A coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian approach was employed to Engine Combustion Network (ECN) Spray-G simulations. The Eulerian in-nozzle flow simulation was conducted with a small plenum attached to the nozzles, and the results were fed to the Lagrangian spray simulation. For Eulerian simulation, the homogeneous relaxation model (HRM) coupled with the volume of fluid (VOF) method was used. HRM proved to be good at predicting the phase change phenomena due to vaporization mechanisms, that is, both cavitation and flash boiling. As a one-way coupling, quantities such as rate of injection (ROI), mass injected through each hole, discharge coefficient, spray plume angle and half cone angle predicted from the Eulerian simulations were used as the initial and boundary conditions for the subsequent Lagrangian spray simulations using the blob injection model. Non-flashing (Spray-G1) and flashing (Spray-G2) spray was simulated, and the results were validated quantitatively against the published data in terms of the liquid and vapor penetration lengths, and good agreements were obtained. Furthermore, the simulation predicted the liquid and gas axial velocity and sauter mean diameter for Spray-G1 condition in agreement with the droplet size and particle image velocimetry (PIV) measurements from literature.
ZhangYKumarPTraverMClearyD. Conventional and low temperature combustion using naphtha fuels in a multi-cylinder heavy-duty diesel engine. SAE Int J Engines2016; 9(2): 1021–1035.
2.
RamanVViolletYChangJ. Development of fast idle catalyst light-off strategy for gasoline compression ignition engine – Part 1. SAE technical paper 2020-01-0316, 2020.
3.
DuJMohanBSimJFangTRobertsWL. Study of spray collapse phenomenon at flash boiling conditions using simultaneous front and side view imaging. Int J Heat Mass Transf2020; 147: 118824.
4.
AtefNBadraJJaasimMImHGSarathySM. Numerical investigation of injector geometry effects on fuel stratification in a GCI engine. Fuel2018; 214: 580–589.
5.
MohanBYangWChouSK. Fuel injection strategies for performance improvement and emissions reduction in compression ignition engines—a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev2013; 28: 664–676.
6.
BadraJFarooqASimJViolletYImHGChangJ. Effects of in-cylinder mixing on low octane gasoline compression ignition combustion. SAE technical paper 2016-01-0762, 2016.
7.
BadraJViolletYElwardanyAImHGChangJ. Physical and chemical effects of low octane gasoline fuels on compression ignition combustion. Appl Energy2016; 183: 1197–1208.
8.
BadraJZubailASimJ. Numerical investigation into effects of fuel physical properties on GCI engine performance and emissions. Energ Fuel2019; 33: 10267–10281.
9.
BadraJASimJElwardanyAJaasimMViolletYChangJ, et al. Numerical simulations of hollow-cone injection and gasoline compression ignition combustion with naphtha fuels. J Energy Resour Technol2016; 138(5): 052202.
10.
ValletABurlukaAABorghiR. Development of a Eulerian model for the “Atomization” of a liquid jet. J Atomization Sprays2001; 11(6): 24.
11.
QuanSSenecalPKPomraningEXueQHuBRajamohanD, et al. A one-way coupled volume of fluid and Eulerian-Lagrangian method for simulating sprays. In: ASME 2016 Internal combustion engine division fall technical conference, Greenville, SC, USA, 9–12 October 2016, V001T06A014 (9 pp.). American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection.
12.
NeroorkarKD. Modeling of flash boiling flows in injectors with gasoline-ethanol fuel blends. University of Massachusetts Amherst, 2011.
13.
MoulaiMGroverRParrishSSchmidtDP.Internal and near-nozzle flow in a multi-hole gasoline injector under flashing and non-flashing conditions. SAE technical paper 2015-01-0944, 2015.
14.
BaldwinETGroverROJrParrishSEDukeDJMatusikKPowellCF, et al. String flash-boiling in gasoline direct injection simulations with transient needle motion. Int J Multiphas Flow2016; 87: 90–101.
