This article addresses the extent to which the concept of ânew
penologyâ is helpful in understanding penal currents, particularly as they
relate to the older paradigms of retribution and rehabilitation. In the light of
theoretical, historical and empirical evidence, support is lent to the arguments:
that the new penology thesis downplays the role of human agency at the level of
implementing criminal justice policies; that it ignores the potentially positive
aspects of managerialism; and that it misses the continuity between past and
contemporary penal features. It is concluded that, despite its merits, new penology
remains a hypothesis, rather than a realized penal rationale.
Allen, F.
(1981) The decline of the rehabilitative ideal: Penal policy
and social purpose.
New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
.
2.
Arendt, H.
(1958/1998) The human condition, 2nd edn.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
.
3.
Auerhahn, K.
(2003) Selective incapacitation and public policy: Evaluating
California's imprisonment crisis.
Albany, NY: State University of New York Press
.
4.
Avecedo, G.A.
(2005)
âTurning anomie on its head: Fatalism as Durkheim's
concealed and multidimensional alienation theoryâ
, Sociological Theory23(1):
75â85
.
5.
Bachrach, P.
and
M.S. Baratz
(1970) Power and poverty: Theory and practice.
New York: Oxford University Press
.
6.
Barnes, B.
(1995) The elements of social theory.
London: UCL Press
.
7.
Barnes, B.
(2000) Understanding agency: Social theory and responsible
action.
London: Sage
.
8.
Baudrillard, J.
(1981) For a critique of the political economy of the
sign.
St Louis: Telos Press
.
9.
Baudrillard, J.
(1983) In the shadow of the silent majorities.
New York: Semiotext(e)
.
10.
Baudrillard, J.
(1988) America.
London: Verso
.
11.
Bauman, Z.
(2000) âSocial uses of law and
orderâ, in
D. Garland
and
R. Sparks
(eds) Criminology and social theory, pp.
23â45.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
12.
Bayens, G.J.
,
M.W. Manske
and
J.O. Smykla
(1998)
âThe impact of the ânew penologyâ on ISPâ
, Criminal Justice Review23(1):
51â62
.
13.
Beck, U.
(1992) Risk society: Towards a new modernism.
London: Sage Publications
.
14.
Beckett, K.
(1997) Making crime pay: Law and order in contemporary
American politics.
New York: Oxford University Press
.
15.
Bottomley, A.K.
and
K. Pease
(1986) Crime and punishment: Interpreting the data.
Milton Keynes: Open University Press
.
16.
Bottoms, A.E.
(1980) âAn introduction to âThe coming
crisisââ, in
A.E. Bottoms
and
R.H. Preston
(eds) The coming penal crisis: A criminological and theological
exploration, pp. 1â24.
Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press
.
17.
Bottoms, A.E.
(1995) âThe philosophy and politics of
punishment and sentencingâ, in
C.M.V. Clarkson
and
R. Morgan
(eds) The politics of sentencing reform, pp.
17â49.
Oxford: Clarendon Press
.
18.
Bourdieu, P.
(1972/1977) Outline of a theory of practice.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
19.
Bourdieu, P.
(1990) The logic of practice.
Cambridge: Polity Press
.
20.
Brody, S.
(1976) The effectiveness of sentencing. Home
Office Research Study 35.
London: HMSO
.
21.
Brown, I.
(1998) âSuccessful probation
practiceâ, in
D. Faulkner
and
A. Gibbs
(eds) New politics, new probation? Proceedings of the Probation Studies
Unit second colloquium. Probation Studies Unit Report 6.
Oxford: Centre for Criminological Research
.
22.
Brownlee, I.
(1998)
âNew Labour â new penology? Punitive rhetoric and the
limits of managerialism in criminal justice policyâ
, Journal of Law and Society25(3):
313â335
.
23.
Bryans, S.
(2000)
âThe managerialisation of prisons â efficiency without
a purpose?â
, Criminal Justice Matters40:
7â8
.
24.
Burgess, A.
(1988) âIntroduction: A âclockwork
orangeâ resuckedâ, in
A. Burgess
(ed.) A clockwork orange, rev. edn, pp.
vâxi.
New York: Ballantine
.
