Fiber-reinforced polymer composites yield a range of microscopic damage mechanisms even under apparently “simple” load cases, e.g. quasi-static uniaxial tensile tests to failure. Even reducing the fiber-reinforced polymer composite to a single fiber embedded in a matrix will produce several different damage types under quasi-static tensile loading. These are fiber breaks and simultaneous fiber–matrix debonding as well as friction between fiber and debonded matrix, and sometimes, additional matrix cracks. Acoustic emission monitoring of mechanical load tests on material specimens or components is often used to identify the occurrence of damage and attempts at locating the source and identifying the damage mechanism or type in a wide range of materials. The complex damage behavior of fiber-reinforced polymer composites poses a challenge in that respect. Therefore, various approaches (e.g. pattern recognition or neural networks) have been developed to identify the different microscopic damage mechanisms from acoustic emission signals obtained from various load tests. For improved understanding of the damage mechanisms in fiber-reinforced polymer composites as well as for validating the procedures for identifying the types of mechanisms, fiber-reinforced polymer specimens showing a “single dominant damage mechanism”, i.e. occurring in significantly larger number than all others, at least in certain stages of damage accumulation or in localized volume elements, can be designed. The contribution discusses and classifies selected examples of single dominant damage mechanism for fiber-reinforced polymer composites and their application.
RobinsonPGreenhalghEPinhoS. Failure mechanisms in polymer matrix composites, criteria, testing and industrial applications, Oxford-Cambridge-Philadelphia-New Delhi: Woodhead Publishing, 2012.
2.
WisnomMR. The role of delamination in failure of fibre-reinforced composites. Philos Trans R Soc A2012; 370: 1850–1870.
3.
RayBCHasanSTCleggDW. Evaluation of defects in FRP composites by NDT techniques. J Reinf Plast Compos2007; 26: 1187–1192.
4.
HsiaoKTHeiderDVacuum assisted resin transfer molding (VARTM) in polymer matrix composites. In: SGAdvaniKTHsiao (eds). Manufacturing techniques for polymer matrix composites (PMCs), Oxford-Cambridge-Philadelphia-New Delhi: Woodhead Publishing, 2017, pp. 310–347.
5.
Rios-SoberanisCR. Acoustic emission technique: an overview as a characterization tool in materials science. J Appl Res Technol2011; 9: 367–379.
6.
DahmeneFYaacoubiSEl MontassirM. Acoustic emission of composites structures: story, success, and challenges. Phys Proc2015; 70: 599–603.
7.
DuchenePChakiSAyadiAet al.A review of non-destructive techniques used for mechanical damage assessment in polymer composites. J Mater Sci2018; 53: 7915–7938.
8.
BrunnerAJAcoustic emission analysis for identification of damage mechanisms in fiber-reinforced polymer composites and structural integrity assessment: selected examples and challenges. In: TShiotaniSWakayamaMEnokiet al.(eds). Progress in acoustic emission XVIII2016, pp. 287–292.
9.
HuguetSGodinNGaertnerRet al.Use of acoustic emission to identify damage modes in glass fibre reinforced polyester. Compos Sci Technol2002; 62: 1433–1444.
10.
MarecAThomasJHEl GuerjoumaR. Damage characterization of polymer-based composite materials: multivariable analysis and wavelet transform for clustering acoustic emission data. Mech Syst Signal Process2002; 22: 1441–1464.
11.
SauseMGRHornS. Simulation of acoustic emission in planar carbon fiber reinforced plastic specimens. J Nondestruct Eval2010; 29: 123–142.
12.
SauseMGRGribovAUnwinARet al.Pattern recognition approach to identify natural clusters of acoustic emission signals. Pattern Recog Lett2012; 33: 17–23.
13.
SauseMGRMüllerTHoroschenkoffAet al.Quantification of failure mechanisms in mode-I loading of fiber reinforced plastics utilizing acoustic emission analysis. Compos Sci Technol2012; 72: 167–174.
14.
El-KadiH. Modeling the mechanical behavior of fiber-reinforced polymeric composite materials using artificial neural networks—A review. Compos Struct2006; 73: 1–23.
15.
McCroryJPAl-JumailiSKCrivelliDet al.Damage classification in carbon fibre composites using acoustic emission: a comparison of three techniques. Compos Part B: Eng2015; 68: 424–430.
16.
ZhaoXKLiMSongGBet al.Hierarchical ensemble-based data fusion for structural health monitoring. Smart Mater Struct2010; 19: 045009: 1–7.
17.
