The mother/daughter-in-law relationship is considered as the tensest in-law relationships in Chinese society. This study adopted retrospective interviews, observations and instant talks with two dyads of mothers-in-law and daughters-in-law to explore the nature of their relationships, language use and strategies employed in their daily discourse to scramble for power. The findings indicated that both mothers-in-law and daughters-in-law applied politeness and impoliteness strategies to save the face or manipulate power within a family. In addition, they reconstructed mother identities to make their own uterine family stable. This study is expected to make contributions to the understanding of the dynamicity and complexity of the mother/daughter-in-law relationships in China.
Ali-SalehOGoldblattHBaron-EpelO (2022) “My problem is that I live next door to my mother-in-law”: Arab women’s postpartum experiences with positive and negative social interactions and the impact on their well-being: A qualitative study. Health & Social Care in the Community30(6): e3985–e3994.
2.
AltmanIBrownBBStaplesB, et al. (1992) A transactional approach to close relationships: Courtship, weddings, and placemaking. In: WalshWBCraikKHPriceRH (eds) Person-Environment Psychology: Models and Perspectives. Hillsdale, MI; New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum; Psychology Press, pp. 193–242.
3.
BakerHDR (1981) Chinese Family and Kinship. Taipei: Southern Materials Center.
4.
BartłomiejczykM (2020) Parliamentary impoliteness and the interpreter’s gender. Pragmatics30(4): 459–484.
5.
BlommaertJ (2005) Discourse: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
BousfieldDLocherMA (2008) Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay With Power in Theory and Practice. Berlin; New York, NY: Mouton De Gruyter.
7.
BrownPLevinsonS (1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BrownRGilmanA (1960) The pronouns of power and solidarity. In: SebcokT (ed.) Style in Language. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press, pp.253–276.
9.
ButlerJ (1990) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. London: Routledge.
10.
ButlerJ (1993) Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of ‘‘Sex’’. New York: Routledge.
11.
CaoHJFineMFangXY, et al. (2018) Chinese adult children’s perceived parents’ satisfaction with adult children’s marriage, in-law relationship quality, and adult children’s marital satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships36(4): 1098–1122.
12.
ChenFN (2005) Residential patterns of parents and their married children in contemporary China: A life course approach. Population Research and Policy Review24(2): 125–148.
13.
ChuR-X (2024) Shifting narratives: A critical discourse analysis of racial bias in the tale of Wu Feng’s indigenous representation. Discourse Studies26(4): 441–464.
14.
CulpeperJ (1996) Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics25(3): 349–367.
15.
CulpeperJ (2011) Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
DelPreteDL (2021) Troubles talk in mother-daughter interaction: Social bond building or social bond blocking?Language and Communication80: 165–179.
17.
DixonRMW (2015) Edible Gender, Mother-in-Law Style, and Other Grammatical Wonders: Studies in Dyirbal, Yidiñ, and Warrgamay. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18.
DörnyeiZ (2007) Research Methods in Applied Linguistics: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19.
DuvallEM (1954) In-Laws: Pro and Con: An Original Study of Inter-Personal Relations. New York, NY: Associated Press.
20.
FaircloughN (1989) Language and Power. London: Longman.
21.
FaircloughN (1992) Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
22.
FaircloughN (2001) Language and Power. London; New York, NY: Routledge.
23.
FaircloughN (2013) Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London; New York, NY: Routledge.
24.
FaircloughNWodakR (1997) Critical discourse analysis. In: van DijkT (ed.) Discourse as Social Interaction. London: Sage, pp. 258–284.
25.
FeiH-T (1986) Peasant Life in China—A Field Study of Country Life in the Yangtze Valley. Nanjing: Jiangsu People’s Publishing House Corporation.
26.
FilaniI (2020) A discourse analysis of national identity in Nigerian stand-up humour. Discourse Studies22(3): 319–338.
27.
FingermanKLGilliganMVan der DriftL, et al. (2012) In-law relationships before and after marriage: Husbands, wives, and their mothers-in-law. Research in Human Development9(2): 106–125.
28.
FischerLR (1983) Mothers and mothers-in-law. Journal of Marriage and the Family45(1): 187–192.
29.
