This article explores the use of private diaries in qualitative research about intimate everyday experiences. The article first reflects on existing diary-based research, then examines data from a small-scale UK study about the negotiation of condom use in heterosex to pose questions about the kinds of data made available when participants use private diaries as a prompt in qualitative interviews. The article discusses the use of private diaries as a way to explore ambivalent, everyday experiences and interrogates the role of diaries as a form of confessional or measurement of private life. It explores how combined researcher intimate diaries and field note journals can be used in reflexive qualitative sexualities research. The article finally examines the potential for diaries as a form of research intervention in participants’ intimate lives.
AlaszewskiA (2006) Using Diaries for Social Research. London: Sage.
2.
AlcoffL (1995) The problem of speaking for others. In: RoofJWiegmanR (eds) Who Can Speak: Authority and Critical Identity. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 97–119.
3.
AllenL (2003) Power talk: young people negotiating (hetero)sex. Women’s Studies International Forum26(3): 235–244.
4.
ApthekerB (1989) Tapestries of Life: Women’s Work, Women’s Consciousness and the Meaning of Daily Experience. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.
5.
ArndtB (2009) The Sex Diaries: Why Women Go Off Sex and Other Bedroom Battles. London: Hamlyn.
6.
AtwoodF (2006) Sexed up: theorizing the sexualization of culture. Sexualties9(1): 7–94.
7.
BellL (1998) Public and private meanings in diaries: researching family and childcare. In: RibbensJEdwardsR (eds) Feminist Dilemmas in Qualitative Research. London: Sage, 72–86.
8.
BirchMMillerT (2000) Inviting intimacy: the interview as therapeutic opportunity. International Journal of Social Research Methodology3(3): 189–202.
9.
BolgerNDavisARafaeliE (2003) Diary methods: capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology54: 579–616.
10.
ButlerJ (1990) Gender Trouble. New York: Routledge.
FinlayL (2002) ‘Outing’ the researcher: the provenance, process, and practice of reflexivity. Qualitative Health Research12(4): 531–545.
16.
FoucaultM (1976) The History of Sexuality. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
17.
GabbJ (2009) Researching family relationships: a qualitative mixed methods approach. Methodological Innovations Online4(2): 37–52.
18.
GaveyN (1997) Feminist poststructuralism and discourse analysis. In: GergenMDavisS (eds) Toward a New Psychology of Gender. New York: Routledge, 49–64.
19.
GaveyNMcPhillipsK (1999) Subject to romance: heterosexual passivity as an obstacle to women initiating condom use. Psychology of Women Quarterly23: 349–367.
20.
GaveyNMcPhillipsKDohertyM (2001) ‘If it’s not on, it’s not on’: or is it? Discursive constraints on women’s condom use. Gender and Society15(6): 917–934.
21.
GiddensA (1992) The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies. Oxford: Polity.
22.
GillR (2008) Empowerment/sexism: figuring female sexual agency in contemporary advertising. Feminism and Psychology18(1): 35–60.
23.
GillR (2009) Mediated intimacy and postfeminism: a discourse analytic examination of sex and relationships advice in a women’s magazine. Discourse and Communication3(4): 1–25.
24.
HarawayD (1988) Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies14(3): 575–599.
25.
HaritawornJ (2008) Shifting positionalities: reflections on a queer/trans of colour methodology. Sociological Research Online13(1). http://www.socresonline.org.uk/13/1/13.html
26.
HarveyLGillR (2010) ‘Spicing it up’: sexual entrepreneurship and The Sex Inspectors. In: GillRScharffC (eds) New Femininities: Postfeminism, Neoliberalism and Subjectivity. London and New York: Palgrave.
27.
HatherallBStoneNInghamRMcEachranJ (2005) The Choreography of Condom Use: How, Not Just If, Young People Use Condoms. Southampton: Brook.
28.
HendersonSHollandJMcGrellisSSharpeSThomsonR (2007) Inventing Adulthoods: A Biographical Approach to Youth Transitions. London: Sage.
29.
HewittMBamundoADayRHarveyC (2007) Perspectives on post-treatment cancer care: qualitative research with survivors, nurses, and physicians. Journal of Clinical Oncology25(16): 2270–2273.
HollandJRamazanogluCScottSSharpeSThomsonR (1990) ‘“Don’t die of ignorance” I Nearly Died of Embarrassment’: condoms in context. In: JacksonSScottS (eds) Feminism and Sexuality. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 117–129.
32.
HollandJRamazanogluCSharpeSThomsonR (1998) The Male in the Head: Young People, Heterosexuality and Power. London: Tufnell Press.
33.
HollidayR (2000) We’ve been framed: visualising methodology. The Sociological Review48(4): 503–521.
34.
HollidayR (2004) Filming ‘The Closet’: the role of video diaries in researching sexualities. American Behavioral Scientist47(12): 1597–1616.
35.
HollwayW (1989) Making love without contraception: towards a theory for analysing accounts. In: HollwayW (ed.) Subjectivity and Method in Psychology: Gender, Meaning and Science. London: Sage, 47–66.
