This study investigated the effect of airflow distance from a personalized ventilation (PV) system on the personal exposure of a PV user to exhaled droplets from different orientations. Constant and dynamic airflow from the PV system was studied. A PV system was designed to produce both constant and dynamic airflows with different periods. Thermal manikins were used to simulate a healthy person (HP), also the PV user, influenced by a respiratory activity from an infected person (IP) at different orientations. Results show that, with a short distance of 0.2 m between the PV and the HP, both constant and dynamic PV flow can effectively protect the HP at all orientations considered; with a longer distance of 0.5 m between the PV and the HP, at some orientations, neither constant PV flow nor dynamic PV flow could protect the HP from the IP under our testing conditions. PV is a potential method to prevent disease transmission. However, a proper design is essential, and the relative position of the PV terminal, the IP and the HP and the distance of the PV from the HP are important factors to be considered so as to achieve the best performance.
SiegelJDRhinehartEJacksonMChiarelloL and Committee HCICPA.2007 guideline for isolation precautions: preventing transmission of infectious agents in health care settings. Am J Infect Control2007;
35: S65–S164.
2.
ClarkRPde Calcina-GoffML.Some aspects of the airborne transmission of infection. J R Soc Interface2009;
6: S767–S782.
3.
World Health Organization. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): situation report, 72.
Geneva:
Author, 2020.
4.
NicasMNazaroffWWHubbardA.Toward understanding the risk of secondary airborne infection: emission of respirable pathogens. J Occup Environ Hyg2005;
2: 143–154.
5.
BerlangaFOlmedoIRuiz de AdanaM.Experimental analysis of the air velocity and contaminant dispersion of human exhalation flows. Indoor Air2017;
27: 803–815.
6.
NielsenPVHyldgaardCEMelikovAAndersenHSoennichsenM.Personal exposure between people in a room ventilated by textile terminals—with and without personalized ventilation. HVAC&R Res2007;
13: 635–643.
7.
CermakRMelikovAK.Protection of occupants from exhaled infectious agents and floor material emissions in rooms with personalized and underfloor ventilation. HVAC&R Res2007;
13: 23–38.
8.
LipczynskaAKaczmarczykJMelikovAK.Thermal environment and air quality in office with personalized ventilation combined with chilled ceiling. Build Environ2015;
92: 603–614.
9.
CermakRMelikovAKForejtLKovarO.Performance of personalized ventilation in conjunction with mixing and displacement ventilation. HVAC&R Res2006;
12: 295–311.
10.
NielsenPVPolakMJiangHLiYQianH.Protection against cross infection in hospital beds with integrated personalized ventilation. In: Proceedings of Indoor Air 2008: The 11th international conference on indoor air quality and climate, Copenhagen, Denmark, 17–22 August, 2008, pp. 17–22. Technical University of Denmark (DTU).
11.
MelikovAKDzhartovV.Advanced air distribution for minimizing airborne cross-infection in aircraft cabins. HVAC&R Res2013;
19: 926–933.
12.
BolashikovZMelikovASpilakM.Experimental investigation on reduced exposure to pollutants indoors by applying wearable personalized ventilation. HVAC&R Res2013;
19: 385–399.
13.
PantelicJThamKWLicinaD.Effectiveness of a personalized ventilation system in reducing personal exposure against directly released simulated cough droplets. Indoor Air2015;
25: 683–693.
14.
ShenCGaoNWangT.CFD study on the transmission of indoor pollutants under personalized ventilation. Build Environ2013;
63: 69–78.
15.
XuCLiuL.Personalized ventilation: one possible solution for airborne infection control in highly occupied space? IndoorBuilt Environ2018;
27: 873–876.
16.
XuCLuoXYuCCaoS-J.The 2019-nCoV epidemic control strategies and future challenges of building healthy smart cities. Indoor Built Environ2020;
29: 639–644.
17.
ZhuYLuoMOuyangQHuangLCaoB.Dynamic characteristics and comfort assessment of airflows in indoor environments: a review. Build Environ2015;
91: 5–14.
18.
ZhouXOuyangQLinGZhuY.Impact of dynamic airflow on human thermal response. Indoor Air2006;
16: 348–355.
19.
HuaJOuyangQWangYLiHZhuY.A dynamic air supply device used to produce simulated natural wind in an indoor environment. Build Environ2012;
47: 349–356.
20.
CuiWCaoGOuyangQZhuY.Influence of dynamic environment with different airflows on human performance. Build Environ2013;
62: 124–132.
21.
ZhuYOuyangQCaoBZhouXYuJ.Dynamic thermal environment and thermal comfort. Indoor Air2016;
26: 125–137.
22.
FangerP. Discomfort due to air velocities in spaces. In: Proceedings of Meeting of Commission B1, B2, E1, of the International Institute Refrigeration, Paris, August 17–18 1977, pp.289–296.
23.
XiaY.Effect of air turbulent intensity and frequency on human thermal sensation. Master Thesis, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, 2000.
24.
