In conventional diesel combustion (CDC), a centrally located multi-hole injector supplies fuel radially outwards. This study introduces and explores the concept of peripheral fuel injection (PeFI) to supply fuel from multiple locations on top of the combustion chamber using several single-hole injectors. The PeFI concept is designed to eliminate flame-wall and jet-wall interactions, and, ideally, to produce independent flames without any interference. PeFI is also intended to increase air entrainment in the near field and thus, reduce equivalence ratio at the lift-off length and subsequent soot formation. PeFI reduces wall heat transfer compared to CDC although this feature is not considered in the present study. The two methods of fuel injection are compared in a non-reacting optical chamber via high-speed imaging of the jets. N-heptane fuel at 1500 bar supply pressures is injected into a test chamber filled with nitrogen at engine relevant ambient densities of 23.0 and 18.5 kg/m3. Four configurations are trialed including a six-hole central injector and six, single-hole PeFI injectors with holes oriented at a layout angle, defined as the angle between the center of the fuel jet and chamber radius, of 0°, 15°, and 30°. Flow visualizations show jet-to-jet interactions at small layout angles for PeFI, but little to no jet-to-jet (or jet-wall) interference as the layout angle increases to 30°. Image analysis reveals that PeFI provides faster rate of injection, longer jet penetration length, greater width near the jet tip, and larger jet volume compared to those for the central injector. Overall, results demonstrate the potential of PeFI to simultaneously improve fuel efficiency and reduce emissions in diesel engines.
DecJ. A conceptual model of DI diesel combustion based on laser-sheet imaging. SAE Paper 970873, 1997.
2.
RamsayCJDineshKKJRFairneyWVaughanN. A numerical study on the effects of constant volume combustion phase on performance and emissions characteristics of a diesel-hydrogen dual-fuel engine. Int J Hydrogen Energy2020; 45: 32598–32618.
3.
ShimEParkHBaeC. Comparisons of advanced combustion technologies (HCCI, PCCI, and dual-fuel PCCI) on engine performance and emission characteristics in a heavy-duty diesel engine. Fuel2020; 262: 116436. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116436
4.
OppenheimATeichmanKHomK, et al. Jet ignition of an ultra-lean mixture. SAE Paper 780637, 1978.
5.
HuaJZhouLGaoQFengZWeiH. Influence of pre-chamber structure and injection parameters on engine performance and combustion characteristics in a turbulent jet ignition (TJI) engine. Fuel2021; 283: 119236. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119236
6.
TianJCuiZRenZTianHLongW. Experimental study on jet ignition and combustion processes of natural gas. Fuel2020; 262: 116467. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116467
7.
FengHGuoCYuanC, et al. Research on combustion process of a free piston diesel linear generator. Appl Energy2016; 161: 395–403.
8.
BabayevR. Isobaric combustion: a potential path to high efficiency, in combination with the double compression expansion engine (DCEE) concept. PhD Dissertation, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Saudi Arabia, 2018.
9.
PickettLMSiebersDL. Soot Formation in diesel fuel jets near the Lift-Off length. Int J Engine Res2006; 7: 103–130.
10.
PickettLMSiebersDL. Soot in diesel fuel jets: effects of ambient temperature, ambient density, and injection pressure. Combust Flame2004; 138: 114–135.
11.
AljabriHLiuXAl-lehaibiM, et al. Fuel flexibility potential for isobaric combustion in a compression ignition engine: a computational study. Fuel2022; 316: 123281. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.123281
12.
BabayevRHouidiMShankarV, et al. Injection strategies for isobaric combustion. SAE Paper 2019-01-2267, 2019.
13.
AljabriHBabayevRLiuX, et al. Validation of computational models for isobaric combustion engines. SAE Paper 2020-01-0806, 2020.
14.
SomSRamirezAILongmanDEAggarwalSK. Effect of nozzle orifice geometry on spray, combustion, and emission characteristics under diesel engine conditions. Fuel2011; 90: 1267–1276.
15.
YuSYinBDengW, et al. Experimental study on the spray characteristics discharging from elliptical diesel nozzle at typical diesel engine conditions. Fuel2018; 221: 28–34.
16.
KatoAMatsuuraKHakozakiT, et al. Influence of a fast injection rate common rail injector for the spray and combustion characteristics of diesel engine. SAE Paper 2011-01-0687, 2011.
17.
NilsenCWBilesDEMuellerCJ. Using ducted fuel injection to attenuate soot formation in a mixing-controlled compression ignition engine. SAE Int J Engines2019; 12: 309–322.
18.
