Abstract
This study investigated the effects of carer attributions on help-seeking behaviour for people with dementia using interviews with 84 carers recruited through general practice. Memory loss was the most commonly reported first symptom but psychological and behavioural symptoms were also common at onset. In over a third of individuals help-seeking was delayed for a mean of 25 months (range 6–69, SD 19.3). Help-seeking between those who attributed symptoms to dementia, or to unknown causes, and those who attributed symptoms to personality, ageing, life events or other illnesses was statistically significant (p < 0.001). No statistically significant associations between help-seeking and patient or carer characteristics were found. There is a need to raise public awareness about the range of symptoms suggestive of dementia. Assumptions that age and other conditions may be the likely cause of an individual’s cognitive decline needs to be challenged by practitioners. Attribution of symptoms to characteristics other than dementia delays help-seeking.
Introduction
Dementia currently affects 1 in 20 people over the age of 65 and in 1 in 5 over the age of 80 (Bunn et al., 2012). Earlier diagnosis of dementia allows investigation of reversible causes of memory loss (Bradford, Kunik, Schulz, Williams, & Singh, 2009) and gives individuals and families time to organise personal affairs and plan a care package (Bunn et al., 2012). However, a number of studies have revealed delays in the diagnosis of dementia (Bradford et al., 2009; Callahan, Hendrie, & Tierney, 1995; Iliffe et al., 1991, 2003; McCormick et al., 1994; Vernooij-Dassen et al., 2005). The National Dementia Strategy (2009) has highlighted a significant ‘diagnosis gap’ in England (Department of Health (DoH), 2009), with only one-third to one-half of people with dementia receiving a formal diagnosis at that time (Chrisp, Thomas, Goddard, & Owens, 2011). A recent report by the Alzheimer’s Society (2014b) found variation in diagnosis rates within and between nations remains extreme, ranging from little more than a third in some areas to over 75% in others. One study in the UK reported a time from symptom onset to diagnosis of three years (Chrisp et al., 2011) whilst another noted a gap of 2.4 years between symptom onset and seeking help (Bradford et al., 2009). General practitioners are blamed for this diagnostic delay. The All-Party Parliamentary Group’s 2012 Report described general practitioners as barriers to early diagnosis (Her Majesty's Stationery Office (HMSO), 2012).
Shigematsu (2011) demonstrated that in 85% of new diagnoses of dementia, memory loss had been the symptom that prompted help-seeking, although 63% of people with dementia also had other behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD). Symptoms of dementia may not be recognised by the person living with dementia or the family, and some of the early characteristics such as memory loss, functional disability, or emotional lability may be thought of as ‘normal’ ageing (Pollitt, 1996). Lack of insight can be a feature of dementia, so people may be unaware that they have a problem (Newens, Forster, & Kay, 1994) and resist seeking help. In addition, the stigma of dementia may prevent the person or family from seeking help because of embarrassment, shame, fear or uncertainty (Bunn et al., 2012, Iliffe, Walters, & Rait, 2000). Symptoms can also fluctuate, complicating decision-making. For example, between 40% and 70% of people with mild cognitive impairment notice an improvement in their symptoms or are found not to have dementia (Le Couteur, Doust, Creasey, & Brayne, 2013; Mitchell & Shiri-Feshki, 2009).
Age, education, employment, ethnicity and gender can influence help-seeking behaviour (Scheppers, van Dongen, Dekker, Geertzen, & Dekker, 2006). Older age, female gender and white race have been linked to a more proactive approach to help-seeking for mental health problems (Mackenzie, Scott, Mather, & Sareen, 2008). However, feelings of resignation, concerns about being perceived as ‘weak’ and low expectations of services also influence help-seeking behaviour in older people (Walters, Iliffe, & Orrell, 2001). Health education messages are less persuasive for older adults and there is a reluctance to want to appear ill due to ageing (Newens et al., 1994). This reluctance may combine with wishes to ‘not bother the doctor’ and to preserve autonomy and identity, explaining why individuals and families may not pursue a diagnosis of dementia. Help-seeking may be further delayed when religious and cultural beliefs influence thinking about symptoms of dementia (Bunn et al., 2012; Shigematsu, 2011).
