Prediction of the wheel profile wear using railroad vehicle dynamics simulation: Comparison of simulation and test results

Abstract

Wear is a fundamental problem in the railroad vehicle design and performance evaluation. Slight changes in the profile shape result in significant impact on the contact geometry characteristics of wheel and rail, thereby altering the dynamic performance as well as derailment safety of railroad vehicles. In this study, a wear simulation capability integrated with multibody railroad vehicle dynamics simulation algorithms is developed considering multipoint contact exhibited between wheel and rail profiles in the wear evolution and validated against experimentally measured profiles obtained by the two-roller and scaled wheel wear tests. It was shown that worn profile shape as well as the magnitude of the weight loss agreed well between the simulation and test results in the two-roller test. Using wear test of a scaled wheel, it was found that the flange contact falls into severe wear regime, while the tread contact is in mild wear regime in the two-roller wear test data. However, a severe flange contact led to much higher wear rate than that obtained using the two-roller test for the same material and the same wear index, while the wear rate for the tread contact adhered to that of the two-roller test in the mild wear regime. This is attributed to the fact that contact condition of the severe flange contact scenario is greatly different from the two-roller contact condition due to the high contact pressure and slippage occurring in the small thin contact patch, leading to a vastly different wear rate per contact area. It is demonstrated that utilizing the flange wear rate leads to good agreement with the measured profile shape, while the two-roller wear rate leads to a significant underestimate of the flange wear due to significantly lower wear rate in severe wear regime.

Keywords

Wheel–rail contact wear prediction railroad vehicle dynamics multibody dynamics contact problem

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Pombo

Ambrósio

Pereira

et al.

A study on wear evaluation of railway wheels based on multibody dynamics and wear computation. Multibody Syst Dyn 2010; 24: 347–366.

Pombo

Ambrósio

Pereira

et al.

Development of a wear prediction tool for steel railway wheels using three alternative wear functions. Wear 2011; 271: 238–245.

Ignesti

Malvezzi

Marini

et al.

Development of a wear model for the prediction of wheel and rail profile evolution in railway systems. Wear 2012; 284–285: 1–17.

Innocenti

Marini

Meli

et al.

Development of a wear model for the analysis of complex railway networks. Wear 2014; 309: 174–191.

Sugiyama

Yada

Yamamoto

et al.

Wheel and rail profile wear on small radius curved track and its effect on derailment coefficients: Measurement and simulation. Int J Railway Technol 2013; 4: 85–98.

Archard

. Contact and rubbing of flat surfaces. J Appl Phys 1953; 24: 981–988.

Krause

Poll

. Wear of wheel-rail surfaces. Wear 1986; 113: 103–122.

Pearce

Sherratt

. Prediction of wheel profile wear. Wear 1991; 144: 343–351.

Jendel

. Prediction of wheel profile wear-comparisons with field measurements. Wear 2002; 253: 89–99.

10.

Enbolm

Berg

. Proposed procedure and trial simulation of rail profile evolution due to uniform wear. Proc IMechE, Part J: J Engineering Tribology 2008; 222: 15–25.

11.

Braghin

Lewis

Dwyer-Joyce

et al.

A mathematical model to predict railway wheel profile evolution due to wear. Wear 2006; 261: 1253–1264.

12.

Bolton

Clayton

. Rolling-sliding wear damage in rail and tyre steels. Wear 1984; 93: 145–165.

13.

Lewis

Dwyer-Joyce

. Wear mechanisms and transitions in railway wheel steels. Proc IMechE, Part J: J Engineering Tribology 2004; 218: 467–478.

14.

Lewis

Olofsson

. Mapping rail wear regimes and transitions. Wear 2004; 257: 721–729.

15.

Kalker

. Three-dimensional elastic bodies in rolling contact, New York: Springer, 1990.

16.

Kalker

. A fast algorithm for the simplified theory of rolling contact. Veh Syst Dyn 1982; 11: 1–13.

17.

Sugiyama

Suda

. Wheel/rail two-point contact geometry with back-of-flange contact. ASME J Comput Nonlinear Dyn 2009; 4: 011010–1-6.

18.

Sugiyama

Suda

. On the contact search algorithms for wheel/rail contact problems. ASME J Comput Nonlinear Dyn 2009; 4: 041001–1-7.

19.

Shabana

Zaazaa

Sugiyama

. Railroad vehicle dynamics: Computational approach, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2008.

20.

Sugiyama

Sekiguchi

Matsumura

et al.

Wheel/rail contact dynamics in turnout negotiations with combined nodal and non-conformal contact approach. Multibody Syst Dyn 2012; 27: 55–74.

21.

Terao

Sugiyama

. Application of tabular contact search method to multibody gear dynamics simulation with tooth surface imperfections. Proc IMechE, Part K: J Multi-Body Dynamics 2015; 229: 274–290.

22.

Enbolm

Berg

. Impact of non-elliptic contact modelling in wheel wear simulation. Wear 2008; 265: 1532–1541.