NilsenCWYraguenBFMuellerCJGenzaleCDelplanqueJP. Ducted fuel injection vs. Free-spray injection: a study of mixing and entrainment effects using numerical modeling. SAE Int J Engines2020; 13: 705–715.
19.
ZhengMReaderGTHawleyJG. Diesel engine exhaust gas recirculation—a review on advanced and novel concepts. Energy Convers Manag2004; 45: 883–900.
20.
LiJYangWMAnHMaghbouliAChouSK. Effects of piston bowl geometry on combustion and emission characteristics of biodiesel fueled diesel engines. Fuel2014; 120: 66–73.
21.
ShojaeKMahdavianMBaghshaniE. Investigation of piston bowl geometry, injection timing, and EGR mass fraction to improve the performance of ISM 370 diesel engine. Fuel2022; 324: 124422. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.124422
22.
StyronJBaldwinBFultonB, et al. Ford 2011 6.7L Power Stroke® diesel engine combustion system development. SAE Paper 2011-01-0415, 2011.
23.
GuoZHeXPeiY, et al. Optimization of piston bowl geometry for a low emission heavy-duty diesel engine. SAE Paper 2020-01-2056, 2020.
24.
DuvvuriPPShrivastavaRKSreedharaS. Numerical optimization of a diesel combustion system to reduce soot mass and particle number density. Fuel2020; 266: 117015. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117015
25.
LeMKZhangYZhangR, et al. Effect of jet–jet interactions on soot formation in a small-bore diesel engine. Proc Combust Inst2017; 36: 3559–3566.
26.
BabuAStaadenDKokjohnS, et al. Emissions benefits of group hole nozzle injectors under conventional diesel combustion conditions. SAE Paper 2020-01-0302, 2020.
27.
MoonSMatsumotoYNishidaKGaoJ. Gas entrainment characteristics of diesel spray injected by a group-hole nozzle. Fuel2010; 89: 3287–3299.
28.
GaoJParkSWWangY, et al. Simulation and analysis of group-hole nozzle sprays using a gas jet superposition model. Fuel2010; 89: 3758–3772.
29.
AddepalliSScarcelliRWangY, et al. Numerical investigation of the impact of fuel flow rate on combustion in a heavy-duty diesel engine with a multi-row nozzle injector. SAE Paper 2022-01-0395, 2022.
30.
SunYSunKLuZ, et al. Selection of swirl ratio in diesel engines based on droplet trajectory analysis. SAE Paper 2017-01-0813, 2017.
31.
GenzaleCReitzRWickmanD. A computational investigation into the effects of spray targeting, bowl geometry and swirl ratio for low-temperature combustion in a heavy-duty diesel engine. SAE Paper 2007-01-0119, 2007.
32.
WangGYuWLiX, et al. Experimental and numerical study on the influence of intake swirl on fuel spray and in-cylinder combustion characteristics on large bore diesel engine. Fuel2019; 237: 209–221.
33.
ChenYLiXShiS, et al. Effects of intake swirl on the fuel/air mixing and combustion performance in a lateral swirl combustion system for direct injection diesel engines. Fuel2021; 286: 119376. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119376
34.
BenajesJOlmedaPMartínJBlanco-CaveroDWareyA. Evaluation of swirl effect on the global energy balance of a HSDI diesel engine. Energy2017; 122: 168–181.
35.
TacinaKLeePMongiaH, et al. A comparison of three second-generation swirl-venturi lean direct injection combustor concepts. In: 52nd AIAA/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference, Salt Lake City, UT, 25–27 July 2016, paper no. AIAA 2016-4891, pp.1–14. Reston, VA: AIAA.
36.
YorkWSimonsDFuY. Operational flexibility of GE’s F-class gas turbines with the DLN2.6+ combustion system. In: ASME turbo expo 2018: turbomachinery technical conference and exposition, Oslo, 11–15 June 2018, paper no. GT2018:77248, pp.1–10. New York: ASME.
37.
LiJBhayarajuUJengSM. Characterization of a novel porous injector for multi-lean direct injection (M-LDI) combustor. In: ASME turbo expo 2017: turbomachinery technical conference and exposition, Charlotte, NC, 26–30 June 2017, paper no. GT2017-63981, pp.1–11. New York: ASME.
38.
UludoganAXinJReitzR. Exploring the use of multiple injectors and split injection to reduce DI diesel engine emissions. SAE Paper 962058, 1996.
39.
UchidaNOkamotoTWatanabeH. A new concept of actively controlled rate of diesel combustion for improving brake thermal efficiency of diesel engines: part 1—verification of the concept. Int J Engine Res2018; 19: 474–487.
40.
