Philosophical and religious influences on social welfare policy in the United States: The ongoing effect of Reformed theology and social Darwinism on attitudes toward the poor and social welfare policy and practice

Abstract

• Summary: This article explores the historical and contemporary philosophical and religious influences of social welfare policy and programs in the United States. A discussion of Weber's critique of Calvin's Reformed theology and the profound influence of Calvin's Reformed theology, including the concept of predestination and the Protestant work ethic, as well as the influence of Spencer's social Darwinism on US social policy. Elements of early ideological bias that reflected the moral failure of the poor are discussed with regard to early poor care and the Charity Organization Society movement, and are contrasted with the more pragmatic and compassionate approach of Jane Addams's Settlement House movement.

• Findings: An argument is made that a resurgence of social Darwinism and secularized Reformed theology is currently reflected in contemporary political and economic movements, including welfare reform measures in PRWORA of 1996, and the related TANF program, which has had a devastating effect on the economically disadvantaged populations in the United States.

• Application: Since social workers are on the front lines of social welfare policy development and practice, implication for social work education and practice are discussed emphasizing the importance of increased awareness of such damaging ideologies. Such awareness will lead to increased political discourse and advocacy for social welfare policy development and practice congruent with social work values.

Keywords

Personal Work Opportunity and Responsibility Act of 1996 philosophy Reformed theology Settlement House movement social Darwinism social welfare policy social work

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Betten

(1973). American attitudes toward the poor: A historical overview. Current History, 65(383), 1–5.

Chunn

Gavigan

(2004). Welfare law, welfare fraud, and the moral regulation of the ‘never deserving’ poor. Social & Legal Studies, 13(2), 219–243.

Darwin

(1998). Origin of the species. Oxford: Oxford University PressOriginal work published 1859.

Duncan

Moore

(2003). Catholic and Protestant social discourse and the American welfare state. Journal of Poverty, 7(30), 57–83.

El-Bassel

Caldeira

N A

Ruglass

L M

Gilbert

(2009). Addressing the unique needs of African American women in HIV prevention. American Journal of Public Health, 99(6), 996–1001.

Feagin

J R

(1975). Subordinating the poor: Welfare and American beliefs. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Friedman

R L

(2007). Traditions of pragmatism and the myth of the Emersonian democrat. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 43(10), 154–184.

Garrett

P M

(2002). Social work and the just society. Journal of Social Work, 2(2), 187–210Retrieved from SocINDEX with Full Text database.

Gettleman

M E

(1963). Charity and social classes in the United States, 1874–1900. American Journal of Economics & Sociology, 22(20), 313–329.

10.

Goodman

(1995). Pragmatism: A contemporary reader. London: Routledge.

11.

Green

J C

Rozell

M J

Wilcox

(2003). The Christian right in American politics: Marching to the millennium. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

12.

Guth

Green

J C

(1986). Faith and politics: Religion and ideology among political contributors. American Politics Quarterly, 14(3), 186–199.

13.

Hagan

(1999). Time limits under Temporary Assistance to Needy Families: A look at the welfare cliff. Journal of Women and Social Work, 14(3), 294–324Retrieved from Social Work Abstracts database.

14.

Hamington

(2005). Public pragmatism: Jane Addams and Ida B. Wells on lynching. Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 19(2), 167–174.

15.

Hausman

D M

McPherson

M S

(2006). Economic analysis, moral philosophy, and public policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.

16.

Hawkins

(1997). Social Darwinism in European and American thought, 1860–1945: Nature as model and nature as threat. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

17.

Heckman

S J

(1983). Max Weber and contemporary social theory. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

18.

Hofstadter, R. (1992). Social Darwinism in American thought: 1860–1915. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. (Original work published 1944.).

19.

Hudson

Coukos

(2005). The dark side of the Protestant ethic: A comparative analysis of welfare reform. Sociological Theory, 23(1), 1–24.

20.

Hughes, H. S. (1977). Consciousness and society: Reorientation of European social thought. New York: Vintage Books.

21.

Kim

(1977). The relationship of Protestant ethic beliefs and values to achievement. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 16(3), 252–262.

22.

Kohut, A., Doherty, C., & Dimock, M. (2009). Trends in political values and core attitudes: 1987–2009. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. Retrieved May 2010 from: http://people-press.org/reports/pdf/517.pdf.

23.

Kohut, A., Doherty, C., Dimock, M., Lugo, L., Dionne, E. J., & Stencel, S. (2004). GOP: The religion friendly party. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center for the People and the Press; Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life. Retrieved May 2010 from: http://people-press.org/reports/pdf/223.pdf.

24.

Kluegal

J R

(1987). Macro-economic problems, beliefs about the poor and attitudes toward welfare spending. Social Problems, 34(1), 82–99.

25.

Knuckey

(2005) A new front in the culture war? Moral traditionalism and voting behavior in U.S. House elections. American Politics Research, 33, 645–671.

26.

Lens

(2001). When the personal and the political collide. Journal of Social Work, 1(3), 361–363Retrieved from SocINDEX with Full Text database.

27.

Lundblad

(1995). Jane Addams and social reform: A role model for the 1990s. Social Work, 40(5), 661–669.

28.

Martin

M E

(2011). Introduction to human services: Through the eyes of practice settings. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Publishing.

29.

National Association of Social Workers (NASW). (2002, January). NASW priorities on faith-based human services initiatives. Retrieved 13 September 2005 from: http://www.naswdc.org/advocacy/positions/faith.asp.

30.

Reese

(2007). The causes and consequences of U.S. welfare retrenchment. Journal of Poverty, 11(3), 47–63.

31.

Schneiderhan, E. (2008). Jane Addams and the rise and fall of pragmatist social provision at Hull-House, 1871–1896. Conference Papers, American Sociological Association, Annual Meeting.

32.

Schram

Fordingy

Sossz

(2008). Neo-liberal poverty governance: Race, place and the punitive turn in U.S. welfare policy. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 1(1), 17–36.

33.

Siegel

Williams

(2003). The relationship between child sexual abuse and female delinquency and crime: A prospective study. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40(1), 71–94.

34.

Tropman

(1986). The ‘Catholic ethic’ versus the ‘Protestant ethic’: Catholic social service and the welfare state. Social Thought, 12(1), 13–22.

35.

Uluorta

H M

(2008). Welcome to the ‘All-American’ fun house: Hailing the disciplinary neo-liberal non-subject. Millennium – Journal of International Studies, 36(2), 51–75.

36.

Weaver

Shapiro

Jacobs

(1995). The polls–trends: Welfare. Public Opinion Quarterly, 59(4), 606–627.

37.

Weber, M. (2002). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism (T. Parsons, trans.). New York: Charles Scribner's Sons. (Original work published 1905.).

38.

Weikart

(1998). Laissez-faire social Darwinism and individualist competition in Darwin and Huxley. The European Legacy, 3(1), 17–30.

39.

Wright

(2000). Resisting homelessness: Global, national and local solutions. Contemporary Sociology, 29(10), 27–43.