Ding P, Li Q and Huang XL. Classification of acoustic emission sources produced by carbon/epoxy composite based on support vector machine. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng 2015; 87: 012002: 1-6.
18.
Gostautas RS. Identification of failure prediction criteria using acoustic emission monitoring and analysis of GFRP bridge deck panels. Report No. K-TRAN: KU-02-1, 2007, pp.1–85.
19.
Schubert L, Schulze E and Frankenstein B. Source mechanisms of acoustic emissions as an indicator of injury during a full scale fatigue test of a wind turbine rotor blade. In: Proceedings of 8th international conference on structural dynamics, EURODYN, Leuven (Belgium), July 4–6 2011, pp.3462–3468.
20.
BaenschFZaunerMSanabriaSJet al.Damage evolution in wood - synchrotron based microtomography as complementary evidence for interpreting acoustic emission behavior. Holzforschung2015; 68: 1015–1025.
21.
GarceaSCSinclairISpearingSM. In situ synchrotron tomographic evaluation of the effect of toughening strategies on fatigue micromechanisms in carbon fibre reinforced polymers. Compos Sci Technol2015; 109: 32–39.
22.
EmersonMJJespersenKMDahlABet al.Individual fibre segmentation from 3D X-ray computed tomography for characterising the fibre orientation in unidirectional composite materials. Compos Part A:Appl Sci Manuf2017; 97: 83–92.
23.
CzabajMWRiccioMLWhitacreWW. Numerical reconstruction of graphite/epoxy composite microstructure based on sub-micron resolution X-ray computed tomography. Compos Sci Technol2014; 105: 174–182.
24.
CuadraJVanniamparambilPAHazeliKet al.Damage quantification in polymer composites using a hybrid NDT approach. Compos Sci Technol2013; 83: 11–21.
25.
BrunnerAJ. Identification of damage mechanisms in fiber-reinforced polymer-matrix composites with Acoustic Emission and the challenge of assessing structural integrity and service-life. Constr Build Mater2018; 173: 629–637.
26.
Feih S, Wonsyld K, Minzari D, et al. Testing procedure for the single fiber fragmentation test. Risø, Forskningscenter Risoe-R No. 1483(EN), 2004, pp.1–30.
27.
Nordstrom RA. Acoustic emission characterization of microstructural failure in the single fiber fragmentation test. PhD Thesis No. 11402, ETH Zürich, Switzerland, 1995.
28.
SørensenBF. Micromechanical model of the single fiber fragmentation test. Mech Mater2017; 104: 38–48.
29.
YaoLJAlderliestenRCBenedictusR. The effect of fibre bridging on the Paris relation for mode I fatigue delamination growth in composites. Compos Struct2016; 140: 125–135.
30.
SchläpferBBrunnerAJKressG. Optimal design and testing of laminated light-weight composite structures with local reinforcements considering strength constraints Part II: testing. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2014; 61: 279–287.
31.
BrunnerAJ. Correlation between Acoustic Emission signals and delaminations in carbon fiber reinforced polymer-matrix composites: a new look at mode I fracture test data. J Acoust Emiss2016; 33: S41–S46.
32.
Brunner AJ, Nordstrom RA and Flüeler P. Fracture phenomena characterization in FRP-composites by acoustic emission. In: Proceedings of European conference on macromolecular physics: surfaces and interfaces in polymers and composites, European Physical Society (EPS), 1997, vol. 21B, pp.83–84.
33.
JoseSRamesh KumarRJanaMKet al.Intralaminar fracture toughness of a cross-ply laminate and its constituent sub-laminates. Compos Sci Technol2001; 61: 1115–1122.
34.
TongJGuildFJOginSLet al.On matrix crack growth in quasi-isotropic laminates – I. Experimental investigation. Compos Sci Technol2007; 57: 1527–1535.
35.
Sause MGR and Horn S. Influence of specimen geometry on acoustic emission signals in fiber reinforced composites: FEM-simulations and experiments. In: Proceedings of 29th European conference on acoustic emissions, Vienna (Austria), 9–11 September 2010, paper 49, pp.1–8.
36.
Sause MGR, Scharringhausen J and Horn S. Identification of failure mechanisms in thermoplastic composites by acoustic emission measurements. In: Proceedings of 19th international conference on composites materials, Montreal, 28 July–2 August 2013, pp.7680–7691.
37.
Sause MGR. In situ monitoring of fiber-reinforced composites theory, basic concepts, methods, and applications. Series in Materials Science. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG, 2016.
38.
KalafatSSauseMGR. Acoustic emission source localization by artificial neural networks. Struct Health Monitor2015; 14: 633–647.
