The critique of planning’s ‘dark’ side has been a theme
of both modern and postmodern perspectives. While a great deal of anecdotal and
empirical evidence exists that highlights how planning can be, and has been, used
for nefarious ends there are few theoretical insights or understandings of the role
of different actors, institutions or processes. This article provides a critical
analysis of the notion of ‘dark side’ from a Lacanian and
Derridean perspective. A short case study of the use of planning for what would
broadly be regarded as ‘dark’ ends highlights a number of
issues, particularly through engagement with Lacanian theory, which provides a
useful theoretical framework for further research into the misuse of planning.
Alexander, E.R.
(2000)
‘Rationality Revisited: Planning Paradigms in a
Post-Postmodernist Perspective’
, Journal of Planning Education and Research19(3):
242–256
.
2.
Allmendinger, P.
(2001) Planning in Postmodern Times.
London: Routledge
.
3.
Boothby, R.
(2001) Freud as Philosopher: Metapsychology after
Lacan.
London: Routledge
.
4.
Boyer, C.
(1983) Dreaming the Rational City.
Boston, MA: MIT Press
.
5.
Bracher, M.
(1993) Lacan, Discourse, and Social Change.
Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
.
6.
Bracher, M.
(1999) The Writing Cure.
Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press
.
7.
Brindley, T.
,
Rydin, Y.
and
Stoker, G.
(1996) Remaking Planning: The Politics of Urban Change in the
Thatcher Years.
London: Unwin Hyman
.
8.
Butler, J.
,
Laclau, E.
and
Žizžek, S.
(2000) Contingency, Hegemony, Universality.
London: Verso
.
9.
Dear, M.
and
Scott, A.
(1981) Urbanisation and Urban Planning in Capitalist
Society.
London: Methuen
.
10.
Derrida, J.
(1981) Dissemination.
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
.
11.
Derrida, J.
(1997) Of Grammatology.
Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press
.
12.
Fink, B.
(1995) The Lacanian Subject: Between Language and
Jouissance.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
.
13.
Fischer, F.
and
Forester, J.
(eds) (1993) The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and
Planning.
London: UCL Press
.
14.
Flyvbjerg, B.
(1998) Rationality and Power.
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
.
15.
Fogelsong, R.
(1986) Planning and the Capitalist City.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
.
16.
Forester, J.
(1989) Planning in the Face of Power.
Berkeley: University of California Press
.
17.
Forester, J.
(1993) Critical Theory, Public Policy and Planning Practice:
Towards a Critical Pragmatism.
Albany: State University of New York
.
18.
Goodwin, M.
(2004) ‘The Scaling of
“Urban” Policy: Neighbourhood, City or
Region?’, in
C. Johnstone
and
M. Whitehead
(eds) New Horizons in British Urban Policy, pp.
173–184.
Aldershot: Ashgate
.
19.
Gunder, M.
(2003a)
‘Passionate Planning for the Others’ Desire: An
Agonistic Response to the Dark Side of Planning’
, Progress in Planning60(3):
235–319
.
20.
Gunder, M.
(2003b)
‘Planning Policy Formulation from a Lacanian Perspective’
, International Planning Studies8(4):
279–294
.
21.
Gunder, M.
(2004a)
‘Shaping the Planner’s Ego-Ideal: A Lacanian
Interpretation of Planning Education’
, Journal of Planning Education and Research23(3):
299–311
.
22.
Gunder, M.
(2004b) ‘Obscuring Difference Through Shaping
Debate: A Lacanian View of Planning for Diversity’,
Proceedings Planning and Development Research Conference,
University of Aberdeen, Scotland
, 31 March–2 April (CD-ROM).
23.
Gunder, M.
(in press)
‘Lacan, Planning and Urban Policy Formation’
, Urban Policy and Research23(1).
24.
Gunder, M.
and
Hillier, J.
(2004)
‘Conforming to the Expectations of the Profession: A Lacanian
Perspective on Planning Practice, Norms and Values’
, Planning Theory and Practice5(2):
217–235
.
25.
Gunder, M.
and
Mouat, C.
(2002)
‘Symbolic Violence and Victimisation in Planning Processes: A
Reconnoitre of the New Zealand Resource Management Act’
, Planning Theory1(2):
125–146
.
26.
Hall, P.
,
Gracey, H.
,
Drewett, R.
and
Thomas, R.
(1973) The Containment of Urban England.
London: Allen and Unwin
.
27.
Harper, T.
and
Stein, S.
