Impact of innovative boot-electronically controlled injector on the performance of marine low-speed engines

Abstract

Injection rate shaping is one of the key measures to achieve energy saving and emission reduction in diesel engines. To apply this technology to marine low-speed engines, an innovative Boot-Electronically Controlled Injector (Boot-ECI) has been proposed. This new type of injector, featuring innovative injection rate shaping technology, effectively compensates for the shortcomings of traditional methods in terms of economic efficiency and operational stability, making it particularly suitable for application in marine low-speed engines. Based on the established models of the injector and a single-cylinder low-speed engine, this study thoroughly investigates the impact of switching delay time (t_sd) and strat of injection (SOI) of the Boot-ECI on the indicated specific fuel consumption (ISFC) and NO_x emissions of the engine. Through comparative analysis, the study reveals the differences in the roles of Boot-ECI and Traditional Electronically Controlled Injector (TECI) during the combustion process in engine and further discusses the specific impact of low lift of the Boot-ECI selection on engine performance. The results indicate that for Boot-ECI, employing a larger t_sd offers a more pronounced advantage in reducing NO_x concentration per unit increase in ISFC under low-load conditions compared to delaying SOI. When Boot-ECI performs a boot-shaped injection, there is an inflection point in the apparent heat release rate (AHRR) during the rise phase, which is associated with the transition from a low injection rate in state I to a high injection rate in state II during the boot-shaped injection. Compared to TECI, Boot-ECI demonstrates superior performance in managing the trade-off between NO_x emissions and ISFC. Furthermore, as the needle low lift of the Boot-ECI increases, the contribution of SOI to NO_x concentration reduction per unit increase in ISFC remains constant, while the contribution of t_sd increases, especially at 25% load.

Keywords

marine low-speed engine boot-electronically controlled injector injection rate shaping indicated specific fuel consumption

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Shi

, et al. An efficient approach to improve thermal efficiency on a low-speed two-stroke marine diesel engine. Fuel 2022; 329: 125386.

Fan

Chen

, et al. Study on fuel injection stability improvement in marine low-speed dual-fuel engines. Appl Therm Eng 2024; 253: 123729.

Lion

Vlaskos

Taccani

. A review of emissions reduction technologies for low and medium speed marine diesel engines and their potential for waste heat recovery. Energy Convers Manag 2020; 207: 112553.

Ampah

Yusuf

Afrane

, et al. Reviewing two decades of cleaner alternative marine fuels: towards imo's decarbonization of the maritime transport sector. J Clean Prod 2021; 320: 128871.

Xing

Stuart

Spence

, et al. Alternative fuel options for low carbon maritime transportation: pathways to 2050. J Clean Prod 2021; 297: 126651.

Lindstad

Polić

Rialland

, et al. Decarbonizing bulk shipping combining ship design and alternative power. Ocean Eng 2022; 266: 112798.

Liang

Liu

Wang

, et al. Impact of pilot injection on combustion and emission characteristics of a low-speed two-stroke marine diesel engine. Energies 2021; 14(2): 417.

Fan

Chen

, et al. Effect of injection strategy optimization on PCCI combustion and emissions under engine speed extension in a heavy-duty diesel engine. Fuel 2023; 332: 126053.

Kanth

Debbarma

Das

. Experimental investigations on the effect of fuel injection parameters on diesel engine fuelled with biodiesel blend in diesel with hydrogen enrichment. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2022; 47(83): 35468–35483.

10.

, et al. Numerical study on NOx and ISFC co-optimization for a low-speed two-stroke engine via Miller cycle, EGR, intake air humidification, and injection strategy implementation. Appl Therm Eng 2019; 153: 398–408.

11.

Zhang

Long

Xiao

, et al. Experimental study of the influences of operating parameters on the performance, energy and exergy characteristics of a turbocharged marine low-speed engine. Processes 2023; 11(10): 2924.

12.

Sener

Yangaz

Gul

. Effects of injection strategy and combustion chamber modification on a single-cylinder diesel engine. Fuel 2020; 266: 117122.

13.

Zhou

Yang

Ping

, et al. Experimental study on the effect of post-injection parameters on performance of extra-high pressure common-rail diesel engine. Energy Rep 2022; 8: 152–160.

14.

Liang

Zheng

Zhang

, et al. A review of early injection strategy in premixed combustion engines. Appl Sci 2019; 9(18): 3737.

15.

Song

Kim

Jang

, et al. Effects of the injection strategy on the mixture formation and combustion characteristics in a DISI (direct injection spark ignition) optical engine. Energy 2015; 93: 1758–1768.

16.

Imtenan

Ashrafur Rahman

Masjuki

, et al. Effect of dynamic injection pressure on performance, emission and combustion characteristics of a compression ignition engine. Renew Sustain Energ Rev 2015; 52: 1205–1211.

17.