FlemingL (2015) Taxonomy and taboo: The (meta)pragmatic sources of semantic abstraction in avoidance registers. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology25(1): 43–65.
30.
FoucaultM (1976) The Archeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language (Translated by Sheridan SmithAM). New York, NY: HarPer & Row.
31.
GallinRS (1994) The intersection of class and age: Mother-in-law/daughter-in-law relations in rural Taiwan. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology9(2): 127–140.
32.
GeeJP (1999) An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. London: Routledge.
33.
GopalakrishnanLAcharyaBPuriM, et al. (2023) A longitudinal study of the role of spousal relationship quality and mother-in-law relationship quality on women’s depression in rural Nepal. SSM-Mental Health3: 100193.
34.
GreenJ (2019) Embodying kin-based respect in speech, sign, and gesture. Gesture18(2/3): 370–395.
35.
HaughM (2015) Impoliteness and taking offence in initial interactions. Journal of Pragmatics86: 36–42.
36.
HunterJEBosterFJ (1987) A model of compliance-gaining message selection. Communication Monographs54(1): 63–84.
37.
HusainWlbrahimSMushtaqS (2023) The relationship between mother-in-law and daughter-in-law: An eastern perspective. Pakistan Journal of Social Research5(2): 1027–1036.
38.
JacksonJBerg-CrossL (1988) Extending the extended family: The mother-in-law and daughter-in-law relationship of black women. National Council of Family Relations37(3): 293–297.
39.
KangK-R (2017) Conflict between mother-in-law and daughter-in-law depicted in a television show and its sub-cultural implications: A discourse analysis on welcome to the mother-in-law, a TV talk show in Korea. Journalism and Mass Communication7(7): 351–366.
40.
KellermannKSheaBC (1996) Threats, suggestions, hints, and promises: Gaining compliance efficiently and politely. Communication Quarterly44(2): 145–165.
41.
KungH-M (2019) Persistence and change in the comparative status of mothers-in-law and daughters-in-law in Taiwanese families: 1979 to 2016. Journal of Family Issues40(14): 1937–1962.
42.
LiBB (1992) On the debate between mother-in-law and daughter-in-law in traditional Chinese families. Sociological Studies (6): 81–89.
43.
LiGY (2018) Dilemma and solution for male participation in family care under two-child policy. Journal of Shenzhen University (Humanities & Social Sciences)35(3): 114–122.
44.
LiQ (2019) Social Stratification in Contemporary China. Beijing: Life Bookstore Publishing Corporation.
45.
LimbergH (2009) Impoliteness and threat responses. Journal of Pragmatics41(7): 1376–1394.
46.
LiuLH (2009) Discourse construction of social power: Interpersonal rhetoric in editorials of the China Daily. Discourse Studies11(1): 59–78.
47.
LoganJRBianFQ (1999) Family values and coresidence with married children in Urban China. Social Forces77(4): 1253–1282.
48.
LoganJRBianFQBianYJ (1998) Tradition and change in the Urban Chinese family: The case of living arrangements. Social Forces76(3): 851–882.
49.
Marotz-BadenRCowanD (1987) Mothers-in-law and daughters-in-law: The effects of proximity on conflict and stress. Family Relations36(4): 385–390.
50.
MerriamSB (1998) Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
51.
MerrillDM (2007) Mothers-in-Law and Daughters-in-Law: Understanding the Relationship and What Makes Them Friends or Foe. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.
52.
MilesMBHubermanAMSaldañaJ (2014) Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook, 3rd edn.London: Sage.
53.
MorganM (2010) The presentation of indirectness and power in everyday life. Journal of Pragmatics42(2): 283–291.
54.
MuJFMaR (2022) A CiteSpace-based analysis of the application of critical discourse analysis in news discourse. Discourse and Communication16(4): 403–425.
55.
NganaseTRBassonWJ (2018) Makoti and Mamazala: Dynamics of the relationship between mothers-and daughters-in-law within a South African context. South African Journal of Psychology49(2): 229–240.
56.
ParkMCheslaC (2007) Revisiting Confucianism as a conceptual framework for Asian family study. Journal of Family Nursing13(3): 293–311.
57.
PerelmutterR (2010) Impoliteness recycled: Subject ellipsis in modern Russian complaint discourse. Journal of Pragmatics42(12): 3214–3231.
