Cognitive assessment of nursing home residents: Survey data on tools used and perceptions of use among social service professionals in one U.S. state

Abstract

Background: Social service professionals routinely use screening tools to assess for cognitive decline or identify suspected dementia in nursing home residents. Published literature lacks details about the specific tools used and how professionals use and perceive them in practice. The aim of this study is to better understand cognitive screening roles performed by nursing home social service professionals and how they view their use and efficacy.Methods: An online survey was administered to all 230 nursing homes in the US state of Alabama between October 2021 and March 2022. Fifty-three social service professionals who conduct resident cognitive screenings responded to the survey.Results: In addition to completing the US-mandated Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) quarterly, 75% of participants reported using additional tools, most notably the Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE). Participants reported using different tools for varied purposes. Those who used both the BIMS and MMSE rated the BIMS significantly higher on ease and time to administer while rating the MMSE higher on reliability and validity. Although most participants reported high levels of confidence using the tools, over half of participants indicated interest in further training in cognitive assessment tools.Discussion: Findings provide evidence regarding who administers nursing home cognitive screenings, which tools are used, and their experiences using those tools. Participant responses reveal the value of using multiple screening tools for improved detection of cognitive status and decline for residents as well as a need for additional training in cognitive assessment. Findings also suggest that the primary tool used for cognitive screening may be quick and easy to use at the expense of perceived reliability and validity. Further evaluation of nursing home cognitive assessment is needed.

Keywords

dementia screening assessment nursing homes social workers

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bern-Klug

Cordes

(2021). Dementia tops training needs of nursing home social services directors; discharge responsibilities are common core functions of the department. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 64(7), 758–774. DOI: 10.1080/01634372.2021.1920538.

Bern-Klug

Kramer

Chan

Kane

Dorfman

Saunders

(2009). Characteristics of nursing home social services directors: How common is a degree in social work? Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 10(1), 36–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2008.06.011.

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services . (2022). Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 for nursing homes and swing bed providers. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/NursingHomeQualityInits/NHQIMDS30

Chodosh

Edelen

M. O.

Buchanan

J. L.

Yosef

J. A.

Ouslander

J. G.

Berlowitz

D. R.

Streim

J. E.

Saliba

(2008). Nursing home assessment of cognitive impairment: Development and testing of a Brief instrument of mental status: Nursing home assessment of mental status. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 56(11), 2069–2075. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01944.x.

Cullen

O’Neill

Evans

J. J.

Coen

R. F.

Lawlor

B. A.

(2007). A review of screening tests for cognitive impairment. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 78(8), 790–799. DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.2006.095414.

Folstein

M. F.

Folstein

S. E.

McHugh

P. R.

(1975). “Mini-Mental state”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198.

Harris-Kotejin

Sengupta

Lendon

J. P.

Rome

Valverde

Caffrey

(2019). Long-term care providers and services users in the United States, 2015-2016. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics.

Hilsabeck

R. C.

Keller

J. N.

Henry

M. L.

Toprac

Rathouz

Sreekanth

Largent

Chang

Pugalenthi

Parson

Cuevas

H. E.

Schmitz

(2022). Multidisciplinary collaboration to develop a digital health solution for early detection of cognitive decline in primary care. Alzheimer’s & Dementia: The Journal of the Alzheimer’s Association. Technology and Dementia Preconference.

Ismail

Rajji

T. K.

Shulman

K. I.

(2010). Brief cognitive screening instruments: An update. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 25(2), 111–120. DOI: 10.1002/gps.2306.

10.

Kahle-Wrobleski

Corrada

M. M.

Kawas

C. H.

(2007). Sensitivity and specificity of the mini-mental state examination for identifying dementia in the oldest-old: The 90+ study: Sensitivity and specificity of MMSE in those aged 90 and older. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 55(2), 284–289. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01049.x.

11.

Kwak

Smith

K. M.

Bern-Klug

Kalin

(2021). Dementia care involvement and training needs of social services directors in U.S. Nursing homes. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 64(7), 851–862. DOI: 10.1080/01634372.2021.1965686.

12.

Larner

A. J.

(2018). Dementia in clinical practice: A neurological perspective (Third edition). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

13.

C.-Y.

Arthur

Downer

Velozo

C. A.

Kuo

Y.-F.

Tzeng

H.-M.

Ottenbacher

K. J.

(2022). Examining the clinical utility of the Brief Interview for mental status. Research in Gerontological Nursing, 15(3), 124–130. DOI: 10.3928/19404921-20220428-02.

14.

Malik

Weiss

E. F.

Gottesman

Zwerling

Verghese

(2018). Picture-based memory impairment screen: Effective cognitive screen in ethnically diverse populations. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 66, 1598–1602.

15.

Manly

J. J.

Jones

R. N.

Langa

K. M.

Ryan

L. H.

Levine

D. A.

McCammon

Heeringa

S. G.

Weir

(2022). Estimating the prevalence of dementia and mild cognitive impairment in the US: The 2016 health and retirement study harmonized cognitive assessment protocol project. JAMA Neurology, 79(12), 1242–1249.

16.

Mitchell

A. J.

(2017). The mini-mental state examination (MMSE): Update on its diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility for cognitive disorders. In Larner

A. J.

(Ed.), Cognitive screening instruments (pp. 37–48). Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-44775-9_3.

17.

Monroe

Carter

(2012). Using the Folstein Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE) to explore methodological issues in cognitive aging research. European Journal of Ageing, 9(3), 265–274. DOI: 10.1007/s10433-012-0234-8.

18.

Pritchett

Canada

K. E.

Galambos

Rollin

Rantz

(2021). Take it to the resident: A model for engaging long-term stay residents in advance care planning. Social Work in Health Care, 60(3), 272–281. DOI: 10.1080/00981389.2021.1878319.

19.

Rosselli

Tappen

Williams

Salvatierra

(2006). The relation of education and gender on the attention items of the Mini-Mental State Examination in Spanish speaking Hispanic elders. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 21(7), 677–686. DOI: 10.1016/j.acn.2006.08.001.

20.

Saliba

Buchanan

Edelen

M. O.

Streim

Ouslander

Berlowitz

Chodosh

(2012). Mds 3.0: Brief Interview for mental status. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 13(7), 611–617. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2012.06.004.

21.

Simons

Connolly

R. P.

Bonifas

Allen

P. D.

Bailey

Downes

Galambos

(2012). Psychosocial assessment of nursing home residents via MDS 3.0: Recommendations for social service training, staffing, and roles in interdisciplinary care. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 13(2), 190. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2011.07.005.

22.

Tsoi

K. K. F.

Chan

J. Y. C.

Hirai

H. W.

Wong

S. Y. S.

Kwok

T. C. Y.

(2015). Cognitive tests to detect dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Internal Medicine, 175(9), 1450–1458. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.2152.

23.

Zimmerman

Connolly

Zlotnik

J. L.

Bern-Klug

Cohen

L. W.

(2012). Psychosocial care in nursing homes in the era of the MDS 3.0: Perspectives of the experts. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 55(5), 444–461. DOI: 10.1080/01634372.2012.667525.