This article considers the impact of a student peer-mentoring programme (the Mentor Accountant Project, MAP) on first-year undergraduates’ academic performance. The development of MAP was informed by reference to extant literature; it relies on the voluntary services of third-year students who then act as mentors to first-year student mentees in an undergraduate degree programme. The impact of MAP in two Scottish universities is measured by reference to the changes in the approaches to learning and the academic achievement of two groups of students: those who participated in MAP and those who did not. The findings indicate that those first-year students who participated in MAP did not experience the significant decline in their deep and strategic approaches to learning that their non-MAP peers did. Likewise, those first-year students who participated in MAP demonstrated a stronger academic performance in comparison to their non-MAP equivalents. In addition, the MAP scheme appeared to have little impact on the approaches to learning of the third-year participants; and the academic performance of the third-year MAP participants was indistinguishable from that of their non-MAP counterparts. The evidence suggests that participation in MAP is beneficial for first-year students.
Biggs, J.B. ( 1978) Study Process Questionnaire Manual. Hawthorn, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research.
2.
Biggs, J.B. ( 1979) ‘Individual Differences in Study Processes and the Quality of Learning Outcomes’, Higher Education8: 381-94.
3.
Biggs, J.B. ( 1987) Student Approaches to Learning and Studying. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research .
4.
Byrne, M., Flood, B. and Willis, P. ( 2002) ‘The Relationship Between Learning Approaches and Learning Outcomes: A Study of Irish Accounting Students’, Accounting Education11(1): 27-42.
5.
Byrne, M., Flood, B. and Willis, P. ( 2004a) ‘Using the Student Learning Framework To Explore the Variation in Academic Performance of European Business Students’ , Journal of Further and Higher Education28(1): 67-78.
6.
Byrne, M., Flood, B. and Willis, P. ( 2004b) ‘Validation of the Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST) Using Accounting Students in the USA and Ireland: A Research Note’, Accounting Education13(4): 449-59.
7.
Congos, D. and Schoeps, N. ( 1993) ‘Does Supplemental Instruction Really Work and What Is it Anyway?’, Studies in Higher Education18(2): 165-75.
8.
Duff, A. ( 2004) ‘Understanding Academic Performance and Progressions of First-Year Accounting and Business Economics Undergraduates: The Role of Approaches to Learning and Prior Academic Achievement’, Accounting Education13(4): 409-30.
9.
Duff, A. and McKinstry, S. ( 2007) ‘Students’ to Learning: A Literature Review’ , Issues in Accounting Education22(2): 183-214.
10.
Durkin, K. and Main, A. ( 2002) ‘Discipline-Based Study Skills Support for First-Year Undergraduate Students’, Active Learning in Higher Education3(1): 24-39.
11.
English, L., Luckett, P. and Mladenovic, R. ( 2004) ‘Encouraging a Deep Approach to Learning Through Curriculum Design’, Accounting Education13(4): 461-88.
12.
Entwistle, N.J. ( 2001) ‘Styles of Learning and Approaches to Studying in Higher Education’, Learning Styles in Higher Education30(5/6): 593-602.
13.
Entwistle, N.J. and Ramsden, P. ( 1983) Understanding Student Learning. London : Croom Helm.
14.
Entwistle, N.J., Hanley, M. and Hounsell, D. ( 1979) ‘Identifying Distinctive Approaches to Studying’ , Higher Education8: 365-80.
15.
Entwistle, N.J., Thompson, J. and Wilson, J.D. ( 1974) ‘Motivation and Study Habits’, Higher Education3: 379-96.
16.
Entwistle, N.J., Tait, H. and McCune, V. ( 2000) ‘Patterns of Response to an Approaches to Studying Inventory Across Contrasting Groups and Contexts’, European Journal of Psychology of Education15(1): 33-48.
17.
Fox, A. and Stevenson, L., (2006) ‘Exploring the Effectiveness of Peer-Mentoring of Accounting and Finance Students in Higher Education’, Accounting Education: An International Journal15(2): 189-202.
18.
Fransson, A. ( 1977) ‘On Qualitative Differences in Learning IV: Effects of Intrinsic Motivation and Extrinsic Test Anxiety on Process and Outcome’ , British Journal of Educational Psychology47: 244-57.
