• Summary: This article examines the relationships between welfare, law and managerialism as key discourses in social work with children and families. It draws on empirical research into the relationships between local authority social workers, social services managers and lawyers in child care work in England.
• Findings: Tensions between social workers and lawyers have, in the past, been seen as symptoms of a wider clash between welfare and law as paradigmatic approaches to the regulation of social life and professional activity. Likewise, the rise of managers and managerialism has widely been portrayed as being in conflict with welfare values. The relationship between law and managerialism, meanwhile, has often been treated as unproblematic — simply two sides of the same coin, the increasing regulation of social work. This study reveals a more complex picture of on-going and unstable overlaps and tensions between the three professional groups and discourses.
• Applications : The study points to a more fluid understanding of the relationships between welfare, law and managerialism in social work, one that recognizes the dynamic nature of the inter-discursive and inter-professional relationships. The character of contemporary child care social work is constructed and constrained through these multi-layered interactions.
Ashenden, S. (1996) `Reflexive Governance and Child Sexual Abuse: Liberal Welfare Rationality and the Cleveland Inquiry', Economy and Society25(1): 64—88.
2.
Beck, A. (1994) `Is Law an Autopoietic System?', Oxford Journal of Legal Studies14(3): 401—18.
3.
Braye, S. and Preston-Shoot, M. (1990) `On Teaching and Applying the Law in Social Work Practice: It is Not that Simple', British Journal of Social Work20(4): 333—53.
4.
Braye, S. and Preston-Shoot, M. (2005) Teaching, Learning and Assessment of Law in Social Work Education. London: Social Care Institute for Excellence.
5.
Burden, T., Cooper, C. and Petrie, S. (2000) `Modernising' Social Policy: Unravelling New Labour's Welfare Reforms. Aldershot: Ashgate .
6.
Clarke, J. and Newman, J. (1997) The Managerial State: Power, Politics and Ideology in the Remaking of Social Welfare. London: Sage.
7.
Clarke, J., Cochrane, A. and McLaughlin, E. (eds) ( 1994) Managing Social Policy. London: Sage.
8.
Coffey, A. and Atkinson, P. (1996) Making Sense of Qualitative Data: Complementary Research Strategies. London: Sage .
9.
DCA (Department for Constitutional Affairs) ( 2005) A Fairer Deal for Legal Aid, Cm 6591London: The Stationery Office.
10.
DCA and DfES (Department for Constitutional Affairs and Department for Education and Skills) (2006) Review of the Child Care Proceedings System in England and Wales. London: DCA.
11.
DfES (Department for Education and Skills) ( 2004) Every Child Matters: The Next Steps. London: DfES.
12.
DHSS (Department of Health and Social Security) ( 1988) Report of the Inquiry into Child Abuse in Cleveland 1987, Cm 412. London: HMSO.
13.
Dickens, J. (1993) `Assessment and the Control of Social Work: An Analysis of Reasons for the Non-use of the Child Assessment Order', Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law15(2): 88—100.
14.
Dickens, J. (2004a) `Risks and Responsibilities: The Role of the Local Authority Lawyer in Child Care Cases', Child and Family Law Quarterly16(1): 17—30.
15.
Dickens, J. (2004b) `Teaching Child Care Law: Key Principles, New Priorities', Social Work Education23(2): 217—30.
16.
Dickens, J. (2005) `Being “the Epitome of Reason”: The Challenges for Lawyers and Social Workers in Child Care Proceedings', International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family19(1): 1—29.
17.
Dickens, J. (2006) `Care, Control and Change in Child Care Proceedings: Dilemmas for Social Workers, Managers and Lawyers', Child and Family Social Work11(1): 23—32.
18.
Donzelot, J. (1980) The Policing of Families: Welfare versus the State . London: Hutchinson.
19.
Evans, T. and Harris, J. (2004) `Street-level Bureaucracy, Social Work and the (Exaggerated) Death of Discretion', British Journal of Social Work34: 871—95.
20.
Farnham, D. and Horton, S. (1996) Managing the New Public Services, 2nd edn. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
21.
Ferguson, H. (2004) Protecting Children in Time: Child Abuse, Child Protection and the Consequences of Modernity. Basingstoke : Palgrave Macmillan.
