Cracks are described as sharp and diffusive surfaces in failure mechanical models. In this paper, a finite element model is developed by using a diffusive description of crack discontinuities. The main objective of this study is to prove the accuracy of the phase-field model in which the alternate minimization iteration and the spectral decomposition formulation are considered. We conduct a set of benchmark numerical tests on notched specimens using the phase-field model, which allows the prediction of the quasi-brittle failure. The fracture surface is approximated by a diffusive field, which interpolates between undamaged and fully damaged states. A mechanical loading was applied on quenched C90 steel and different obtained crack patterns are discussed. Microstructural analyses are performed to prove the accuracy of the proposed numerical approach. Through the determination of microstructural properties of untreated and quenched C90 steel, it is concluded that the presence of the micro-cracks may have a great influence on the crack path evolution.
RainerF. Modelling of environmentally assisted material degradation in the crack phase-field framework. Proc Inst Mech Eng Pt L J2018; 233: 5–12.
2.
MoakharSHentatiHBarkallahM, et al.Parametric study of aluminum bar shearing using Johnson-Cook material modeling. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf2021; 235: 1399–1411.
3.
GhasemiMAFalahatgarSR. Investigation on the effective parameters of through-the-width crack propagation in ceramic coatings due to substrate tension using discrete element method. Proc Inst Mech Eng Pt L J2019; 234: 144–155.
4.
TavaresSMOReisLDe FreitasM, et al.Mixed mode fatigue and fracture in planar geometries: observations on Keq and crack path modelling. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct2019; 42: 2441–2456.
5.
LinMAgboSChengJJR, et al.Application of the extended finite element method (XFEM) to simulate crack propagation in pressurized steel pipes. In: ASME pressure vessels and piping conference, Waikoloa, Hawaii, USA, July 16–20 2017, paper no. PVP2017-65575, V03BT03A024, 8 pages.
6.
FrancfortGAMarigoJJ. Revisiting brittle fracture as an energy minimization problem. J Mech Phys Solids1998; 46: 1319–1342.
GriffithAA. The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids. Phil Trans R Soc Lond A1921; 221: 163–198.
9.
Dal MasoGToaderR. A model for the quasi-static growth of brittle fractures: existence and approximation results. Arch Rational Mech Anal2002; 162: 101–135.
10.
MieheCSchänzelLMUlmerH. Phase-field modeling of fracture in multiphysics problems. Part I. Balance of crack surface and failure criteria for brittle crack propagation in thermo-elastic solids. Comput Method Appl M2015; 294: 449–489.
11.
ChuDLiXLiuZ. Study the dynamic crack path in brittle material under thermal shock loading by phase field modeling. Int J Fract2017; 208: 115–130.
12.
MieheCHofackerMSchänzelLM, et al.Phase field modeling of fracture in multi-physics problems. Part II. Coupled brittle-to-ductile failure criteria and crack propagation in thermo-elastic-plastic solids. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng2015; 294: 486–522.
13.
MieheCZähDRosatoD. Variational-based modeling of micro-electro-elasticity with electric field-driven and stress-driven domain evolutions. Int J Num Meth Eng2012; 91: 115–141.
14.
AmorHMarigoJJMauriniC. Regularized formulation of the variational brittle fracture with unilateral contact: numerical experiments. J Mech Phys Solids2009; 57: 1209–1229.
15.
MieheCHofackerMWelschingerF. A phase field model for rate-independent crack propagation: robust algorithmic implementation based on operator splits. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng2010; 199: 2765–2778.
16.
ZhuangXZhouSShengM, et al.On the hydraulic fracturing in naturally-layered porous media using the phase field method. Eng Geol2020; 266: 105306.
17.
ZhangSKimDUJiangW, et al.A phase field model of crack propagation in anisotropic brittle materials with preferred fracture planes. Comp Mater Sci2021; 193: 110400.
18.
JeongHSignettiSHanST, et al.Phase field modeling of crack propagation under combined shear and tensile loading with hybrid formulation. Comp Mater Sci2018; 155: 483–493.
19.
ZhangSJiangWTonksMR. Assessment of four strain energy decomposition methods for phase field fracture models using quasi-static and dynamic benchmark cases. Mater Theory2022; 6: 6.
