Ethanol, n-propanol, isopropanol, n-butanol, isobutanol, and sec-butanol are six potential carbon-neutral fuels of the future. One application of these carbon-neutral fuels is in high-dilution spark ignition. To understand the potential of these fuels in high-dilution spark ignition, this work experimentally determines the spark ignition lean flammability limit of each fuel with no external, cooled exhaust gas recirculation (EGR), and with 20% external, EGR. The spark ignition lean flammability limit in this work is defined as the excess-air ratio that results in a coefficient of variance of gross indicated mean effective pressure greater than 5%. This is done on an engine with a compression ratio of 12.5, using an intake pressure of 1 bar and an intake temperature of 320 K. It was found that ethanol had the leanest lean limit, due to its high flame speed, followed by n-propanol, isopropanol, and sec-butanol, which all had similar lean limits. n-Butanol and isobutanol had the richest lean limits due their high knock propensity and low flame speed, respectively. The lean limit of each fuel decreased with external, cooled EGR addition, with ethanol as the least sensitive and isopropanol as the most sensitive to EGR addition. Overall, using a high dilution strategy increased the cycle efficiency for each fuel. Ethanol, n-propanol, isopropanol, and sec-butanol all showed promising performance and are great candidates to be combined with an advanced high-dilution SI strategy to enable high-dilution SI with a carbon-neutral fuel.
KalghatgiG. Is it really the end of internal combustion engines and petroleum in transport?Appl Energy2018; 225: 965–974.
2.
LarsonE. A review of life-cycle analysis studies on liquid biofuel systems for the transport sector. Energy Sustain Dev2006; 10(2): 109–126.
3.
BrynolfSTaljegardMGrahnMHanssonJ. Electrofuels for the transport sector: a review of production costs. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2018; 81(Pt 2): 1887–1905.
4.
ZabedHSahuJSuelyABoyceAFaruqG. Fuel ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass: an overview on feedstocks and technological approaches. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2016; 66: 751–774.
5.
ZabedHSahuJSuelyABoyceAFaruqG. Bioethanol production from renewable sources: current perspectives and technological progress. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2017; 71: 475–501.
6.
HazelwoodLADaranJ-Mvan MarisAJAPronkJTDickinsonJR. The Ehrlich pathway for fusel alcohol production: a century of research on Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolism. Appl Environ Microbiol2008; 74: 2259–2266.
7.
ZhangKSawayaMREisenbergDSLiaoJC. Expanding metabolism for biosynthesis of nonnatural alcohols. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA2008; 105(52): 20653–20658.
8.
HamelinckCFaajiA. Future prospects for production of methanol and hydrogen from biomass. J Power Sources2002; 111: 1–22.
9.
KiefferRFujiwaraMUdronLSoumaY. Hydrogenation of CO and CO2 toward methanol, alcohols and hydrocarbons on promoted copper-rare earth oxides catalysts. Catal Today1997; 36: 15–24.
10.
LipsDSchuurmansJBranco dos SantosFHellingwerfK. Many ways towards “solar fuel”: quantitative analysis of the most promising strategies and the main challenges during scale-ip. Energy Environ Sci2018; 11: 10–22.
11.
LiuCColonBZiesackMSilverPNoceraD. Water splitting-biosynthetic system with CO2 reduction efficiencies exceeding photosynthesis. Science2016; 352: 1210–1213.
12.
GaineyBLawlerB. The role of alcohol biofuels in advanced combustion: an analysis. Fuel2021; 283: 118915.
13.
YusriIMamaRNajafiG, et al. Alcohol based automotive fuels from first four alcohol family in compression and spark ignition engine: a review on engine performance and exhaust emissions. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2017; 77: 169–181.
14.
AwadOMamatRAliO, et al. Alcohol and ether as alternative fuels in spark ignition engine: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev2018; 82(Pt 3): 2586–2605.
15.
WestbrookCCurranH. Detailed kinetics of fossil and renewable fuel combustion. In: FaravelliTManentiFRanziE. (eds) Mathematical modelling of gas-phase complex reaction systems: Pyrolysis and combustion. Cambridge, MA: Elsevier, 2019, pp.363–444.
16.
AgarwalAK. Biofuels (alcohols and biodiesel) applications as fuels for internal combustion engines. Prog Energy Combust Sci2007; 33: 233e71.
17.
