This study examined student perspectives on flipped learning (FL), a pedagogy that shifts lectures outside the classroom to promote active, hands-on engagement during class. Twenty-four Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) faculty members from a 4-year university and a 2-year community college implemented FL after receiving professional development. The research employed a longitudinal quasi-experimental design, tracking the implementation of FL over a 4-year period. A sample of 1,466 students enrolled in these flipped courses provided feedback via end-of-course surveys. Survey data were analyzed using ordinal logistic regression to assess the impact of gender, race/ethnicity, institution type, and academic level on FL perceptions. Results revealed variations across demographics: male respondents expressed higher confidence, whereas nonbinary students strongly endorsed FL across metrics. Female students admitted having higher engagement and favorable classroom environments. The highest levels of positive perception were observed among Asian students, and non-White and senior-level (fourth-year) students reported stronger agreement on FL benefits. Perceptions were more favorable in the 2-year institution, highlighting FL’s unique impact in this environment. Overall, FL was positively associated with increased engagement and confidence across diverse student groups, suggesting that the model is a vital, resilient, and inclusive framework for STEM education.
AidooB.MacdonaldM. A.VesterinenV. -M.PétursdóttirS.GísladóttirB. (2022) Transforming teaching with ICT using the flipped classroom approach: Dealing with COVID-19 pandemic. Education Sciences, 12(6), Article 421. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12060421
2.
AnandS. A. A. (2021). Flipped pedagogy: Strategies and technologies in chemistry education. Materials Today: Proceedings, 47, 240–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.133
3.
BaigM. I.YadegaridehkordiE. (2023). Flipped classroom in higher education: A systematic literature review and research challenges. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, Article 61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00430-5
4.
BaileyT. R.JaggarsS. S.JenkinsD. (2015). Redesigning America’s community colleges: A clearer path to student success. Harvard University Press.
5.
Campillo-FerrerJ. M.Miralles-MartínezP. (2021). Effectiveness of the flipped classroom model on students’ self-reported motivation and learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8, Article 176. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00860-4
6.
ChangY. H.YanY. C.LuY. T. (2022). Effects of combining different collaborative learning strategies with problem-based learning in a flipped classroom on program language learning. Sustainability, 14, Article 5282. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095282
7.
ChenC. Y. (2024). Flipped classroom with case-based learning for improving preservice teachers’ classroom management learning outcomes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 152, Article 104785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104785.
8.
de LengB.PawelkaF. (2020). The cognitive load of the in-class phase of a flipped classroom course on radiology: Could computer support be of help?Medical Teacher, 43(2), 216–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1841890
9.
DianatiS.IwashitaN.VasquezC. (2022). Flipped classroom experiences: Comparing undergraduate and postgraduate perceptions of self-regulated learning. Issues in Educational Research, 32(2), 473–493. http://www.iier.org.au/iier32/dianati.pdf
10.
DivjakB.RientiesB.IniestoF.VondraP.ŽižakM. (2022). Flipped classrooms in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: Findings and future research recommendations. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19, Article 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00316-4
11.
DoughertyK. J. (2016). The contradictory college: The conflicting origins, impacts, and futures of the community college. SUNY Press.
12.
DoveA. (2013, March25). Students’ perceptions of learning in a flipped statistics class. In McBrideR.SearsonM. (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2013–Society for information technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 393–398). New Orleans, Louisiana, United States: Association for the advancement of computing in education (AACE). Retrieved December 29, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/48133/
13.
EgaraF. O.MosimegeM. (2024). Effect of flipped classroom learning approach on mathematics achievement and interest among secondary school students. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 8131–8150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12145-1
14.
EkkekakisP.AlbeeM.ZenkoZ. (2016). Knowledge of exercise prescription guidelines across one 4-year kinesiology curriculum. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 87(1), 124–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2015.1083524.
15.