Carers and family members are instrumental in seeking a diagnosis as they often recognise symptoms before the person is affected. An earlier study found that 39% (n = 104) of carers reported that they made contact with the GP when they first noticed that something was wrong (Downs et al., 2006b). However, the stigma of the diagnosis and the impression that little can be done for someone with a progressive neurodegenerative disease (Newens et al., 1994) may often block the diagnostic pathway. For example, individuals and carers are more likely to seek help for mobility problems than for memory loss (Newens et al., 1994). Both theory (Leventhal, Zimmerman, & Gumann, 1984) and empirical evidence (Hurt, Burns, Brown, & Barraclough, 2012) suggest that symptom attributions can be a cause of diagnostic delay. However, apart from a small qualitative study by Begum, Morgan, Chiu, Tylee, and Stewart (2012) little research has been done about the attribution of dementia symptoms and its effect on help-seeking and consequently on diagnosis.
Aim of study
This study is part of a larger study that tested the acceptance and effectiveness of tailored education in primary care in the identification, diagnosis and management of dementia (Wilcock et al., 2013). The qualitative study reported here aimed to examine family carers’ accounts of first onset and symptom attribution when they first became concerned about their relative’s early signs of dementia. The aim was addressed through exploring the following questions:
When something was first noticed? What were the symptoms at this time and what was the suspected cause? How soon after first becoming concerned do families contact their primary care practitioner? How do carers rate their experience of talking with the GP and the action taken at that time? What rating do carers give to the way the GP responded to their concern about their relative and what influenced their rating? What rating do carers give to the way the practice team as a whole responded and what influenced their rating?
Methods
In 2010, 84 carers of people with dementia were recruited through their GP to take part in a retrospective survey of help-seeking behaviour in response to symptoms suggestive of dementia. The 19 practices from which they were recruited were participating in a randomised controlled trial designed to enhance dementia diagnosis and management skills in primary care (Wilcock et al., 2013). The study took place in North London, Essex, Hertfordshire and Bedfordshire, UK.
People with dementia were identified by practice managers using the Quality and Outcomes Framework for dementia (http://bma.org.uk/practical-support-at-work/contracts/independent-contractors/qof-guidance). The lead clinician for each person with dementia was asked to identify their carer and to give their opinion about the capacity of the person with dementia to give informed consent. Carers were defined as those who were responsible for either direct care provision for a relative or those involved in decision making with a relative still living independently. Those with poor command of English were excluded.
People with dementia judged as having decision making capacity (n = 796) received a covering letter signed by their GP inviting them and their carer to participate in the study, a participant information sheet and a response letter and pre-paid envelope to be returned to the research team.
A researcher met those people with dementia and carers who expressed an interest in the study at the individual’s home, in the practice or at the research team’s offices to answer queries about the study and to gain consent from the carer and consent or assent from the person with dementia for their participation.
Two hundred and thirty-eight carers were identified, 90 expressed an interest in the study and 84 gave consent to participate and were interviewed. The process for obtaining participant informed consent or assent was carried out in accordance with the National Research Ethics Service (NRES) guidance (http://www.nres.npsa.nhs.uk/applications/guidance), the Mental Capacity Act (http://www.opsi.gov.uk/ACTS/acts2005/ukpga_20050009_en_1) and Good Clinical Practice (http://www.mhra.gov.uk/Howweregulate/Medicines/Inspectionandstandards/GoodClinicalPractice/index.htm).
Example of questions and answers.
The carers were interviewed in a place of their own choosing, usually their own home. The mean interview time was 98 min (range 30–205 min). The domains covered in the interview included diagnosis (e.g. symptoms that raised concern, attributions of those symptoms, speed of help-seeking, and time to diagnosis). Verbatim notes were made when participants commented on their reasons for delaying help-seeking. We opted not to audiotape interviews so as not to inhibit discussion around potentially sensitive subject areas.
Immediate help-seeking was defined as within three months of the onset of symptoms that caused concern to the individual, a family member or another. Answers were recorded on a proforma at the time of the interview. After the interview the structured coded responses to closed-ended questions were entered on SPSS version 20 software for analysis. Data were cleaned by crosschecking entries against the paper questionnaire; discrepancies and implausible entries were corrected where necessary. Pearson’s Chi-squared test was used where appropriate to assess statistical significance (p value ≤ 0.05) and odds ratios were calculated for factors associated with immediate or delayed help-seeking.
Results
Demographic profile of participants
Three-quarters of the 84 carers interviewed were female (75%, n = 63). The average age of carers was 66 years (SD 12.6, range 36–88) and the majority were married (86%, n = 72). Just under one-half of carers were spouses (49%, n = 41), more than one-third of whom were wives (36%, n = 30). One-third of carers were daughters (33%, n = 28), 11% were sons (n = 9) and 7% (n = 6) were other relatives or friends.
