This paper deals with the possibility of improving the urea dosage control for the Selective Catalytic Reduction Systems (SCR) of an Euro VI d diesel light commercial vehicle in order to increase after-treatment reduction performance. To this aim, first, we assess the effective emissions abatement performance for the appraised diesel vehicle via real-world experimental campaign, carried out according to the Real Driving Emissions (RDE) tests on urban, extra-urban and motorway road sections in Naples, Italy. Based on these real-world data, we derive a parameterized control-oriented model for the SCR system which is, then, exploited for the designing of an alternative urea injection logic which could be able to maximize the reduction efficiency while minimizing tailpipe ammonia slip. Specifically, the optimal AdBlue injection rate is designed according to a Nonlinear Model Predictive Control Approach which allows obtaining a proper trade-off between the abatement and the urea overdosing problem. The effectiveness of the proposed controller is evaluated by comparing the performance assessed for the appraised SCR system during the experimental tests with the ones achievable if the Euro VI diesel would be equipped with the proposed control strategy. Numerical simulation discloses the effectiveness of the NMPC controller in ensuring improved reduction with performance complying with the emissions norms, main in avoiding excessive ammonia slip and in guaranteeing a reduced feed ratio w.r.t. to the standard industrial SCR controller mounted on the vehicle.
HaasTSanderH.Decarbonizing transport in the European union: emission performance standards and the perspectives for a European green deal. Sustainability2020; 12(20): 8381.
2.
MondalPKMandalBK.A comprehensive review on the feasibility of using water emulsified diesel as a ci engine fuel. Fuel2019; 237: 937–960.
3.
GotaSHuizengaCPeetKMedimorecNBakkerS.Decarbonising transport to achieve paris agreement targets. Energy Efficiency2019; 12(2): 363–386.
4.
BozzaFGimelliATuccilloR.The control of a vva-eq35 SI engine operation by means of 1d simulation and mathematical optimization. SAE Trans2002; 111: 1790–1801.
5.
GimelliAMuccilloMPennacchiaO.Study of a new mechanical variable valve actuation system: part II—estimation of the actual fuel consumption improvement through one-dimensional fluid dynamic analysis and valve train friction estimation. Int J Engine Res2015; 16(6): 762–772.
6.
GimelliAMuccilloMPennacchiaO.Study of a new mechanical variable valve actuation system: part I—valve train design and friction modeling. Int J Engine Res2015; 16(6): 750–761.
KorakianitisTNamasivayamAMCrookesRJ.Natural-gas fueled spark-ignition (si) and compression-ignition (ci) engine performance and emissions. Prog Energy Combust Sci2011; 37(1): 89–112.
10.
ÇelebiYAydınH.An overview on the light alcohol fuels in diesel engines. Fuel2019; 236: 890–911.
11.
YuanXLiuHGaoY.Diesel engine SCR control: current development and future challenges. Emission Control Sci Technol2015; 1(2): 121–133.
12.
BozzaFGimelliAAndreassiLRoccoVScarcelliR. 1d-3d analysis of the scavenging and combustion process in a gasoline and natural-gas fuelled two-stroke engine. SAE technical paper 2008-01-108, 2008.
13.
GimelliAMuccilloM.Performance assessment of a 15kW micro-CHCP plant through the 0d/1d thermo-fluid dynamic characterization of a double water circuit waste heat recovery system. Energy2019; 181: 803–814.
14.
BelgiornoGDimitrakopoulosNDi BlasioGBeatriceCTunestålPTunérM.Effect of the engine calibration parameters on gasoline partially premixed combustion performance and emissions compared to conventional diesel combustion in a light-duty euro 6 engine. Appl Energy2018; 228: 2221–2234.
15.
YuanXGaoYWangX.A novel nh3 slip control for diesel engine selective catalytic reduction aftertreatment system. Int J Engine Res2016; 17(2): 169–178.
16.
