Since the 1980s an extensive research literature has investigated how to improve student success in higher education focusing on student outcomes such as retention, completion and employability. A parallel research programme has focused on how students engage with their studies and what they, institutions and educators can do to enhance their engagement, and hence success. This article reports on two syntheses of research literature on student engagement and how this can be enhanced. It first synthesizes 93 research studies from ten countries to develop a conceptual organizer for student engagement that consists of four perspectives identified in the research: student motivation; transactions between teachers and students; institutional support; and engagement for active citizenship. Secondly, the article synthesizes findings from these perspectives as ten propositions for improving student engagement in higher education. It concludes by identifying some limitations with the conceptual organizer and one suggestion for developing a more integrated approach to student engagement.
Ahlfeldt S., Mehta S. and Sellnow T. ( 2005) Measurement and analysis of student engagement in university classes where varying levels of PBL methods of instruction are in use, Higher Education Research and Development24(1): 5-20.
2.
Ainley M. ( 2006) Connecting with learning: Motivation, affect and cognition in interest processes, Educational Psychology Review18: 391-405.
3.
Acer (2008) Attracting, engaging and retaining: New conversations about learning. Australasian student engagement report. Camberwell, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research.
4.
Barnett R. and Coate K. ( 2005) Engaging the Curriculum in Higher Education. Maidenhead: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
5.
Berger JB ( 2000) Optimizing capital, social reproduction, and undergraduate persistence: A sociological perspective, in JM Braxton (ed.), Reworking the Student Departure Puzzle , pp. 95-124. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
6.
Beven JP ( 2007) Bridging diversity to achieve engagement: ‘The Sentence is Right’ game show rip off, in Student Engagement. Proceedings of the 16th Annual Teaching Learning Forum, 30-31 January 2007 . Perth: The University of Western Australia: http://lsn.curtin.edu.au/tlf/tlf2007/refereed/beven.html [accessed 15 July 2008].
7.
Braxton J. and Lien L. ( 2000) The viability of academic integration as a central construct in Tinto’s interactionalist theory of college student departure, in J Braxton (ed.), Reworking the Student Departure Puzzle, pp. 11-28. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
8.
Bryson C. and Hand L. ( 2007) The role of engagement in inspiring teaching and learning , Innovations in Education and Teaching International44(4): 349-62.
9.
Case J. ( 2007) Alienation and engagement: Exploring students’ experiences of studying engineering, Teaching in Higher Education12(1): 119-33.
10.
Coates H., Hillman K., Jackson D., Tan L., Daws A., Rainsford D. and Murphy M. ( 2008) Attracting, engaging and retaining: New conversations about learning. Australasian Student Engagement Report (AUSSE)Camberwell: ACER.
11.
Cook B. and King J. ( 2005) Improving Lives Through Higher Education: Campus Programs and Policies for Low-Income Adults. Washington DC: Lumina Foundation for Education and American Council on Education Center for Policy Analysis: http://www.acenet.edu/bookstore/pdf/2005CampusPP4Adults.pdf [accessed July 2010].
12.
Deci E. and Ryan R. ( 2000) The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behaviour, Psychological Inquiry11(4): 227-68.
13.
Dewart H., Drees D., Hixenbaugh P. and Thorn L. ( 2006) Engaging first year students at a metropolitan university: Is electronic mentoring an effective strategy?Paper presented at the 9th Pacific Rim First Year in Higher Education Conference: Engaging Students. Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia, 12-14 July.
14.
Edwards R. ( 2003) Ordering subjects: Actor-networks and intellectual teachnologies in lifelong learning, Studies in The Education of Adults35(1): 54-67.
15.
Fazey D. and Fazey J. ( 2001) The potential for autonomy in learning: Perceptions of competence, motivation and locus of control in first-year undergraduate students , Studies in Higher Education26(3): 345-61.
16.
Gavala J. and Flett R. ( 2005) Influential factors moderating academic enjoyment/motivation and psychological well-being for Maori university students at Massey University , New Zealand Journal of Psychology34(1): 52-7.
17.
Harper S., Carini R. and Bridges B. ( 2004) Gender differences in student engagement among African American undergraduates at historically Black colleges and universities, Journal of College Student Development45(3): 271-84.
18.
Hockings C., Cooke S., Yamashita H., McGinty S. and Bowl M. ( 2008) Switched off? A study of disengagement among computing students at two universities, Research Papers in Education23(2): 191-201.
19.
Howe K. ( 2004) A critique of experimentalism, Qualitative Inquiry10(1): 42-61.
20.
Johnson D., Soldner M., Leonard J. et al. (2007) Examining sense of belonging among first-year undergraduates from different racial/ethnic groups, Journal of College Student Development48(5): 525-42.
21.
Kiernan E., Lawrence J. and Sankey M. ( 2006) Preliminary essay plans: Assisting students to engage academic literacy in a first year communication course. Paper presented at the 9th Pacific Rim First Year in Higher Education Conference: Engaging Students. Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia, 12-14 July.
22.
Krause K-L. ( 2005) Engaged, inert or otherwise occupied? Deconstructing the 21st century undergraduate student. Keynote paper presented at the Sharing Scholarship in Learning and Teaching: Engaging Students Symposium, James Cook University, Townsville, 21-22 September.
23.
Krause K-L. and Coates H. ( 2008) Students’ engagement in first-year university, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education33(5): 493-505.
24.
