A workshop activity to demonstrate that approaches to learning are influenced by the teaching and learning environment

Abstract

It is important to demonstrate to those taking courses for new teachers that approaches to learning have a relational nature — that they are influenced by the teaching and learning context. This article describes a workshop activity, based on the Revised Study Process Questionnaire. Workshop participants recorded their approaches to learning in two contexts: how they currently studied as postgraduate students, and how they studied in their most disliked undergraduate course. Analysis of the results from this activity indicates that approaches to learning are markedly influenced by the teaching and learning environment. This provides a graphic demonstration to workshop participants of the importance of their teaching, as it will have a strong influence on the quality of learning of their students. The data from the activity give quantitative evidence of the relational nature of approaches to learning. Further, there appears to be a discipline effect operating with the nature of the typical teaching and learning environment in the arts, humanities and social sciences being more conducive to students cultivating a deep approach to learning.

Keywords

approaches to learning higher education Revised Study Process Questionnaire teaching and learning environment workshop activity for teaching assistants

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barnes, M.W. & Patterson, R.H. (1988) ` Using Teaching Evaluation Results to Plan Departmental Strategies to Accomplish the Institutional Mission ', paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for College and University Planning, Toronto, August.

Becher, T. (1989) Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines. Milton Keynes: SRHE and Open University Press.

Biggs, J. (1987) Student Approaches to Learning and Studying. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research .

Biggs, J. (1993) `What do Inventories of Students' Learning Processes Really Measure? A Theoretical Review and Clarification' , British Journal of Educational Psychology 63: 3—19.

Biggs, J. (1999) Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press .

Biggs, J. , Kember, D. & Leung, D.Y.P. (2001) `The Revised Two Factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F' , British Journal of Educational Psychology 71: 133—49.

Boyer, E.L. (1990) Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate . Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

Cashin, W.E. (1990) `Students do Rate Different Academic Fields Differently ', in M. Theall & J. Franklin (eds) Student Ratings of Instruction: Issues for Improving Practice, New Direction for Teaching and Learning, No. 43, pp. 113—21. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

Cohen, J. (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences (2nd edn). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

10.

Entwistle, N.J. & Ramsden, P. (1983) Understanding Student Learning. London: Croom Helm.

11.

Feldman, K.A. (1978) `Course Characteristics and College Students' Ratings of Their Teachers; What We Know and What We Don't' , Research in Higher Education 9: 199—242.

12.

Feldman, K.A. (1997) ` Identifying Exemplary Teachers and Teaching: Evidence from Student Ratings ', in R. P. Perry & J. C. Smart (eds) Effective Teaching in Higher Education : Research and Practice , pp. 368—95. New York : Agathon Press.

13.

Gibbs, G. (1992) Improving the Quality of Student Learning. Bristol: Technical and Educational Services .

14.

Gow, L. & Kember, D. (1993) `Conceptions of Teaching and Their Relationship to Student Learning' , British Journal of Educational Psychology 63: 20—33.

15.

Kember, D. (1996) `The Intention to both Memorise and Understand: Another Approach to Learning?' , Higher Education 31: 341—51.

16.

Kember, D. (1997) `A Reconceptualisation of the Research into University Academics' Conceptions of Teaching' , Learning and Instruction 7(3): 255—75.

17.

Kember, D. (2000) `Misconceptions about the Learning Approaches, Motivation and Study Practices of Asian Students' , Higher Education 40(1): 99—121.

18.

Kember, D. & Gow, L. (1994) `Orientations to Teaching and Their Effect on the Quality of Student Learning' , Journal of Higher Education 65(1): 58—74.

19.

Kember, D. & Kwan, K.P. (2000) `Lecturers' Approaches to Teaching and Their Relationship to Conceptions of Good Teaching' , Instructional Science 28: 469—90.

20.

Kember, D. With Mcnaught, C. (2007) Enhancing University Teaching: Lessons from Research into Award Winning Teachers. Abingdon: Routledge.

21.

Laurillard, D. (1984) `Learning from Problem Solving', in F. Marton , D. Hounsell & N. Entwistle (eds) The Experience of Learning, pp. 124—43. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.

22.

Marton, F. , Hounsell, D. & Entwistle, N. (1984) The Experience of Learning. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.

23.

Marton, F. & Säljö, R. (1976) `On Qualitative Differences in Learning, Outcome and Process. I' , British Journal of Educational Psychology 46: 4—11.

24.

Olejnik, S. & Algina, J. (2000) `Measures of Effect Size for Comparative Studies: Applications, Interpretations, and Limitations' , Contemporary Educational Psychology 25: 241—86.

25.

Prosser, M. & Trigwell, K. (1999) Understanding Learning and Teaching:The Experience in Higher Education. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.

26.

Ramsden, P. (1987) `Improving Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: The Case for a Relational Perspective' , Studies in Higher Education 12(3): 275—86.

27.

Ramsden, P. (1992) Learning to Teach in Higher Education. London: Routledge.

28.

Richardson, J.T.E. (1994) `Cultural Specificity of Approaches to Studying in Higher Education: A Literature Survey' , Higher Education 27: 449—68.

29.

Sheppard, C. & Gilbert, J. (1991) `Course Design, Teaching Method and Student Epistemology' , Higher Education 22: 229—49.

30.

Trigwell, K. , Prosser, M. & Taylor, P. (1994) `Qualitative Differences in Approaches to Teaching First Year University Science' , Higher Education 27: 75—84.

31.

Trigwell, K. , Prosser, M. & Waterhouse, F. (1999) `Relations between Teachers' Approaches to Teaching and Students' Approaches to Learning' , Higher Education 37: 57—70.