15.
SahaKSomSBattistoniM, et al. Numerical investigation of two-phase flow evolution of in-and near-nozzle regions of a gasoline direct injection engine during needle transients. SAE Int J Engines2016; 9(2): 1230–1240.
16.
SahaKSomSBattistoniMLiYQuanSSenecalPK. Modeling of internal and near-nozzle flow for a gasoline direct injection fuel injector. J Energy Resour Technol2016; 138(5): 052208.
17.
SahaKQuanSBattistoniM, et al. Coupled Eulerian internal nozzle flow and Lagrangian spray simulations for GDI systems. SAE technical paper 2017-01-0834, 2017.
SchmidtDRakshitSNeroorkarK.Thermal and inertial equilibrium in small, high-speed, cavitating nozzle simulations. In: 11th International Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems (ICLASS-2009), Vail, CO, USA, 26–30 July 2009, pp. 26–30. Institute for Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems (ILASS).
20.
BilickiZKestinJ. Physical aspects of the relaxation model in two-phase flow. Proc Roy Soc Lond Math Phys Eng Sci1990; 428(1875): 379–397.
21.
Downar-ZapolskiPBilickiZBolleLFrancoJ. The non-eq16 relaxation model for one-dimensional flashing liquid flow. Int J Multiphas Flow1996; 22(3): 473–483.
22.
SenecalPRichardsKPomraningEYangTDaiMZMcDavidRM, et al. A new parallel cut-cell cartesian CFD code for rapid grid generation applied to in-cylinder diesel engine simulations. SAE technical paper 2007-01-0159, 2007.
23.
SchmidtDPRutlandC. A new droplet collision algorithm. J Comput Phys2000; 164(1): 62–80.
24.
PostSLAbrahamJ. Modeling the outcome of drop–drop collisions in diesel sprays. Int J Multiphas Flow2002; 28(6): 997–1019.
25.
AmsdenAAButlerTDO’RourkePJ. The KIVA-II computer program for transient multidimensional chemically reactive flows with sprays. SAE technical paper872072, 1987.
26.
LiuABMatherDReitzRD. Modeling the effects of drop drag and breakup on fuel sprays. SAE technical paper 930072, 1993.
27.
SenecalPPomraningERichardsKSomS. Grid-convergent spray models for internal combustion engine CFD simulations. In: Internal combustion engine division fall technical conference, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 23–26 September 2012, pp.697–710. ASME.
28.
SenecalPPomraningERichardsKSomS. Grid-convergent spray models for internal combustion engine computational fluid dynamics simulations. J Energy Resour Technol2014; 136(1): 012204.
29.
BattistoniMDukeDSwantekABTiloccoFZPowellCFSomS. Effects of noncondensable gas on cavitating nozzles. J Atomization Sprays2015; 25(6): 453–483.
30.
LeachFKnorschTLaidigCWieseW. A review of the requirements for injection systems and the effects of fuel quality on particulate emissions from GDI engines. SAE technical paper 2018-01-1710, 2018.
31.
KaleRBanerjeeR. Optical investigation of flash boiling and its effect on in-cylinder combustion for butanol isomers and iso-octane. Int J Engine Res. Epub ahead of print 28May2020. DOI: 10.1177/1468087420917241.
32.
MohapatraCKSchmidtDPSforozoBAMatusikKYueZPowellCF, et al. Collaborative investigation of the internal flow and near-nozzle flow of an eight-hole gasoline injector (Engine Combustion Network Spray G). Int J Engine Res. Epub ahead of print 10June2020. DOI: 10.1177/1468087420918449.
33.
ManinJKastengrenAPayriR. Understanding the acoustic oscillations observed in the injection rate of a common-rail direct injection diesel injector. J Eng Gas Turbines Power2012; 134(12): 122801.
34.
