A damage identification system involving a surface-attached piezoelectric transducer was developed in this study in correlation with an elastic wave propagation model. A signal processing and identification algorithm in the time-frequency domain based on the wavelet transform technique was proposed to suppress the diverse broadband interferences and effectively extract useful diagnostic information from the acquired raw impact responses, facilitating a prompt yet accurate structural health assessment. The developed system was then validated by applying it to a defective metal beam bearing a transverse crack with an increasing depth that simulates the crack growth. It is shown that the monitoring for the variable damage severity in the one-dimensional structure can be fulfilled quantitatively and exactly using this technique.
Daubechies, I. (1990). The wavelet transform, time-frequency localization and signal analysis. Journal of IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 36(5), 961-995.
2.
Newland, D.E. (1994). Wavelet analysis of vibration, Part I: Theory. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 116, 409-416.
3.
Kim, Y.Y. and Kim, E.H. (2000). A new damage detection method based on a wavelet transform. Proceedings of 18th IMAC. San Antonio, Texas, USA. pp. 1207-1212. 7-10 February.
4.
Samuel, P. and Pines, D. (1997). Health monitoring/damage detection of a rotorcraft planetary geartrain system using piezoelectric sensors. SPIE, 3041: 44-53.
5.
Sung, D.U., Oh, J.H. and Kim, C.G. (2000). Impact monitoring techniques for smart composite laminates. Proceedings of the Second Asian-Australasian Conference on Composite Materials. Korea. pp. 1123-1128. 18-20 August.
6.
Kim, Y.Y. and Kim, E.H. (2001). Effectiveness of the continuous wavelet transform in the analysis of some dispersive elastic waves. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 110(1), 1-9.
7.
Chakraborty, G. and Mallik, A.K. (2000). Wave propagation and vibration of a traveling beam with and without non-linear effects, Part I: free vibration. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 236, 277-290.
8.
Kawiecki, G. (1998). Feasibility of applying distributed piezo transducers to structural damage detection. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 9(3), 189-197.
9.
Zhou, Z., Noori, M. and Amand, R.S. (2000). Wavelet-based approach for structural damage detection. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 7, 667-683.
10.
Zou, Y., Tong, L. and Steven, G.P. (2000). Vibration-based model-dependent damage (delamination) identification and health monitoring for composite structures a review. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 230, 257-278.
11.
Achenbach, J.D. (2000). Quantitative nondestructive evaluation. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 37, 13-27.
12.
Wang, M.L., Heo, G. and Satpathi, D. (1998). Health monitoring system for large structural systems. Smart Materials and Structures, 7, 606-661.
13.
Lakshmanan, K.A. and Pines, D.J. (1997). Modeling damage in rotorcraft flexbeams using wave mechanics. Smart Materials and Structures, 6, 383-392.
14.
Vera, C.P.D. and Guemes, J.A. (1998). Embedded self-sensing piezoelectric for damage detection. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 9(11), 876-887.
15.
Wolfinger, C., Arendts, F.J. and Friedrich, K. (1996). Health-monitoring based on piezoelectric transducers. Aerospace Science and Technology, 6, 391-400.
16.
Salawu, O.S. (1997). Detection of structural damage through changes in frequency: a review. Engineering Structure, 19(9), 718-723.
17.
Laura, P.A.A., Malfa, S.L. and Bambill, D.V. (1998). Monitoring structural health through changes in frequency. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 212(5), 909-911.
18.
Tracy, M. and Chang, F.-K. (1998). Identifying impacts in composite plates with piezoelectric strain sensors, Part I: Theory. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 9(11), 920-927.
19.
Boller, C. (2001). Ways and options for aircraft structural health monitoring. Smart Materials and Structures, 10, 432-440.
20.
Doyle, J.F. (1997). Wave propagation in structures. Springer-Verlag, New York. 2nd Edn.
