Health scares are characterized by mass media reporting that generates panic about a particular health issue or intervention, and those involved often require information. This article describes a study that aimed to examine the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccination scare, its impact on parents of young children, and its effect on their need for information. Seventeen semi-structured interviews were carried out with parents in Sheffield, UK. Analysis of the interview transcripts revealed several categories including the one presented in this article, ‘Information and the MMR vaccine’. The health scare increased parents’ information needs in relation to their decision whether to have their child vaccinated. Parents viewed traditional sources of information critically as they did not consider them to be trustworthy. Parents considered trustworthiness of the information source to be an important factor. Ongoing work in this area is investigating these issues through a large-scale, quantitative study.
References
1.
1 Burns F. Information for Health: An Information Strategy for the Modern NHS 1998–2005. A National Strategy for Local Implementation. NHS Executive, Leeds. London: Department of Health , 1998. http://www.nhsia.nhs.uk, February 2003.
2.
2 Gann R. Consumer health information: information for the public, patients and carers. In Carmel M. ed. Health Care Librarianship and Information Work 2nd edn, 59–71. London: Library Association , 1995.
3.
3 Coulter A. Evidence based patient information . British Medical Journal1998; 317; 225–226 .
4.
4 Coulter A, Entwistle V, Gilbert D. Sharing decisions with patients: is the information good enough? British Medical Journal1999; 318; 318–322 .
5.
5 Leydon G, Boulton M, Moynihan C, Jones A, Mossman J, Boudinoni M, Pherson K M. Cancer patients’ information needs and information seeking behaviour: in depth interview study . British Medical Journal2000; 320 (7239); 909–913 .
6.
6 Rees C, Bath P A. The information needs and source preferences of women with breast cancer and their family members: a review of the literature published between 1988 and 1998 . Journal of Advanced Nursing2000; 31 (4); 833–841 .
7.
7 Miller S. Monitoring versus blunting styles of coping with cancer influence the information patients want and need about their disease: implications for cancer screening and management . Cancer1995; 76 (2); 167–177 .
8.
8 Dervin B. From the mind’s eye of the user: the sense-making qualitative–quantitative methodology. In Glazier J, Powell R eds Qualitative Research in Information Management 61–84. Colorado: Libraries Unlimited , 1992.
9.
9 Dixon-Woods M. Writing wrongs? An analysis of published discourses about the use of patient information leaflets . Social Science & Medicine2001; 52; 1417–1432 .
10.
10 Nicholas D, Marden M. Parents and their information needs. A case study: parents of children under the age of five . Journal of Librarianship and Information Science1998; 30 (1); 35–48 .
11.
11 Department of Health. NHS Immunisation Statistics, England: 2001–2002. http://www.doh.gov.uk, January 2003.
12.
12 Wakefield A, Murch S, Anthony A, Linnell J, Casson D, Malik M, Berelowitz M, Dhillon A, Thomson M, Harvey P, Valentine A, Davies S, Walker-Smith J. Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children . Lancet1998; 351 (9103); 637–641 .
13.
13 Jewell D. MMR and the age of unreason . British Journal of General Practice2001; 51; 1–1 .
14.
14 Pareek M, Pattison H. The two dose measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) immunisation schedule: factors affecting maternal intention to vaccinate . British Journal of General Practice2000; 50; 969–971 .
15.
15 Evans M, Stoddart H, Condon L, Freeman E, Grizzell M, Mullen R. Parents’ perspectives on the MMR immunisation: a focus group study . British Journal of General Practice2001; 51; 904–910 .
16.
16 Johnson A, Joynes E. MMR vaccination uptake in a rural setting . British Journal of General Practice2001; 51 (466); 408–408 .
17.
17 Guba E, Lincoln Y. Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In Denzin N, Lincoln Y eds Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage , 1994.
18.
18 Clark A. The qualitative–quantitative debate: moving from positivism and confrontation to postpositivism and reconciliation . Journal of Advanced Nursing1998; 6 (27); 1242–1249 .
19.
19 Britten N. Qualitative research: qualitative interviews in medical research . British Medical Journal1995; 311; 251–253 .
20.
20 Strauss A. Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press , 1987.
21.
21 Guillaume L R. PhD thesis, University of Sheffield, in preparation.
22.
22 Brazy J, Anderson B, Becker P, Becker M. How parents of premature infants gather information and obtain support . Neonatal Network2001; 20 (2); 41–48 .
23.
23 Bond L, Nolan T, Pattison P, Carlin J. Vaccine preventable diseases and immunisations: a qualitative study of mothers’ perceptions of severity, susceptibility, benefits and barriers . Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health1998; 22 (4); 440–446 .
24.
24 Mason B, Donnelly P. Impact of a local newspaper campaign on the uptake of the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine . Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health2000; 54; 473–474 .
25.
25 Lieu T, Glauber J, Fuentes-Afflick E, Lo B. Effect of vaccine information pamphlets on parents’ attitudes . Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine1994; 148; 921–925 .
26.
26 Rosenstock I, Strecher M, Becker M. Social learning theory and the health belief model . Health Education Quarterly1988; 15 (2); 175–183 .