GeHJohnsonJEKrishnamoorthyHLeeS-YNaberJDRobargeN, et al. A comparison of computational fluid dynamics predicted initial liquid penetration using rate of injection profiles generated using two different measurement techniques. Int J Engine Res2019; 20(2): 226–235.
35.
PayriRGimenoJMarti-AldaraviPVaquerizoD. Momentum flux measurements on an ECN GDi injector. SAE technical paper 2015-01-1893, 2015.
36.
PayriRGimenoJMarti-AldaraviPVaquerizoD. Internal flow characterization on an ECN GDi injector. J Atomization Sprays2016; 26(9): 889–919.
37.
BefruiBAyeABossiAMarkleLEVarbleDL. ECN GDI spray G: coupled LES jet primary breakup-Lagrangian spray simulation and comparison with data. In: ICLASS Americas 28th annual conference on liquid atomization and spray systems, Dearbon, MI, USA, 15–18 May 2016. Institute for Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems (ILASS).
38.
ManinJJungYSkeenSAPickettLMParrishSEMarkleLE. Experimental characterization of DI gasoline injection processes. SAE technical paper 2015-01-1894, 2015.
39.
MohanBAliMJMAhmedAPerezFHSimJRobertsWL, et al. Numerical simulations of high reactivity gasoline fuel sprays under vaporizing and reactive conditions. SAE technical paper 2018-01-0292, 2018.
40.
AguerreHJNigroNM. Implementation and validation of a Lagrangian spray model using experimental data of the ECN spray G injector. Comput Fluids2019; 190: 30–48.
41.
Di IlioGKrastevVKFalcucciG. Evaluation of a scale-resolving methodology for the multidimensional simulation of GDI sprays. Energies2019; 12(14): 2699.
42.
ParediDLucchiniTD’ErricoGOnoratiAPickettLLaceyJ. CFD modeling of spray evolution for spark-ignition, direct injection engines. In: AIP conference proceedings, AIP Publishing LLC, 2019, p.020125. AIP Publishing LLC.
43.
HoyasSGilAMargotXKhuong-AnhDRavetF. Evaluation of the Eulerian–Lagrangian Spray Atomization (ELSA) model in spray simulations: 2D cases. Math Comput Model2013; 57(7–8): 1686–1693.
44.
SalvadorFJGimenoJPastorJMMartí-AldaravíP. Effect of turbulence model and inlet boundary condition on the diesel spray behavior simulated by an Eulerian Spray Atomization (ESA) model. Int J Multiphas Flow2014; 65: 108–116.
45.
JanickaJPetersN. Prediction of turbulent jet diffusion flame lift-off using a PDF transport equation. Proc Combust Inst1982; 19(1): 367–374.
46.
WeiHChenXZhaoWZhouLChenR. Effects of the turbulence model and the spray model on predictions of the n-heptane jet fuel–air mixing and the ignition characteristics with a reduced chemistry mechanism. Proc Inst Mech Eng D J Aut Eng2017; 231(14): 1877–1888.
47.
HoyasSPastorJKhuong-AnhDMompó-LabordaJMRavetF. Evaluation of the Eulerian-Lagrangian Spray Atomisation (ELSA) in spray simulations. Int J Veh Syst Model Test2011; 6(3/4): 187–201.
48.
ParediDLucchiniTD’ErricoGOnoratiAMontanaroAAlloccaL, et al. Combined experimental and numerical investigation of the ECN spray G under different engine-like conditions. SAE technical paper 2018-01-0281, 2018.
49.
ParediDLucchiniTD’ErricoGOnoratiAPickettLLaceyJ. Validation of a comprehensive computational fluid dynamics methodology to predict the direct injection process of gasoline sprays using spray G experimental data. Int J Engine Res2020; 21(1): 199–216.
50.
MigliaccioMMontanaroAParediDLucchiniTAlloccaLD’ErricoG. CFD modeling and validation of the ECN spray G experiment under a wide range of operating conditions. SAE technical paper 2019-24-0130, 2019.
