Memory and dementia are historical ideas that preceded the development of modern neuroscientific, psychogeriatric and medical approaches to aging and cognitive impairment. This article explores the value of such historical ideas in order to understand the discourses and metaphors by which Western thought has individualized memory as the guarantor of rational personhood, while at the same, treating memory decline as a threat to healthy and successful aging. Discussion focuses on the relationship between memory and the body in the classical and medieval ars memoria (the art of memory) and in the early modern philosophies of personhood, particularly the work of John Locke. Conclusions consider the significance of Western culture’s history of embodied memory as it moved from cosmic to individual to neurocognitive sites for our wider views about the treatment of dementia.
BallengerJ. F. (2006a) Self, senility, and Alzheimer’s Disease in modern America: A history. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
2.
BallengerJ. F. (2006b) The biomedical deconstruction of senility and the persistent stigmatization of old age in the United States. In: LeibingA.CohenL. (eds) Thinking about dementia: Culture, loss, and the anthropology of senility. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, pp. 106–120.
3.
BalintB.CarruthersM. (2002) On the six wings of the seraph. In: CarruthersM.ZiolkowskiJ. M. (eds) The medieval craft of memory: An anthology of texts and pictures. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 82–102.
4.
BurrowJ. A. (1986) The ages of man: A study in medieval writing and thought. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
5.
CarruthersM. (1990) The book of memory: A study of memory in medieval culture. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6.
CarruthersM.ZiolkowskiJ. M. (2002) General introduction. In: CarruthersM.ZiolkowskiJ. M. (eds) The medieval craft of memory: An anthology of texts and pictures. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 1–31.
7.
CorsiP. (1989) The mill of thought: From the art of memory to the neurosciences. Milano, Italy: Electra, pp. 18–26.
8.
Da Signa, B. ([1235]) 2002). On memory. S. Gallagher (trans.). In M. Carruthers, & J. M. Ziolkowski (Eds.), The medieval craft of memory: An anthology of texts and pictures (pp. 101–117). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
9.
DamàsioA. (1994) Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York, NY: Putnam.
10.
DamàsioA. (2010) Self comes to mind: Constructing the conscious brain. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
11.
DanzigerK. (2008) Marking the mind: A history of memory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12.
DoveM. (1986) The perfect age of man’s life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13.
Draaisma, D. (2000). Metaphors of memory: A history of ideas about the mind (P. Vincent, Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
14.
DumitJ. (2004) Picturing personhood: Brain scans and biomedical identity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
15.
FingerS. (2000) Minds behind the brain: A history of the pioneers and their discoveries. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
16.
FluddR. (1619) Microcosmi historia. Oppenheim, Germany: De Pry Press.
17.
GilleardC. (2002) Aging and old age in medieval society and the transition to modernity. Journal of Aging and Identity. 7(1): 25–41.
18.
GilleardC. (2009) Old age in the Dark Ages: The status of old age during the early Middle Ages. Ageing & Society. 29: 1065–1084.
19.
HackingI. (1996) Memory sciences, memory politics. In: AntzeP.LambekM. (eds) Tense past: Cultural essays in trauma and memory. London, UK; New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 67–87.
20.
HackingI. (1997) Canguilhem amid the cyborgs. Economy and Society. 27(2&3): 202–216.
21.
HackingI. (2005) The Cartesian vision fulfilled: Analogue bodies and digital minds. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews. 30(2): 153–166.
22.
HookeR. (1682) An hypothetical explication of memory: How the organs made use of the mind in its operation may be mechanically understood. In: WallerR. (ed.) The posthumous works of Robert Hooke. London, UK: Sam Smith and Benjamin Walford, pp. 138–148.
23.
KatzS. (1996) Disciplining old age: The formation of gerontological knowledge. Charlottesville, VA: The University Press of Virginia.
24.
KontosP. (2005) Embodied selfhood in Alzheimer’s disease: Rethinking person-centred care. Dementia: The International Journal of Social Research and Practice. 4(4): 553–570.
25.
KontosP.NaglieG. (2007) Bridging theory and practice: Imagination, the body, and person-centred dementia care. Dementia: The International Journal of Social Research and Practice. 6(4): 549–569.
