Recent research provides strong evidence that the syntacticization of recurrent multi-actional and interactional patterns for accomplishing social actions is quite a general phenomenon. Drawing on a body of audio and video recordings, we consider three pervasive conversational patterns whereby English speakers carry out the assessing of an event or situation, and the interactional contingencies which give rise to these patterns. We propose that one of these patterns (known as `extraposition') can be revealingly understood as having syntacticized to a grammatical and prosodically unified construction as an amalgamation of the other two patterns, which are interactional routines. We suggest that the `extraposition' construction provides a particularly elegant instance of how grammar emerges from the recurrent interactional practices which make up the fabric of our daily lives.
Atkinson, J.M. and Heritage, J. (eds) (1984) Structures of Social Action . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
Barth-Weingarten, D. and Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2002) `On the Development of Final Though: A Case of Grammaticalization?', in I. Wischer and G. Diewalds (eds) NeW Reflections on Grammaticalization, pp. 345-61. Amsterdam : Benjamins.
3.
Berk, L.M. (1999) English Syntax: From Word to Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Finegan, E., Conrad, S. and Finegan, E. (1999) Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
5.
Celce-Murcia, M. and Larsen-Freeman, D. (1999) The Grammar Book: An Esl/EFL Teacher's Course. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
6.
Chafe, W. (1994) Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: The FloW and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
7.
Collins, P. (1994) `Extraposition in English', Functions of Language1(1): 7-24.
8.
Couper-Kuhlen, E. and Ono, T. (2007) ```Incrementing' in Conversation. A Comparison of Practices in English, German and Japanese', in E. Couper-Kuhlen and T. Ono (eds) `Turn Continuation in Cross-linguistic Perspective', Pragmatics, 17(4): 513-552.
9.
Couper-Kuhlen, E. and Ono, T. (eds) (2007) `Turn Continuation in Cross-linguistic Perspective', Pragmatics17(4).
10.
Couper-Kuhlen, E. and Thompson, S.A. (2005) `A Linguistic Practice for Retracting Overstatements: "Concessive Repair''', in A. Hakulinen and M. Selting (eds) Syntax and Lexis in Conversation: Studies on the Use of Linguistic Resources in Talk-in-interaction , pp. 257-88. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
11.
Couper-Kuhlen, E. and Thompson, S.A. (2006) `"You Know It's Funny": Eine Neubetrachtung der "Extraposition'' im Englischen', in S. Günthner and W. Imo (eds) Konstruktionen in der Interaktion, pp. 23-58. Berlin: de Gruyter.
12.
Davidson, J.A. (1984) `Subsequent Versions of Invitations, Offers, Requests, and Proposals Dealing with Potential or Actual Rejection', in J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds) Structures of Social Action. Studies in Conversation Analysis, pp. 102-28. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
Davidson, J.A. (1990) `Modifications of Invitations, Offers and Rejections' , in G. Psathas (ed.) Interaction Competence, pp. 149-79. Washington, DC: University Press of America.
14.
Drew, P. and Holt, E. (1998) `Complainable Matters: The Use of Idiomatic Expressions in Making Complaints', Social Problems35(4): 398-417.
15.
Du Bois, J., Schuetze-Coburn, S., Paolino, D. and Cumming, S. (1993) `Outline of Discourse Transcription', in J.A. Edwards and M.D. Lampert (eds) Talking Data: Transcription and Coding Methods for Language Research, pp. 45-89. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
Du Bois, J.W. et al. (2000-2005) Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, Parts 1-4Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.
17.
Ehlich, K. (1982) `Anaphora and Deixis. Same, Similar, or Different?' , in R.J. Jarvella and W. Klein (eds) Speech, Place, and Action: Studies in Deixis and Related Topics, pp. 315-38. Chichester: Wiley.
18.
Erdmann, P. (1990) Discourse and Grammar: Focussing and Defocussing in English. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
19.
Erman, B. (2001) `Pragmatic Markers with a Focus on You KnoW in Adult and Adolescent Talk', Journal of Pragmatics33: 1337-59.
20.
Fillmore, C.J. (1989) `Grammatical Construction Theory and the Familiar Dichotomies', in R. Dietrich and C.F. Graumann (eds) Language Processing in Social Context, pp. 17-38. Amsterdam: Elsevier .
