Turbulent jet ignition is seen as one of the most promising strategies to achieve stable lean-burn operation in modern spark-ignition engines thanks to its ability to promote rapid combustion. A nearly stoichiometric mixture is ignited in a small-volume pre-chamber, following which multiple hot turbulent jets are discharged in the main chamber to initiate combustion. In the present work, a detailed computational investigation on the turbulent combustion regime of premixed rich propane/air mixture in a quiescent divided chamber vessel is carried out, to study the characteristics of the jet flame without the uncertainties in mixing and turbulent conditions typical of real-engine operations. In particular, the paper investigates the dependency of flame propagation on nozzle diameter (4, 6, 8, 12 and 14 mm) and pre-chamber/main-chamber volume ratio (10% and 20%); CFD results are compared to the experimental outcomes. Results show that the combustion regime in the quiescent pre-chamber follows a well-stirred reaction mode, rendering the limitation in using conventional flamelet combustion models. Furthermore, due to the very high turbulence levels generated by the outflowing reacting jets, also the main chamber combustion develops in a well-stirred reactor type, confirming the need for a kinetics-based approach to combustion modelling. However, the picture is complicated by thickened flamelet conditions possibly being verified for some geometrical variations (nozzle diameter and pre-chamber volume). The results show a general good alignment with the experimental data in terms of both jet phasing and combustion duration, offering a renewed guideline for combustion simulations under quiescent and low Damköhler number conditions.
YongJYRamachandaramurthyVKTanKM, et al. A review on the state-of-the-art technologies of electric vehicle, its impacts and prospects. Renew Sustain Energ Rev2015; 49: 365–385.
2.
MangerugaVGiacopiniMBarbieriSG, et al. Design of a hybrid power unit for formula SAE application: packaging optimization and thermomechanical design of the electric motor case. SAE paper 2019-24-0197, 2019.
3.
HagemanMDSakaiSSRothamerDA.Determination of soot onset and background particulate levels in a spark-ignition engine. Proc Combust Inst2015; 35: 2949–2956.
4.
ChoESChungSH.Improvement of flame stability and NOx reduction in hydrogen-added ultra lean premixed combustion. J Mech Sci Technol2009; 23(3): 650–658.
5.
D’AdamoABredaSFontanesiS, et al. A RANS knock model to predict the statistical occurrence of engine knock. Appl Energy2017; 191: 251–263.
6.
D’AdamoABredaSFontanesiS, et al. A RANS-based CFD model to predict the statistical occurrence of knock in spark-ignition engines. SAE Int J Engines2016; 9(1): 618–630.
7.
BredaSD’AdamoAFontanesiS, et al. CFD analysis of combustion and knock in an optically accessible GDI engine. SAE Int J Engines2016; 9: 641–656.
8.
QuaderAA. Lean combustion and the misfire limit in spark ignition engines. SAE paper 741055, 1974.
9.
GermaneGJWoodCGHessCC. Lean combustion in spark-ignited internal combustion engines: a review. SAE paper 831694, 1983.
10.
D’AdamoABredaSBerniF, et al. Understanding the origin of cycle-to-cycle variation using large-eddy simulation: similarities and differences between a homogeneous low-revving speed research engine and a production DI turbocharged engine. SAE Int J Engines2018; 12(1): 45–56.
11.
ChinnathambiPThelenBCookD, et al. Performance metrics for fueled and unfueled turbulent jet igniters in a rapid compression machine. Appl Therm Eng2021; 182: 115893.
12.
BenekosSFrouzakisCEGiannakopoulosGK, et al. Prechamber ignition: an exploratory 2-D DNS study of the effects of initial temperature and main chamber composition. Combust Flame2020; 215: 10–27.
13.
DistasoEAmiranteRCassoneE, et al. Experimental and numerical analysis of a pre-chamber turbulent jet ignition combustion system. SAE paper 2019-24-0018, 2019.
14.
AttardWPFraserNParsonsP, et al. A turbulent jet ignition pre-chamber combustion system for large fuel economy improvements in a modern vehicle powertrain. SAE Int J Engines2010; 3(2): 20–37.
15.
AttardWKohnJParsonsP. Ignition energy development for a spark initiated combustion system capable of high load, high efficiency and near zero NOx emissions. SAE paper 20109088, 2010.
16.
AttardWPBlaxillH. A gasoline fueled pre-chamber jet ignition combustion system at unthrottled conditions. SAE Int J Engines2012; 5(2): 315–329.
17.
AttardWBlaxillH. A lean burn gasoline fueled pre-chamber jet ignition combustion system achieving high efficiency and low NOx at part load. SAE paper 2012-01-1146, 2012.
18.
TsuboiSMiyokawaSMatsudaM, et al. Influence of spark discharge characteristics on ignition and combustion process and the lean operation limit in a spark ignition engine. Appl Energy2019; 250: 617–632.
19.
KyrtatosPBardisKBollaM, et al. Transferability of insights from fundamental investigations into practical applications of prechamber combustion systems. In: 4th IAV international conference on ignition systems for gasoline engines, Berlin, Germany, 6–7 December 2018, pp.442–459. Berlin: IAV.
20.
BunceMBlaxillHKulatilakaW, et al. The effects of turbulent jet characteristics on engine performance using a pre-chamber combustor. SAE paper 2014-01-1195, 2014.