26.
KontosP.NaglieG. (2009) Tacit knowledge of caring and embodied selfhood. Sociology of Health and Illness. 31(5): 688–704.
27.
LeibingA. (2008) Entangled matters – Alzheimer’s, interiority, and the ‘unflattening’ of the world. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry. 32: 177–193.
28.
LockeJ. ([1689] 1974) An essay concerning human understanding. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
29.
LoweE. J. (1995) Locke on human understanding. London, UK; New York, NY: Routledge.
30.
Magnus, A. ([1254-1257] 2002). Commentary on Aristotle: On memory and recollection. J. M. Ziolkowski (trans.). In M. Carruthers, & J. M. Ziolkowski (Eds.), The medieval craft of memory: An anthology of texts and pictures (pp. 118–152). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
31.
McGilchristI. (2009) The master and his emissary: The divided brain and the making of the modern world. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
32.
MulliganL. (1992) Robert Hooke’s ‘Memoranda’: Memory and natural history. Annals of Science. 49: 47–61.
33.
OrtegaF.VidalF. (2011) Neurocultures: Glimpses into an expanding universe. Berlin, Germany: Peter Lang International Academic Publishers.
34.
PellingM.SmithR. M. (1991) Life, death and the elderly: Historical perspectives. London, UK: Routledge.
35.
ReissT. J. (1996) Denying the body? Memory and the dilemmas of history in Descartes. Journal of the History of Ideas. 57(4): 587–607.
36.
RoseS. (2005) The future of the brain: The promise and perils of tomorrow’s neuroscience. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
37.
RosenfieldI. (1988) The invention of memory: A new view of the brain. New York, NY: Basic Books.
38.
RosenthalJ. (1996) Old age in late medieval England. Philadelphia, PA: University of Philadelphia Press.
39.
SchäferD. (2003) Gulliver meets Descartes: Early modern concepts of age-related memory loss. History of the Neurosciences. 12(1): 1–11.
40.
SchäferD. (2005) No old man ever forgot where he buried his treasure: Concepts of cognitive impairment in old age circa 1700. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 53: 2023–2027.
41.
Shahar, S. (1997). Growing old in the middle ages. Y. Lotan (trans.). London, UK: Routledge.
42.
ShermanC. R.LukehartP. M. (2000) Writing on hands: Memory and knowledge in early modern Europe. Carlisle, PA: The Trout Gallery. Distributed by University of Washington Press, Seattle.
43.
SorabjiR. (2006) Aristotle on memory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
44.
SuttonJ. (1998) Philosophy and memory traces: Descartes to connectionism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
45.
UttalW. R. (2001) The new phrenology: The limits of localizing cognitive processes in the brain. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
46.
Van HoutsE. (2001) Medieval memories: Men, women and the past, 700-1300. Edinburgh Gate, UK: Pearson Education Ltd.
47.
VidalF. (2002) Brains, bodies, selves, and science: Anthropologies of identity and the resurrection of the body. Critical Inquiry. 28(4): 930–974.
48.
VidalF. (2009) Brainhood, anthropological figure of modernity. History of the Human Sciences. 22(1): 5–36.
49.
WhitehouseP. J.GeorgeD. (2008) The myth of Alzheimer’s. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
50.
WhitehouseP. J.MaurerK.BallengerJ. F. (2000) Concepts of Alzheimer Disease: Biological, clinical, and cultural perspectives. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.
51.
YatesF. A. ([1966] 2010) The art of memory. London, UK: Pimlico.
52.
Yeo, R. (2004). A philosopher and his notebooks: John Locke (1632-1704) on memory and information: Professorial lecture delivered at Griffith University, May 20, 2004. Griffith University: Griffith University Professorial Lecture Series 4.
53.
ZiolkowskiJ. M. (2002) Introduction: Thomas Aquinas, Commentary on Aristotle, On memory and recollection. In: CarruthersM.ZiolkowskiJ. M. (eds) The medieval craft of memory: An anthology of texts and pictures. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 153–156.