20.
HentatiHNaceurIBBouzidW, et al.Numerical analysis of damage thermo-mechanical models. Adv Appl Math Mech2015; 7: 625–643.
21.
SicsicPMarigoJJMauriniC. Initiation of a periodic array of cracks in the thermal shock problem: a gradient damage modeling. J Mech Phys Solids2013; 63: 256–284.
22.
ProserpioDAmbatiMLorenL, et al.Phase-field simulation of ductile fracture in shell structures. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng2021; 385: 1140.
23.
SamaniegoCUlloaJRodríguezP, et al.A phase-field model for ductile fracture with shear bands: a parallel implementation. Int J Mech Sci2021; 200: 106424.
24.
FelderSKopic-OsmanovicNHolthusenH, et al.Thermo-mechanically coupled gradient-extended damage-plasticity modeling of metallic materials at finite strains. Int J Plast2022; 148: 103142.
25.
TaoPYeFLiuH, et al.Dual-phase cohesive zone modelling and experimental validation for hydrogen-assisted cracking of 2205 duplex stainless steel. Int J Press Vessel Pip2021; 190: 104296.
26.
KriaaYHentatiHZouariB. Applying the phase-field approach for brittle fracture prediction: numerical implementation and experimental validation. Mech Adv Mater Struct2020; 1: 07.
27.
BourdinBFrancfortGAMarigoJJ. The variational approach to fracture. J Elasticity2008; 91: 5–148.
28.
HentatiHAbdelmoulaRMaalejA, et al.Quasi static analysis of anti-plane shear crack. Appl Mech Mater2012; 232: 92–96.
29.
HentatiHAbdelmoulaRMaalejA, et al.Quasi static fracture – global minimizer of the regularized energy. Appl Mech Mater2012; 232: 97–101.
30.
AmbatiMGerasimovTLorenzisLD. A review on phase-field models of brittle fracture and a new fast hybrid formulation. J Comput Mech2014; 55: 383–405.
31.
MurryG. Transformations dans les aciers. In: Techniques de l’Ingénieur, traité Matériaux métalliques. Doc. M. 1(115 – 5), 1999, pp.1–54.
32.
HájekJDlouhaZPrůchaV. Comparison of industrial quenching oils. Metals (Basel)2021; 11: 250.
33.
QasimBMKhidirTHameedAF, et al.Influence of heat treatment on the absorbed energy of carbon steel alloys using oil quenching and water quenching. JMERD2018; 41: 43–46.
34.
WangYLiRZuoX, et al.The twice softening of martensitic matrix in Q–P–T steels and its effect on ductility. Heat Treat Surf eng2019; 1: 2–10.
35.
QiuHUejiRKimuraY, et al.Heterogeneous distribution of microstrain evolved during tensile deformation of polycrystalline plain low carbon steel. Metals (Basel)2020; 10: 774.
36.
TaoPYeFGongJ, et al.A dislocation-based yield strength model for nano-indentation size effect. Proc Inst Mech Eng Pt L J2021; 235: 1238–1247.
37.
DukaEOettelHDiloT. Connection between micro and macro hardness pearlitic-ferritic steel. In: AIP Conference 2nd international advanced in applied physics and materials science congress, Antalya, Turkey, April 26–29 2012, paper no. 1476, pp.47–51.
38.
HussinMSFJumaidinRHasanR, et al.Effect of cooling Medium and tempering on microstructures and hardness of SK3 high carbon steel. J Adv Res Fluid Mech2019; 63: 199–209.
39.
BodedeOROjoPOAyodeleOR, et al.Evaluation of as-quenched hardness of 1.2% carbon steels in different quenching media. J Emerg Trends Eng Appl Sci2012; 3: 127–130.
40.
HongzhiLVenkateshTA. On the relationships between hardness and the elastic and plastic properties of isotropic power-law hardening materials. Philos Mag2014; 94: 35–55.
41.
YanCBorBPlunkettA, et al.Nanoindentation of supercrystalline nanocomposites: linear relationship between elastic modulus and hardness. JOM2022; 74: 2261–2276.