PraveenaVMartinMLJ. A review on various after treatment techniques to reduce nox emissions in a ci engine. J Energ Inst2018; 91(5): 704–720.
17.
LapuertaMRamosÁFernández-RodríguezDGonzález-GarcíaI.High-pressure versus low-pressure exhaust gas recirculation in a euro 6 diesel engine with lean-nox trap: effectiveness to reduce NOX emissions. Int J Engine Res2019; 20(1): 155–163.
18.
TwiggMV.Progress and future challenges in controlling automotive exhaust gas emissions. Appl Catal B Environ2007; 70(1–4): 2–15.
19.
WangYYZhangHWangJ.NOx sensor reading correction in diesel engine selective catalytic reduction system applications. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron2015; 21(1): 1–471.
20.
LiuGBaoWZhangW, et al. An intelligent control of nh3 injection for optimizing the nox/nh3 ratio in scr system. J Energ Inst2019; 92(5): 1262–1269.
21.
GuzzellaLOnderC.Introduction to modeling and control of internal combustion engine systems. Zurich: Springer Science & Business Media, 2009.
22.
ÅbergAWiddAAbildskovJHuusomJK.Methodology for analysing the NOx-NH 3 trade-off for the heavy-duty automotive SCR catalyst. IFAC-PapersOnLine2017; 50(1): 5998–6003.
23.
MaYWangJ. Sliding-mode control of ammonia coverage ratio for automotive selective catalytic reduction systems. In: 2018 Annual American control conference (ACC), Milwaukee, WI, 27–29 June 2018, pp. 25–30. New York: IEEE.
24.
MaYWangJ.Sliding-mode control of automotive selective catalytic reduction systems with state estimation. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering2020; 234(2–3): 630–644.
25.
YouKWeiLJiangK.A fuzzy logic urea dosage controller design for two-cell selective catalytic reduction systems. ISA Trans2018; 78: 21–30.
26.
MaYWangJ. A predictive control method for automotive selective catalytic reduction systems. In: 2019 American control conference (ACC), Philadelphia, PA, 10–12 July 2019, 1593–1598. New York: IEEE.
27.
NegnevitskyM.Artificial intelligence: a guide to intelligent systems. London, UK: Pearson education, 2005.
28.
GanneRJainKKMecklPHAngreHHiremathJR. Computationally efficient urea-dosing controllers for urea-SCR. In: ASME 2020 dynamic systems and control conference, Virtual, online, 5–7 October 2020. American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection.
29.
HuJZengJWeiL.Failure diagnosis and tolerant control method for hydrothermally aged SCR system by utilizing EKF observer and MRAC controller. Energy2018; 156: 103–121.
30.
HuJZhengSLiuXWangMDengJYanF.Optimizing the fault diagnosis and fault-tolerant control of selective catalytic reduction hydrothermal aging using the unscented kalman filter observer. Fuel2021; 288: 119827.
31.
GurusamyPGandhiUMangalanathanUJayabalanA.Higher order sliding mode controller for urea-SCR system. Turk J Electr Eng Comput Sci2018; 26(3): 1505–1514.
32.
LimJKirchenPNagamuneR. LPV controller design for diesel engine scr aftertreatment systems based on quasi-LPV models. In: IEEE control systems letters, Volume 5, Issue: 5, 2021, pp. 1807–1812. New York: IEEE.
33.
LiuGZhangYShenDYuanBLiRSunY.Anticipatory nh3 injection control for scr system based on the prediction of the inlet nox concentration. J Energ Inst2021; 94: 167–175.
34.
SkafZAliyevTSheadLSteffenT. The state of the art in selective catalytic reduction control. SAE technical paper 2014-01-1533, 2014.
35.
ChenPWangJ.Estimation and adaptive nonlinear model predictive control of selective catalytic reduction systems in automotive applications. J Process Control2016; 40: 78–92.
36.
ZhaoYHuJHuaLShuaiSWangJ.Ammonia storage and slip in a urea selective catalytic reduction catalyst under steady and transient conditions. Ind Eng Chem Res2011; 50(21): 11863–11871.
