Abstract
While substantial research has focused on how political talk can reinforce to or undermine democratic norm, relatively little attention has been paid to the role of incidental political discussion in everyday, nonpolitical contexts. Embedded within contexts of shared, nonpartisan identities or preexisting social relationships, existing theory suggests that incidental political discussion will be less likely to include political opinion and uncivil expression than purposive political discussion. Analyses of nearly 3000 comments on mass shootings and gun control across both political and nonpolitical communities on Reddit show that, contrary to expectations, incidental political discussions are more likely than purposive political discussions to contain expressions of policy opinion. In addition, the level of incivility does not differ between the two kinds of discussions.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
