Voluntary adopters versus forced adopters: integrating the diffusion of innovation theory and the technology acceptance model to study intra-organizational adoption
Restricted accessOtherFirst published online June, 2008
Voluntary adopters versus forced adopters: integrating the diffusion of innovation theory and the technology acceptance model to study intra-organizational adoption
This study extends diffusion research to the intra-organizational level and integrates the classic diffusion of innovation theory (DIT) with the relatively new technology acceptance model (TAM) to empirically explore Chinese journalists' adoption of the internet. It makes a theoretical contribution by proposing four adoption categories — voluntary adopters, forced adopters, resistant non-adopters, and dormant non-adopters — according to the voluntariness of organizational members' innovation decision-making. Based on data from a nationwide survey of 813 journalists in China, this study demonstrates that the DIT and TAM are respectively related to voluntary and forced adoption of the internet.Young, male journalists who perceive the internet positively (i.e., relative advantage and ease of use) and think it to be popular in society are most likely to be voluntary adopters. High-ranking journalists who believe the internet can enhance their job performance and who work in large and technologically sophisticated organizations are most likely to be forced adopters.
Agarwal, R. and J. Prasad (1997) `The Role of Innovation Characteristics and Perceived Voluntaries in the Acceptance of Information Technologies', Decision Science28(3): 557-82.
2.
Bu, W. and X. Liu (1998) `Use of the internet among Journalists: Computer and internet Usage Report of Journalists of the People's Daily, Xinhua News Agency, and the China Daily', Journalism and Communication15: 33-45 (in Chinese).
3.
Chinese Journalism Yearbook (2001). Beijing : China Social Science Publishing House.
4.
Chinese Journalism Yearbook (2004). Beijing : China Social Science Publishing House.
5.
Chen, C., J. Zhu and W. Wu (1998) `The Chinese Journalist', in D. Weaver (ed.) The Global Journalist: News People around the World, pp. 9-30. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
6.
Cnnic (1998) `Statistical Report of the Development of the internet in China, July 1998', URL (consulted February 2004): http://www.cnnic.net.cn/
7.
Cnnic (2003) `Statistical Report of the Development of the internet in China, July 2003', URL (consulted February 2004): http://www.cnnic.net.cn/
8.
Davis, F.D. (1989) `Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technologies', Management of Information Science Quarterly13(3): 319-39.
9.
Davis, F.D., R.P. Baggozzi and P.R. Warshaw (1989) `User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models', Management Science35(8): 982-1003.
10.
DeFleur, M.H. (1997) Computer-Assisted Investigative Reporting: Development and Methodology. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum .
11.
Ding G. ( 2001) `Party Publicity Chief Stresses Development of internet News Service', The People's Daily 8 February 2001, URL (consulted February 2001): http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/200102/08/eng20010208_61817.html
12.
Fishbein, M. and I. Ajzen (1975) Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
13.
Frambach, R.T. and N. Schillewaert (2002) `Organizational Innovation Adoption: A Multilevel Framework of Determinants and Opportunities for Future Research', Journal of Business Research55(2): 163-76.
14.
Flanagin,A.J. and M.J. Metzger (2000) `Perceptions of internet Information Credibility' , Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly77(3): 515-40.
15.
Garrison, B. (1996) Successful Strategies for Computer-Assisted Reporting . Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
16.
Garrison, B. (1998a) `Newspaper Size as a Factor in Use of Computer-Assisted Reporting', paper presented at the Communication Technology and Policy Division of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication Annual Conference, Baltimore, MD , 5-8 August.
17.
Garrison, B. (1998b) `Caught in the Web: Newspaper Use of the internet and other Online Resources', paper presented at the Newspaper Division of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication Annual Conference, Baltimore, MD, 5-8 August.
18.
Garrison, B. (1998c) Computer-Assisted Reporting, 2nd edn. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
19.