37.
LuiDGPetrilloASantiniS.An optimal distributed PID-like control for the output containment and leader-following of heterogeneous high-order multi-agent systems. Inf Sci2020; 541: 166–184.
38.
LuiDGPetrilloASantiniS.Distributed model reference adaptive containment control of heterogeneous multi-agent systems with unknown uncertainties and directed topologies. J Franklin Inst2021; 358(1): 737–756.
39.
PakraveshHAksikasIVotsmeierMDubljevicSHayesREForbesF.Characteristics-based model predictive control of selective catalytic reduction in diesel-powered vehicles. J Process Control2016; 47: 98–110.
40.
LiaoWWeiXLaiJSunH.Recursive state-value function: a method to reduce the complexity of online computation of dynamic programming. IEEE Access2020; 8: 61124–61130.
41.
WeiLYanFHuJXiGLiuBZengJ.Nox conversion efficiency optimization based on nsga-ii and state-feedback nonlinear model predictive control of selective catalytic reduction system in diesel engine. Appl Energy2017; 206: 959–971.
42.
YanFWeiLHuJZengJZhengSWangJ.Simultaneous optimization of urea dosing and ammonia coverage ratio of selective catalytic reduction system in diesel engine by using physico-chemical model based NSGA-II algorithm. Appl Therm Eng2019; 154: 46–62.
43.
MeraZMatzerCHausbergerSFonsecaN.Performance of selective catalytic reduction (SCR) system in a diesel passenger car under real-world conditions. Appl Therm Eng2020; 181: 115983.
44.
LakshminarayananPAgarwalAK. Design and development of heavy duty diesel engines: a handbook. Basingstoke, Regno Unito: Springer Nature, 2019.
45.
PiazzesiGDevadasMKröcherOElsenerMWokaunA.Isocyanic acid hydrolysis over fe-ZSM5 in urea-SCR. Catal Commun2006; 7(8): 600–603.
46.
HsiehMFWangJ.Design and experimental validation of an extended Kalman Filter-based NOx concentration estimator in selective catalytic reduction system applications. Control Eng Pract2011; 19(4): 346–353.
47.
HsiehMF.Control of diesel engine urea selective catalytic reduction systems. PhD Thesis, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 2010.
48.
GrossaleANovaITronconiEChatterjeeDWeibelM.The chemistry of the NO/NO2–NH3 fast SCR reaction over fe-ZSM5 investigated by transient reaction analysis. J Catal2008; 256(2): 312–322.
49.
KoebelMElsenerMKleemannM.Urea-SCR: a promising technique to reduce NOx emissions from automotive diesel engines. Catal Today2000; 59(3-4): 335–345.
50.
GrossaleANovaITronconiE.Study of a fe–zeolite-based system as nh3-scr catalyst for diesel exhaust aftertreatment. Catal Today2008; 136(1-2): 18–27.
51.
GiechaskielBClairotteMValverde-MoralesV, et al. Framework for the assessment of pems (portable emissions measurement systems) uncertainty. Environ Res2018; 166: 251–260.
52.
BaiSHanJLiuMQinSWangGLiGX.Experimental investigation of exhaust thermal management on nox emissions of heavy-duty diesel engine under the world harmonized transient cycle (WHTC). Appl Therm Eng2018; 142: 421–432.
53.
GuardiolaCMartínJPlaBBaresP.Cycle by cycle nox model for diesel engine control. Appl Therm Eng2017; 110: 1011–1020.
54.
PratiMVCostagliolaMAZuccherosoANapolitanoP.Assessment of euro 5 diesel vehicle NOX emissions by laboratory and track testing. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int2019; 26(11): 10576–10586.
55.
LiuFYuYHeH.Environmentally-benign catalysts for the selective catalytic reduction of NO(x) from diesel engines: structure-activity relationship and reaction mechanism aspects.. Chem Commun2014; 50(62): 8445–8463.