ElfekyA. I. M.MasadehT. S. Y.ElbyalyM. Y. H. (2020). Advance organizers in flipped classroom via e-learning management system and the promotion of integrated science process skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, Article 100622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100622
16.
GoedhartN. S.WestrhenenN. B.MoserC.ZweekhorstM. B. M. (2019). The flipped classroom: Supporting a diverse group of students in their learning. Learning Environments Research, 22, 297–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-019-09281-2
17.
GoldenbergB. M. (2014). White teachers in urban classrooms: Embracing non-white students’ cultural capital for better teaching and learning. Urban Education, 49(1), 111–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085912472510
18.
GongJ.CaiS.ChengM. (2024). Exploring the effectiveness of flipped classroom on stem student achievement: A meta-analysis. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 29, 1129–1150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-023-09700-7
19.
GopalanC.BraceyG.KlannM.SchmidtC. (2018). Embracing the flipped classroom: The planning and execution of a faculty workshop. Advances in Physiology Education, 42, 648–654. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00012.2018
20.
GopalanC.FentemA.ReverA. L. (2020) The refinement of flipped teaching implementation to include retrieval practice. Advances in Physiology Education, 44, 131–137. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00143.2019
21.
GopalanC.OnalS.Butts-WilmsmeyerC.DickeyP.SerranoC.BraceyG.BartelsL.LockeS.FickasJ. (2021). Flipped teaching eased the transition of students to online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. The FASEB Journal, 35. https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.2021.35.S1.04659
22.
GopalanC.Butts-WilmsmeyerC.MoranV. (2021). Virtual flipped teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic. Advances in Physiology Education, 45, 670–678. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00061.2021
23.
GopalanC.DaughrityS.HackmannE. (2022). The past, the present, and the future of flipped teaching. Advances in Physiology Education, 46(2), 331–334. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00016.2022
24.
GopalanC.SerranoC.DickeyP.DaughrityS.HackmannE.BraceyG.BartelsL.FickasJ.LockeS.Butts-WilmsmeyerC. (2022). Flipped teaching transition to online teaching by STEM educators during the COVID-19 pandemic. Advances in Physiology Education, 46, 677–684. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00148.2022
25.
GopalanC.HalpinP. A.SelvamA. A. A.HungW. (2024). Exploring educational transformations through the innovative flipped learning instruction project symposium. Advances in Physiology Education, 48, 505–511. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00027.2024
26.
GryppL.LuebeckJ. (2015). Rotating solids and flipping instruction. The Mathematics Teacher, 109(3), 186–193. Retrieved March 14, 2025, from https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacher.109.3.0186
27.
GündüzA. Y.AkkoyunluB. (2019). Student views on the use of flipped learning in higher education: A pilot study. Education and Information Technologies, 24, 2391–2401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09881-8
28.
HannonB. (2014). Predicting college success: The relative contributions of five social/personality factors, five cognitive/learning factors, and SAT scores. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 2(4), 46–58. https://doi.org/10.11114%2Fjets.v2i4.451
29.
HaoY. (2016). Exploring undergraduates’ perspectives and flipped learning readiness in their flipped classrooms. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 82–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.032.
30.
HsinA.XieY. (2014). Explaining Asian Americans’ academic advantage over whites. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(23), 8416–8421. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1406402111
31.
IdsardiR.FriedlyI.MancinelliJ.UsaiN.MatosL. F. (2023). Outcomes of early adopters implementing the flipped classroom approach in undergraduate STEM courses. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32, 655–670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10066-9
32.
JovanovicJ.MirriahiN.GaševićD.DawsonS.PardoA. (2019). Predictive power of regularity of pre-class activities in a flipped classroom. Computers & Education, 134, 156-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.011
33.
KarpM. M.HughesK. L.O’GaraL. (2010). An exploration of Tinto’s integration framework for community college students. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 12, 69–86. https://doi.org/10.2190/CS.12.1.e
34.
KayR.MacDonaldT.DiGiuseppeM. (2019). A comparison of lecture-based, active, and flipped classroom teaching approaches in higher education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 31, 449–471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9197-x
35.