Garrison, B. (2000) `Online Information Use in Newsrooms: A Longitudinal Diffusion Study', paper presented at the Newspaper Division of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication Annual Conference, Phoenix, AZ, 8-12 August.
20.
Hartwick, J. and H. Barki (1994) `Explaining the Role of User Participation in Information System Usage', Management Science40(4): 440-65.
21.
Jebeile, S. and R. Reeve (2003) `The Diffusion of E-learning Innovations in an Australia Secondary College: Strategies and Tactics for Educational Leaders' , The Innovation Journal8(4): 1-21.
22.
Jin, J. (2001) `The Diffusion of the internet in Mainland China' , URL (consulted August 2002): http://www.cddc.net/baogao/57.htm (in Chinese).
23.
Kelman, H.C. (1958) `Compliance, Identification and Internalization: Three Processes of Attitude Change', Journal of Conflict Resolution2(1): 51-60.
24.
Lu,Y. and S. Chen (2000) `Survey and Analysis Report on Broadcasting Journalists in Shanghai', Journalism University63: 31-45.
25.
Min, D. (2001) `Reflections on News Media Websites Construction and Operation', paper presented at the First Forum on Chinese internet Media, Qingdao, China, 22-23 June (in Chinese).
26.
Moore, G.C. and I. Benbasat (1991) `Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation', Information Systems Research2(3): 192-222.
27.
Nie, N. and L. Erbring (2000) internet and Society: A Preliminary Report. Stanford, CA: Stanford Institute for the Quantitative Study of Society.
28.
Ram, S. and H.S. Jung (1991) `Forced Adoption of Innovation in Organizations: Consequences and Implications',Journal of Production Innovation Management8(2): 117-26.
29.
Rogers, E.M. (1983) Diffusion of Innovation, 3rd edn. New York: Free Press.
30.
Rogers, E.M. (1990) `The "Critical Mass" in the Diffusion of Interactive Technologies', in M. Carnevale, M. Lucertini and S. Nicosia (eds) Modeling the Innovation: Communications, Automation and Information System, pp. 79-93. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
31.
Rogers, E.M. (1995) Diffusion of Innovations, 4th edn. New York: Free Press.
32.
Rogers, E.M. (2003) Diffusion of Innovations, 5th edn. New York: Free Press.
33.
Splichal, S. (1993, Winter/1992, Fall) `How Florida Newspapers Are Dealing with Access to Computerized Government Information', Newspaper Research Journal13(4)-14(1): 73-83.
34.
Thierer,A.D. (2000) `How Free Computers are Filling the Digital Divide' , URL (consulted February 2002): http://www.heritage.org/library/backgrounder/bg1361es.html
35.
Tornatzky, L.G. and K.J. Klein (1982) `Innovation Characteristics and Innovation Adoption-Implementation: A Meta-Analysis of Findings', IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management29(1): 28-45.
36.
Venkatesh,V. and F.D. Davis (2000) `A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies', Management Science46(2): 186-204.
37.
Valente,T. (1995) Network Models of the Diffusion of Innovations . New York: Hampton Press.
38.
Warshaw, P.R. (1980) `A New Model for Predicting Behavioral Intentions: An Alternative to Fishbein', Journal of Marketing Research17(2): 153-72.
39.
Williams, P. and D. Nicholas (1998) `Not an Age Thing! Gregnetters in the Newsroom Defy the Stereotype', New Library World99(1142): 143-48.
40.
Zhang, G. (2001) `Audiences in the Era of the internet', Journalism University67: 19-21 (in Chinese).
41.
Zhou,Y. ( 2003) `Adoption and Use of Short Message Service: A Comparative Study of University Students in Shenzhen and Hong Kong', China Media Report4(2): 110-22 (in Chinese).
42.
Zhu, J. and Z. He (2002) `Perceived Characteristics, Perceived Needs, and Perceived Popularity: Adoption and Use of the internet in China', Communication Research29(4): 466-95.
