Doing Difference: The Bright Side,Dark Side,and Unexpected

Abstract

Entities, including organisations, brands and individuals, pursue a strategy of difference (a way to be dissimilar to others) to improve their performance outcomes and well-being. In this editorial, we introduce five research articles and two expert commentaries that examine some aspects of such difference. We further highlight the challenges that consumers face when taking action to meet the goal of difference. Using activity theory and its associated systemic framework, we uncover three contradictions (community, power and knowledge) that manifest as tensions or conflicts as consumers navigate difference. Being aware of these contradictions assists marketers in capitalising on the bright side, preparing for the unexpected and avoiding the dark side of consumers’ efforts towards difference. We also suggest a research agenda to stimulate future scholarship on difference.

Keywords

activity theory activity system difference ANZMAC consumers need for uniqueness

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agrawal

Han

Duhachek

(2013). Emotional agency appraisals influence responses to preference inconsistent information. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120(1), 87−97.

Amaldoss

Jain

(2005). Pricing of conspicuous goods: A competitive analysis of social effects. Journal of Marketing Research, 42, 30−42.

Amatulli

De Angelis

Donato

(2021). The atypicality of sustainable luxury products. Psychology & Marketing, 38(11), 1990−2005.

Arsel

Bean

(2013). Taste regimes and market-mediated practice. Journal of Consumer Research, 5(1), 899−917.

Bachchan

(2020). 5 reasons why Minecraft is the best-selling video game of all time. Spotskeeda. https://www.sportskeeda.com/esports/5-reasons-minecraft-best-selling-video-game-time

Belk

R. W.

(2013). Extended self in digital world. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(3), 477−500.

Belk

R. W.

Wallendorf

Sherry

J. F.

Jr. (1989). The sacred and the profane in consumer behavior: Theodicy on the odyssey. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(1), 1−38.

Bellezza

Gino

Keinan

(2014). The red sneakers effect: Inferring status and competence from signals of nonconformity. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(1), 35−54.

Berger

Heath

(2007). Where consumers diverge from others: Identity signaling and product domains. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(2), 121−134.

10.

Brewer

M. B.

(1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(5), 475−482.

11.

Canniford

Shankar

(2013). Purifying practices: How consumers assemble romantic experiences of nature. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(5), 1051−1069.

12.

Chad

(2023). Rescuing unwanted household goods: Moving towards a circular economy. Australasian Marketing Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582231165268

13.

Chan

Berger

van Boven

(2012). Identifiable but not identical: Combining social identity and uniqueness motives in choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(3), 561−573.

14.

Cheema

Kaikati

A. M.

(2010). The effect of need for uniqueness on word of mouth. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(3), 553−563.

15.

Cheng

J. T.

Tracy

J. L.

Henrich

(2010). Pride, personality, and the evolutionary foundations of human social status. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(5), 334−347.

16.

Childers

T. L.

Rao

A. A.

(1992). The influence of familial and peer-based reference groups on consumer decision. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(2). 198−211.

17.

Dalton

(2022). Is the new lord of the ring TV show really ‘too woke’? The Sydney Morning Herald. https://www.smh.com.au/culture/tv-and-radio/is-the-new-lord-of-the-rings-tv-show-really-too-woke-20220907-p5bg38.html

18.

Engeström

(1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. Perspectives on Activity Theory, 19(38), 19−30.

19.

Engeström

(2006). Activity theory and expansive design. In Bagnara

Crampton Smith

(Eds.), Theories and practice of interaction design (pp. 3–23). Erlbaum.

20.

Engeström

(2009). The future of activity theory: A rough draft. In Sannino

Daniels

Gutiérrez

K. D.

(Eds.), Learning and expanding with activity theory (pp. 303–328). Cambridge University Press.

21.

Errmann

Kishore

Lee

S. J.

(2023). Positively original: Effects of mindfulness on social media tweets and sentiment. Australasian Marketing Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582231173064

22.

Escalas

J. E.

Bettman

J. R.

(2003). You are what they eat: The influence of reference groups on consumers’ connection to brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 339−348.

23.

Fakhimi

Garry

Biggemann

(2023). The effects of anthropomorphised virtual conversational assistants on consumer engagement and trust during service encounters. Australasian Marketing Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582231181140

24.

Foot

K. A.

(2014). Cultural-historical activity theory: Exploring a theory to inform practice and research. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 24(3), 329−347.

25.

Fromkin

H. L.

(1970). The effects of experimentally aroused feelings of undistinctiveness upon valuation of scarce and novel experiences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 521−529.

26.

Granulo

Fuchs

Puntoni

(2021). Preference for human (vs. robotic) labor is stronger in symbolic consumption contexts. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(1), 72−80.

27.

Grönroos

(2023). Towards a marketing renaissance: Challenging underlying assumptions. Australasian Marketing Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582231172269

28.

Hashim

Jones

M. L.

(2007). Activity theory: A framework for qualitative analysis. Paper presented at the 4th International Qualitative Research Convention (QRC). Malaysia.

29.

Imhoff

Erb

H.-P.

(2009). What motivates Nonconformity? Uniqueness seeking blocks majority influence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(3), 309−320.

30.

Jankowski

P. J.

Hooper

L. M.

(2012). Differentiation of self: A validation study of the Bowen theory construct. Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice, 1(3), 226−243.

31.

Kuutti

(1996). Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. In Nardi

(Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 17–44). MIT Press.

32.

Leibenstein

(1950). Bandwagon, snob, and Veblen effects in the theory of consumers’ demand. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 64, 183−207.

33.

Lotus

(2013). Leading by going after the cool kids. Forbes.

34.

Lynn

Harris

(1997). Individual differences in the pursuit of self-uniqueness through consumption. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 1861–1883.