KippaxSCrawfordJWaldbyCBentonP (1990) Women negotiating heterosex: implications for AIDS prevention. Women’s Studies International Forum13(6): 533–542.
41.
LewisG (2009) Animating hatreds: research encounters, organisational secrets,emotional truths. In: Ryan-FloodRGillR (eds) Secrecy and Silence in the Research Process: Feminist Reflections. London: Routledge.
42.
MacPhailCCampbellC (2001) ‘I think condoms are good but, aai, I hate those things’: condom use among adolescents and young people in a southern African township. Social Science and Medicine52: 1613–1627.
43.
McPhillipsKBraunVGaveyN (2001) Defining (hetero)sex: how imperative is the ‘coital imperative’?Women’s Studies International Forum24(2): 229–240.
44.
McRobbieA (2009) The Aftermath of Feminism: Gender, Culture and Social Change. London: Sage.
45.
MaxwellC (2007) ‘Alternative’ narratives of young people’s heterosexual experiences in the UK. Sexualities10(5): 539–558.
46.
MethP (2003) Entries and omissions: using solicited diaries in geographical research. Area35(2): 195–205.
47.
MiesM (1983) Towards a methodology for feminist research. In: BowlesGDuelli KleinR (eds) Theories of Women’s Studies. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 117–139.
48.
MilesL (1997) Women, AIDS and power in heterosexual sex: a discourse analysis. In: GergenMDavisS (eds) Toward a New Psychology of Gender. New York: Routledge, 479–502.
49.
MohantyC (1991) Under western eyes: feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. In: MohantyCRussoATorresL (eds) Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism. Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.
50.
PlummerK (1995) Telling Sexual Stories: Power, Change, and Social Worlds. London: Routledge.
51.
PottsA (2000) Coming, coming, gone: a feminist deconstruction of heterosexual orgasm. Sexualities3(1): 55–76.
52.
PottsA (2001) The man with two brains: hegemonic masculine subjectivity and the discursive construction of the unreasonable penis-self. Journal of Gender Studies10(2): 145–156.
53.
RamazanogluCHollandJ (2002) Feminist Methodology: Challenges and Choices. London: SAGE.
54.
RenoldERingroseJ (2008) Regulation and rupture: mapping tween and teenage girls’ resistance to the heterosexual matrix. Feminist Theory9(3): 313–338.
55.
RichA (1980) Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence. In: AbeloveHBaraleMHalperinD (eds) The Lesbian and Gay Studies Reader. New York: Routledge, 227–254.
56.
RingroseJWalkerdineV (2008) Regulating the abject. Feminist Media Studies8(3): 227–246.
57.
RitchieABarkerM (2006) ‘There aren’t words for what we do or how we feel so we have to make them up’: constructing polyamorous languages in a culture of compulsory monogamy. Sexualities9(5): 584–601.
58.
RosenthalDGiffordSMooreS (1998) Safe sex or safe love: competing discourses?AIDS Care: Psychological and Socio-Medical Aspects of AIDS/HIV10(1): 35–47.
59.
RubinG (1982) Thinking sex: notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality. In: AbeloveHBaraleMHalperinD (eds) The Lesbian and Gay Studies Reader. New York: Routledge, 3–44.
60.
RyanA (2000) Feminism and sexual freedom in an age of AIDS. Sexualities4(1):91–107.
61.
StanleyL (1996) Mass Observation’s ‘Little Kinsey’ and the British Sex Survey Tradition. In: WeeksJHollandJ (eds) Sexual Cultures. London: Macmillan, 97–113.
62.
StopkaTSpringerKKoshnoodKShawSSingerM (2004) Writing about risk: use of daily diaries in understanding drug-user risk behaviors. AIDS and Behavior8(1): 73–85.
63.
SullivanMBhuyanRSenturiaKShiu-ThorntonSCiskeS (2005) Participatory action research in practice: a case study in addressing domestic violence in nine cultural communities. Journal of Interpersonal Violence20(8): 977–995.
ThomasF (2007) Eliciting emotions in HIV/AIDS research: a diary-based approach. Area39(1): 74–82.
66.
ThomsonRHollandJ (2005) ‘Thanks for the memory’: memory books as a methodological resource in biographical research. Qualitative Research5(2): 201–219.
67.
TolmanD (2006) In a different position: conceptualising female adolescent compulsory heterosexuality. New Directions for Child Adolescent Development112: 71–89.
68.
TylerM (2004) Managing between the sheets: lifestyle magazines and the management of sexuality in everyday life. Sexualities7(1): 81–106.
69.
TylerM (2008) Sex self-help books: hot secrets for great sex or promoting the sex of prostitution. Women’s Studies International Forum31(5): 363–372.
WeedonC (1987) Feminist Practice and Poststructuralist Theory. Basil Blackwell:Oxford.
73.
WiltonT (2004) Stand by your man? Telling heterosexual stories. In: WiltonT (ed.) Sexual (Dis)Orientation: Gender, Sex, Desire and Self-Fashioning. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 126–153.
74.
ZimmermanDWiederD (1977) The diary: diary-interview method. Urban Life5(4): 479–498.