(2004)
‘Moral Values and the Public Planner’s Professional Responsibility’
, paper presented at the Association of Collegiate Schools of
Planning (ACSP) Conference, Portland,
21–4 October.
28.
Harvey, D.
(1973) Social Justice and the City.
London: Verso
.
29.
Harvey, D.
(1989) The Urban Experience.
London: Blackwell
.
30.
Hay, C.
(1995) ‘Structure and Agency: Holding the Whip
Hand’, in
D. Marsh
and
G. Stoker
(eds) Theory and Methods in Political Science.
London: Macmillan
.
31.
Healey, P.
(1993)
‘The Communicative Work of Development Plans’
, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design20:
83–104
.
32.
Healey, P.
(1997) Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented
Societies.
London: Macmillan
.
33.
Healey, P.
(2004) ‘Towards a “Social
Democratic” Policy Agenda for Cities’, in
C. Johnstone
and
M. Whitehead
(eds) New Horizons in British Urban Policy, pp.
159–172.
Aldershot: Ashgate
.
34.
Healey, P.
,
Doak, A.
,
McNamara, P.
and
Elson, M.
(1988) Land Use Planning and the Mediation of Urban Change:
The British Planning System in Practice.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
35.
Hillier, J.
(2002) Shadows of Power.
London: Routledge
.
36.
Hillier, J.
(2003)
‘ “Agon”ising Over Consensus: Why Habermasian
Ideals Cannot be “Real” ’
, Planning Theory2(1):
37–59
.
37.
Hillier, J.
and
Gunder, M.
(2003)
‘Planning Fantasies?: An Exploration of a Potential Lacanian
Framework for Understanding Development Assessment Planning’
, Planning Theory2(3):
225–248
.
38.
Hillier, J.
and
Gunder, M.
(in press) ‘Not Over Your Dead Bodies!: A Lacanian
Interpretation of Planning Discourse and Practice’,
Environment and Planning A.
39.
Ihlanfeldt, K.
(2004)
‘Introduction: Exclusionary Land Use Regulations’
, Urban Studies41(2):
255–259
.
40.
Jameson, F.
(2003) ‘Imaginary and Symbolic in Lacan:
Marxism, Psychoanalytic Criticism, and the Problem of the
Subject’, in
S. Žižek
(ed.) Jacques Lacan: Critical Evaluations in Cultural Theory,
Volume III, pp. 3–43.
London: Routledge
.
41.
Jessop, B.
(1998)
‘The Rise of Governance and the Risks of Failure: The Case of
Economic Development’
, International Social Science Journal155(14):
29–45
.
42.
Jessop, B.
(2000)
‘The Crisis of the National Spatio-Temporal Fix and the
Tendential Ecological Dominance of Globalizing Capitalism’
, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research24(2):
323–360
.
43.
Jones, M.
and
Ward, K.
(2004) ‘Neo-Liberalism, Crisis and the City: The
Political Economy of New Labour’s Urban Policy’, in
C. Johnstone
and
M. Whitehead
(eds) New Horizons in British Urban Policy, pp.
143–155.
Aldershot: Ashgate
.
44.
Kay, S.
(2003) Žižek: A Critical
Introduction.
Cambridge: Polity
.
45.
Lacan, J.
(1988a) The Seminar, Book I, 1953–1954.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
46.
Lacan, J.
(1988b) The Seminar, Book II, 1954–1955.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
47.
Lacan, J.
(1992) The Ethics of Psychoanalysis.
London: Routledge
.
48.
Lacan, J.
(1993) The Psychoses.
London: Routledge
.
49.
Lacan, J.
(1998) The Seminar, Book XX, 1972–1973.
New York: Norton
.
50.
Lacan, J.
(2002) Ecrits.
London: Norton
.
51.
Lacan, J. (2004) ‘The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book XVII, The
Other Side of Psychoanalysis: 1969–1970’, manuscript translation
by Russell Grigg.
52.
Lefebvre, H.
(2003) The Urban Revolution.
Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press
.
53.
Little, J.
(1993) Gender, Planning and the Policy Process.
Oxford: Pergamon
.
54.
McGuirk, P.
(2004)
‘State, Strategy, and Scale in the Competitive City: A
Neo-Gramscian Analysis of the Governance of “Global Sydney”’
, Environment and Planning A36(6):
1019–1043
.
55.
Marcuse, P.
(1994) ‘Not Chaos but Walls: Postmodernism and
the Partitioned City’, in
S. Watson
and
K. Gibson
(eds) Postmodern Cities and Spaces.
London: Blackwell
.
56.