22.
Foucault, M. (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison . Harmondsworth: Penguin.
23.
Galanter, M. (1984) `Worlds of Deals: Using Negotiation to Teach about Legal Process', Journal of Legal Education34: 268—76.
24.
Glaser, B. and Strauss, A. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
25.
Grace, C. (1994) Social Workers, Children and the Law. Oxford: Clarendon.
26.
Harlow, E. (2003) `New Managerialism, Social Services Departments and Social Work Practice Today', Practice15(2): 29—44.
27.
Harris, J. (1998) `Scientific Management, Bureau-professionalism, New Managerialism: The Labour Process of State Social Work', British Journal of Social Work28: 839—62.
28.
Harris, R. and Timms, N. (1993) Secure Accommodation in Child Care: Between Hospital and Prison or Thereabouts. London: Routledge.
29.
Hilgendorf, L. (1981) Social Workers and Solicitors in Child Care Cases . London: HMSO.
30.
HM Government (2004) Every Child Matters: Change for Children. London: DfES.
31.
HM Government (2006) Working Together to Safeguard Children: A Guide to Inter-Agency Working to Safeguard and Promote the Welfare of Children. London: The Stationery Office.
32.
HM Treasury (2003) Every Child Matters, Cm 5860. London: The Stationery Office.
33.
Howe, D. (1992) `Child Abuse and the Bureaucratisation of Social Work', Sociological Review40(3): 491—508.
34.
Howe, D. (1994) `Modernity, Postmodernity and Social Work', British Journal of Social Work24: 513—32.
35.
Humphrey, J. (2003) `New Labour and the Regulatory Reform of Social Care', Critical Social Policy23(1): 5—24.
36.
Hunt, J., Macleod, A. and Thomas, C. (1999) The Last Resort: Child Protection, the Courts and the 1989 Children Act. London: The Stationery Office.
37.
James, A. (1992) `An Open or Shut Case? Law as an Autopoietic System ', Journal of Law and Society19(2): 271—83.
38.
Jockelson, D. (2005) `The Threat to Care Proceedings', Family Law35: 891—4.
39.
Katz, S. (1961) `The Lawyer and the Caseworker: Some Observations ', Social Casework42(1): 10—15.
40.
King, M. (1991) `Child Welfare within the Law: The Emergence of a Hybrid Discourse', Journal of Law and Society18(3): 303—22.
41.
King, M. (1993) `The “Truth” about Autopoiesis', Journal of Law and Society20(2): 218—36.
42.
King, M. (1999) `Being Sensible: Images and Practices of the New Family Lawyers', Journal of Social Policy28(2): 249—73.
43.
King, M. and Piper, C. (1990) How the Law Thinks About Children. Aldershot: Gower.
44.
King, M. and Trowell, J. (1992) Children's Welfare and the Law: The Limits of Legal Intervention. London: Sage.
45.
Laming, Lord H. (2003) The Victoria Climbié Inquiry Report, Cm 5370. London: The Stationery Office.
46.
Lau, J. (1983) `Lawyers vs. Social Workers: Is Cerebral Hemisphericity the Culprit?', Child Welfare62(1): 21—9.
47.
Law Society (2004) Good Practice in Child Care Cases: A Guide for Solicitors Acting in Public Law Children Act Proceedings Including Cases Involving Adoption. London: The Law Society with the Association of Lawyers for Children, the Child Care Law Joint Liaison Group and the Solicitors Family Law Association.
48.
London Borough of Brent (1985) A Child in Trust: The Report of the Panel of Inquiry Investigating the Circumstances Surrounding the Death of Jasmine Beckford. London: London Borough of Brent.
49.
Macleod,A. (1993) Servicing Social Services: LocalAuthority Legal Representation in Child Care Cases: The Child in the Civil Courts Research Project, 1990—1991. London: HMSO.
50.
Madill, A., Jordan, A. and Shirley, C. (2000) `Objectivity and Reliability in Qualitative Analysis: Realist, Contextualist and Radical Constructionist Epistemologies', British Journal of Psychology91: 1—20.
51.
