Marxian value theory

Abstract

Marx's critique of political economy and analysis of the capitalist mode of production are grounded in more general ideas about human activity and social organization that, taken together, constitute an anthropology which is applicable in principle to all social systems and forms of social production, including those that do not involve the production and exchange of commodities. Marx's anthropology is built upon general notions of production, need, value, semiotic mediation, exploitation, alienation, the role of subjective activity and consciousness, and the structural properties of systems of social production as totalities. This article attempts to abstract the general forms and principles of these notions in terms applicable to non-commodity producing social systems. It identifies Marx's formulation of value theory as the most encompassing organizational framework of his anthropological ideas.

Keywords

activity Marx semiotic mediation value theory

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Banaji, J. (1979) `From the Commodity to Capital: Hegel's Dialectic in Marx's Capital', in D. Elson (ed.) Value: The Representation of Labour in Capitalism, pp. 14—45. London: CSE Books.

De Vroey, M. (1981) `Value, Production, and Exchange', in I. Steedman (ed.) The Value Controversy, pp. 173—201. London: Verso.

Elson, D. (1979) `The Value Theory of Labour', in D. Elson (ed.) Value: The Representation of Labour in Capitalism, pp. 115—80. London: CSE Books.

Marx, K. (1934) `Letter of 11 July 1868', Letters to Dr. Kugelmann , pp. 73—4. The Marx-Engels-Lenin Institute. Moscow: Glavlit.

Marx, K. (1965) Pre-Capitalist Economic Formations. New York: International Publishers.

Marx, K. (1971) A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy . London: Lawrence & Wishart .

Marx, K. (1976) Capital: A Critique of Political Economy Volume 1, trans. B. Fowkes, pp. 138—62. London: Penguin.

Tucker, R.C. , ed. (1978) The Marx-Engels Reader. New York: Norton.

Turner, T. (1979a) `Kinship, Household and Community Structure among the Northern Kayapo', in D. Maybury-Lewis (ed.) Dialectical Societies, pp. 179—217. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

10.

Turner, T. (1979b) `The Ge and Bororo Societies as Dialectical Systems: A General Model', in D. Maybury-Lewis (ed.) Dialectical Societies, pp. 147—78. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

11.

Turner, T. (1984) `Dual Opposition, Hierarchy and Value: Moiety Structure and Symbolic Polarity in Central Brazil and Elsewhere', in J.-C. Galey (ed.) Differences, Valeurs, Hierarchies:Textes Offertes a Louis Dumont et Reunis par Jean-Claude Galey , pp. 335—70. Paris: Editions de l'Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales.

12.

Turner, T. (1995) `Social Body and Embodied Subject: The Production of Bodies, Actors and Society among the Kayapo', Cultural Anthropology 10(2): 143—70.

13.

Turner, T. (2000) `The Sacred as Alienated Social Consciousness: Ritual and Cosmology among the Kayapo', in L. Sullivan (ed.) Indigenous Religions and Cultures of Central and South America, pp. 278—98. New York: Continuum.

14.

Turner, T. (2003) `The Beautiful and the Common: Gender and Social Hierarchy among the Kayapo', Tipiti: The Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Lowland South America 1(1): 11—26.