Zhang

S-W

Sun

B-G

Luo

Q-H

, et al. Experimental multiple parameters optimization of the injection strategies for a turbocharged direct injection hydrogen engine to achieve highly efficient and clean performance. Energy 2024; 312: 133592.

18.

d’Ambrosio

Ferrari

. Potential of double pilot injection strategies optimized with the design of experiments procedure to improve diesel engine emissions and performance. Appl Energy 2015; 155: 918–932.

19.

Mohan

Yang

Chou

, et al. Fuel injection strategies for performance improvement and emissions reduction in compression ignition engines—a review. Renew Sustain Energ Rev 2013; 28: 664–676.

20.

Han

Yuan

, et al. Effect of fuel injection rate shapes on mixture formation and combustion characteristic in a free-piston diesel engine generator. Adv Mech Eng 2018; 10(5): 1687814018775242.

21.

Motlagh

Azadani

Yazdani

. Multi-objective optimization of diesel injection parameters in a natural gas/diesel reactivity controlled compression ignition engine. Appl Energy 2020; 279: 115746.

22.

Xuan

Xue

, et al. A numerical study of the effects of injection rate shape on combustion and emission of diesel engines. Therm Sci 2014; 18(1): 67–78.

23.

Zhou

Tay

, et al. A numerical investigation on the injection timing of boot injection rate-shapes in a kerosene-diesel engine with a clustered dynamic adaptive chemistry method. Appl Energy 2018; 220: 117–126.

24.

Ghaffarpour

Baranescu

. NOx reduction using injection rate shaping and intercooling in diesel engines. SAE technical paper, 1996.

25.

Ghaffarpour

Azarfam

Noorpoor

. Emission reduction in diesel engines using new fuel injection system. JSME International Journal Series B Fluids and Thermal Engineering 2006; 49(4): 1298–1306.

26.

Williams

Moiz

Cung

, et al. Generation of Rate-of-Injection (ROI) profile for Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) model of Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) using machine learning. Energy AI 2022; 8: 100148.

27.

Hwang

Kal

Kim

, et al. Effect of fuel injection rate on pollutant emissions in DI diesel engine. SAE technical paper, 1999.

28.

Desantes

Benajes

Molina

, et al. The modification of the fuel injection rate in heavy-duty diesel engines. Part 1: effects on engine performance and emissions. Appl Therm Eng 2004; 24(17–18): 2701–2714.

29.

Desantes

Benajes

Molina

, et al. The modification of the fuel injection rate in heavy-duty diesel engines: Part 2: effects on combustion. Appl Therm Eng 2004; 24(17–18): 2715–2726.

30.

Beck

Chen

. Injection rate shaping and high speed combustion analysis-new tools for diesel engine combustion development. SAE technical paper, 1990.

31.

Ikegami

Nakatani

Tanaka

, et al. Fuel injection rate shaping and its effect on exhaust emissions in a direct-injection diesel engine using a spool acceleration type injection system. SAE Transactions 1997; 106: 524–535.

32.

Chen

Shi

, et al. Combustion and emission characteristics of a diesel engine with a variable injection rate. Appl Sci 2024; 14(11): 4941.

33.

Benajes

Molina

De Rudder

, et al. Influence of injection rate shaping on combustion and emissions for a medium duty diesel engine. J Mech Sci Technol 2006; 20: 1436–1448.

34.

Benajes

Payri

Molina

, et al. Investigation of the influence of injection rate shaping on the spray characteristics in a diesel common rail system equipped with a piston amplifier. J Fluids Eng 2005; 127(6): 1102–1110.

35.

Kohketsu

Tanabe

Mori

. Flexibly controlled injection rate shape with next generation common rail system for heavy duty DI diesel engines. SAE Transactions 2000; 1: 459–468.

36.

Tanabe

Kohketsu

Mori

, et al. Innovative injection rate control with next-generation, common-rail fuel injection system. SAE technical paper, 2000.

37.

Tanabe

Kohketsu

Nakayama

. Effect of fuel injection rate control on reduction of emissions and fuel consumption in a heavy duty DI diesel engine. SAE technical paper, 2005.

38.

Ganser

. Common rail injector with injection rate control. SAE Transactions 1998; 107: 1873–1880.

39.

Dober

Tullis

Greeves

, et al. The impact of injection strategies on emissions reduction and power output of future diesel engines. SAE technical paper, 2008.

40.

Ferrari

Zhang

. Influence of the injector setup on digital and continuous injection rate-shaping performance in diesel engine passenger cars. Energy Convers Manag 2020; 205: 112259.

41.

d’Ambrosio

Ferrari

Mancarella

, et al. Effects of rate-shaped and multiple injection strategies on pollutant emissions, combustion noise and fuel consumption in a low compression ratio diesel engine. Int J Autom Technol 2020; 21: 197–214.

42.

Fan

Chen

, et al. Performance study of an innovative dual injection mode injector for marine low-speed dual-fuel engine. Int J Engine Res 2025; 26: 811–825.