Mendip District Council (1991) Planning Application No. 085539/005.
57.
Moore-Milroy, B.
(1991)
‘Into Postmodern Weightlessness’
, Journal of Planning Education and Research10(3):
181–187
.
58.
Murdoch, J.
and
Abram, S.
(2002) Rationalities of Planning.
Aldershot: Ashgate
.
59.
Newton, K.
(1976) Second City Politics: Democratic Processes and
Decision Making in Birmingham.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
60.
Oranje, M.
(1996)
‘Modernising South Africa and its Forgotten People Under
Postmodern Conditions’
, paper presented at the University of Newcastle 50th Anniversary
Conference, Newcastle, 25–7 October.
61.
Paris, C.
(ed.) (1982) Critical Readings in Planning Theory.
Oxford: Pergamon Press
.
62.
Pickvance, C.
(1982) ‘Physical Planning and Market Forces in
Urban Development’, in
C. Paris
(ed.) Critical Readings in Planning Theory.
Oxford: Pergamon Press
.
Rawls, J.
(2001) Justice as Fairness.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
.
65.
Reade, E.J.
(1987) British Town and Country Planning.
Milton Keynes: Open University Press
.
66.
Sager, T.
(2002) Democratic Planning and Social Choice Dilemmas.
Aldershot: Ashgate
.
67.
Sandercock, L.
(1995)
‘Introduction’
, Planning Theory13:
3–24
.
68.
Sandercock, L.
(1998) Towards Cosmopolis.
Chichester: Wiley
69.
Sandercock, L.
(2003) Cosmopolis II: Mongrel Cities of the 21st
Century.
London: Continuum
.
70.
Schön, D.
and
Rein, M.
(1994) Frame Reflection.
New York: Basic Books
.
71.
Scott, A.J.
and
Roweis, S.T.
(1977)
‘Urban Planning Theory in Practice: A Reappraisal’
, Environment and Planning A9:
1097–1119
.
72.
Soja, E.
(1997) ‘Planning in/for
Postmodernity’, in
G. Benko
and
U. Strohmayer
(eds) Space and Social Theory, in Interpreting Modernity and
Postmodernity.
Oxford: Blackwell
.
73.
Stavrakakis, Y.
(1999) Lacan and the Political.
London: Routledge
.
74.
Tajbakhsh, K.
(2001) The Promise of the City.
Berkeley: University of California Press
.
75.
Thomas, H.
and
Krishnaraynan, V.
(1993)
‘Race, Equality and Planning’
, The Planner29(3):
17–21
.
76.
Verhaeghe, P.
(2001) Beyond Gender.
New York: Other Press
.
77.
Wilson, E.
(1991) The Sphinx in the City: Urban Life, the Control of
Disorder and Women.
Berkley: University of California Press
.
78.
Yates, D.
(1977) The Ungovernable City: The Politics of Urban Problems
and Policy Making.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
.
79.
Yiftachel, O.
(1994) ‘The Dark Side of Modernism: Planning as
Control of Control of an Ethnic Minority’, in
S. Watson
and
K. Gibson
(eds) Postmodern Cities and Spaces.
Oxford: Blackwell
.
80.
Yiftachel, O.
(1995)
‘Planning as Control: Policy and Resistance in a Deeply Divided Society’
, Progress in Planning44(2):
115–184
.
81.
Yiftachel, O.
(1998)
‘Planning and Social Control: Exploring the Dark Side’
, Journal of Planning Literature12(4):
395–406
.
82.
Yiftachel, O.
(2000)
‘Social Control, Urban Planning and the Ethno-Class Relations:
Mizrahi Jews in Israel’s “Development Towns” ’
, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research20(2):
418–438
.
83.
Žižek, S.
(1989) The Sublime Object of Ideology.
London: Verso
.
84.
Žižek, S.
(1993) Tarrying with the Negative.
Durham, NC: Duke University Press
.
85.
Žižek, S.
(1997a) The Plague of Fantasies.
London: Verso
.
86.
Žižek, S.
(1997b) The Abyss of Freedom.
Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
.
87.
Žižek, S.
(1999) The Ticklish Subject.
London: Verso
.
88.
Žižek, S.
(2001) Did Somebody Say Totalitarianism?London: Verso
.
89.
Žižek, S.
(2002) For They Know Not What They Do.
London: Verso
.
90.
Žižek, S.
(2004) Organs without Bodies.
London: Routledge
.
91.
Žižek, S.
and
Daly, G.
(2004) Conversations with Žižek.
Cambridge: Polity
.