19.
Gow, L., Kember, D. and Cooper, B. ( 1994) ‘The Teaching Context and Approaches to Study of Accountancy Students’, Issues in Accounting Education9(1): 118-30.
20.
Gray, R., Bebbington, J. and McPhail, K. ( 1994) ‘Teaching Ethics in Accounting and the Ethics of Accounting Teaching: Educating for Immorality and a Possible Case for Social and Environmental Accounting Education’, Accounting Education3(1): 51-75.
21.
Hall, M., Ramsay, A. and Raven, J. ( 2004) ‘Changing the Learning Environment to Promote Deep Learning Approaches in First-Year Accounting Students’, Accounting Education13(4): 489-505.
22.
Hayes, K., King, E. and Richardson, J.T.E. ( 1997) ‘Mature Students in Higher Education III: Approaches to Studying in Access Students’, Studies in Higher Education22: 19-31.
23.
Janssen, P.J. ( 1996) ‘Studaxology: The Expertise Students Need To Be Effective in Higher Education’, Higher Education31: 117-41.
24.
Krause, K. ( 2001) ‘The University Essay Writing Experience: A Pathway for Academic Integration During Transition’, Higher Education Research and Development20(2): 147-68.
25.
Lucas, U. and Mladenovic, R. ( 2004) ‘Editorial’, Accounting Education13(4): 399-407.
26.
Marton, F. and Saljo, R. ( 1976) ‘On Qualitative Differences in Learning: 1-Outcome and Process’, British Journal of Educational Psychology46: 4-11.
27.
Parry, V. ( 2005) The Truth About Hormones. London: Atlantic Books.
28.
Pask, G. ( 1977) ‘Styles and Strategies of Learning’, British Journal of Educational Psychology46: 128-48.
29.
Peat, M., Dalziel, J. and Grant, A.M. ( 2000) ‘Enhancing the Transition to University by Facilitating Social and Study Networks: Results of a One-Day Workshop’, Innovations in Education and Training International37(4): 293-303.
30.
Pitkethly, M. and Prosser, M. ( 2001) ‘The First-Year Experience Project: for University-Wide Change’, Higher Education Research and Development20(2): 185-98.
31.
Prosser, M. and Trigwell, K. ( 1999) Understanding Learning and Teaching: The Experience in Higher Education. Milton Keynes: SRHE and OU Press.
32.
Ramsden, P. ( 1979) ‘Student Learning and Perceptions of the Academic Environment’, Higher Education8: 411-27.
33.
Ramsden, P. and Entwistle, N.J. ( 1981) ‘Effects of Academic Departments on Students’ Approaches to Studying’, British Journal of Educational Psychology51: 368-83.
34.
Ramsden, P. ( 1992) Learning To Teach in Higher Education. London: Routledge.
35.
Saunders, D. ( 1992) ‘Peer-Tutoring in Higher Education’, Studies in Higher Education17(2): 211-19.
36.
Schmeck, R.R., Ribich, F.D. and Ramaniah, N. ( 1977) ‘Development of a Self-Report Inventory for Assessing Individual Differences in Learning Processes’, Applied Psychological Measurement1: 413-31.
37.
Tait, H. and Entwistle, N.J. ( 1996) ‘Identifying Students at Risk Through Ineffective Study Strategies’, Higher Education31: 97-116.
38.
Tait, H., Entwistle, N.J. and McCune, V. ( 1998) ‘ASSIST: A Re-Conceptualisation of the Approaches to Studying Inventory’, in C. Rust (ed.) Improving Student Learning: Improving Students as Learners, pp.262-71. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.
39.
Vermunt, J.D.H.M. ( 1992) Learning Styles and Guidance of Learning Processes in Higher Education. Amsterdam: Swets and Zeitlinger.
40.
Wallace, J. ( 1992) ‘Students Helping Students To Learn’, The New Academic1(2): 8-9.
41.
Whittaker, R. ( 2008) Quality Enhancement Themes: The First Year Experience: Transition to and During First Year. Mansfield: Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education.
42.
Zeegers, P. ( 2001) ‘Approaches to Learning in Science: A Longitudinal Study’, British Journal of Educational Psychology71: 115-32.
