In this article we argue that the concept of genre has a valuable function within sociological theory, particularly for understanding emerging communicative practices within social and personal media. Genres span the whole range of recognizable forms of communication, play a crucial role in overcoming contingency and facilitate communication. Their function is to enhance composing and understanding of communication by offering interpretative, recognizable and flexible frames of reference. As such, genres generate a sense of stability in modern complex societies. Genres ought to be seen as an intermediary level between the levels of media and text, however influenced by both. They operate as interaction between two interdependent dimensions, conventions and expectations, both of which are afforded by media and specific texts. In this article these relationships are illustrated through two cases of emerging personal media genres: the online diary and the camphone self-portrait.
Askehave I. and Nielsen AE ( 2005) Digital genres: A challenge to traditional genre theory , Information Technology and People18(2): 120-141.
2.
Bakardjieva M. ( 2006) Domestication running wild. From the moral economy of the household to the mores of a culture. In: Berker T, Hartmann M, Punie Y and Ward K (eds) Domestication of Media and Technology. Maidenhead: Open University Press, 62-79.
3.
Berkenkotter C. and Huckin TN ( 1993) Rethinking genre from a sociocognitive perspective. Written Communication10(4): 475-509.
4.
Borgersen T. ( 1988) Norske bilder: tekster fra prosjektets avslutningsseminar 9-11 mai 1988, in the series Bildemediene og skole 10, University of Trondheim.
5.
Brake D. ( 2007) Personlige webloggere og deres publikum: Hvem tror de egentlig at de snakker med? In: Lüders M, Prøitz L and Rasmussen T (eds) Personlige medier: Livet mellom skjermene. Oslo: Gyldendal , 141-163.
6.
Choi JH ( 2006) Living in cyworld: contextualising cy-ties in South-Korea . In: Bruns A and Jacobs J (eds) Use of Blogs (Digital Formations) . New York: Peter Lang, 173-186.
7.
Eco U. ( 1987) För et semiologisk gerillakrig. In: Vad kostar ett mästerverk?Malmö: Brombergs bokförlag, 231-237. Originally published in: Il costume di casa, 1973, Milano: Bompiani.
8.
Fairclough N. ( 1992) Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge : Polity Press.
9.
Giddens A. ( 1984) The Constitution of Society. Cambridge : Polity Press.
10.
Herring SC, Scheidt LA, Wright E. and Bonus S. ( 2005) Weblogs as a bridging genre. Information Technology and People18(2): 142-171.
11.
Huffaker DA and Calvert SL ( 2005) Gender, identity, and language use in teenage blogs. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication10(2). Consulted 7 March 2009. Available at: http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue2/huffaker.html .
12.
Ihlström C. and Henfridsson O. ( 2005) Online newspapers in Scandinavia. A longitudinal study of genre change and interdependency. Information Technology and People18(2): 172-192.
13.
Jauss HR ( 1982[1967]) Toward an Aesthetic of Reception. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
14.
Kitzmann A. ( 2004) Saved from Oblivion: Documenting the Daily from Diaries to Web Cams. New York: Peter Lang .
15.
Kuhn A. ( 2002[1995]) Family Secrets: Acts of Memory and Imagination. London: Verso.
16.
Lenhart A. and Fox S. ( 2006) Bloggers. A Portrait of the Internet’s New Storytellers . Consulted 19 July, 2007. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/186/report_display.asp.
17.
Lüders M. ( 2007) Being in Mediated Spaces. An Enquiry into Personal Media Practices. PhD thesis. Oslo: University of Oslo.
18.
Luhmann N. ( 1997) Die gesellschaft der gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
19.
Martin JR ( 1985) Factual Writing: Exploring and Challenging Social Reality . Deakin, Vic.: Deakin University Press.
20.
Martin JR ( 1992) English Text: System and Structure. Philadelphia, PA/Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
21.
Miller CR ( 1994) Genre as social action. In: Freedman A and Medway P (eds) Genre and the New Rhetoric. London: Taylor and Francis.
22.
Miller CR and Shepherd D. ( 2004) Blogging as social action: a genre analysis of the weblog. Into the Blogosphere. Consulted 7 March 2009. Available at: http://blog.lib.umn.edu/blogosphere/blogging_as_social_action_a_genre_analysis_of_the_weblog.html .
23.
Neale S. ( 1990) Questions of genre. Screen31(1): 45-66.
24.
Prøitz L. ( 2007) The Mobile Phone Turn. A Study of Gender, Sexuality and Subjectivity in Young People’s Mobile Phone Practices. PhD thesis. Oslo: University of Oslo.
25.
Schryer CF, Lingard L. and Spafford M. ( 2003) Structure and agency in medical case presentations. In Bazerman C and Russell DR (eds) Writing Selves/Writing Societies: Research from Activity Perspectives. Fort Collins, CO: The WAC (Writing Across the Curriculum) Clearinghouse and Mind, Culture, and Activity , 62-96. Consulted 7 January 2009. available at: http://wac.colostate.edu/books/selves%5Fsocieties.
26.
Swales J. ( 1990) Genre Analysis. English in Academic and Research Setting . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
Todorow T. ( 1990) Genres in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
Weber M. ( 1958) From Max Weber. Essays in Sociology. In: Gerth HH and Mills CW (eds.) From Max Weber. Essays in Sociology, 323-362. New York: Oxford University Press.
29.
Wittgenstein L. ( 1953) Philosophical Investigations. Oxford : Blackwell.
