This study draws on Relevance Theory (Sperber and Wilson, 1986/1995), Conversation Analysis (Sacks et al., 1974), and Politeness Theory (Brown and Levinson, 1987) in investigating a full range of discourse functions for hao and dui with reference to recurrent patterns, distributions, and forms of organization in a large corpus of talk. Special emphasis is placed on a comparison of hao and dui in combination with a small subset of discourse particles: in particular hao/hao le/ hao la/hao a/hao ba and dui/dui a/dui le in spoken discourse. We find that both of the markers signal special sequential relatedness in talk and carry information which is relevant in determining the boundaries of conversational exchange. However, in interaction hao is used for expressing acceptance of the other speaker’s move or act, whereas dui conveys acknowledgment of the propositional content of the utterance produced by the other speaker.
Austin, J.L. ( 1962) How to Do Things with Words. New York : Oxford University Press.
2.
Biq, Y.-O. ( 2003) ‘From Collocation to Idiomatic Expression: The Grammaticalization of Hao Phrases/Constructions in Mandarin Chinese’, Journal of Chinese Language and Computing14(2): 73-95.
3.
Blakemore, D. ( 2002) Relevance and Linguistic Meaning: The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Brown, P. and Levinson, S.C. ( 1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Chan, M.K.M. ( 1997) ‘Gender Differences in the Chinese Language: A Preliminary Report’, in Proceedings of the Ninth American Conference on Chinese Linguistics Vol. 2, pp. 35-52. Los Angeles: GSIL Publications, University of California.
6.
Chen, Y. and He, A.W. ( 2001) ‘Dui Bu Dui as a Pragmatic Marker: Evidence from Chinese Classroom Discourse’, Journal of Pragmatics33: 1441-65.
7.
Chu, C.C. ( 1999) A Cognitive-Functional Grammar of Mandarin Chinese. Taipei: The Crane Publishing Co. Ltd.
8.
Chui, K. ( 2002) ‘Ritualization in Evolving Pragmatic Functions: A Case Study of Dui’, Language and Linguistics3(4): 645-63.
9.
Cruttenden, A. ( 1989) Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Drummond, K. and Hopper, R. ( 1993a) ‘Back Channels Revisited: Acknowledgment Tokens and Speakership Incipiency’, Research on Language and Social Interaction26(2): 157-77.
11.
Drummond, K. and Hopper, R. ( 1993b) ‘Some Uses of Yeah’, Research on Language and Social Interaction26(2): 203-12.
12.
Fasold, R. ( 1991) Sociolinguistics of Language. Oxford : Basil Blackwell.
13.
Fraser, B. ( 1990) ‘An Approach to Discourse Markers’, Journal of Pragmatics14: 383-95.
14.
Grice, P. ( 1975) ‘Logic and Conversation’, in P. Cole and J.L. Morgan (eds) Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3, Speech Acts, pp. 41-58. New York: Academic Press.
15.
Holmes, J. ( 1986) ‘Functions of You Know in Women’s and Men’s Speech’, Language in Society15: 1-22.
16.
Holmes, J. ( 1990) ‘Hedges and Boosters in Women’s and Men’s Speech’, Language and Communication10: 185-205.
17.
Holtgraves, T. ( 1997) ‘Yes, but . . .: Positive Politeness in Conversation Arguments’, Journal of Language and Social Psychology1(2): 222-39.
18.
Kuo, S.-H. ( 1998) ‘The Discourse Functions of Dui A in Spoken Mandarin’ , The Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies, New Series 28(4): 505-29.
19.
Leech, G.N. ( 1983) Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
20.
Levinson, S.C. ( 1983) Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
Li, C.N. and Thompson, S.A. ( 1981) Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
22.
Liu, Y.-L. ( 2008) ‘Pragmatic Functions of Tag Question Hao Bu Hao in Mandarin Chinese - When Not to Respond Verbally’, paper presented at 2008 National Conference on Linguistics, 2-3 May, National Chiayi University, Taiwan.
23.
Lu, E. ( 2006) ‘The Semantic and Pragmatic Account of the Chinese Word Hao’, Journal of Suihua University26(2): 140-3.
24.
Lu, F. ( 2000) Comparative Illustration of Common Chinese Words and Expressions . Beijing: Language University Publishing Co.
25.
Lü, S. ( 1980/2004) Xiandai Hanyu Babai Ci [800 Words in Modern Chinese]. Hong Kong: Commercial Press, Hong Kong Division.