The majority described themselves as White UK (87%, n = 73), with 7% as White other (n = 6), 2% Black Caribbean and Black other (n = 2) and 4% Indian (n = 3). Sixty-one percent were retired (n = 51), 11% were in full-time employment (n = 9), 14% in part-time employment (n = 12) with 14% being in the ‘other’ category (i.e. homemaker, unable to work (n = 12)). The mean age of leaving full-time education was 17 years (SD 2.5, range 13–29), and more than half of carers interviewed had had further education (52%, n = 44). The majority were home owners (94%, n = 79).
Over one-third of people with dementia had a carer-reported diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (35%, n = 29), 17% of dementia (n = 14), 12% of vascular dementia (n = 10), 11% of mixed dementia (n = 9), 5% of dementia of Lewy-Body disease (n = 4), 2% of Pick’s disease (n = 2) and in 19% the carer was uncertain about the diagnosis (n = 16).
Symptoms and their attribution
The interviewed carer had noticed the first symptoms of dementia in more than half of all cases (58%, n = 43). In one-quarter (26%, n = 22) of cases, symptoms were noticed by people other than the interviewed carer or the person aware of their own symptoms in 12% of cases (n = 10) and in only one case the GP was the first to notice symptoms of dementia. Over two-thirds (69%, n = 58) of the interviewees reported noticing memory loss. More than half (55%, n = 46) also reported behavioural and psychological symptoms. Mobility problems were noted in seven cases, which included three people living with dementia who had fallen. Carers described multiple symptoms that made them suspicious in half of all cases (n = 42), whilst single symptoms were reported by just over a third (35%, n = 29).
More than a third of carers (39%, n = 33) thought that the symptoms that concerned them were attributable to a cause other than dementia (26%, n = 22) including cerebrovascular disease, stress, Parkinson’s disease, brain injuries, bereavement, mobility problems and alcohol use. Surgery or the person’s personality, diabetes, life events and tiredness were also suspected. A quarter attributed the symptoms to ageing (24%, n = 20) and a small proportion (12%, n = 10) could not explain the symptoms.
Help-seeking
Example symptoms described by carers in the immediate help-seeking group.
Example symptoms described by carers in the delayed help-seeking group.
Odds of immediate help-seeking, by attribution group.
No significant differences were observed between immediate help-seeking and age of the person with dementia (p = 0.13), gender of the person with dementia (p = 0.23), carer gender (p = 0.90), carer ethnicity (p = 0.65) and ethnicity of the person with dementia (p = 0.31). The educational level of the person with dementia (p = 0.35) and carer (p = 0.17) was also not statistically significant in influencing help-seeking behaviour.
Time to diagnosis
Figure 1 shows the time from onset of symptoms to diagnosis. Carers could remember the time from symptom onset to diagnosis in 38 (74.5%) of 51 cases in the immediate help-seeking group and in 21 (64%) of 33 cases in the delayed help-seeking group. Recall was less complete for time from symptom onset to help-seeking in the delayed onset group, with 17 (51.5%) of 33 able to give a timeframe. Amongst those who contacted their GP soon after becoming aware of symptoms, the mean time to diagnosis was 16 months (range 0–48, SD 12.9), compared with 25 months for those who delayed help-seeking (range 6–69, SD 19.3). The delay in help-seeking in the latter group was 24 months on average (range 5–69 months, SD 19.3) but overall those who delayed help-seeking received a diagnosis nine months later than the immediate help group. There were some delays between help-seeking and diagnosis in those who contacted their GP or other NHS services immediately. Box 4 shows examples of such delays.
Time from symptom onset to diagnosis in immediate and delayed help-seeking. Examples of reasons for delays between GP consultation and diagnosis, in the immediate help-seeking group.
Discussion
What this study shows?
In this sample, memory loss was the most commonly reported symptom that caused concern, either in isolation or accompanied by other symptoms, but behavioural and psychological symptoms were prominent at onset. In nearly two-thirds of cases help was sought within three months of symptoms causing concern. More than a third of interviewed carers thought causes other than dementia were responsible for their family member's symptoms. Attribution of symptoms to other causes led to delayed help-seeking, whilst attribution to dementia was significantly associated with earlier help-seeking. These findings support Leventhal et al.’s (1984) Self-Regulations Theory which states that illness identity (i.e. attribution/making sense of symptoms) guides coping (help-seeking behaviours amongst other activities).
