This article reviews the paradoxical gap between theory/policy and reality from 16 years of community-based natural resources management (CBNRM) in Malawi’s fisheries, forestry and wildlife sectors, focusing on influences of imported neoliberal blueprints. The article argues that CBNRM has created shifting institutional hybridities melding neoliberal principles and modern institutions with neo-patrimonial institutions, producing more challenges than opportunities. Recent gains and bias toward revenue generation have not been matched by practical measures for ecological sustainability. Synthesis of trends, challenges, lessons and opportunities through an institutional choice lens contributes to understanding of relative costs and benefits of CBNRM in delivering ecological and socio-economic goals.
AgrawalA.2005:Environmentality: Technologies of government and the making of subjects. Duke University Press.
2.
AndersenK.F.GondweE.MumbaR.2007: Getting the institutional setup right – A lessons learnt study from the BHA Lake Chirwa Project. In NielsenE.RasmussenP., editors, Community based wildlife management in Malawi. Proceedings of a national conference, Capital Hotel, Lilongwe, 6–7November. CURE, WESM, DHA, 55–63.
3.
BatesR.1981: Markets and states in Tropical Africa. University of California Press.
4.
BatterburyS.FernandoJ.2006: Rescaling governance and the impacts of political and environmental decentralization: An introduction. World Development34, 1851–63.
5.
BlaikieP.2006: Is small really beautiful? Community-based natural resource management in Malawi and Botswana. World Development34, 1942–57.
6.
BrycesonD.F.BankL.2001: End of an era: Africa’s development policy parallax. Journal of Contemporary African Studies19, 5–23.
ChinsingaB.2005: The interface between tradition and modernity: The struggle for political space at the local level in Malawi. Civilisations54, 255–74.
9.
COMPASS. 2003: Examples of CBNRM best-practices in Malawi (4th edition). Document 32, COMPASS.
10.
DickinsonJ.BitaR.2007: Can Malawi sustain CBNRM? In NielsenE.RasmussenP., editors, Community based wildlife management in Malawi. Proceedings of a national conference, Capital Hotel, Lilongwe, 6–7November. CURE, WESM, DHA, 107–114.
11.
DobsonT.A.1997: Radical restructuring of environmental policy to preserve biodiversity in southern Africa: Malawi at the crossroads. Journal of Natural Resources and Environmental Law13, 149–75.
12.
FAO. 2005: Fishery country profile – Republic of Malawi. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
13.
FergusonJ.1994: The anti-politics machine: ‘Development’, depoliticization, and bureaucratic power in Lesotho. University of Minnesota Press.
14.
FolkeC.PritchardL.JrBerkesF.ColdingJ.SvedinU.2007: The problem of fit between ecosystems and institutions: Ten years later. Ecology and Society12, 30, http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art30/, last accessed on 15 January 2010.
15.
FøllesdalA.1998: Survey article: Subsidiary. Journal of Political Philosophy6, 190–218.
16.
GibsonC.OstromE.AhnT.K.2000: The concept of scale and the human dimensions of global change: A survey. Ecological Economics32, 217–39.
17.
GoM. 1997a: Forest Act
1997. Ministry of Forestry, Fisheries and Environmental Affairs.
18.
GoM. 1997b: Fisheries Conservation and Management Act 1997. Ministry of Natural Resources and Environmental Affairs.
19.
GoM. 1998: Local Government Act, 1998. Number 42, Local Government, Malawi Government.
20.
GoM. 2004: National Parks and Wildlife (Amendment) Act, 2004. Malawi Government.
21.
HaraM.2008: Dilemmas of democratic decentralization in Mangochi district, Malawi: Interest and mistrust in fisheries management. Conservation and Society6, 74–86.
22.
HechtJ.2008: When will community management conserve biodiversity? Evidence from Malawi. Field Actions Science Reports1, 9–17.
23.
IFMSLP. 2007: Baseline report. Improved Forest Management for Sustainable Livelihoods Programme (IFMSLP). Final Version, 2007. IFMSLP.
24.
IFMSLP. 2009: Something big is brewing in Misuku Hills. Kupeza, Kupeza NewsletterIssue 3, March. Improved Forest Management for Sustainable Livelihoods Project.
25.
JereP.KnoxV.VoyseyB.2000: Synthesis study of CBNRM initiatives in co-management of natural resources in Malawi. Working Group on Co-management of Forest Goods and Services. Department of Forestry.
JumbeC.B.L.AngelsenA.2006: Do the poor benefit from devolution policies? Evidence from Malawi’s forest co-management program. Land Economics84, 562–81.
28.
JumbeC.B.L.AngelsenA.2007: Forest dependence and participation in CPR management: Empirical evidence from forest co-management in Malawi. Ecological Economics62, 661–72.
29.
KasuloP.PerringsC.2006: Fishing down the value chain: Biodiversity and access regimes in fresh-water fisheries – The case of Malawi. Ecological Economics59, 106–14.
30.
LeachM.MearnsR.ScoonsI.1999: Environmental entitlements: Dynamics and institutions in community-based natural resource management. World Development27, 225–47.
31.
LundJ.F.TreueT.2008: Are we getting there? Evidence of decentralized forest management from Tanzanian miombo woodlands. World Development36, 2780–2800.
32.
MauambetaD.MwalukomoH.KafakomaP.2007: Community based natural resources management in Malawi: The case of Bwanje Environmental Development Organization (BERDO) in Ntcheu district, Malawi and Kam’mwamba Sustainable Management of Indigenous Forests (SMIF) Project, in Mwanza/Neno districts. United States Agency for International Development (USAID).