KerimbayevN.UmirzakovaZ.ShadievR.JotsovV. (2023) A student-centered approach using modern technologies in distance learning: A systematic review of the literature. Smart Learning Environments, 10, Article 61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00280-8
36.
KimD. (2016). Flipped interpreting classroom: Flipping approaches, student perceptions and design considerations. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 11(1), 38–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750399X.2016.1198180
37.
KnowlesM. S. (1968). Andragogy, not pedagogy. Adult Leadership, 16(10), 350–352, 386.
38.
LapitanL. D. S.ChanA. L. A.SabarilloN. S.SumalinogD. A. G.DiazJ. M. S. (2023). Design, implementation, and evaluation of an online flipped classroom with collaborative learning model in an undergraduate chemical engineering course. Education for Chemical Engineers, 43, 58–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2023.01.007
39.
LeH. V. (2024). Factors impeding university students’ participation in English extracurricular activities: Time constraints and personal obstacles. Heliyon, 10(5), Article e27332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27332
40.
LeeY. H. (2017). Scripting to enhance university students’ critical thinking in flipped learning: Implications of the delayed effect on science reading literacy. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(5), 569–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2017.1372483
41.
LiR.LundA.NordsteienA. (2021). The link between flipped and active learning: A scoping review. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(8), 1993–2027. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1943655
42.
LiY. (2018). Current problems with the prerequisites for flipped classroom teaching-a case study in a university in Northwest China. Smart Learning Environments, 5, Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-018-0051-4.
43.
LinY.HsiaL.HwangG. (2021). Promoting pre-class guidance and in-class reflection: A SQIRC-based mobile flipped learning approach to promoting students’ billiards skills, strategies, motivation and self-efficacy. Computers & Education, 160, Article 104035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104035
44.
LoC. K. (2018). Grounding the flipped classroom approach in the foundations of educational technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66, 793–811. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9578-x
45.
LoC. K. (2023). Strategies for enhancing online flipped learning: A systematic review of empirical studies during the COVID-19 pandemic. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(7), 3517–3545. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2184392
46.
MasicA.PolzE.BecirovicS. (2020). The relationship between learning styles, GPA, school level, and gender. European Researcher, 11(1), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.13187/er.2020.1.51
47.
NaingC.WhittakerM. A.AungH. H.ChellappanD. K.RiegelmanA. (2023) The effects of flipped classrooms to improve learning outcomes in undergraduate health professional education: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 19(3), Article e1339. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1339
48.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2023). Characteristics of postsecondary students. condition of education. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. Retrieved February 20, 2025, from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/csb
49.
NjueJ.RetishP. (2010). Transitioning: Academic and social performance of African immigrant students in an American high school. Urban Education, 45(3), 347–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085909355763
50.
OnalS.Butts-WilsmeyerC.SerranoC.DickeyP.BraceyG.BartellsL.LockeS.FickasJ.GopalanC. (2023). Flipped teaching eased the transition to online learning of college students in STEM courses during COVID-19. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 35, 196–208. https://doi.org/10.7771/1812-9129.1017
51.
PerskyA. M.McLaughlinJ. E. (2017). The flipped classroom–From theory to practice in health professional education. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 81(6), Article 118. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe816118
52.
RiedlA.YeungF.BurkeT. (2021). Implementation of a flipped active-learning approach in a community college general biology course improves student performance in subsequent biology courses and increases graduation rate. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 20(2), Article 30. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-07-0156
53.
Ruiz-JiménezM. C.Martínez-JiménezR.Licerán-GutiérrezA. (2024). Students’ perceptions of their learning outcomes in a flipped classroom environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72, 1205–1223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10289-y
54.
SalernoS.ReynoldsJ. R. (2017). Latina/o students in majority white schools: How school ethnic enclaves link ethnicity with success. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity, 3(1), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332649216663002
55.
