AhluwaliaR. (2002) How prevalent is the negativity effect in consumer environments?Journal of Consumer Research, September, pp. 270–279.
2.
CarlW. (2006) What's all the buzz about? Everyday communication and the relational basis of word-of-mouth and buzz marketing practices.Management Communication Quarterly, 19, pp. 601–634.
3.
CharlettD., GarlandR., & MarrN. (1995) How damaging is negative word of mouth?Marketing Bulletin, 6, pp. 42–50.
4.
EastR., & HammondK. (2005) The impact of positive and negative word of mouth on brand choice. Paper presented at the 2005 Australian and New Zealand Marketing Academy (ANZMAC) Conference.
5.
EastR., HammondK., LomaxW., & RobinsonH. (2005) What is the effect of a recommendation?The Marketing Review, 5, pp. 145–157.
6.
FergusonB. (2005) Black buzz and red ink. In: KirbyJ., & MarsdenP. (eds) Connected Marketing: The Viral, Buzz and Word of Mouth Revolution.London: Butterworth-Heinemann.
7.
HerrP.M., KardesF.R., & KimJ. (1991) Effects of word of mouth and product-attribute information on persuasion: an accessibility-diagnosticity perspective.Journal of Consumer Research, 17, pp. 454–462.
8.
ItoT.A., LarsenJ.T., SmithN.K., & CacioppoJ.T. (1998) Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: the negativity bias in evaluative categorizations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75 (4), pp. 887–900.
MittalV., RossW., & BaldasareP. (1998) The asymmetric impact of negative and positive attribute-level performance on overall satisfaction and repurchase intentions.Journal of Marketing, January, pp. 33–47.
11.
MurrayK.B. (1991) A test of services marketing theory: consumer information acquisition activities.Journal of Marketing, 55, pp. 10–25.
12.
ReichheldF. (2003) The one number you need to grow.Harvard Business Review, December, pp. 1–11.
13.
SharpB., WrightM., & GoodhardtG. (2002) Purchase loyalty is polarised into either repertoire or subscription patterns.Australasian Marketing Journal, 10 (3), pp. 7–20.
14.
Weaver LariscyR.A., & TinkhamS.F. (2004) Accentuating the negative.USA Today, 132, pp. 18–19.