25.
Campbell, A.
(1987)
âSelf-definition by rejection: The case of gang girlsâ
, Social Problems34(5):
451â466
.
26.
Carlen, P.
(2002)
âGoverning the governors: Telling tales of managers, mandarins
and mavericksâ
, Criminal Justice2(1):
27â49
.
27.
Carrabine, E.
(2000)
âDiscourse, governmentality and translation: Towards a social
theory of imprisonmentâ
, Theoretical Criminology4(3):
309â331
.
28.
Castel, R.
(1991) âFrom dangerousness to
riskâ, in
G. Burchell
,
C. Gordon
and
P. Miller
(eds) The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality, pp.
281â298.
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
.
29.
Cheliotis, L. (forthcoming) âTastes of freedom: An empirical
evaluation of the prisonersâ temporary release and home detention curfew
schemes in England and Walesâ, PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.
30.
Christie, N.
(1993) Crime control as industry.
London: Routledge
.
31.
Cohen, S.
(1979)
âThe punitive city: Notes on the dispersal of social controlâ
, Contemporary Crises3(3):
339â363
.
32.
Cohen, S.
(1985) Visions of social control: Crime, punishment and
classification.
Cambridge: Polity Press
.
33.
Coleman, R.
and
J. Sim
(2005) âContemporary statecraft and the
âpunitive obsessionâ: A critique of the new
penologyâ, in
J. Pratt
,
D. Brown
,
M. Brown
,
S. Hallsworth
and
W. Morrison
(eds) The new punitiveness: Trends, theories, perspectives, pp.
101â118.
Devon: Willan
.
34.
Corbette, R.
and
G.T. Marx
(1991)
âCritique: No soul in the new machine: Technofallacies in the
electronic monitoring movementâ
, Justice Quarterly8(3):
399â414
.
35.
Cotton, M.
(2000)
âBack with a vengeance: The resilience of retribution as an
articulated response of criminal punishmentâ
, American Criminal Law Review37(4):
1313â1362
.
36.
Crawford, A.
(1999) The local governance of crime: Appeals to community
and partnerships.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
37.
Dahl, R.A.
(1961) Who governs? Democracy and power in an American
city.
New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
.
38.
Downes, A.
and
R. Morgan
(1997) âDumping the âhostages to
fortuneâ? The politics of law and order in post-war
Britainâ, in
M. Maguire
,
R. Morgan
and
R. Reiner
(eds) The Oxford handbook of criminology, 2nd edn, pp.
87â134.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
39.
Durkheim, Ă.
(1893/1964) The division of labour in society.
New York: Free Press
.
40.
Durkheim, Ă.
(1914/1973) âThe dualism of human nature and its
social conditionsâ, in
R.N. Bellah
(ed.) Emile Durkheim on morality and society, pp.
149â163.
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
.
41.
Dworkin, R.
(1977) Taking rights seriously.
London: Duckworth
.
42.
Emirbayer, M.
and
A. Mische
(1998)
âWhat is agency?â
, American Journal of Sociology103(4):
962â1023
.
43.
Ericson, R.
(1994)
âThe division of expert knowledge in policing and securityâ
, British Journal of Sociology45(2):
149â175
.
44.
Feeley M.M.
and
E.L. Rubin
(1999) Judicial policy making and the modern state: How the
courts reformed America's prisons.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
45.
Feeley M.M.
and
J. Simon
(1992)
âThe new penology: Notes on the emerging strategy of corrections
and its implicationsâ
, Criminology30(4):
449â474
.
46.
Feeley, M.M.
and
J. Simon
(1994) âActuarial justice: The emerging new
criminal lawâ, in
D. Nelkin
(ed.) The future of criminology, pp.
172â201.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
.
47.
Foucault, M.
(1977) Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison.
London: Allen Lane
.
48.
Foucault, M.
(1980) Power/knowledge.
New York: Pantheon
.
49.
Fromm, E.
(1955) The sane society.
New York: Rinehart
.
50.
Fukuyama, F.
(1992) The end of history and the last man.
London: Hamish Hamilton
.
51.
Garland, D.
(1985) Punishment and welfare: A history of penal
strategies.
