• Summary: This article discusses research that explored an alternative to proceduralized child protection practice informed by the risk paradigm, by expanding the repertoire available to practitioners through combining features of the risk paradigm with social constructionism. This approach incorporates three dimensions: theories of knowledge and power, related professional roles, and practice skills. In this article, we discuss and critically evaluate only the first dimension: theories of knowledge and power. Through dialogue facilitated by semi-structured questions, we explored practitioners' perspectives about the relevance and appropriateness of the alternative approach for practice.
• Findings: The practitioners' participation and feedback offer insights into complex connections between `theory' and `practice' with the practitioner as a positioned subject and mediator of practical meanings of formal concepts.
• Applications: 1) Recognition of each practitioner's interpretation of formal concepts and how they are applied in actual practice, even within shared organizational contexts. 2) The importance of dialogue to expand the range of possibilities that maintain openness to ongoing learning. 3) The value of theoretical pluralism that may offer greater opportunities for professional discretion, rather than single self-contained approaches that may constrain effective and ethical practice.
Camilleri, P. (1996) (Re)Constructing Social Work. Aldershot: Avebury.
2.
Camilleri, P. (1999) `Social Work and its Search for Meaning: Theories, Narratives and Practices', in B. Pease and J. Fook (eds) Transforming Social Work Practice: Postmodern Critical Perspectives, pp. 25-39. St Leonards, Australia: Allen and Unwin .
3.
D'Cruz, H. (2002) `Research on Developing a Practice-Generated Approach to Policy Implementation', End-of-Project Report, December, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria.
4.
D'Cruz, H. (2003) `Research on Developing a Practice-Generated Approach to Policy Implementation', End-of-Project Report, July, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria.
5.
D'Cruz, H. (2004a) Constructing Meanings and Identities in Child Protection Practice. Melbourne: Tertiary Press.
6.
D'Cruz, H. (2004b) `The Social Construction of Child Maltreatment: The Role of Medical Practitioners', Journal of Social Work4(1): 99-123.
7.
D'Cruz, H. and Gillingham, P. (2005) `"Building Bridges": A Case Study of a Collaborative Research Process', Journal of Progressive Human Services16(1): 51-80.
8.
D'Cruz, H., Gillingham, P. and Melendez, S. (2004) `Exploring the Possibilities of an Expanded Practice Repertoire in Child Protection: An Overview of Outcomes of a Collaborative Study', Global Social Work Congress 2004: Reclaiming Civil Society, October, Adelaide, South Australia.
9.
D'Cruz, H., Gillingham, P. and Melendez, S. (2007) `Reflexivity, its Meanings and Relevance for Social Work: A Critical Review of the Literature', British Journal of Social Work37(1): 73-90. (BJSW Advanced Access published 20 February 2006, available online at: [doi:10.1093/bjsw/bc1001].)
10.
D'Cruz, H., Gillingham, P., Christoe, D. and Cuff, C. (2002) `Building Bridges: A Case Study of Collaborative Research between "the Academy" and "Industry", "Government" and "Non Government", "Theory" and "Practice" and Other Yet Unknown Possibilities', Working Across Borders, Joint AASWWE/AASW (WA) Conference, 29 September-2 October, Perth, Western Australia.
11.
Edwards, D., Ashmore, M. and Potter, J. (1995) `Death and Furniture: The Rhetoric, Politics and Theology of Bottom Line Arguments against Relativism', History of the Human Sciences8: 25-49.
12.
Ferguson, H. (1997) `Protecting Children in New Times: Child Protection and the Risk Society', Child and Family Social Work2(4): 221-34.
13.
Feyerabend, P. (1975) Against Method. London: New Left Books.
14.
Fook, J. (1996) `Preface', in J. Fook (ed.) The Reflective Researcher, pp. xii-xv. St Leonards, Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
15.
Fook, J. (1999) `Critical Reflectivity in Education and Practice' , in B. Pease and J. Fook (eds) Transforming Social Work Practice: Postmodern Critical Perspectives, pp. 195-208. St Leonards , Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
16.
