Discussion on: Shape constrained additive smooth models by Simon N. Wood

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahkim

, Gijbels

, & Verhasselt

(2017). Shape testing in varying coefficient models. Test , 26(2), 429–450. doi:10.1007/s11749-0 16-0518-y.

Andrews

D. W.

(2000). Inconsistency of the boot-strap when a parameter is on the boundary of the parameter space. Econometrica , 68, 399–405

Andriyana

, Gijbels

, & Verhasselt

(2014). Shape testing in varying P-splines quantile regression estimation in varying co-efficient models. Test , 23, 153–194. doi:10.1 007/s11749-013-0346-2.

Andriyana

, Gijbels

, & Verhasselt

(2018). Quantile regression in varying co-efficient models: non-crossingness and het-eroscedasticity. Statistical Papers , 59(4), 1589–1621. doi:10.1007/s00362-016-0847-7.

Bertsimas

, & Popescu

(2002). On the re-lation between option and stock prices: A convex optimization approach. Operations Research , 50(2), 358–374. doi:10.1287/op re.50.2.358.424.

Bollaerts

, Eilers

P. H. C.

, & van Mechelen

(2006). Simple and multiple p-splines regres-sion with shape constraints. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology , 59(2), 451–469. doi:https://doi.org/10.1348/ 000711005X84293.

Cavaliere

, Nielsen

H. B.

, & Rahbek

(2017). On the consistency of bootstrap test-ing for a parameter on the boundary of the parameter space. Journal of Time Series Analysis , 38, 513–534.

Chernoff

(1954). On the distribution of the like-lihood ratio. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics , 25, 573–578.

Delgado

M. A.

, & Arteaga-Molina

L. A.

(2021). Testing constancy in varying co-efficient models. Journal of Econometrics , 222(1), 625–644. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.07.041.

10.

Eilers

P. H. C.

(2005). Unimodal smoothing. Jour-nal of Chemometrics , 19(5-7), 317–328. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/cem.935.

11.

Fan

, & Zhang

(2008). Statistical methods with varying coefficient models. Statistics and Its Interface , 1(1), 179–195. doi:10.431 0/SII.2008.v1.n1.a15.

12.

Hofner

, Kneib

, & Hothorn

(2016). A unified framework of constrained regression. Statistics and Computing , 26, 1–14.

13.

Kneib

(2013). Beyond mean regression. Statis-tical Modelling , 13(4), 275–303. doi:10.1177/ 1471082X13494159.

14.

Kneib

, Klein

, Lang

, & Umlauf

(2019). Modular regression - a Lego sys-tem for building structured additive dis-tributional regression models with tensor product interactions. Test , 28(1), 1–39. doi: 10.1007/s11749-019-00631-z.

15.

Meyer

M. C.

(2013). Semi-parametric additive constrained regression. Journal of Nonparametric Statistics , 25(3), 715–730. doi:10.1080/0485252.2013.797577.

16.

Meyer

M. C.

(2018). A framework for estimation and inference in generalized additive models with shape and order restrictions. Statistical Science , 33(4), 595–614. doi:10.1214/18-S TS671.

17.

Navarro-García

, Guerrero

, & Durban

(2023). On constrained smoothing and out-of-range prediction using p-splines: A conic optimization approach. Applied Mathematics and Computation , 441, 127679. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2022.127679.

18.

Navarro-García

, Guerrero

, & Durban

(2024). A mathematical optimization ap-proach to shape-constrained generalized ad-ditive models. Expert Systems with Applica-tions , 255, 124654. doi:https://doi.org/10.101 6/j.eswa.2024.124654.

19.

Nielsen

H. B.

, & Rahbek

(2024). Penalized quasi-likelihood estimation and model selec-tion with parameters on the boundary of the parameter space. The Econometrics Journal , 27, 107–125.

20.

Nychka

(1988). Bayesian confidence intervals for smoothing splines. Journal of the Amer-ican Statistical Association , 83(404), 1134–1143.

21.

Shapiro

(1988). Towards a unified theory of inequality constrained testing in multivariate analysis. International Statistical Review , 56, 49–62.

22.

Silvapulle

M. J.

, & Sen

P. K.

(2005). Constrained statistical inference: Inequality, order and shape restrictions . Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & and Sons.

23.

Stasinopoulos

D. M.

, & Rigby

R. A.

(2007). Generalized additive models for location, scale and shape (GAMLSS) in R. Journal of Statistical Software , 23(7), 1–46.

24.

Stasinopoulos

D. M.

, Kneib

, Klein

, Mayr

, & Heller

G. Z.

(2024). Generalized additive models for location, scale and Shape-shape: A distributional regression approach, with applications . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

25.

Takemura

, & Kuriki

(1997). Weights of fi² distribution for smooth or piecewise smooth cone alternatives. The Annals of Statistics , 25, 2368–2387.

26.

Umlauf

, & Kneib

(2018). A primer on Bayesian distributional regression. Statisti-cal Modelling , 18, 219–247. doi:10.1177/14 71082X18759140.

27.

Umlauf

, Klein

, & Zeileis

(2018). BAMLSS: Bayesian additive models for lo-cation, scale and shape (and beyond). Jour-nal of Computational and Graphical Statis-tics , 27(3), 612–627. doi:10.1080/10618600.2017.1407325.

28.

Wood

S. N.

(2025). Generalized additive models. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Applica-tion , 12, 497–526.

29.

Yang

, Pan

, Kang

, Brummett

, & Li

(2023). Simultaneous selection and infer-ence for varying coefficients with zero region: a soft-thresholding approach. Biometrics , 79, 3388–3401. doi:10.1111/biom.13900.