56.
ShiXLiuFXieLShanWHeH.NH3-SCR performance of fresh and hydrothermally aged fe-ZSM-5 in standard and fast selective catalytic reduction reactions. Environ Sci Technol2013; 47(7): 3293–3298.
57.
XuMWangJYuTWangJShenM.New insight into cu/sapo-34 preparation procedure: impact of NH4-SAPO-34 on the structure and cu distribution in cu-sapo-34 nh3-scr catalysts. Appl Catal B Environ2018; 220: 161–170.
58.
WilkenNWijayantiKKamasamudramK, et al. Mechanistic investigation of hydrothermal aging of cu-beta for ammonia scr. Appl Catal B Environ2012; 111: 58–66.
59.
ZhangTLiJLiuJ, et al. High activity and wide temperature window of fe-cu-ssz-13 in the selective catalytic reduction of no with ammonia. AIChE J2015; 61(11): 3825–3837.
60.
KwakJHSzanyiJPedenCHF. Nonthermal plasma-assisted catalytic nox reduction over Ba-Y,FAU: the effect of catalyst preparation. J Catal2003; 220(2): 291–298.
61.
ZhangXShenQHeC, et al. Investigation of selective catalytic reduction of n2o by nh3 over an fe–mordenite catalyst: reaction mechanism and o2 effect. ACS Catal2012; 2(4): 512–520.
62.
Al-SabawiMde LasaH.Kinetic modeling of catalytic conversion of methylcyclohexane over usy zeolites: adsorption and reaction phenomena. AIChE J2009; 55(6): 1538–1558.
63.
SchärCM. Control of a selective catalytic reduction process. Zurich, CHF: ETH Zurich, 2003.
64.
ScharCMOnderCHGeeringHP.Control of an SCR catalytic converter system for a mobile heavy-duty application. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol2006; 14(4): 641–653.
65.
WurzenbergerJCWankerR.Multi-scale SCR modeling, 1d kinetic analysis and 3d system simulation. SAE Trans2005; 114: 344–362.
66.
ChatterjeeDBurkhardtTWeibelMNovaIGrossaleATronconiE. Numerical simulation of zeolite-and v-based SCR catalytic converters. Technical report. SAE technical paper 2007-01-1136, 2007.
67.
ÅbergAWiddAAbildskovJHuusomJK.Parameter estimation and analysis of an automotive heavy-duty SCR catalyst model. Chem Eng Sci2017; 161: 167–177.
68.
WilliR.Low-temperature selective catalytic reduction of NOX: catalytic behavior and kinetic modeling. PhD Thesis, ETH Zurich, 1996
69.
WangTJBaekSWKwonHJ, et al. Kinetic parameter estimation of a commercial fe-zeolite scr. Ind Eng Chem Res2011; 50(5): 2850–2864.
70.
KamasamudramKCurrierNSzailerTYezeretsA.Why Cu- and Fe-zeolite SCR catalysts behave differently at low temperatures. SAE Int J Fuel Lubricants2010; 3(1): 664–672.
71.
LiuCMaltaGKubotaHToyaoTMaenoZShimizuKI.Mechanism of NH3–selective catalytic reduction (SCR) of NO/NO2 (fast SCR) over cu-cha zeolites studied by in situ/operando infrared spectroscopy and density functional theory. J Phys Chem B2021; 125(40): 21975–21987.
72.
StadlbauerSWaschlHdel ReL. Adaptive SCR model for MPC control including aging effects. SAE technical paper 2015-01-1045, 2015.
73.
GundlapallySRPapadimitriouIWahiduzzamanSGuT.Development of ECU capable grey-box models from detailed models—application to a SCR reactor. Emission Control Sci Technol2016; 2(3): 124–136.
74.
GimelliAMottolaFMuccilloM, et al. Optimal configuration of modular cogeneration plants integrated by a battery energy storage system providing peak shaving service. Appl Energy2019; 242: 974–993.