Aldershot: Gower Publishing
.
52.
Garland, D.
(1990) Punishment and modern society: A study in social
theory.
Oxford: Clarendon Press
.
53.
Garland, D.
(1995) âPenal modernism and
post-modernismâ, in
T.G. Blomberg
and
S. Cohen
(eds) Punishment and social control, pp.
181â209.
New York: Aldine de Gruyter
.
54.
Garland, D.
(1996)
âThe limits of the sovereign state: Strategies of crime control
in contemporary societyâ
, British Journal of Criminology36(4):
445â471
.
55.
Garland, D.
(1997)
ââGovernmentalityâ and the problem of crime:
Foucault, criminology, sociologyâ
, Theoretical Criminology1(2):
173â214
.
56.
Garland, D.
(2001a) Mass imprisonment: Social causes and
consequences.
London: Sage Publications
.
57.
Garland, D.
(2001b) The culture of control: Crime and social order in
contemporary society.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
58.
Gartner, R.
and
C. Kruttschnitt
(2004)
âA brief history of doing time: The California Institution for
Women in the 1960s and the 1990sâ
, Law & Society Review38(2):
267â304
.
59.
Gaventa, J.
(1980) Power and powerlessness: Quiescence and rebellion in
an Appalachian valley.
Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press
.
60.
Giddens, A.
(1991) The consequences of modernity.
Cambridge: Polity Press
.
61.
Goffman, E.
(1959) The presentation of self in everyday life.
London: Penguin
.
62.
Gordon, D.R.
(1990) Justice juggernaut.
New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press
.
63.
Gottfredson, M.
and
D. Gottfredson
(1988) Decision making in criminal justice.
New York: Plenum
.
64.
Habermas, J.
(1976) Legitimation crisis.
London: Heinemann
.
65.
Haggerty, K.D.
(2001) Making crime count.
Toronto: University of Toronto Press
.
66.
Haney, L.
(1996)
âHomeboys, babies, men in suits: The state and the reproduction
of male dominanceâ
, American Sociological Review61(5):
759â778
.
67.
Hannah-Moffat, K.
(2001) Punishment in disguise: Penal governance and federal
imprisonment of women in Canada.
Toronto: University of Toronto Press
.
68.
Hetherington, K.
(2003) The kinaesthetics of capitalism: Fetishism, spectacle
and the body. Available at http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/papers/hetherington-kinaestheticsof-capitalism.pdf
69.
Hochschild, A.R.
(1983) The managed heart: Commercialisation of human
feeling.
Berkeley, CA: University of California Press
.
70.
Holmwood, J.
(1999) âRadical sociology: What's
left?â, in
P. Bagguley
and
J. Hearn
(eds) Transforming politics: Power and resistance, pp.
277â293.
Basingstoke: Macmillan
.
71.
Honderich, T.
, ed. (1995) The Oxford companion to philosophy.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
72.
Hood, C.
(1991)
âA public management for all seasons?â
, Public Administration69(1):
3â19
.
73.
Hood, R.
and
S. Shute
(2000) The parole system at work: A study of risk based
decisionmaking. Home Office Research Study 202.
London: Home Office
.
74.
Hudson, B.
(2003) Understanding justice: An introduction to ideas,
perspectives and controversies in modern penal theory.
Buckingham: Open University Press
.
75.
Humphrey, C.
and
K. Pease
(1992)
âEffectiveness measurement in probation: A view from the troopsâ
, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice31(1):
31â52
.
76.
Israel, J.
(1971) Alienation: From Marx to modern sociology.
Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon
.
77.
Jameson, F.
(1984) âForewordâ, in
J.F. Lyotard
(ed.) The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge, pp.
viiâxxi.
Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press
.
78.
Joas, H.
(1996) The creativity of action.
Cambridge: Polity Press
.
79.
Kanter, R.
(1977) Men and women of the corporation.
New York: Basic
.
80.
Kempf-Leonard, K.
and
E.S.L. Peterson
(2000)
âExpanding realms of the new penology: The advent of actuarial
justice for juvenilesâ
, Punishment & Society2(1):
66â97
.
81.