58.
PfeiferSK (1989) Mothers-in-Law’s and Daughters-in-Law’s Perceptions of Interpersonal Interaction. Newark, NJ: University of Delaware.
59.
PoduvalJPoduvalM (2009) Working mothers: How much working, how much mothers and where is the womanhood?Mens Sana Monogr7(1): 63–79.
60.
QianYQianZC (2014) Work, family, and gendered happiness among married people in Urban China. Social Indicators Research121(1): 61–74.
61.
RileyNE (1994) Interwoven lives: Parents, marriage, and guanxi in China. Journal of Marriage and the Family56(4): 791–803.
62.
SchellingTC (1956) An essay on bargaining. The American Economic Review46(3): 281–306.
63.
SearleJR (1969) Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
64.
ShihKYPykeK (2009) Power, resistance, and emotional economies in women’s relationships with mothers-in-law in Chinese immigrant families. Journal of Family Issues31(3): 333–357.
65.
ShihKYPykeK (2016) Seeing mothers-in-law through the lens of the mothering ideology. Journal of Family Issues37(14): 1968–1993.
66.
SongYZhangY (2012) Husbands’ conflict styles in Chinese mother/daughter-in-law conflicts: Daughters-in-law’s perspectives. Journal of Family Communication12(1): 57–74.
67.
TannenD (2009) The relativity of linguistic strategies: Rethinking power and solidarity in gender and dominance. In: CouplandNJaworskiA (eds) The New Sociolinguistics Reader. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 168–186.
68.
TantucciVWangA (2019) Diachronic change of rapport orientation and sentence-periphery in Mandarin. Discourse Studies22(2): 146–173.
69.
Van DijkTA (1997) Discourse as Social Interaction: Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, vol. 2. London; Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
70.
Van DijkTA (2009) Critical discourse studies: A sociocognitive approach. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis2(1): 62–86.
71.
Van DijkTA (2015) Critical discourse analysis. In: TannenDHamiltonHESchiffrinD (eds.) The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, vol 2, 2nd edn.Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 466–485.
72.
WardFLinnR (2020) The mother-in-law mystique: A tale of conflict, criticism and resistance. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy41(4): 381–392.
73.
WillsonAEShueyKMElderGH (2003) Ambivalence in the relationship of adult children to aging parents and in-laws. Journal of Marriage and Family65(4): 1055–1072.
74.
WodakR (2015) Discrimination via discourse. In: BonvillainN (ed.) Routledge Handbook of Linguistic Anthropology. London: Routledge, pp.366–383.
WolfM (1972) Women and the Family in Rural Taiwan. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
77.
WoolleyMEGreifGL (2018) Mother-in-law reports of closeness to daughter-in-law: The determinant triangle with the son and husband. Social Work64(1): 73–82.
78.
XuYC (1988) Three Hundred Tang Poems. Beijing: China Translation Corporation.
79.
Yakali-ÇamoğluD (2007) Turkish family narratives: The relationships between mothers-and daughters-in-law. Journal of Family History32(2): 161–178.
80.
YangBJ (2009) Translation and Annotation of Analects. Beijing: The Publishing House of China.
81.
YangMC (2012) A Chinese Village: Taitou, Shantung Province. Nanjing: Jiangsu People’s Publishing House.
82.
YılmazFElmasTErözB (2023) Twitter-based analysis of anti-refugee discourses in Türkiye. Discourse and Communication17(3): 298–318.
83.
YoungVJDeGrootJM (2021) Topic avoidance as a boundary management strategy in communication with a mother-in-law. Family Relations70(2): 408–421.
84.
ZhangY (2014) Take my mother-in-law. . .Please!Journal of Family and Economic Issues36(4): 633–645.
85.
ZhaoLSRanYP (2022) Rationalizing impoliteness: Taking offence and providing vicarious accounts in mother-in-law/daughter-in-law conflict mediation. Journal of Pragmatics197: 69–80.
86.
ZhouMQ (2011) Philosophical origin and methodology of gender linguistics. Foreign Language Education32(4): 47–51+64.
87.
ZouXMeiYHWuYH (2015) Causes of the conflict between mother and daughter-in-law: Using a mixed-methods analysis integrating qualitative and quantitative approach. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis51(1): 187–194.