75.
GimelliALuongoAMuccilloM.Efficiency and cost optimization of a regenerative organic rankine cycle power plant through the multi-objective approach. Appl Therm Eng2017; 114: 601–610.
76.
GimelliAMuccilloMSanninoR.Effects of uncertainties on the stability of the results of an optimal sized modular cogeneration plant. Energy Proc2017; 126: 369–376.
77.
BrancatiRDi MassaGPaganoSPetrilloASantiniS.A combined neural network and model predictive control approach for ball transfer unit–magnetorheological elastomer–based vibration isolation of lightweight structures. J Vib Control2020; 26(19–20): 1668–1682.
78.
OlssonLSjövallHBlintRJ.A kinetic model for ammonia selective catalytic reduction over cu-zsm-5. Appl Catal B Environ2008; 81(3–4): 203–217.
79.
PantASchmiegSJ.Kinetic model of nox scr using urea on commercial Cu−Zeolite catalyst. Ind Eng Chem Res2011; 50(9): 5490–5498.
80.
ShibataGEijimaWKoiwaiR, et al. NH3-scr by monolithic cu-zsm-5 and cu-afx catalysts: kinetic modeling and engine bench tests. Catal Today2019; 332: 59–63.
81.
EijimaWShibataGShibayamaNKobashiYOgawaHShimizuKI.Kinetic modeling of steady-state NH3-SCR over a monolithic cu-cha catalyst. Catal Today2020; 352: 237–242.
82.
MetkarPSHaroldMPBalakotaiahV.Experimental and kinetic modeling study of nh3-scr of nox on fe-zsm-5, cu-chabazite and combined Fe- and Cu-zeolite monolithic catalysts. Chem Eng Sci2013; 87: 51–66.
83.
OlssonLWijayantiKLeistnerK, et al. A multi-site kinetic model for nh3-scr over cu/ssz-13. Appl Catal B Environ2015; 174-175: 212–224.
84.
GaoFWalterEDKollarMWangYSzanyiJPedenCHF. Understanding ammonia selective catalytic reduction kinetics over cu/ssz-13 from motion of the cu ions. J Catal2014; 319: 1–14.
85.
De-La-TorreUPereda-AyoBGutiérrez-OrtizMAGonzález-MarcosJAGonzález-VelascoJR.Steady-state NH 3 -SCR global model and kinetic parameter estimation for NO x removal in diesel engine exhaust aftertreatment with cu/chabazite. Catal Today2017; 296: 95–104.
86.
HassanatAAlmohammadiKAlkafaweenEAbunawasEHammouriAPrasathVBS. Choosing mutation and crossover ratios for genetic algorithms—A review with a new dynamic approach. Information2019; 10(12): 390.
87.
ColomboMNovaITronconiE.Detailed kinetic modeling of the NH3–NO/NO2 scr reactions over a commercial cu-zeolite catalyst for diesel exhausts after treatment. Catal Today2012; 197(1): 243–255.
88.
UpadhyayDVan NieuwstadtM. Modeling of a urea SCR catalyst with automotive applications. In: ASME international mechanical engineering congress and exposition (Vol. 36290, pp. 707–713), November 17–22, 2002, New Orleans, LA. ASME.
89.
CaiazzoBCoppolaAPetrilloASantiniS.Distributed nonlinear model predictive control for connected autonomous electric vehicles platoon with distance-dependent air drag formulation. Energies2021; 14(16): 5122.
90.
BifulcoGNCoppolaALoizouSGPetrilloASantiniS. Combined energy-oriented path following and collision avoidance approach for autonomous electric vehicles via nonlinear model predictive control. In: 2021 IEEE international conference on environment and electrical engineering and 2021 IEEE industrial and commercial power systems Europe (EEEIC/I&CPS Europe), 2021, pp. 1–6. New York: IEEE.
91.
HeckRMFarrautoRJGulatiST.Catalytic air pollution control: commercial technology. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2016.
