64-Slice CT compared to MRI to clear cervical spine injury in high-risk GCS < 14 blunt trauma patients admitted to the ICU

Abstract

Objective

Clearance of cervical spine injury including ligamentous injury is of paramount importance as results of missed injury may have serious consequences. In obtunded patients, cervical spine clearance is challenging. This study sought to determine whether a negative 64-slice CT scan alone is sufficient to clear cervical spine injury.

Patients and methods

All consecutive blunt trauma patients admitted to a regional (level 1) trauma center from 1 April 2008 to 31 March 2012 were screened for inclusion in this study. High-risk, GCS < 14, blunt trauma patients were included if they were admitted to the intensive care unit, had a negative 64-slice CT, and MRI of diagnostic quality. GCS was measured at the time of CT scan. Patients with a positive finding on CT scan were excluded. All images were re-interpreted by a trauma radiologist blinded to clinical outcome. Details of missed injuries and clinical impact were reported. The primary outcome was missed clinically significant injury, defined as any injury requiring an additional intervention including continued immobilization or surgery.

Results

There were 5891 blunt trauma patients admitted to the ICU, 44 of whom met inclusion criteria. Patients had a median injury severity score of 35 and MRI three (2–9) days after CT. Eight of 44 (18%) patients had a positive finding on MRI and five of the findings were clinically insignificant. Three patients (7%) with focal neurologic findings on clinical exam had missed injuries requiring immobilization with a collar. Two of these patients had spine disease, which may have increased their injury risk.

Conclusions

In high-risk obtunded blunt trauma patients admitted to the ICU, a negative 64-slice CT scan alone is insufficient to clear clinically significant cervical spine injury, with a missed clinically significant injury rate of 7%. When considered with symmetric motor function, a negative 64-slice CT scan may be sufficient. A prospective study is required to confirm these findings.

Keywords

Blunt trauma cervical spine obtunded clearance multislice computed tomography magnetic resonance imaging

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Como

Leukhardt

Anderson

et al.

Computed tomography alone may clear the cervical spine in obtunded blunt trauma patients: a prospective evaluation of a revised protocol. J Trauma: Injury Infect Crit Care 2011; 70: 345–351.

Hoffman

Mower

Wolfson

et al.

Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma. National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study Group. N Engl J Med 2003; 343: 94–99.

Stelfox

Velmahos

Gettings

et al.

Computed tomography for early and safe discontinuation of cervical spine immobilization in obtunded multiply injured patients. J Trauma: Injury Infect Crit Care 2007; 63: 630–636.

Anekstein

Jeroukhimov

Bar-Ziv

et al.

The use of dynamic CT surview for cervical spine clearance in comatose trauma patients: a pilot prospective study. Injury 2008; 39: 339–346.

Kanji

Neitzel

Sekhon

et al.

Sixty-four–slice computed tomographic scanner to clear traumatic cervical spine injury: systematic review of the literature. J Crit Care 2014; 29: 314.e9–314.e13.

Muchow

Resnick

Abdel

et al.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the clearance of the cervical spine in blunt trauma: a meta-analysis. J Trauma: Injury Infect Crit Care 2008; 64: 179–189.

Patel

Humble

Cullinane

et al.

Cervical spine collar clearance in the obtunded adult blunt trauma patient. J Trauma: Injury Infect Crit Care 2015; 78: 430–441.

Grunau

Dibski

Hall

. The daunting task of ‘clearing’ the cervical spine. CJEM 2012; 14: 187–192.

April

Watts

Folley

et al.

Unstable cervical spine fracture with normal computed tomography imaging. Am J Emerg Med 2015; 33: 1846.e1–1846.e2.

10.

Erwood

Abel

Grossbach

et al.

Acutely unstable cervical spine injury with normal CT scan findings: MRI detects ligamentous injury. J Clin Neurosci 2016; 24: 165–167.

11.

Hoffman

Wolfson

Todd

et al.

Selective cervical spine radiography in blunt trauma: methodology of the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS). YMEM 1998; 32: 461–469.

12.

Hanson

Blackmore

Mann

et al.

Cervical spine injury: a clinical decision rule to identify high-risk patients for helical CT screening. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 174: 713–717.

13.

Holly

Kelly

Counelis

et al.

Cervical spine trauma associated with moderate and severe head injury: incidence, risk factors, and injury characteristics. J Neurosurg 2002; 96: 285–291.

14.

Sanchez

Waxman

Jones

et al.

Cervical Spine clearance in blunt trauma: evaluation of a computed tomography-based protocol. J Trauma: Injury Infect Crit Care 2005; 59: 179–183.

15.

Tan

Kasliwal

Traynelis

. Comparison of CT and MRI findings for cervical spine clearance in obtunded patients without high impact trauma. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2014; 120: 23–26.

16.

McCallum J, Griesdale DE, Sekhon M, et al. 64-slice CT scan to clear cervical spine injury: remember to examine the patient before clearing. J Crit Care 2015; 30: 1143–1144.