In research and assessment of indoor environmental quality (IEQ), the terms ‘Comfort’, ‘Health’ and ‘Well-being’ are often used interchangeably without a clear definition of terms or effects on conditions for occupants. This calls for a systematic restructuring of the ontological approach to IEQ and, based on a meta-analysis of recent IEQ literature, the authors suggest three substantial contributions: 1) A framework consisting of comfort, health and well-being as three equal branches of IEQ to increase focus on previously neglected aspects and make inter-domain relations more transparent. 2) The identification of key IEQ trends and by extension suggestions for formal definitions of three main domains as part of a multidisciplinary conceptual framework for working holistically with IEQ. 3) The introduction of positive stimuli to IEQ assessment as opposed to the predominance of focus on the absence of negative parameters of current practice. Through including this positive stimuli dimension, the field of IEQ shifts from ‘not bad’ to ‘truly good’, encouraging the design of enriched environments to further positive experiences improving occupant well-being.
ASHRAE Guideline 10-2016. Interactions affecting the achievement of acceptable indoor environments.
Atlanta:
The American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, 2016.
11.
BluyssenPM.Towards new methods and ways to create healthy and comfortable buildings. Build Environ2010;
45: 808–818.
12.
HuppertFASoT.Flourishing across Europe: application of a new conceptual framework for defining well-being. Soc Indic Res2013;
110: 837–861.
13.
Merriam-Webster Dictionary Definitions of Comfort, Health and Well-being. Dictionary by Merriam-Webster, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ (2018, accessed 13 November 2018).
14.
Oxford Dictionary Definitions of Comfort, Health, and Well-being. English Oxford Living Dictionaries, https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/ (2018, accessed 13 November 2018).
15.
GiarmaCTsikaloudakiKAravantinosD.Daylighting and visual comfort in buildings’ environmental performance assessment tools: a critical review. Procedia Environ Sci2017;
38: 522–529.
16.
MacNaughtonPSatishULaurentJGCFlaniganSVallarinoJCoullBSpenglerJDAllenJG.The impact of working in a green certified building on cognitive function and health. Build Environ2017;
114: 178–186.
17.
Al HorrYArifMKatafygiotouMMazroeiAKaushikAElsarragE.Impact of indoor environmental quality on occupant well-being and comfort: a review of the literature. Int J Sustain Built Environ2016;
5: 1–11.
18.
BragerGSde DearRJ.Thermal adaptation in the built environment: a literature review. Energy Build1998;
27: 83–96.
19.
NicolJFHumphreysMA.Adaptive thermal comfort and sustainable thermal standards for buildings. Energy Build2002;
34: 563–572.
20.
de DearRJAkimotoTArensEABragerGCandidoCCheongKWLiBNishiharaNSekharSCTanabeSToftumJZhangHZhuY.Progress in thermal comfort research over the last twenty years. Indoor Air2013;
23: 442–461.
21.
SteemersKManchandaS.Energy efficient design and occupant well-being: case studies in the UK and India. Build Environ2010;
45: 270–278.
22.
BragerGZhangHArensE.Evolving opportunities for providing thermal comfort. Build Res Inf2015;
43: 274–287.
23.
FangerPO.What is IAQ?Indoor Air2006;
16: 328–334.
24.
de DearRJ.A global database of thermal comfort field experiments. ASHRAE Trans1998;
104: 1141–1152.
25.
BragerGBakerL.Occupant satisfaction in mixed-mode buildings. Build Res Inf2009;
37: 369–380.
26.
BrunsgaardCHeiselbergPKnudstrupM-ALarsenTS.Evaluation of the indoor environment of comfort houses: qualitative and quantitative approaches. Indoor Built Environ2012;
21: 432–451.
27.
PallasmaaJ.The eyes of the skin: architecture and the senses.
Chichester:
John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2005.
28.
PallasmaaJ.Hapticity and time. Archit Rev2000;
207: 78–84.
29.
Merleau-PontyM. The film and the new psychology. In: Sense and Non-Sense. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1964, p. 18.
30.
AaltoA.The humanizing of architecture. Technol Rev1940;
14: 14–16.
RasmussenSE.Experiencing architecture.
Cambridge:
MIT Press, 1962.
33.
VitruviusPMorganMH.Vitruvius: the ten books on architecture.
New York:
Dover Publications, 1914.
34.
VitruviusPPhilandrierGBarbaroDWottonHSaumaiseCBaldiB.M. Vitruvii Pollionis de Architectura Libri decem.
Amsterdam:
apud Ludovicum Elzevirium, 1649.
35.
MangoneGKurversSRLuscuerePG.Constructing thermal comfort: investigating the effect of vegetation on indoor thermal comfort through a four season thermal comfort quasi-experiment. Build Environ2014;
81: 410–426.
36.
HopkinsonRG.Glare from daylighting in buildings. Appl Ergon1972;
3: 206–215.
37.
OsterhausWK. Discomfort glare from daylight in computer offices: what do we really know? In: Proceedings Lux Europa 2001 - The 9th European Lighting Conference, Reykjavik, June 18–20 2001; pp. 448–456.
38.
HuppertFA.Psychological well-being: evidence regarding its causes and consequences. Appl Psychol Heal Well-Being2009;
1: 137–164.
39.
AriesMBCVeitchJANewshamGR.Windows, view, and office characteristics predict physical and psychological discomfort. J Environ Psychol2010;
30: 533–541.
40.