ArensEXuTMiuraKHuiZFountainMBaumanF.A study of occupant cooling by personally controlled air movement. Energy Build1998;
27: 45–59.
25.
ZhouGMelikovAK. Equivalent frequency-a new parameter for description of frequency characteristics of airflow fluctuations. In: Proceedings of Roomvent 2002, the 8th international conference on air distribution in rooms: special topic - individually controlled environment (Melikov AK and Peter Vilhelm Nielsen (eds)) Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Copenhagen, September 8–11 2002, pp. 357–336.
26.
LinG.Effect of airflow frequency on human thermal response.
Beijing:
Tsinghua University, 2006.
27.
HuangLOuyangQZhuY.Perceptible airflow fluctuation frequency and human thermal response. Build Environ2012;
54: 14–19.
28.
Al AssaadDGhaliKGhaddarNHabchiC.Mixing ventilation coupled with personalized sinusoidal ventilation: optimal frequency and flow rate for acceptable air quality. Energy Build2017;
154: 569–580.
29.
Al AssaadDHabchiCGhaliKGhaddarN.Effectiveness of intermittent personalized ventilation in protecting occupant from indoor particles. Build Environ2018;
128: 22–32.
30.
ZhangNTangJWLiY.Human behavior during close contact in a graduate student office. Indoor Air2019;
29: 577–590.
RimDNovoselacA.Transport of particulate and gaseous pollutants in the vicinity of a human body. Build Environ2009;
44: 1840–1849.
33.
PantelicJSze-ToGNThamKWChaoCYKhooYC.Personalized ventilation as a control measure for airborne transmissible disease spread. J R Soc Interface2009;
6: S715–S726.
34.
ThomasRJWebberDSellorsWCollingeAFrostAStaggAJBaileySCJayasekeraPNTaylorRRElaySTitballRW.Characterization and deposition of respirable large-and small-particle bioaerosols. Appl Environ Microbiol2008;
74: 6437–6443.
35.
BurtonNCAdhikariAGrinshpunSAHornungRReponenT.The effect of filter material on bioaerosol collection of Bacillus subtilis spores used as a Bacillus anthracis simulant. J Environ Monit2005;
7: 475–480.
36.
ThomasRJWebberDHopkinsRFrostALawsTJayasekeraPNAtkinsT.The cell membrane as a major site of damage during aerosolization of Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol2011;
77: 920–925.
37.
LicinaDMelikovASekharCThamKW.Human convective boundary layer and its interaction with room ventilation flow. Indoor Air2015;
25: 21–35.
38.
KwonS-BParkJJangJChoYParkD-SKimCBaeG-NJangA.Study on the initial velocity distribution of exhaled air from coughing and speaking. Chemosphere2012;
87: 1260–1264.
39.
LicinaDMelikovAPantelicJSekharCThamKW.Human convection flow in spaces with and without ventilation: personal exposure to floor-released particles and cough-released droplets. Indoor Air2015;
25: 672–682.
40.
ChaoCYHWanMPMorawskaLJohnsonGRRistovskiZDHargreavesMMengersenKCorbettSLiYXieXKatoshevskiD.Characterization of expiration air jets and droplet size distributions immediately at the mouth opening. J Aerosol Sci2009;
40: 122–133.
41.
ISO 14644-1:2015. Cleanrooms and associated controlled environments – part 1: classification of air cleanliness by particle concentration.
42.
MorawskaLAfshariABaeGBuonannoGChaoCYHHänninenOHofmannWIsaxonCJayaratneERPasanenPSalthammerTWaringMWierzbickaA.Indoor aerosols: from personal exposure to risk assessment. Indoor Air2013;
23: 462–487.
43.
YangJSekharSCheongKRaphaelB.Performance evaluation of a novel personalized ventilation – personalized exhaust system for airborne infection control. Indoor Air2015;
25: 176–187.
44.
PapineniRSRosenthalFS.The size distribution of droplets in the exhaled breath of healthy human subjects. J Aerosol Med1997;
10: 105–116.
45.
MorawskaLJohnsonGRistovskiZHargreavesMMengersenKCorbettSChaoCYHLiYKatoshevskD.Size distribution and sites of origin of droplets expelled from the human respiratory tract during expiratory activities. J Aerosol Sci2009;
40: 256–269.
46.
XuCWeiXLiuLSuLLiuWWangYNielsenPV.Effects of personalized ventilation interventions on airborne infection risk and transmission between occupants. Build Environ2020;
180: 107008.
47.
YangBMelikovAKKabanshiAZhangCBaumanFSCaoGAwbiHWigöHNiuJCheongKWDThamKWSandbergMNielsenPVKosonenRYaoRKatoSSekharSCSchiavonSKarimipanahTLiXLinZ. Areview of advanced air distribution methods-theory, practice, limitations and solutions. Energy Build2019;
202: 109359.
48.
Al AssaadDGhaliKGhaddarN.Effect of flow disturbance induced by walking on the performance of personalized ventilation coupled with mixing ventilation. Build Environ2019;
160: 106217.