SelvamA. A. A. (2023). Examining the implementation and outcomes of flipped pedagogy in science education: A review. The Cuvette, 1, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.21428/a70c814c.ac7f0ffb
56.
SelvamA. A. A.SenapatiS. (2023). Investigating the impact of combining structured peer work with a flipped organic chemistry course for high school students. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(12), 4625–4637. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00642
57.
SenapatiS.SelvamA. A. A. (2024). Promoting higher-order thinking skills through experiential e-learning for school chemistry topics. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 97(6), 217–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2024.2448808
58.
ShapiroD.DundarA.WakhunguP.YuanX.HarrellA. (2015). Completing college: A state-level view of student attainment rates (Signature report no. 8a). National Student Clearinghouse Research Center.
59.
ShehataB.TliliA.HuangR.AdarkwahM. A.LiuM.ChangT. (2024). How are we doing with student-centered learning facilitated by educational technologies? A systematic review of literature reviews. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 7813–7854. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12112-w
60.
SimkoT.PinarI.PearsonA.HuangJ.MutchG.PatwaryA. S.LuiM. J.RyanK. (2019). Flipped learning – a case study of enhanced student success. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 24(1), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/22054952.2019.1617650
61.
SinghK.MahajanR.GuptaP.SinghT. (2018). Flipped classroom: A concept for engaging medical students in learning. Indian Pediatrics, 55, 507–512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-018-1342-0
62.
StrayhornT. L. (2012). Exploring the impact of Facebook and myspace use on first-year students’ sense of belonging and persistence decisions. Journal of College Student Development, 53(6), 783–796. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1353/csd.2012.0078
63.
TanH. C.HoJ. A.TeohG. C.NgS. I. (2021). Is social desirability bias important for effective ethics research? A review of literature. Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 10, 205–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13520-021-00128-9
64.
TwiggC. A. (2009). Using asynchronous learning in redesign: Reaching and retaining the at-risk student. Online Learning, 13, 147–155. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v13i3.1663
65.
Wagner-LoeraD. (2018). Flipping the ESL/EFL classroom to reduce cognitive load: A new way of organizing your classroom. In MehringJ.LeisA. (Eds.), Innovations in flipping the language classroom (pp. 169–184). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6968-0_12
66.
WattsF. M.McAfeeS. C.RodriguezJ. G. (2024). Using hypothetical scenarios to address social desirability bias: Investigating student perceptions, evaluations, and motivations of cheating and academic integrity in the general chemistry laboratory. Journal of American Chemical Society, 4, 2029–2040. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacsau.4c00227
67.
WeiX.ChengI.ChenN.YangX.LiuY.DongY.ZhaiX.Kinshuk. (2020). Effect of the flipped classroom on the mathematics performance of middle school students. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 1461–1481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09752-x.
68.
Wrigley-AsanteC.AckahC. G.FrimpongL. K. (2023). Gender differences in academic performance of students studying Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) subjects at the University of Ghana. SN Social Sciences, 3, Article 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-023-00608-8
69.
XinX.ZhangM. (2024). Effects of flipped English learning designs on learning outcomes and cognitive load: Workload of out-of-class activities versus during-class activities. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(4), 1745–1765. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12978
70.
YılmazF. G. K. (2021). An investigation into the role of course satisfaction on students’ engagement and motivation in a mobile-assisted learning management system flipped classroom. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 31(1), 15–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2021.1940257
71.
ZainuddinZ.AttaranM. (2015). Malaysian students’ perceptions of flipped classroom: A case study. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53(6), 660–670. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2015.1102079
72.
ZanderL.HöhneE.HarmsS.PfostM.HornseyM. J. (2020). When grades are high but self-efficacy is low: Unpacking the confidence gap between girls and boys in mathematics. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 552355. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.552355
73.
ZhangX.ZhangB.ZhangF. (2023). Student-centered case-based teaching and online–offline case discussion in postgraduate courses of computer science. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, Article 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00374-2
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