PaulWLTaylorPA.A comparison of occupant comfort and satisfaction between a green building and a conventional building. Build Environ2008;
43: 1858–1870.
ANSI/ASHRAE 55-2017. Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy.
Atlanta:
The American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, 2017.
43.
VeitchJA.Psychological processes influencing lighting quality. J Illum Eng Soc2001;
30: 124–140.
44.
ANSI/ASHRAE 62.2-2016. Ventilation and acceptable indoor air quality in low-rise residential buildings.
Atlanta:
The American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, 2016.
45.
ΚαιΧΕργωνΗ.Κτιριοδομικος Κανονισμός Φεκ 59/Δ/3-02-89. 1989 (Greek Building Regulation).
46.
RasmussenB. Sound classification schemes in Europe-Quality classes intended for renovated housing. In: COST Action TU0901: Improving the quality European housing stock. University of Malta, May 2010, pp. 1–8.
WHO. WHO definition of health. In: Preamble to the Constitution of the World Health Organization as adopted by the international health New York conference, New York, June 19–22 1946; pp.100.
HuberMKnottnerusJAGreenLvan der HorstHJadadARKromhoutDLeonardBLorigKLoureiroMIvan der MeerJWMSchnabelPSmithRvan WeelCSmidH.How should we define health?BMJ2011;
343: d4163.
WoodcockJPerisESicaG, Koziel Z, Moorhouse AT and Waddington DC. Human response to vibration in residential environments: establishing exposure-response relationships. In: 10th International congress on noise as a public health problem (ICBEN), London, July 24–28 2011; pp. 719–726.
53.
FiskWJLei-GomezQMendellMJ.Meta-analyses of the associations of respiratory health effects with dampness and mold in homes. Indoor Air2007;
17: 284–296.
54.
ShawCYWonDReardonJT.Managing volatile organic compounds and indoor air quality in office buildings - an engineering approach. Final report 5.2. NRC Publications Archive (NPArC), National Research Council Canada, Ottawa, 2005.
55.
WeschlerCJ.Chemical reactions among indoor pollutants: what we’ve learned in the new millennium. Indoor Air2004;
14: 184–194.
56.
XieHClements-CroomeDWangQ.Move beyond green building: a focus on healthy, comfortable, sustainable and aesthetical architecture. Intell Build Int2017;
9: 88–96.
57.
WatsonKJ. Developing wellbeing valuation practices in the built environment. In: CIBSE ASHRAE technical symposium, Loughborough, April 5–6 2017; pp. 1–12.
58.
ZachariaeR.Psychoneuroimmunology: a bio-psycho-social approach to health and disease. Scand J Psychol2009;
50: 645–651.
59.
BluyssenPM.The healthy indoor environment: how to assess occupants’ wellbeing in buildings.
New York:
Routledge, 2014.
60.
SteptoeADeatonAStoneAA.Subjective wellbeing, health, and ageing, Series Ageing 4. Lancet2015;
385: 640–648.
GrigoriouEJonesS.Wellbeing matters. Assessing views on the impact of the built environment on wellbeing.
London:
Feeling Good Foundation, 2014.
63.
OrtizMAKurversSRBluyssenPM.A review of comfort, health, and energy use: understanding daily energy use and wellbeing for the development of a new approach to study comfort. Energy Build2017;
152: 323–335.
64.
UlrichRS.View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science1984;
224: 420–421.
65.
UlrichRSSimonsRFLositoBDFioritoEMilesMAZelsonM.Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. J Environ Psychol1991;
11: 201–230.
66.
BaronRAReaMSDanielsSG.Effects of indoor lighting (illuminance and spectral distribution) on the performance of cognitive tasks and interpersonal behaviors: the potential mediating role of positive affect. Motiv Emot1992;
16: 1–33.
67.
BaronRA.Environmentally induced positive affect: its impact on self-efficacy, task performance, negotiation, and conflict. J Appl Soc Psychol1990;
20: 368–384.
68.
AshbyFGIsenAMTurkenAU.A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition. Psychol Rev1999;
106: 529–550.
69.
LiYIStarrLRHershenbergR.Responses to positive affect in daily life: positive rumination and dampening moderate the association between daily events and depressive symptoms. J Psychopathol Behav Assess2017;
39: 412–425.
70.
PatersonTSEYeungSEThorntonWL.Positive affect predicts everyday problem-solving ability in older adults. Aging Ment Health2016;
20: 871–879.
71.
ChangCYChenPK,
Human response to window views and indoor plants in the workplace. HortSci. 2005;
40: 1354–1359.
72.
ZhangHArensEFardSAHuizengaCPaliagaGBragerGZagreusL.Air movement preferences observed in office buildings. Int J Biometeorol2007;
51: 349–360.
73.
ToftumJ,
Air movement - good or bad?Indoor Air2004;
14: 40–45.
74.
van MillIM.Hjemlig belysning i klasselokaler skaber ro [Homelike lighting conditions in classrooms creates calm environment]. Lys, 2018, pp. 16–17.
75.
KaplanS.The restorative benefits of nature: toward an integrative framework. J Environ Psychol1995;
15: 169–182.
76.
KaplanR.The nature of the view from home. Environ Behav. 2003;
33: 507–542.
ShinJ.Toward a theory of environmental satisfaction and human comfort: a process-oriented and contextually sensitive theoretical framework. J Environ Psychol2016;
45: 11–21.
79.
KhoslaM.Positive affect and coping with stress. J Indian Acad Appl Psychol2016;
32: 185–192.