21.
GentzGThelenBGholamisheeriM, et al. A study of the influence of orifice diameter on a turbulent jet ignition system through combustion visualization and performance characterization in a rapid compression machine. Appl Therm Eng2015; 81: 399–411.
22.
BiswasSTanvirSWangH, et al. On ignition mechanisms of premixed CH4/air and H2/air using a hot turbulent jet generated by pre-chamber combustion. Appl Therm Eng2016; 106: 925–937.
23.
MullerMFreemanCZhaoP, et al. Numerical simulation of ignition mechanism in the main chamber of turbulent jet ignition system. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2018 internal combustion engine division fall technical conference. Volume 2: emissions control systems; instrumentation, controls, and hybrids; numerical simulation; engine design and mechanical development, San Diego, CA, 4–7 November 2018. New York: ASME.
24.
BunceMBlaxillH. Methodology for combustion analysis of a Spark ignition engine incorporating a pre-chamber combustor. SAE paper 2014-01-2603, 2014.
25.
MaléQStaffelbachGVermorelO, et al. Large eddy simulation of pre-chamber ignition in an internal combustion engine. Flow Turbul Combust2019; 103: 465–483.
26.
GholamisheeriMWichmanISToulsonE. A study of the turbulent jet flow field in a methane fueled turbulent jet ignition (TJI) system. Combust Flame2017; 183: 194–206.
27.
GholamisheeriMThelenBCGentzGR, et al. Rapid compression machine study of a premixed, variable inlet density and flow rate, confined turbulent jet. Combust Flame2016; 169: 321–332.
28.
BollaMShapiroETineyN, et al. Numerical simulations of pre-chamber combustion in an optically accessible RCEM. SAE paper 2019-01-0224, 2019.
29.
ShapiroETineyNKyrtatosP, et al. Experimental and numerical analysis of pre-chamber combustion systems for lean burn gas engines. SAE paper 2019-01-0260, 2019.
30.
XuGKotzagianniMKyrtatosP, et al. Experimental and numerical investigations of the unscavenged prechamber combustion in a rapid compression and expansion machine under engine-like conditions. Combust Flame2019; 204: 68–84.
31.
YamaguchiSOhiwaNHasegawaT. Ignition and burning process in a divided chamber bomb. Combust Flame1985; 59: 177–187.
32.
BerniFCicaleseGFontanesiS. A modified thermal wall function for the estimation of gas-to-wall heat fluxes in CFD in-cylinder simulations of high performance spark-ignition engines. Appl Therm Eng2017; 115: 1045–1062.
33.
BerniFFontanesiS. A 3D-CFD methodology to investigate boundary layers and assess the applicability of wall functions in actual industrial problems: a focus on in-cylinder simulations. Appl Therm Eng2020; 174: 115320.
34.
BerniFCicaleseGSparacinoS, et al. On the existence of universal wall functions in in-cylinder simulations using a low-Reynolds RANS turbulence model. AIP Conf Proc2019; 2191: 020019.
35.
QinZLissianskiVVYangH, et al. Combustion chemistry of propane: a case study of detailed reaction mechanism optimization. Proc Combust Inst2000; 28: 1663–1669.
36.
BlintRJ. The relationship of the laminar flame width to flame speed. Combust Sci Technol1986; 49(1–2): 79–92.
37.
VancoillieJDemuynckJGalleJ, et al. A laminar burning velocity and flame thickness correlation for ethanol-air mixtures valid at spark-ignition engine conditions. Fuel2012; 102: 460–469.
38.
D’AdamoADel PecchiaMBredaS, et al. Chemistry-based laminar flame speed correlations for a wide range of engine conditions for iso-octane, n-heptane, toluene and gasoline surrogate fuels. SAE paper 2017-01-2190, 2017.
39.
Del PecchiaMBredaSD’AdamoA, et al. Development of chemistry-based laminar flame speed correlation for part-load SI conditions and validation in a GDI research engine. SAE Int J Engines2018; 11(6): 715–741.
40.
Del PecchiaMPessinaVBerniF, et al. Gasoline-ethanol blend formulation to mimic laminar flame speed and auto-ignition quality in automotive engines. Fuel2020; 264: 116741.
41.
D’AdamoAIacovanoCFontanesiS. Large-Eddy simulation of lean and ultra-lean combustion using advanced ignition modelling in a transparent combustion chamber engine. Appl Energy2020; 280: 115949.
42.
PetersN. Turbulent combustion. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
43.
PetersN. Laminar Flamelet Concepts in Turbulent Combustion. In: Twenty first international symposium on combustion, Technical University of Munich, Germany, 3–8 August 1986, pp.1231–1250. Pittsburgh: The Combustion Institute.
44.
Abdel-GayedRGBradleyDLungFKK. Combustion regimes and the straining of turbulent premixed flames. Combust Flame1989; 76(2): 213–218.
45.
PoinsotTVeynanteDCandelS. Diagrams of premixed turbulent combustion based on direct simulation. In: Twenty-third international symposium on combustion, University of Orléans, France, 22–27 July 1990, pp.613–619. Pittsburgh: The Combustion Institute.
46.
IacovanoCD’AdamoACantoreG. Analysis and simulation of non-flamelet turbulent combustion in a research optical engine. Energy Proc2018; 148: 463–470.