Mnookin, R. and Kornhauser, L. (1979) `Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: The Case of Divorce', Yale Law Journal88: 950—97.
52.
Munro, E. (2004) `The Impact of Audit onSocial Work Practice',British Journal of Social Work34(8): 1075—95.
53.
Murray, T., Dingwall, R. and Eekelaar, J. (1983) `Professionals in Bureaucracies: Solicitors in Private Practice and Local Government', in R. Dingwall and P. Lewis (eds) The Sociology of the Professions, pp. 195—220. London: Macmillan.
54.
Neves, M. (2001) `From the Autopoiesis to the Allopoiesis of Law ', Journal of Law and Society28(2): 242—64.
55.
O'Brien, M. and Penna, S. (1998) Theorizing Welfare: Enlightenment and Modern Society . London: Sage.
56.
Parton, N. (1985) The Politics of Child Abuse. London: Macmillan.
57.
Parton, N. (1991) Governing the Family: Child Care, Child Protection and the State. London: Macmillan .
58.
Parton, N. (1998) `Risk, Advanced Liberalism and Child Welfare: The Need to Rediscover Uncertainty and Ambiguity', British Journal of Social Work28: 5—27.
59.
Phillips, A. (1979) `Social Work and the Delivery of Legal Services ', Modern Law Review42: 29—41.
60.
Pithouse, A. (1998) Social Work: The Social Organisation of an Invisible Trade, 2nd edn. Aldershot: Ashgate.
61.
Pollitt, C. (1990) Managerialism and the Public Services: The Anglo-American Experience. Oxford: Basil Blackwell .
62.
Potter, J. and Wetherell, M. (1987) Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. London: Sage.
63.
Preston-Shoot, M. (2001) `Regulating the Road of Good Intentions: Observations on the Relationship between Policy, Regulations and Practice in Social Work ', Practice13(4): 5—20.
64.
Preston-Shoot, M., Roberts, G. and Vernon, S. (1998a) `Social Work Law: From Interaction to Integration ', Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law20(1): 65—80.
65.
Preston-Shoot, M., Roberts, G. and Vernon, S. (1998b) `Working Together in Social Work Law', Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law20(2): 137—50.
66.
Rojek, C., Peacock, G. and Collins, S. (1988) Social Work and Received Ideas. London: Routledge.
67.
Russel, R. (1988) `Role Perceptions of Attorneys and Caseworkers in Child Abuse Cases in Juvenile Court', Child Welfare67(3): 205—16.
68.
Sinclair, I. and Corden, J. (2005) A Management Solution to Keeping Children Safe: Can Agencies on their Own Achieve What Lord Laming Wants?York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
69.
Smith, C. (2000) `The Sovereign State v. Foucault: Law and Disciplinary Power', Sociological Review48(2): 283—306.
70.
Smith, C. (2004) `Autopoietic Law and the “Epistemic Trap”: A Case Study of Adoption and Contact', Journal of Law and Society31(3): 318—44.
71.
Smith, C. and White, S. (1997) `Parton, Howe and Postmodernity: A Critical Comment on Mistaken Identity', British Journal of Social Work27: 275—95.
72.
Stevenson, O. (1988) `Law and Social Work Education: A Commentary on the “Law Report”', Issues in Social Work Education8(1): 37—45.
73.
Swain, P. (1989) `From Carney to Cleveland . . . to Chinkapook and Cottles Bridge or Lawyer and Social Worker . . . Can the Marriage Work?', Journal of Social Welfare Law11: 229—34.
74.
Taylor, C. and White, S. (2000) Practising Reflexivity in Health and Welfare. Buckingham: Open University Press.
75.
Teubner, G. (1989) `How the Law Thinks: Towards a Constructivist Epistemology of Law', Law and Society Review23: 728—57.
76.
Timms, J. (1997) `The Tension between Welfare and Justice', Family Law27: 38—47.
77.
White, S. (1998) `Interdiscursivity and Child Welfare: The Ascent and Durability of Psycho-legalism', Sociological Review46(2): 264—92.
78.
White, S. and Featherstone, B. (2005) `Communicating Misunderstandings: Multi-agency Work as Social Practice', Child and Family Social Work10(3): 207—16.