Kemshall, H.
and
M. Maguire
(2001)
âPublic protection, partnership and risk penality: The
multi-agency risk management of sexual and dangerous offendersâ
, Punishment & Society3(2):
237â264
.
82.
Lampkin, L.M.
(1991)
âDoes crime pay? AFSCME reviews the record on the privatization
of prisonsâ
, Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice7(1):
41â48
.
83.
Langan, P.A.
and
D.P. Farrington
(1998) Crime and justice in the United States and in England
and Wales, 1981â1996.
Washington: US Department of Justice
.
84.
Lemert, E.M.
(1993)
âVisions of social control: Probation consideredâ
, Crime & Delinquency39(4):
447â461
.
85.
Lianos, M.
and
M. Douglas
(2000) âDangerization and the end of deviance:
The institutional environmentâ, in
D. Garland
and
R. Sparks
(eds) Criminology and social theory, pp.
103â125.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
86.
Liebling, A.
(2001)
âWhose side are we on? Theory, practice and allegiances in
prisons researchâ
, British Journal of Criminology41(3):
472â484
.
87.
Liebling, A.
(2002) âThe uses of
imprisonmentâ, in
S. Rex
and
M. Tonry
(eds) Reform and punishment: The future of sentencing, pp.
105â137.
Devon: Willan
.
88.
Liebling, A.
(2004) Prisons and their moral performance: A study of
values, quality, and prison life.
Oxford: Clarendon Press
.
89.
Liebling, A.
and
D. Price
(2003) âPrison officers and the use of
discretionâ, in
L. Gelsthorpe
and
N. Padfield
(eds) Exercising discretion: Decision-making in the criminal justice
system and beyond, pp. 74â96.
Devon: Willan
.
90.
Lin, A.C.
(2000) Reform in the making: The implementation of social
policy in prison.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
.
91.
Lipsky, M.
(1980) Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual
in public services.
New York: Russell Sage Foundation
.
92.
Lipton, D.
,
R. Martinson
and
J. Wilks
(1975) The effectiveness of correctional treatment: A survey
of treatment evaluation studies.
New York: Praeger
.
93.
Lucken, K.
(1998)
âContemporary penal trends: Modern or postmodern?â
, British Journal of Criminology38(1):
106â123
.
94.
Lukes, S.
(1974) Power: A radical view.
London: Macmillan
.
95.
Lukes, S.
(1977) Essays in social theory.
London: Macmillan
.
96.
Lynch, M.
(1998)
âWaste managers? The new penology, crime fighting, and parole
agent identityâ
, Law & Society Review32(4):
839â869
.
97.
Lynch, M.
(2000)
âRehabilitation as rhetoric: The ideal of reformation in
contemporary parole discourse and practicesâ
, Punishment & Society2(1):
40â65
.
98.
Lyotard, J.F.
(1984) The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge.
Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press
.
99.
McCorkle, R.
and
J. Crank
(1996)
âMeet the new boss: Institutional change and loose coupling in
parole and probationâ
, American Journal of Criminal Justice21(1):
1â25
.
100.
McDermott, K.
and
R.D. King
(1988)
âMind games: Where the action is in prisonsâ
, British Journal of Criminology28(3):
357â377
.
101.
McEvoy, K.
(2001) Paramilitary imprisonment in Northern Ireland:
Resistance, management, and release.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
102.
McIvor, G.
and
M. Barry
(1998) Social work and criminal justice, volume 7: Community
based throughcare.
Edinburgh: Scottish Office Central Research Unit
.
103.
McNeill, F.
(2000)
âDefining effective probation: Frontline perspectivesâ
, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice39(4):
382â397
.
104.
McWilliams, W.
(1987)
âProbation, pragmatism and policyâ
, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice26(2):
97â121
.
105.
Mannheim, H.
, ed. (1960) Pioneers in criminology.
London: Stevens & Sons
.
106.
Marcuse, H.
(2000) Reason and revolution: Hegel and the rise of social
theory.
London: Routledge
.
107.
Martinson, R.
(1974)
âWhat works? Questions and answers about prison reformâ
, Public Interest35:
22â54
.
108.
Maruna, S.
(2001) Making good: How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their
lives.