21.
Ford, C.E., Fox, B.A. and Thompson, S.A. (2002) `Constituency and the Grammar of Turn Increments' , in C. Ford, B.A. Fox and S.A. Thompson (eds) The Language of Turn and Sequence, pp. 14-38. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22.
Fox Tree, J.E. and Schrock, J.C. (2002) `Basic Meanings of You KnoW and I Mean', Journal of Pragmatics34: 727-47.
23.
Geluykens, R. (1987) `Tails (Right-dislocations) as a Repair Mechanism in English Conversation', in J. Nuyts and G. De Schutter (eds) Getting One's Words into Line: On Word Order and Functional Grammar, pp. 119-29. Dordrecht: Foris.
24.
Geluykens, R. (1992) From Discourse Process to Grammatical Construction: On Left Dislocation in English. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
25.
Goldberg, A. (1996) `Making One's Way Through the Data', in A. Alsina, J. Bresnan and P. Sells (eds) Complex Predicates . Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications . (Also in Shibatani, M. and Thompson, S.A. (eds) (1996) Grammatical Constructions: Their Form and Meaning, pp. 29-53. Oxford : Clarendon Press.)
26.
Goodwin, C. (1981) Conversational Organization: Interaction betWeen Speakers and Hearers. New York: Academic Press.
27.
Goodwin, C. (1986) `Between and Within: Alternative Treatments of Continuers and Assessments', Human Studies9: 205-17.
28.
Goodwin, C. (1996) `Transparent Vision', in E. Ochs, E.A. Schegloff and S.A. Thompson (eds) Interaction and Grammar , pp. 370-404. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
Goodwin, C. and Goodwin, M.H. (1987) `Concurrent Operations on Talk: Notes on the Interactive Organization of Assessments', IPRA Papers in Pragmatics1(1): 1-54.
30.
Goodwin, C. and Goodwin, M.H. (1992) `Assessments and the Construction of Context', in C. Goodwin and A. Duranti (eds) Rethinking Context, pp. 147-89. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
31.
Goodwin, M.H. (1990) He-said-she-said: Talk as Social Organization among Black Children. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
32.
Gundel, J.K., Hedburg, N. and Zacharski, R. (2005) `Pronouns without Explicit Antecedents: How Do We Know When a Pronoun is Referential?', in A. Branco, T. McEnery and R. Mitkov (eds) Anaphora Processing: Linguistic, Cognitive and Computational Modelling, pp. 351-64. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Available online at: [ http://www.zacharski.org/papers/GHZ2005.pdf ].
33.
Hopper, P.J. (1999) A Short Course in Grammar: A Course in the Grammar of Standard Written English. New York: W.W. Norton.
34.
Hopper, P.J. (2001) `Grammatical Constructions and Their Discourse Origins: Prototype or Family Resemblance?', in M. Pütz and S. Niemeier (eds) Applied Cognitive Linguistics: Theory and Language Acquisition, pp. 109-29. Berlin : Mouton/de Gruyter.
35.
Hopper, P.J. (2004) `The Openness of Grammatical Constructions', Chicago Linguistic Society40: 239-56.
36.
Hopper, P. and Thompson, S.A. (forthcoming) `Projectability and Clause Combining in Interaction' , in R. Laury (ed.) Crosslinguistic Studies of Clause Combining: The Multi-functionality of Conjunctions . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
37.
Huddleston, R. (1984) Introduction to the Grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38.
Huddleston, R. and Pullum, G. (2002) The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Huddleston, R. and Pullum, G. (2005) A Student's Introduction to English Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40.
Hudson, R. (1971) English Complex Sentences: An Introduction to Systemic Grammar. Amsterdam: North-Holland .
41.
Imo, W. (2005) `A Construction Grammar Approach to the Phrase "I Mean" in Spoken English', InLiSt42, available online at: [http://www.uni-potsdam.de/u/inlist/index.htm].
42.
Jackendoff, R. (1990) Semantic Structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
43.
Jefferson, G. (1988) `On the Sequential Organization of Troubles-talk in Ordinary Conversation', Social Problems35: 418-41.
44.
Jespersen, O. (1965) A Modern English Grammar: On Historical Principles III, Vol. 2. London: Allen & Unwin.
