evaluation human visual performance in an office environment using luminance-based metrics. PhD Thesis, University of Washington, Seattle, USA, 2012.

15.

Veitch

Dikel

. Imagining the future of office lighting: smart, sustainable, solid-state. Light: the Official Newsletter of the Indian Society of Lighting Engineers 2013; 13: 10–22.

16.

Kelz C, Grote V and Moser M. Interior wood use in classrooms reduces pupils’ Stress levels. In: The 9th biennial conference on environmental psychology, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, 24–24 September 2011, pp.612–618.

17.

Tsunetsugu

Miyazaki

Sato

. Physiological effects in humans induced by the visual stimulation of room interiors with different wood quantities. Wood Sci 2007; 53: 11–16.

18.

van den Wymelenberg K and Inanici M. A study of luminance distribution patterns and occupant preference in daylit offices. In: PLEA2009 – 26th conference on passive and low energy architecture, Quebec City, Canada, 22–24 June 2009, pp.487–493.

19.

Lam

WMC

. Perception and lighting as form givers for architecture, New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1977.

20.

Jafarian

Demers

CMH

Blanchet

Laundry

. Impact of indoor use of wood on the quality of interior ambiances under overcast and clear skies: case study of the Eugene H. Kruger Building, Québec City. J Biores 2016; 11: 1647–1663.

21.

Arsenault

Hébert

Dubois

M-C

. Effects of glazing colour type on perception of daylight quality, arousal, and switch-on patterns of electric light in office rooms. Build Environ 2012; 57: 223–231.

22.

Bodart

De Herde

. Global energy savings in office buildings by the use of daylighting. Energy Build 2002; 34: 421–429.

23.

Pineault N. Effets des vitrages à revêtement et des verres teintés sur la qualité de l’éclairage naturel: Étude expérimentale à l’aide d’une maquette à échelle réduite d’une salle de séjour. Master’s (MSc) Thesis. University of Laval, Quebec, Canada, 2009.

24.

Michael A, Heracleous C, Thravalou S and Philokyprou M. Lighting performance of urban vernacular architecture in the East-Mediterranean area: field study and simulation analysis. Indoor Built Environ 2015. 26: 471–487.

25.

Lau

JJH

. Use of scale models for appraising lighting quality. Light Res Technol 1972; 4: 254–262.

26.

Ward G. HDRI Tutorial. In: 17th Color imaging conference 2009, http://anyhere.com/gward/pickup/CIC17HDRcourse.pdf (accessed November 2015).

27.

Borisuit

Linhart

Scartezzini

J-L

Münch

. Effects of realistic office daylighting and electric lighting conditions on visual comfort, alertness and mood. Light Res Technol 2014; 47: 192–209.

28.

Inanici

. Per-pixel lighting data analysis, Berkeley: Ernesto Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 2005, pp. 29–46.

29.

Demers CMH. The sanctuary of art: images in the assessment and design of light in architecture. PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, 1997.

30.

Demers CMH. A classification of daylighting qualities based on contrast and brightness analysis. In: Proceedings of the American Solar Energy Society, (ASES), SOLAR 2007, Cleaveland, OH, 7–12 July 2007, pp.379–386.

31.

Troland

. Report of Committee on Colorimetry for 1920–21. J Optic Soc Am 1922; 6: 527–596.

32.

Baardseth P, Skrede G, Naes T, Thomassen MS, Iversen A and Kaaber L (1988) A Comparison of CIE (1976) L*a*b* values obtained from two different instruments on several food commodities. J Food Sci 53: 1737–1742.

33.

Malacara

. Color vision and colorimetry theory and applications, Bellingham WA: SPIE Press, 2002.