UchidaNWatanabeH. A new concept of actively controlled rate of diesel combustion (ACCORDIC): part II—simultaneous improvements in brake thermal efficiency and heat loss with modified nozzles. Int J Engine Res2019; 20: 34–45.
41.
LiuDGuoYLiuL, et al. Optimization of marine medium speed diesel engine performance based on multi-injector system. In: 3rd international conference on energy resources and sustainable development, Harbin, China, 25–27 December 2020, paper no. 01026, pp.1–8. Les Ulis: EDP Sciences.
42.
BabayevRNyrenstedtGJohanssonB. Computational Study of a multiple fuel injector concept under high-load and High-EGR conditions. SAE Int J Adv Curr Pr Mobil2020; 3: 171–186.
43.
NyrenstedtGImHAnderssonA, et al. Novel geometry reaching high efficiency for multiple injector concepts. SAE Paper 2019-01-0246, 2019.
44.
LiuXAljabriHAlRamadanAS, et al. Computational study of the multi-injector isobaric combustion concept in a heavy-duty compression ignition engine. Fuel2022; 326: 125099. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.125099
45.
AgrawalABittleJ. Fuel injection methodology to reduce emissions and improve operation of diesel engines. Internal Patent Application UAIPD17-0048, USA, 2017.
46.
BogdanowiczEFLoperAHarrisZBittleJAgrawalAK. A numerical investigation of peripheral fuel injection to improve diesel engine combustion performance. In: Paper 180NCT-0350, 13th United States National Combustion Meeting, 19–22 March 2023.
47.
AgrawalABittleJ. Peripheral fuel injection for low emission and high efficiency diesel engines. Patent Application 63/529,925, USA, 2023.
48.
LiXSunZDuWWeiR. Research and development of double swirl combustion system for a DI diesel engine. Combust Sci Technol2010; 182: 1029–1049.
49.
NaberJSiebersD. Effects of gas density and vaporization on penetration and dispersion of diesel sprays. SAE Paper 960034, 1996.
50.
NyrenstedtGTangQSampathR, et al. A comparative study of isobaric combustion and conventional diesel combustion in both metal and optical engines. Fuel2021; 295: 120638. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2021.120638
51.
LoperABogdanowiczEBittleJ, et al. Jet development and penetration of a multi-hole diesel injector in a constant volume, low temperature chamber. In: 11th US national combustion meeting, Pasadena, CA, 2019.
52.
BogdanowiczEF. An Investigation into Multi-Point Peripheral Fuel Injection to Acheive Clean and Efficient Combustion in Diesel Engines. PhD Dissertation. The University of Alabama, 2023.
53.
SivasankaralingamVRamanVMubarakAliM, et al. Experimental and numerical investigation of ethanol/diethyl ether mixtures in a CI engine. SAE Paper 2016-01-2180, 2016.
54.
NyrenstedtGAlturkestaniTImH, et al. CFD study of heat transfer reduction using multiple injectors in a DCEE concept. SAE Paper 2019-01-0070, 2019.
55.
PickettLMManinJGenzaleCL, et al. Relationship between diesel fuel spray vapor penetration/dispersion and local fuel mixture fraction. SAE Int J Engines2011; 4: 764–799.
56.
OtsuN. A threshold selection method from Gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern1979; 9: 62–66.
57.
LazzaroMIannielloR. Image processing of vaporizing GDI sprays: a new curvature-based approach. Meas Sci Technol2018; 29: 015402.
58.
MacianVPayriRGarciaABardiM. Experimental evaluation of the best approach for diesel spray images segmentation. Exp Tech2012; 36: 26–34.
KookSPickettLM. Soot volume fraction and morphology of conventional, Fischer-Tropsch, coal-derived, and surrogate fuel at Diesel conditions. SAE Int J Fuel Lubricants2012; 5: 647–664.
61.
LoperABogdanowiczEFBittleJ, et al. Densities, investigation of shot-to-shot and jet-to-jet variations of a multi-hole diesel injector at different injection pressures and ambient. Int J Engine Res (In Review).
62.
BogdanowiczEFBittleJAgrawalA. Numerical investigation of peripheral injection to raise performance in diesel engine applications. Fuel (In Review).
63.
PickettLManinJPayriR, et al. Transient rate of injection effects on spray development. SAE Paper 2013-24-0001, 2013.
64.
NealNRothamerD. Measurement and characterization of fully transient diesel fuel jet processes in an optical engine with production injectors. Exp Fluids2016; 57: 155.
65.
BoschW. The fuel rate indicator: a new measuring instrument for display of the characteristics of individual injection. SAE Paper 660749, 1966.
66.
BowerGFosterD. A comparison of the Bosch and Zuech rate of injection meters. SAE Paper 910724, 1991.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
