The relationships between text or talk and the context are among the basic fields of pragmatic research and an insight into their nature may contribute to a better understanding of language use. In this article, we use the results of an analysis of discourse marker use in two different conversational genres (telephone conversation and television interviews) in an attempt to examine the impact of context on the use of discourse markers, generalized for each analysed genre. In the first stage of the analysis, we observe important differences between the two genres: discourse markers are far more frequently used in telephone conversations than in television interviews. In the second stage of the analysis, we identify several contextual factors which contribute to the differences in the use of discourse markers. In this way, we obtain insight into this particular aspect of genre context-talk relationships, and identify some of the characteristics of the genres in question.
Andersen, E.S., Brizuela, M., DuPuy, B. and Gonnermas, L. (1999) `Cross-Linguistic Evidence for the Early Acquisition of Discourse Markers as Register Variables', Journal of Pragmatics31: 1339-51.
2.
Archakis, A. (2001) `On Discourse Markers: Evidence from Modern Greek' , Journal of Pragmatics33: 1235-61.
3.
Biber, D., Conrad, S. and Reppen, R. (1998) Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Blakemore, D. (2002) Relevance and Linguistic Meaning: The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Dedaić, M.N. (2005) `Ironic Denial: tabože in Croatian Political Discourse', Journal of Pragmatics37: 667-83.
6.
Fox Tree, J.E. (2006) `Placing Like in Telling Stories', Discourse Studies8(6): 723-43.
7.
Fraser, B. (1996) `Pragmatic Markers', Pragmatics6(2): 167-90.
8.
Fraser, B. (1999) `What are Discourse Markers?', Journal of Pragmatics31: 931-52.
9.
Fukushima, T. (2005) `Japanese Continuative Conjunction ga as a Semantic Boundary Marker', Language and Communication25: 81-106.
10.
Gonzalez, M. (2005) `Pragmatic Markers and Discourse Coherence in English and Catalan Oral Narrative', Discourse Studies7(1): 53-86.
11.
Hymes, D. (1977) Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach. London: Tavistock Publications .
12.
Jucker, A.H. and Ziv, Y. (eds) (1998) Discourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins .
13.
Kroon, C. (1998) `A Framework for the Description of Latin Discourse Markers', Journal of Pragmatics30: 205-23.
14.
Matsui, T. (2002) `Semantics and Pragmatics of a Japanese Discourse Marker dakara (so/in other words): A Unitary Account', Journal of Pragmatics34: 867-91.
15.
Montes, R.G. (1999) `The Development of Discourse Markers in Spanish: Intejections', Journal of Pragmatics31: 1289-319.
16.
Pisanski Peterlin, A. (2005) `Text-organising Metatext in Research Articles: An English- Slovene Contrastive Analysis', English for Specific Purposes25: 307-19.
17.
Redeker, G. (1990) `Ideational and Pragmatic Markers of Discourse Structure', Journal of Pragmatics14: 367-81.
18.
Saville-Troike, M. (1982) The Ethnography of Communication: An Introduction . Oxford: Blackwell.
19.
Schiffrin, D. (1987) Discourse Markers. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
20.
Schlamberger Brezar, M. (2007) `Vloga povezovalcev v govorjenem diskurzu', Jezik in slovstvo52(3-4): 21-32.
21.
Schourup, L. (1999) `Discourse Markers', Lingua107: 227-65.
22.
Schourup, L. (2001) `Rethinking Well', Journal of Pragmatics33: 1025-60.
23.
Smolej, M. (2004) `Clenki kot besedilni povezovalci', Jezik in slovstvo49(5): 45-57.
24.
Swales, J.M. (1990) Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Tchizmarova, I.K. (2005) `Hedging Functions of the Bulgarian Discourse Marker xajde', Journal of Pragmatics37: 1143-63.
26.
Van Dijk, T.A. (1997) `Cognitive Context Models and Discourse', in M. Stamenov (ed.) Language Structure, Discourse and the Access to Consciousness, pp. 189-226. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
27.
Van Dijk, T.A. (2001) `Discourse, Ideology and Context', Folia Linguistica30(1-2): 11-40.
28.
Van Dijk, T.A. (2007) `Discourse, Context and Cognition', Discourse Studies8(1): 159-77.
29.
Verdonik, D. (2006) `Mhm, ja, no, dobro, glejte, eee . . .: Diskurzni označevalci v telefonskih pogovorih', Jezik in slovstvo51(2): 19-36.
30.
Verdonik, D. (2007) Jezikovni elementi spontanosti v pogovoru: Diskurzni označevalci in popravljanja. Maribor: Slavistično društvo Maribor.
31.
Verdonik, D. and Rojc, M. (2006) `Are You Ready for a Call? - Spontaneous Conversations in Tourism for Speech-to-speech Translation Systems', in Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation , Genoa, Italy. Paris: European Language Resources Association.
32.
Verdonik, D., Pisanski Peterlin, A. and Žgank, A. (2007) `Diskurzni označevalci v dveh pogovornih žanrih', Jezik in slovstvo52(6): 19-33.
33.
Verdonik, D., Rojc, M. and Stabej, M. (2007) `Annotating Discourse Markers in Spontaneous Speech Corpora on an Example for the Slovenian Language', Language Resources and Evaluation Journal41(2): 147-80.
34.
Vlemings, J. (2003) `The Discourse Use of French donc in Imperative Sentences', Journal of Pragmatics35: 1095-112.
35.
Wang, Y.F. and Tsai, P.H. (2007) `Textual and Contextual Contrast Connection: A Study of Chinese Contrastive Markers across Different Text Types', Journal of Pragmatics39: 1775-815.
36.
Wang, Y.F., Tsai, P.H. and Ling, M.Y. (2007) `From Informational to Emotive Use: meiyou (``No'') as a Discourse Marker in Taiwan Mandarin Conversation', Discourse Studies9(5): 677-701.
37.
Waring, H.Z. (2003) ```Also'' as a Discourse Marker: Its Use in Disjunctive and Disaffiliative Environments', Discourse Studies5(3): 415-36.
38.
Žgank, A., Rotovnik, T., Sepesy Maučec, M., Verdonik, D., Kitak, J., Vlaj, D., Hozjan, V., Kačič, Z. and Horvat, B. (2004) `Acquisition and Annotation of Slovenian Broadcast News Database', in Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Lisbon, Portugal, pp. 2103-6. Paris: European Language Resources Association .