33.
MumbaR.2003: Examination of factors affecting sustainable management of forest resources by local communities in Traditional Authorities Kunthembwe and Somba, Blantyre district: A case study of the Blantyre City Fuelwood Project. Unpublished MSc thesis, Faculty of Environmental Science, University of Malawi.
34.
MurphreeM.W.2001: Community-based conservation: Old ways, new myths and enduring challenges. In BaldusR.D.SiegeL., editors, Experiences with community based wildlife conservation in Tanzania. Tanzania Wildlife Discussion Paper No. 29, GTZ, 4–15, http://wildlife-baldus.com/download/nr_29_1.pdf, last accessed on 21 January 2010.
35.
MzumaraS.P.2007: Co-management of wildlife – The case of Majete Wildlife Reserve. In NielsenE.RasmussenP., editors, Community based wildlife management in Malawi. Proceedings of a national conference, Capital Hotel, Lilongwe, 6–7November. CURE, WESM, DHA, 75–89.
36.
NdoviW.W.2007: Community based wildlife management (CBWM) in Malawi: Policy and legal framework and opportunities and constraints. In NielsenE.RasmussenP., editors, Community based wildlife management in Malawi. Proceedings of a national conference, Capital Hotel, Lilongwe, 6–7November. CURE, WESM, DHA, 44–53.
37.
NielsenE.RasmussenP. editors, 2007: Community based wildlife management in Malawi. Proceedings of a national conference, Capital Hotel, Lilongwe, 6–7November. CURE, WESM, DHA, 107–14.
38.
NjayaF.2007: Government challenges for the implementation of fisheries co-management: Experiences from Malawi. International Journal of the Commons1, 137–53.
39.
NjayaF.J.DondaS.J.HaraM.M.1999: Fisheries co-management in Malawi: Lake Chiuta revisit case study. Paper presented at the International Workshop on Fisheries Co-management, Penang, Malaysia.
40.
NSO. 2008: 2008 population and housing census: Preliminary report. National Statistical Office, NSO, Malawi.
41.
OrrB.EiswerthB.FinanT.MalemboL.1998: Malawi public lands utilization study. Tuscon, Arizona. University of Arizona and Forestry Research Institute of Malawi.
42.
OstromE.1990: Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.
43.
PurcellM.BrownJ.2005: Against the local trap: Scale and the study of environment and development. Progress in Development Studies5, 279–97.
44.
RemmeH.O’BrienM.2008: Mid-term review of the Improved Forest Management for Sustainable Livelihoods Programme (IFMSLP) – 9 ACP MAI 16. Final Report. TRANSTEC.
45.
RibotJ.C.2006: Choose democracy: Environmentalists’ socio-political responsibility. Global Environmental Change16, 115–19.
46.
RibotJ.C.AgrawalA.LarsonA.M.2006: Recentralizing while decentralizing: How national governments reappropriate forest resources. World Development34, 1864–86.
47.
RibotJ.C.AshwiniC.LankinaT.2008: Introduction: Institutional choice and recognition in the formation and foundation of local democracy. Conservation and Society6, 1–11.
48.
RussellA.J.M.2007: Understanding the nature of ‘success’: An Analysis of fisheries co-management regimes on Lake Malawi. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University.
49.
RussellA.J.M.DobsonTWilsonJ.G.M.2008: Fisheries management in Malawi: A patchwork of traditional, modern, and post-modern regimes unfolds. In SchechterM.G.LeonardN.J.TaylorW.W., editors, International governance of fisheries ecosystems: Learning from the past, finding solutions for the future. American Fisheries Society, 53–98.
50.
SalanjeG.F.2006: Information sharing among fisheries and aquaculture institutions for sustainable development in Malawi. In AndersonK.L.ThieryC., editors, Information for responsible fisheries: Libraries as mediators: Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference. International Association of Aquatic and Marine Science Libraries and Information Centers, 233–242, https://darchive.mblwhoilibrary.org/bitstream/handle/1912/1561/proc05233.pdf?sequence=1, last accessed on 10 January 2012.
51.
Satellitbild. 1993: Forest resources mapping and biomass assessment for Malawi. Department of Forestry, Malawi.
52.
SenS.NielsenJ.1996: Fisheries co-management: A comparative analysis. Marine Policy20, 405–07.
53.
SmithN.1992: Geography, difference and the politics of scale. In DohertyJ.GrahamE.MalekM., editors, Postmodernism and the social sciences. St Martin’s Press, 57–79.
54.
Sosola-BandaB.G.JohnsenF.H.2005: Rural livelihoods on bamboo handicraft making and culm vending in Mvera, Malawi. J. Bamboo and Rattan4, 93–107.
55.
TaylorC.1994: Multiculturalism: Examining the politics of recognition. Princeton University Press.
World Bank. 2000: Can Africa claim the 21st century? The World Bank.
58.
ZuluL.C.2006: Rescaling conservation: The political ecology of community based forest management in southern Malawi. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Department of Geography, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
59.
ZuluL.C.2008: Community forest management in southern Malawi: Solution or part of the problem?Society and Natural Resources21, 687–703.
60.
ZuluL.C.2009a: Politics of scale and community-based forest management in southern Malawi. Geoforum40, 686–99.
61.
ZuluL.C.2009b: Land cover change, forest condition and community based forest management in the Blantyre City Fuelwood Project (BCFP) area. In KalipeniE.KakomaI.SanogoY.O.FawsettK.WarnerR.E., editors, Turning science into action: Biodiversity conservation and natural resources management in Africa. Africa World Press, 251–98.