26.
McCarthy, M. ( 1998) Spoken Language & Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
Miracle, W.C. ( 1989) ‘Hao: A Chinese Discourse Marker’, in B. Music et al. (eds) Papers from the 25th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Part 2: Parasession on Language in Context, pp. 213-27. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Linguistics Department.
28.
Miracle, W.C. ( 1991) ‘Discourse Markers in Mandarin Chinese’, PhD thesis, The Ohio State University.
29.
Pearson, E. ( 1986) ‘Agreement/Disagreement: An Example of Results of Discourse Analysis Applied to the Oral English Classroom’, ITL Review of Applied Linguistics74: 47-61.
30.
Pomerantz, A. ( 1984) ‘Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/ Dispreferred Turn Shapes’, in J. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds) Structures of Social Action, pp. 57-101. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
31.
Ohta, A.S. ( 2001) ‘A Longitudinal Study of the Development of Expression of Alignment in Japanese as a Foreign Language’, in K.R. Rose and G. Kasper (eds) Pragmatics in Language Teaching, pp. 103-20. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
32.
Ragan, S.L. ( 1983) ‘Alignment and Conversational Coherence’, in R.T. Craig and K. Tracy (eds) Conversational Coherence: Form, Structure, and Strategy, pp. 157-71. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
33.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A. and Jefferson, G. ( 1974) ‘A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation’, Language50: 696-735.
34.
Schegloff, E.A. and Sacks, H. ( 1973) ‘Opening Up Closings’, Semiotica1: 289-327.
35.
Schiffrin, D. ( 1987) Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
Searle, J. ( 1969) Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
Shao, J. and Zhu, X. ( 2005) ‘The Discourse Functions of Hao and its Evolution Toward Functional Usage’, Zhongguo Yuwn [Chinese Language]5: 399-407.
38.
Sinclair, J.M. and Coulthard, M. ( 1975) Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
39.
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. ( 1986/1995) Relevance: Communication and Cognition . Oxford: Blackwell.
40.
Strauss, S. ( 1995) ‘Assessments as a Window to Sociolinguistic Research: The Case of Japanese, Korean, and American English’, in M. Tokunaga (ed.) Gengo-henyoo Ni Kan-suru Taikeiteki Kenkyuu Oyobi Sono Nihongo Kyooiku E No Ooyoo [Systematic Studies of Language Variation and their Application to Japanese Language Teaching] , pp. 177-91. Tokyo: Kanda University of Foreign Studies.
41.
Tsai, H.-C. ( 2001) ‘The Discourse Function of the "Dui" Receipt in Mandarin Conversation’, unpublished MA thesis, National Taiwan Normal University.
42.
van Dijk, T.A. ( 2000) ‘Discourse as Interaction in Society’, in T.A. van Dijk (ed.) Discourse as Social Interaction, pp. 1-37. London: Sage.
43.
Wang, H.L. ( 2005) ‘The Grammaticalization of "Hao" in Mandarin Chinese’ , MA thesis, Graduate Institute of Linguistics at National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu.
44.
Wang, L.Y. ( 2004) ‘The Polysemy and Grammaticalization of Hao in Mandarin Chinese’, unpublished MA thesis, National Taiwan Normal University.
45.
Wang, Y.-F. and Tsai, P.-H. ( 2005) ‘ "Hao" in Chinese Spoken Discourse: Relevance and Coherence’, Language Sciences27: 215-43.
46.
Watts, R.J. ( 1989) ‘Taking the Pitcher to the ‘‘Well’’: Native Speakers’ Perception of their Use of Discourse Markers in Conversation’ , Journal of Pragmatics13: 203-37.
47.
Xian, L.-X. ( 2007) ‘A Pragmatic Analysis of the Marker Hao’, Journal of Xichang College19(3): 1-5.
48.
Xu, J. ( 2005) ‘The Use of Discourse Markers in Spoken Chinese of Urban Teenagers’, unpublished PhD dissertation, Beijing Foreign Studies University.
49.
Yu, K.-L. ( 2004) ‘The Functions and Usage of ‘‘Dui’’ in Mandarin Spoken Discourse’, unpublished MA thesis, National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan.
50.
Zhang, Y. ( 2006) ‘On the Subjective-Quantity Markers of Mei, Bu, and Hao’, Zhongguo Yuwn [Chinese Language]2: 127-34.
