This article presents a dynamic time domain simulation model of loop-sortation systems. Loop-sortation systems for sortation of medium-size items are designed as a closed chain of carts guided in a closed loop track with a view to meet customers’ requirements of capacity and space available. Loop-sortation systems are complex mechatronic systems which require the use of simulation models in order to analyse, predict, and improve the dynamic performance in a cost efficient way. The model utilizes theory for unconstrained rigid multibody dynamics where contact between carts and between cart and track are modelled through the use of force elements. To determine contact between the track and the chain of carts, a rapid and robust contact search formulation has been developed and implemented in the model. Comparisons of main forces of the chain model are made with experimental measurements on three different test layouts. Verification results show that the normalized root mean square deviations are generally less than 10 per cent.
InterRoll, available from www.interroll.com (accessed 31 August 2010).
3.
Crisplant A/S, available from www.crisplant.com (accessed 31 August 2010).
4.
NikraveshP. E.Computer-aided analysis of mechanical systems, 1988 (Prentice Hall (Englewood Cliffs, NJ).
5.
NakanishiT.YinX.ShabanaA. A.–Dynamics of multibody tracked vehicles using experimentally identified modal parameters. J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Contr., September 1996, 118. 499–507.
6.
ChoiJ. H.LeeH. C.ShabanaA. A.–Spatial dynamics of multibody tracked vehicles part I: spatial equations of motion. Veh. Syst. Dyn., 1998, 29(1), 27–49.
7.
LeeH. C.ChoiJ. H.ShabanaA. A.–Spatial dynamics of multibody tracked vehicles. Part II: spatial equations of motion. Veh. Syst. Dyn., 1998, 29(2), 113–137.
8.
RyuH. S.HuhK. S.BaeD. S.ChoiJ. H.–Development of a multibody dynamics simulation tool for tracked vehicles. JSME Int. J. Series C, 2003, 46(2), 550–556.
9.
RubinstienD.HitronR.–A detailed multi-body model for dynamic simulation of off-road tracked vehicles. J. Terramech., 2004, 41. 163–173.
10.
MahalingamS.–Polygonal actions in chain drives. J. Franklin Inst., 1958, 265. 23–28.
11.
Srnik, J. and Pheiffer, F. Dynamics of CVT chain drives: mechanical model and verification. In Proceedings of DETC 97, the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, Sacramento, California, 14–17 September 1997.
12.
SrivastavaN.HaqueI.–Clearance and friction-induced dynamics of chain CVT drives. Multibody Sys. Dyn., 2008, 19. 255–280.
13.
PedersenS. L.–Model of contact between rollers and sprockets in chain-drive systems. Appl. Mech., 2005, 74. 489–508.
14.
PedersenS. L.HansenJ. M.AmbrósioA. C.–A roller chain drive model including contact with guide-bars. Multibody Sys. Dyn., 2004, 12. 285–301.
15.
Hippmann, G., Arnold, M., and Schittenhelm, M. Efficient simulation of brush and roller chain drives. In Proceedings of Multibody Dynamics 2005, the ECCOMAS Thermatic Conference, Madrid, Spain, 21–24 June 2005.
16.
Callegari, M. and Cannella, F. Lumped parameter model of timing belt transmissions. In Proceedings of the 15th AIMETA Congress on Theoretical and applied mechanics, Taormina, Italy, 26–29 September 2001.
17.
CallegariM.CannellaF.FerriG.–Multi-body modelling of timing belt dynamics. Proc. IMechE, Part K: J. Multi-body Dynamics, 2003, 217. 63–75.
18.
Ebbesen, M. K.Optimal design of flexible multibody systems. PhD Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Aalborg University, Denmark, 2008.
19.
EbbesenM. K.HansenM. R.PedersenN. L.–A modular approach to analysis of large scale baggage handling systems, NSCM-17, 2004 (KTH, Mechanics, Royal Institute of technology, Stockholm (Sweden, 23–26.
20.
Petersen, G. and Kofman, J. Simulation of multibody systems with flexible boundaries. Master Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Aalborg University, Denmark, 2009.
21.
PressW. H.TeukolskyS. A.VetterlingW. T.FlanneryB. P.Numerical recipes in fortran 90: the art of parallel scientific computation, 2nd edition, 1996 (Cambridge University Press (Cambridge).
22.
HuntK. H.CrossleyF. R. E.–Coefficient of restitution interpreted as damping in vibroimpact. ASME J. Appl. Mech., 1975, 42. 440–445.
23.
HertzH.–Über die berürung fester elasticher körper. J. für die reine und gewandte Mathematik, 1882, 92. 156–171.
24.
LankaraniH. M.NikraveshP. E.–Continuous contact force models for impact analysis in multibody systems. Nonlinear Dyn., 1994, 5. 193–207.
25.
LankaraniH. M.NikraveshP. E.–A contact force model with hysteresis damping for impact analysis of multibody system. J. Mech. Des., 1990, 112. 369–376.
26.
FloresP.AmbrósioJ.ClaroJ. C. P.LankaraniH. M.–Dynamics of multibody systems with spherical clearance joints. J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn., 2006, 1. 240–247.
27.
MaloneK. F.XuB. H.–Determination of contact parameters for discrete element method simulations of granular systems. Particuology, 2008, 6. 521–528.
28.
NievergeltY.–Computing the distance from a point to a helix and solving the Kepler’s equation. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A, 2009, 598. 788–794.
29.
Sørensen, S. E., Hansen, M. H., and Ebbesen, M. K. An experimentally verified model for time domain simulation of large scale material handling chains. In Proceedings of the 1st Joint International Conference on Multibody system dynamics, Lappeenranta, Finland, 25–27 May 2010.