45.
Keenan Ochs, E. and Schieffelin, B. (1976a) `Foregrounding Referents: A Reconsideration of Left Dislocation in Discourse', Berkeley Linguistics Society2: 240-57. Reprinted in Ochs, E. and Schieffelin, B. (eds) (1983) Acquiring Conversational Competence, pp. 158-74. London : Routledge.
46.
Keenan Ochs, E. and Schieffelin, B. (1976b) `Topic as a Discourse Notion: A Study of Topic in the Conversation of Children and Adults', in C.N. Li (ed.) Subject and Topic, pp. 335-84. New York: Academic Press.
47.
Klocke, C. (2002) `Extrapositional it Sentences and it-clefts in Spoken English: Towards a Usage-based Analysis', Master's thesis, Department of Linguistics, University of Konstanz.
48.
Labov, W. and Waletzky, J. (1967) `Narrative Analysis: Oral Versions of Personal Experience', in J. Helm (ed.) Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts. Annual Spring Meeting of the American Ethnological Society, pp. 12-44. Seattle : University of Washington Press.
49.
Lerner, G.H. (2004) `On the Place of Linguistic Resources in the Organization of Talk-in-interaction: Grammar as Action in Prompting a Speaker to Elaborate' , Research on Language and Social Interaction37(2): 151-84.
50.
Levinson, S.C. (1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51.
Mair, C. (1990) Infinitival Complement Clauses in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52.
Mazeland, H. and Huiskes, M. (2001) `Dutch but as a Sequential Conjunction: Its Use as a Resumptive Marker', in M. Selting and E. Couper-Kuhlen (eds) Studies in Interactional Linguistics, pp. 141-69. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
53.
Michaelis, L.A. and Lambrecht, K. (1996a) `The Exclamative Sentence Type in English', in A. Goldberg (ed.) Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language, pp. 375-89. Stanford, CA : Center for the Study of Language and Information .
54.
Michaelis, L.A. and Lambrecht, K. (1996b) `Towards a Construction-based Theory of Language Function: The Case of Nominal Extraposition', Language72(2): 215-47.
55.
Ochs, E., Schegloff, E.A. and Thompson, S.A. (eds) (1996) Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
56.
Ono, T. and Thompson, S.A. (1995) `What Can Conversation Tell Us about Syntax?', in P.W. Davis (ed.) Descriptive and Theoretical Modes in the Alternative Linguistics, pp. 213-71. Amsterdam : John Benjamins.
57.
Pomerantz, A. (1984) `Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/dispreferred Turn Shapes', in J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis , pp. 57-101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
58.
Quirk, R. and Greenbaum, S. (1973) A Concise Grammar of Contemporary English. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
59.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. and Svartvik, J. (1985) A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language . London: Longman.
60.
Raymond, G. (2004) `Prompting Action: The Stand-alone "So" in Ordinary Conversation', Research on Language and Social Interaction37(2): 185-218.
61.
Rosenbaum, P. (1967) The Grammar of English Predicate Complement Constructions . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
62.
Sacks, H. (1992) Lectures on Conversation, Vols I and II, ed. G. Jefferson.Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
63.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A. and Jefferson, G. (1974) `A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-taking for Conversation', Language50(4): 696-735.
64.
Schegloff, E.A. (1980) `Preliminaries to Preliminaries: ``Can I Ask You a Question?''', Sociological Inquiry50(3-4): 104-52.
65.
Schegloff, E.A. (2007) Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
66.
Szymanski, M.H. (1999) `Re-engaging and Dis-engaging Talk in Activity' , Language in Society28: 1-23.
67.
Thompson, S.A. (2002) ```Object Complements'' and Conversation: Towards a Realistic Account', Studies in Language26(1): 125-64.
68.
Thompson, S.A. and Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2005) `The Clause as a Locus of Grammar and Interaction', Discourse Studies7(4-5): 481-505. Reprinted in Language and Linguistics6(4): 807-37 (2005).
69.
Walker, G. (2004) `On Some Interactional and Phonetic Properties of Increments to Turns in Talk-in-interaction', in E. Couper-Kuhlen and C. Ford (eds) Sound Patterns in Interaction: Cross-linguistic Studies from Conversation, pp. 147-69. Amsterdam: Benjamins .