BontorinAde Oliveira CarvalhoL. Investigation of the impact of lean mixtures on the performance of GDI engines. SAE technical paper 2016-36-0326, 2016.
18.
MaFWangY. Study on the extension of lean operation limit through hydrogen enrichment in a natural gas spark-ignition engine. Int J Hydrogen Energy2008; 33(4): 1416–1424.
19.
AlgerTGingrichJMangoldBRobertsC. A continuous discharge ignition system for EGR limit extension in SI engines. SAE Int J Engines2011; 4(1): 677–692.
20.
JungDIidaN. An investigation of multiple spark discharge using multi-coil ignition system for improving thermal efficiency of lean SI engine operation. Appl Energy2019; 212: 322–332.
21.
SrivastavaDAgarwalA. Comparative experimental evaluation of performance, combustion and emissions of laser ignition with conventional spark plug in a compressed natural gas fuelled single cylinder engine. Fuel2014; 123: 113–122.
22.
ManofskyLVavraJAssanisDBabajimopoulosA. Bridging the gap between HCCI and SI: spark-assisted compression ignition. SAE technical paper 2011-01-1179, 2011.
23.
AyalaFHeywoodJ. Lean SI engines: the role of combustion variability in defining lean limits. SAE 2007-24-0030, 2007.
24.
WangDMaoXWangJZhuoB. Experimental study on the operating range restrictions of a lean-burn turbocharged SI natural gas engine. Energy Fuels2009; 23: 3054–3062.
25.
WuBWangeLShenXYanRDongP. Comparison of lean burn characteristics of an SI engine fueled with methanol and gasoline under idle condition. Appl Therm Eng2016; 95: 264–270.
26.
YuXGuoZSunP, et al. Investigation of combustion and emissions of an SI engine with ethanol port injection and gasoline direct injection under lean burn conditions. Energy2019; 189: 116231.
27.
ZhangBJiCWangS. Investigation on the lean combustion performance of a hydrogen-enriched n-butanol engine. Energy Convers Manag2017; 136: 36–43.
28.
WallnerT. Correlation between speciated hydrocarbon emissions and flame ionization detector response for gasoline/alcohol blends. J Eng Gas Turbine Power2011; 133(8): 082801.
29.
GaineyBLongtinJPLawlerB. A guide to uncertainty quantification for experimental engine research and heat release analysis. SAE Int J Engines2019; 12(5): 509–523.
30.
SarathySOwaldPHansenNKohse-HoinghausK. Alcohol combustion chemistry. Prog Energy Combust Sci2014; 44: 40–102.
31.
WangXZhangHYaoB, et al. Experimental study on factors affecting lean combustion limit of S.I. Engine fueled with compressed natural gas and hydrogen blends. Energy2012; 38: 58–65.
32.
VelooPWangYEgolfopoulosFWestbrookC. A comparative experimental and computational study of methanol, ethanol, and n-butanol flames. Combust Flame2010; 157: 1989–2004.
33.
VelooPEgolfopoulosF. Studies of n-propanol, iso-propanol, and propane flames. Combust Flame2011; 158: 501–510.
JiCSarathySMVelooPSWestbrookCKEgolfopoulosFN. Effects of fuel branching on the propagation of octane isomers flames. Combust Flame2012; 159: 1426e36.
36.
GaineyBYanZMoserSVorwerkELawlerB. Tailoring thermal stratification to enable high load low temperature combustion with wet ethanol on a gasoline engine architecture. Int J Eng Res. Epub ahead of print August 10, 2020. DOI: 10.1177/1468087420945960.
37.
MiddletonRMartzJLavoieGBabajimopoulosAAssanisD. A computational study and correlation of premixed isooctane air laminar reaction fronts diluted with EGR. Combust Flame2012; 159(10): 3146–3157.
38.
KolodziejCPammingerMSevikJ, et al. Effects of fuel laminar flame speed compared to engine tumble ratio, ignition energy, and injection strategy on lean and EGR dilute spark ignition combustion. SAE Int J Fuels Lubr2017; 10(1): 82–94.
39.
SzybistJSplitterD. Effects of fuel composition on EGR dilution tolerance in spark ignited engines. SAE Int J Engines2016; 9(2): 819–831.
40.
PanMShuGWeiHZhuTLiangYLiC. Effects of EGR, compression ratio and boost pressure on cyclic variation of PFI gasoline engine at WOT operation. Appl Therm Eng2014; 64(1–2): 491–498.