Those who had sought help when symptoms were first noticed received a diagnosis 16 months later whilst those who delayed seeking help (for 25 months) waited a further nine months on average to receive a diagnosis, suggesting that the referral process may have been faster for those who did not seek help immediately. The reasons for this are likely multi-factorial and complex. Delaying help-seeking may lead to presentation with more severe and clear symptoms whereas earlier presentation can lead to delayed diagnosis in those who contacted their GP or other NHS services immediately. This is most likely caused by a combination of clinical, practical and psychosocial factors which require further investigation.
Strengths and limitations
This is one of the few studies examining the effect of symptom attribution on help-seeking behaviour by carers of people who develop dementia. The strengths of this study are that it employed in-depth interviewing carried out by a single interviewer with a standard schedule developed and refined from a previous trial. Its limitations are that it involved a self-selected group of relatively affluent, educated White carers and findings were based on carer recall, which may have been prone to bias. Some carers may have ignored their relative’s symptoms, a response which we were unlikely to identify in retrospective interviews. We were not able to assess whether the severity of symptoms influenced help-seeking, as some studies suggest (Bradford et al., 2009).
Comparison with other studies
Family carers can recognise symptoms, including memory loss and associated cognitive and psychological dysfunction as pathological (Newens et al., 1994) but in this sample attribution mediated help-seeking, supporting Begum, Whiteley, et al.s’ (2012) emphasis on ‘causation’ of symptoms as a factor influencing help-seeking, and Hurt et al.’s (2012) views on the importance of beliefs about memory. A vignette study found that cognitive deficits are more readily identified as dementia than non-cognitive symptoms, which were commonly attributed to depression or stress (Hamilton-West, Milne, Chenerey, & Tilbrook, 2010). In Clare, Goater, and Woods’ (2006) study two-thirds of people with early stage dementia referred to their difficulties as ‘memory problems’, and attributed their symptoms to ageing, sometimes also citing stressful or tiring jobs, falls or accidents.
A recent survey by the Alzheimer’s Society showed that more than 40% of people affected by dementia have kept concerns about the condition to themselves, and half of respondents had waited for six months or more after first noticing symptoms (Alzheimer’s Society, 2014a). A recent YouGov survey suggested that help was not sought out of embarrassment, for fear of making a fuss, or because dementia was suspected (Alzheimer’s Society, 2014b). Attitudes towards mental health are strong predictors of help-seeking behaviour (Helmes, McKirdy, & Caltabiano, 2010).
The characteristics of the person living with dementia and their carers did not seem to influence help-seeking, contrary to other reported studies (Bradford et al., 2009; Cattel et al., 2000). Mobility problems were less influential in prompting help-seeking compared to other reports (Newens et al., 1994). The majority of those who sought help immediately did so from their GP. Recognising the presenting symptoms can have an impact on timely diagnosis (Singh et al., 2013) but GPs struggle to differentiate psychological disorders, including depression, from dementia (van Hout, Vernooij-Dassen, & Stalman, 2007), and lack of diagnostic confidence in primary care may further delay diagnosis (Iliffe, Wilcock, & Haworth, 2006).,
Implications for research and practice
This study highlights the need to raise public awareness about the range of symptoms suggestive of dementia, and reinforces the conclusions reached by Hurt et al. (2012). Assumptions that age and other conditions may be the likely cause of an individual’s cognitive decline may need to be challenged by practitioners.
Further research exploring the emerging themes on a larger sample size would allow refinement and appropriateness of recommendations for public and professional awareness campaigns around symptom attribution and earlier help-seeking. This study did not set out to explore the psychological processes of attribution or attitudes to help-seeking and dementia in this age group which would be a worthwhile follow on study.
Conclusions
Attribution of symptoms suggesting dementia to characteristics like ageing, life events or prior personality can delay help-seeking. This sample suspicion of dementia, or uncertainty about the cause of symptoms, fostered help-seeking.
Footnotes
Acknowledgements
We thank all those carers who agree to be interviewed for this study, and the practices which invited them to participate.
Authors’ Contributions
SI conceived the study and gained funding; JW and IT-B carried out the study and LF analysed the data and wrote the first drafts of this paper. All authors have contributed to drafting this paper.
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: All authors declare they have no conflicts of interest to report, other than receipt of research funding from the NIHR.
Ethics approval
Ethics approval was granted by Southampton Ethics Committee (reference 09/H0502/77).
Funding
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This article presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under its Programme Grants for Applied Research scheme (RP-PG-0606-1005). The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health.