Kuh G. ( 2001) The national survey of student engagement: Conceptual framework and overview of psychometric properties. Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research and Planning: http://nsse.iub.edu/pdf/conceptual_framework_2003.pdf [accessed 17 September 2008].
25.
Kuh G. and Gonyea R. ( 2003) The role of the academic library in promoting student engagement in learning, College and Research Libraries64(4): 256-82.
26.
Kuh G., Kinzie J., Schuh J. et al. (2005) Student Success in College: Creating Conditions that Matter. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
27.
Kuh G., Kinzie J., Buckley J. et al. (2006) What matters to student success: A review of the literature. Commissioned Report: http://nces.ed.gov/IPEDS/research/pdf/Kuh_Team_Report.pdf [accessed July 2010].
28.
Laird T. and Kuh G. ( 2005) Student experiences with information technology and their relationship to other aspects of student engagement, Research in Higher Education46 (2): 211-33.
29.
Laird T., Bridges B., Morelon-Quainoo C., Williams J. and Salinas Homes M. ( 2007) African American and Hispanic student engagement at minority serving and predominantly white institutions, Journal of College Student Development48(1): 39-56.
30.
Leach L. and Zepke N.(2010) Making it into the pipeline: Transitions from school to tertiary education , Journal of Adult Learning in Aotearoa New Zealand38(1): 5-22.
31.
Law B. ( 2005) Experiential learning in the context of educating for a sustainable future: Is it an appropriate pedagogy for shifting teachers’ thinking and engaging learners? Set no. 3.
32.
Lewis C. and Middleton V. ( 2003) African Americans in community colleges: A review of research reported in the Community College Journal of Research and Practice: 1920-2000 , Community College Journal of Research and Practice27(9-10): 787-98.
33.
Lizzio A. and Wilson K. ( 2006) Enhancing the effectiveness of self-managed learning groups: Understanding students’ choices and concerns, Studies in Higher Education31(6): 689-703.
34.
Llorens S., Schaufeli W., Bakker A. and Salanova M. ( 2007) Does a positive gain spiral of resources, efficacy beliefs and engagement exist?Computers in Human Behavior23: 825-41.
35.
McClenney K. ( 2003) Engaging community colleges: A first look, Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2002 Findings. Austin, TX : Texas University Leadership Program.
36.
McInnis C. ( 2003) New realities of the student experience: How should universities respond?Paper presented at the European Association for Institutional Research 25th Annual Conference, Limerick .
37.
McMahon B. and Portelli J. ( 2004) Engagement for what? Beyond popular discourses of student engagement, Leadership and Policy in Schools3(1): 59-76.
38.
Mearns K., Meyer J. and Bharadwaj A. ( 2007) Student engagement in human biology practical sessions . Refereed paper presented at the Teaching and Learning Forum, Curtin University of Technology: http://otl.curtin.edu.au/tlf/tlf2007/refereed/mearns.html [accessed July 2010].
39.
Miliszewska I. and Horwood J. ( 2004) Engagement theory: A framework for supporting cultural differences in transnational education, in Transforming Knowledge into Wisdom: Proceedings of the 27th HERDSA Annual Conference, Miri, Malaysia, 4-7 July: http://www.herdsa.org.au/?page_id=170 [accessed July 2010].
40.
Moran E. and Gonyea T. ( 2003) The influence of academically-focused peer interaction on college students’ development. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED478773.
41.
Mutch C. ( 2007) Mixed method research: Methodological eclecticism or muddled thinking?Paper delivered at the NZARE Conference , Christchurch, December.
42.
Pike G., Smart J., Kuh G. and Hayek J. ( 2006) Educational expenditures and student engagement: When does money matter? Research in Higher Education47(7): 847-72.
43.
Pittaway S. and Moss T. ( 2006) Contextualising student engagement: Orientation and beyond in teacher education. Paper presented at the 9th Pacific Rim First Year in Higher Education Conference: Engaging Students. Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia, 12-14 July.
44.
Porter S. ( 2006) Institutional structures and student engagement, Research in Higher Education47(5): 531-58.
45.
Reason R., Terenzini P. and Domingo R. ( 2006) First things first: Developing academic competence in the first year of college, Research in Higher Education47(2): 149-75.
46.
Ryan R. and Deci E. ( 2000a) Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions, Contemporary Educational Psychology25(1): 54-67.
47.
Ryan R. and Deci E. ( 2000b) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development and well being, American Psychologist55(1): 68-78.
48.
Schuetz P. ( 2008) A theory-driven model of community college student engagement , Community College Journal of Research and Practice32: 305-24.
49.
Umbach PD and Wawrzynski MR ( 2005) Faculty do matter: The role of college faculty in student learning and engagement, Research in Higher Education46(2): 153-84.
50.
Yorke M. ( 2006) Student engagement: Deep, surface or strategic?Keynote address delivered at the 9th Pacific Rim First Year in Higher Education Conference: Engaging Students. Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia, 12-14 July.
51.
Yorke M. and Knight P. ( 2004) Self-theories: Some implications for teaching and learning in higher education, Studies in Higher Education29(1): 25-37.
52.
Zepke N. and Leach L. ( 2005) Integration and adaptation: approaches to the student retention and achievement puzzle, Active Learning in Higher Education6(1): 46-59.
53.
Zhao C. and Kuh G. ( 2004) Adding value: Learning communities and student engagement , Research in Higher Education45(2): 115-38.