Fook, J., Ryan, M. and Hawkins, L. (2000) Professional Expertise: Practice, Theory and Education for Working with Uncertainty. London: Whiting and Birch.
17.
Foucault, M. (1971) `Orders of Discourse', Social Science Information10(2): 7-30.
18.
Foucault, M. (1972) The Archaeology of Knowledge, trans. A. Sheridan. London: Tavistock. (Originally published 1969 in French as L'Archéologie du Savoir, Editions Gallimard.)
19.
Foucault, M. (1978) `Politics and the Study of Discourse', Ideology and Consciousness3: 7-26.
20.
Foucault, M. (1980) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, ed. C. Gordon.Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
21.
Goddard, C.R., Saunders, B.J., Stanley, J.R. and Tucci, J. (1999) `Structured Risk Assessment Procedures: Instruments of Abuse?', Child Abuse Review8(4): 251-63.
22.
Hassard, J. (1993) `Postmodernism and Organizational Analysis: An Overview', in J. Hassard and M. Parker (eds) Postmodernism and Organizations , pp. 1-23. London: SAGE.
23.
Heap, J.L. (1995) `Constructionism in the Rhetoric and Practice of Fourth Generation Evaluation', Evaluation and Program Planning18(1): 51-61.
24.
Howe, D. (1992) `Child Abuse and the Bureaucratisation of Social Work', Sociological Review40(3): 491-508.
25.
Jacobs, S. (2002a) `The Genesis of "Scientific Community"', Social Epistemology16(2): 157-68.
26.
Jacobs, S. (2002b) `Polanyi's Presagement of the Incommensurability Concept', Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science Part A33(1): 105-20.
27.
Jones, L. (1993) `Decision Making in Child Welfare: A Critical Review of the Literature', Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal10(3): 241-62.
28.
Lee, N. (1994) `Child Protection Investigations: Discourse Analysis and the Management of Incommensurability', Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology4: 275-86.
29.
Marcus, G. (1994) `What Comes (Just) After "Post"? The Case of Ethnography' , in N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research , 2nd edn, pp. 563-74. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
30.
Neuman, W.L. and Kreuger, L.W. (2003) Social Work Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Applications. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
31.
Parton, N. (1991) Governing the Family: Child Care, Child Protection and the State. London: Macmillan .
32.
Parton, N. and O'Byrne, P. (2000) `What Do We Mean by Constructive Social Work?' , Critical Social Work1(2): 1-17, available online at: [http://www.criticalsocialwork.com/00_2_what_parton.html].
33.
Parton, N., Thorpe, D. and Wattam, C. (1997) Child Protection: Risk and the Moral Order. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
34.
Reason, P. and Bradbury, H. (2001) `Introduction: Inquiry and Participation in Search of a World Worthy of Human Aspiration', in P. Reason and H. Bradbury (eds ) Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice, pp. 1-14. London: SAGE.
35.
Reder, P., Duncan, S. and Gray, M. (1993) Beyond Blame: Child Abuse Tragedies Revisited. London: Routledge.
36.
Riessman, C.K. (1994) `Subjectivity Matters: The Positioned Investigator' , in C.K. Riessman (ed.) Qualitative Studies in Social Work Research, pp. 133-8. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
37.
Schön, D. (1983) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
38.
Schön, D. (1987) Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Towards a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
39.
Scott, D. and Swain, S. (2002) Confronting Cruelty: Historical Perspectives on Child Protection in Australia. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
40.
Sheppard, M., Newstead, S., Caccavo, A. and Ryan, K. (2000) `Reflexivity and the Development of Process Knowledge in Social Work: A Classification and Empirical Study', British Journal of Social Work30(4): 465-88.
41.
Taylor, C. and White, S. (2000) Practising Reflexivity in Health and Welfare: Making Knowledge. Buckingham: Open University Press.
42.
Turnell, A. and Edwards, S. (1999) Signs of Safety: A Solution and Safety Oriented Approach to Child Protection. New York: Norton.
43.
Walton, M. (1993) `Regulation in Child Protection - Policy Failure?' , British Journal of Social Work23(2): 139-56.