Washington: American Psychological Association
.
109.
Marx, K.
(1844) Economic and philosophic manuscripts.
London: Lawrence & Wishart
.
110.
Marx, K.
(1859/1971) A contribution to the critique of political
economy.
London: Lawrence & Wishart
.
111.
Mathiesen, T.
(1965) The defences of the weak.
London: Tavistock
.
112.
Maupin, J.
(1993)
âRisk classification systems and the provision of juvenile aftercareâ
, Crime & Delinquency39(1):
90â105
.
113.
Miller, L.
(2001)
âLooking for postmodernism in all the wrong places: Implementing
the new penologyâ
, British Journal of Criminology41(1):
168â184
.
114.
Mommsen, W.
(1987) âPersonal conduct and societal change:
Towards a reconstruction of Max Weber's concept of
historyâ, in
S. Whimster
and
S. Lash
(eds) Max Weber, rationality and modernity, pp.
35â51.
London: Allen & Unwin
.
115.
Moore, B., Jr
(1978) Injustice: The social bases of obedience and
revolt.
London: Macmillan
.
116.
Morris, N.
(2002) Maconochie's gentlemen: The story of Norfolk
Island and the roots of modern prison reform.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
117.
Morris, N.
and
G. Hawkins
(1970) The honest politician's guide to crime
control.
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
.
118.
Newburn, T.
(2002)
âAtlantic crossings: âPolicy transferâ and
crime control in the USA and Britainâ
, Punishment & Society4(2):
165â194
.
119.
O'Malley, P.
(1992)
âRisk, power and crime preventionâ
, Economy and Society21(3):
252â275
.
120.
O'Malley, P.
(1996) âRisk and
responsibilityâ, in
A. Barry
,
T. Osborne
and
N. Rose
(eds) Foucault and political reason: Liberalism, neo-liberalism and
rationalities of government, pp. 189â207.
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
.
121.
O'Malley, P.
(2001)
âDiscontinuity, government and risk: A response to Rigakos and Haddenâ
, Theoretical Criminology5(1):
85â92
.
122.
Parsons, T.
(1951) The social system.
London: Routledge & Kegan Paul
.
123.
Peters, A.
(1988) âMain currents in criminal law
theoryâ, in
J.J.M. van Dijk
(ed.) Criminal law in action, pp.
19â36.
Deventer: Kluwer
.
124.
Petersilia, J.
and
S. Turner
(1987) âGuideline-based justice: Prediction and
racial minoritiesâ, in
D.G. Gottfredson
and
M. Tonry
(eds) Prediction and classification: Criminal justice decision
making, pp. 151â182.
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
.
125.
Petersilia, J.
,
S. Turner
and
J. Peterson
(1986) Prison versus probation in California: Implications
for crime and offender recidivism.
Santa Monica, CA: Rand
.
126.
Pratt, J.
(1995)
âDangerousness, risk and technologies of powerâ
, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology28(1):
3â32
.
127.
Raine, J.W.
and
M.J. Willson
(1995)
âNew public management and criminal justice: How well does the
coat fit?â
, Public Money and Management15(1):
35â40
.
128.
Raine, J.W.
and
M.J. Willson
(1997)
âBeyond managerialism in criminal justiceâ
, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice36(1):
80â95
.
129.
Rigakos, G.S.
(2001)
âOn continuity, risk and political economy: A response to O'Malleyâ
, Theoretical Criminology5(1):
93â100
.
130.
Rigakos, G.S.
and
R.W. Hadden
(2001)
âCrime, capitalism and the ârisk societyâ:
Towards the same olde modernity?â
, Theoretical Criminology5(1):
61â84
.
131.
Ritzer, G.
(1993) The McDonaldization of society.
Newbury Park, CA: Pine Forge
.
132.
Robertson, R.
(1992) Globalization: Social theory and global culture.
London: Sage
.
133.
Robinson, G.
(2002)
âExploring risk management in probation practice: Contemporary
developments in England and Walesâ
, Punishment & Society4(1):
5â25
.
134.
Robinson, G.
and
F. McNeill
(2004) âPurposes matter: Examining the
âendsâ of probationâ, in
G. Mair
(ed.) What matters in probation, pp.
