This article examines the dynamics of flexibility experienced by sole mothers involved in a welfare-to-work program, and the strategies they use to retain their identities as caregivers and family providers. Based on individual interviews with 120 work-tested sole mothers on social benefits in New Zealand, we make three arguments. First, despite the constraints experienced by these mothers, welfare rules permit considerable flexibility in fulfilling work requirements. Second, this flexibility can contrast sharply with sole mothers' experiences in the labour market, where slightly higher income is traded for conformity to the rigidities of the low-waged part-time workplace. Third, sole mothers' lack of resources and strongly-held moral codes about ‘good mothering’ make them vulnerable to work/family tensions but also make them less valued employees in the current labour market. As labour markets and welfare regimes are being restructured in similar ways in ‘liberal welfare states’, these New Zealand findings are relevant to other countries such as Australia, Canada and the UK.
Allard, Tom (2001) ‘Payment Tests Tightened but Child Care Boosted’, Sydney Morning Herald, 23 May 2001, online (www.smh.com.au).
2.
Baker, Maureen (2001) Families, Labour and Love: Family Diversity in a Changing World. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
3.
Baker, Maureen and David Tippin (1999) Poverty, Social Assistance and the Employability of Mothers: Restructuring Welfare States. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
4.
Bittman, Michael and Jocelyn Pixley (1997) The Double Life of the Family: Myth, Hope and Experience. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
5.
Blank, R.M. (1995) ‘Outlook for the US Labor Market and Prospects for Low-Wage Entry Jobs’, pp. 33–69 in D. Nightingale and R. Haveman (eds) The Work Alternative: Welfare Reform and the Realities of the Job Market. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
6.
Bolderson, Helen and Deborah Mabbett (1991) Social Policy and Social Security in Australia, Britain and the USA. Aldershot, UK: Avebury.
7.
Burtless, G. (1995) ‘The Employment Prospects of Welfare Recipients’, pp. 71–106 in D. Nightingale and R. Haveman (eds) The Work Alternative: Welfare Reform and the Realities of the Job Market.Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
8.
Cancian, M. , R. Haveman, T. Kaplan, D. Meyer and B. Wolfe (1999) ‘Work, Earnings and Well-being after Welfare: What Do We Do?’, in S. Danziger (ed.) Economic Conditions and Welfare Reform: What are the Early Lessons?Kalamazoo, MI: Upjohn Institute.
9.
Corcoran, Mary , S.K. Danziger, A. Kalil and K.S Seefeldt (2000) ‘How Welfare Reform is Affecting Women's Work’, Annual Review of Sociology26: 241–269.
10.
Curtis, Lori J. (2001) ‘Lone Motherhood and Health Status’, Canadian Public PolicyXXVII (3): 335–356.
11.
Dorsett, Richard and Alan Marsh (1998) The Health Trap: Poverty, Smoking and Lone Parenthood. London: Policy Studies Institute.
12.
DWI (New Zealand Department of Work and Income) (2000) Domestic Purposes and Widows Benefit: For Sole Parents and Widows(Information Booklet). Wellington.
13.
Edin, Kathryn and Laura Lein (1997) Making Ends Meet: How Single Mothers Survive Welfare and Low-Wage Work. New York: Russell Sage.
14.
Ellwood, David (2001) ‘The US Vision of Work Based Reform: Promise, Prospects, and Pitfalls’. Paper presented to the National Social Policy Conference, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia, 4–6 July.
15.
Esping-Andersen, Gösta (1990) Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
16.
Harris, K.M. (1996) ‘Life After Welfare: Women, Work and Repeat Dependency’, American Sociological Review61: 407–426.
17.
Hobcraft, John and Kathleen Kiernan (2001) ‘Childhood Poverty, Early Motherhood and Adult Social Exclusion’, British Journal of Sociology52(3): 495–517.
18.
Holtzer, H. (1996) What Employers Want: Job Prospects for Less Educated Workers. New York: Russell Sage.
19.
Holtzer, H. (1999) ‘Will Employers Hire Welfare Recipients? Recent Survey Evidence from Michigan’, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management18(3): 449–472.
20.
Korpi, Walter (2000) ‘Faces of Inequality: Gender, Class, and Patterns of Inequalities in Different Types of Welfare States’, Social Politics7(2): 127–191.
21.
McMillan, K.E. and H.B. Worth (2001) ‘Working Against Them: Health Status in a Sample of Single Mothers on Welfare’. Paper presented to the TASA Conference, Sydney, 13–15 December.
22.
Millar, J. and K. Rowlingson (eds) (2001) Lone Parents, Employment and Social Policy: Cross-National Comparisons. Bristol: The Policy Press.
23.
O'Connor , Julia S., Ann Shola Orloff and Sheila Shaver (1999) States, Markets, Families. Gender Liberalism and Social Policy in Australia, Canada, Great Britain and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
OECD (2001) Society at a Glance. OECD Social Indicators. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
25.
Pryor, Jan and Bryan Rodgers (2001) Children in Changing Families. Life After Parental Separation. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
26.
Riccio, J. and S. Freedman (1995) Can They All Work? A Study of the Employment Potential of Welfare Recipients in a Welfare-to-Work Program. New York: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation.
27.
Sarfati, Diana and Kate Scott (2001) ‘The Health of Lone Mothers in New Zealand’, The New Zealand Medical Journal114(1133): 257–260.
28.
Shaver, Sheila , Anthony King, Marilyn McHugh and Toni Payne (1994) At the End of Eligibility: Female Lone Parents Whose Youngest Child Turns 16. Sydney: University of New South Wales, SPRC. Report #117. December.
29.
Tippin, David and Maureen Baker (2001) ‘Managing the Health of the Poor: Contradictions in Welfare-to-Work Programs’. Paper presented to the 2001 TASA conference, University of Sydney, 13–15 December.
30.
Torjman, Sherri and Ken Battle (1999) Good Work. Getting it and Keeping it. Ottawa: Caledon Institute of Social Policy.
31.
Uttley, Stephen (2000) ‘Lone Mothers and Policy Discourse in New Zealand’, Journal of Social Policy2(3): 441–458.
32.
Vosko, Leah (2000) Temporary Work. The Gendered Rise of a Precarious Employment Relationship. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
33.
Warner-Smith, Penny and Carla Imbruglia (2001) ‘Motherhood, Employment and Health: Is There a Deepening Divide Between Women?’, Just Policy#24 (December): 24–32.
34.
Webb, Steve , Martin Kemp and Jane Millar (1996) ‘The Changing Face of Low Pay in Britain’, Policy Studies17(4): 255–271.
35.
Whitehead, Margaret , Bo Burströ and Finn Diderichsen (2000) ‘Social Policies and the Pathways to Inequalities in Health: A Comparative Analysis of Lone Mothers in Britain and Sweden’, Social Science and Medicine50(2): 255–270.
36.
Wilson, Moira (2000) ‘The Policy Response to the Employment Taskforce and Changing Patterns of Domestic Purposes Benefit Receipt: A Cohort Analysis’, Social Policy Journal of New Zealand14 (July): 78–103.