35.

Lynn

Snyder

C. R.

(2002). Uniqueness seeking. In Snyder

C. R.

Lopez

S. J.

(Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 395–410). Oxford University Press.

36.

Maciel

Wallendorf

(2017). Taste engineering: An extended consumer model of cultural competence constitution. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(5), 726−746.

37.

Madison Avenue Couture. (2021). How to buy an Hermes bag: Everything you need to know. https://madisonavenuecouture.com/blogs/news/how-to-buy-an-hermes-bag-the-hard-way-and-the-easy-way

38.

Maffei

Sangiorgi

(2006). From communication design to activity design. In J. Frascara (Ed.), Designing effective communications: Creating contexts for clarity and meaning (pp. 83–100). Allworth Press.

39.

Martin

D. M.

Schouten

J. W.

(2014). Consumption-driven market emergence. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(5), 855−870.

40.

Maslach

(1974). Social and personal bases of individuation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 411−425.

41.

Morf

C. C.

Rhodewalt

(2001). Unraveling the paradoxes of narcissism: A dynamic self-regulatory processing model. Psychological Inquiry, 12(4), 177−196.

42.

Muñiz

A. M.

Jr. O’Guinn

T. C.

(2001). Brand community. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(4), 412−432.

43.

Nardi

B. A.

(1996a). Activity theory and human-computer interaction. Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction, 436, 7−16.

44.

Nardi

B. A.

(1996b). Studying context: A comparison of activity theory, situated action models, and distributed cognition. In Nardi

B. A.

(Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 69–102). The MIT Press.

45.

Payne

Martin

B. A. S.

Tuzovic

Wang

(2023). Defining biometrics with privacy and benefits: A research agenda for academics and public policy makers. Australasian Marketing Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582231167645

46.

Puzakova

Aggarwal

(2018). Brands as rivals: Consumer pursuit of distinctiveness and the role of brand anthropomorphism. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(4), 869−888.

47.

Roggeveen

A. L.

Schweiger

E. B.

Grewal

(2023). In-store communications: Understanding the mundane, the bright sides, and the unexpected. Australasian Marketing Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582231189896

48.

Ruvio

(2008). Unique like everybody else? The dual role of consumers’ need for uniqueness. Psychology & Marketing, 25(5), 444−464.

49.

Schau

H. J.

Muñiz

A. M.

Jr. Arnould

E. J.

(2009). How brand community practices create value. Journal of Marketing, 73, 30−51.

50.

Schouten

J. W.

McAlexander

J. H.

(1995). Subcultures of consumption: An ethnography of new bikers. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(1), 43−61.

51.

Schumpe

B. M.

Herzberg

P. Y.

Erb

H. P.

(2016). Assessing the need for uniqueness: Validation of the German NfU-G scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 90, 231–237.

52.

Sepehr

Holzmüller

Rosenberger

P. J.

(2022). City, consumption and interculturalism: How cities can facilitate consumer acculturation. Australasian Marketing Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582221136131

53.

Skålén

Gummerus

(2022). Conceptualizing services and service innovation: A practice theory study of the Swedish music market. Journal of Service Research, 26(1), 83−102.

54.

Snyder

C. R.

Fromkin

H. L.

(1977). Abnormality as a positive characteristic: The development and validation of a scale measuring need for uniqueness. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86, 518−527.

55.

Snyder

C. R.

Fromkin

H. L.

(1980). Uniqueness: The human pursuit of difference. Plenum.

56.

Song

C. E.

Sela

(2023). Phone and self: How smartphone use increases the preference for uniqueness. Journal of Marketing Research, 60(3), 473–488.

57.

Tian

K. T.

Bearden

W. O.

Hunter

G. L.

(2001). Consumers’ need for uniqueness: Scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1), 50−66.

58.

Tian

K. T.

McKenzie

(2001). The long-term predictive validity of the consumers’ need for uniqueness scale. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 10(3), 171−193.

59.

Tracy

J. L.

Robins

R. W.

(2004). Putting the self into self-conscious emotions: A theoretical model. Psychological Inquiry, 15(2), 103−125.

60.

Vignoles

V. L.

Regalia

Manzi

Golledge

Scabini

(2006). Beyond self-esteem: Influence of multiple motives on identity construction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(2), 308–333.

61.

Wade-Jaimes

Cohen

J. D.

Calandra

(2019). Mapping the evolution of an after-school STEM club for African American girls using activity theory. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 14(4), 981−1010.

62.

Walter

(Ed.). (2004). Cambridge learner’s dictionary with CD-ROM. Cambridge University Press.

63.

Weijo

Bean

Rintamäki

(2019). Brand community coping. Journal of Business Research, 94(1), 128−136.

64.

White

Argo

J. J.

(2011). When imitation doesn’t flatter: The role of consumer distinctiveness in responses to mimicry. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(4), 667−680.

65.

Whitley

(2023). Review bombing is about power, politics and revenge – but it’s not about art. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/review-bombing-is-about-power-politics-and-revenge-but-its-not-about-art-199005#:~:text=It%20also%20most%20often%20happens,generated%20reviews%20on%20its%20site

66.

Wilson

(2020). The rise and fall – and rise again – of Abercrombie & Fitch. Insider. https://www.businessinsider.com/history-of-clothing-brand-abercrombie-and-fitch#abercrombie-co-was-founded-in-1892-as-an-outdoor-retailer-that-sold-fishing-and-hunting-gear-1

67.

Yaden

(2019). Minecraft has become the best-selling game of all time. Playstation Lifestyle. https://www.playstationlifestyle.net/2019/05/17/minecraft-best-selling-game-of-all-time/