277â304.
Devon: Willan
.
135.
Rose, N.
(1996) âGoverning âadvancedâ
liberal democraciesâ, in
A. Barry
,
T. Osborne
and
N. Rose
(eds) Foucault and political reason: Liberalism, neo-liberalism and
rationalities of government, pp. 37â64.
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
.
136.
Rose, N.
and
P. Miller
(1992)
âPolitical power beyond the state: Problematics of governmentâ
, British Journal of Sociology43(2):
173â205
.
137.
Rothman, D.J.
(1980) Conscience and convenience: The asylum and its
alternatives in progressive America.
Boston, MA: Little, Brown
.
138.
Rutherford, A.
(1993) Criminal justice and the pursuit of decency.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
139.
Schwartz, M.D.
and
D.O. Friedrichs
(1994)
âPostmodern thought and criminological discontent: New metaphors
for understanding violenceâ
, Criminology32(2):
221â246
.
140.
Scott, J.C.
(1990) Domination and the arts of resistance: Hidden
transcripts.
New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
.
141.
Shanken, E.A.
(2000)
âTele-agency: Telematics, telerobotics, and the art of meaningâ
, Art Journal59(2):
64â77
.
142.
Shichor, D.
(1997)
âThree strikes as a public policy: The convergence of the new
penology and the McDonaldization of punishmentâ
, Crime & Delinquency43(4):
470â492
.
143.
Shilling, C.
and
P.A. Mellor
(1998)
âDurkheim, morality and modernity: Collective effervescence, homo
duplex and the sources of moral actionâ
, British Journal of Sociology49(2):
193â209
.
144.
Simon, J.
(1993) Poor discipline: Parole and the social control of the
underclass, 1890â1990.
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
.
145.
Simon, J.
(1995)
âThey died with their boots on: The boot camp and the limits of
modern penalityâ
, Social Justice22(2):
25â48
.
146.
Simon, J.
and
M.M. Feeley
(1995) âTrue crime: The new penology and public
discourse on crimeâ, in
T.G. Blomberg
and
S. Cohen
(eds) Punishment and social control, pp.
147â180.
New York: Aldine de Gruyter
.
147.
Simon, J.
and
M.M. Feeley
(2003) âThe form and limits of the new
penologyâ, in
T.G. Blomberg
and
S. Cohen
(eds) Punishment and social control, 2nd edn, pp.
75â116.
New York: Aldine de Gruyter
.
148.
Smith, D.J.
and
J. Gray
(1985) Police and people in London: The PSI report.
Gower: Aldershot
.
149.
Sparks, R.
,
A.E. Bottoms
and
W. Hay
(1996) Prisons and the problem of order.
Clarendon Press: Oxford
.
150.
Steinberg, J.
(2002) All or nothing: The axis and the Holocaust,
1941â43.
London: Routledge
.
151.
Sykes, G.
(1958) The society of captives.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
.
152.
Taylor, C.
(1985) Human agency and language: Philosophical papers
1.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
153.
Thompson, J.D.
(1967/2003) Organizations in action: Social science bases of
administrative theory.
New Brunswick: Transaction
.
154.
Tonry, M.
(1996) Sentencing matters.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
155.
Travis, A.
(2004) âArrested
developmentâ, Guardian10 March: 6â7.
156.
Urry, J.
(1991) âTime and space in Giddensâ
social theoryâ, in
C.G.A. Bryant
and
D. Jary
(eds) Giddensâ theory of structuration: A critical
appreciation, pp. 160â175.
London: Routledge
.
157.
Wacquant, L.
(2003)
âToward a dictatorship over the poor? Notes on the penalization
of poverty in Brazilâ
, Punishment & Society5(2):
197â205
.
158.
Weber, M.
(1914/1978) Economy and society: An outline of interpretive
sociology.
New York: Bedminster Press
.
159.
Wrong, D.H.
(1994) The problem of order: What unites and divides
society.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
.
160.
Zimbardo, P.G.
(2003) The political psychology of terrorist alarms.
Available at http://www.zimbardo.com/downloads/2002%20Political%20Psychology%20of%20Terrorist%20Alarms.pdf
