This study investigated the colonization of slime-producing coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CoNS) in 80 patient wards in Turkey (40 vinyl and 40 ceramic tile floors). A total of 480 samples that included 557 CoNS isolates were obtained. Slime production was investigated with the Christensen method and methicillin-susceptibility was tested by the diskdiffusion method. There was a significant difference in the percentage of slime-producing CoNS isolates on vinyl (12.4%) versus ceramic tile flooring (4.4%). From vinyl flooring, the percentage of slime producing methicillin-resistant CoNS (MRCoNS) (8.9%) was significantly higher than for methicillin-sensitive CoNS (MSCoNS) (3.6%), whereas there was no difference from ceramic tile flooring (2.5% MRCoNS versus 1.8% MSCoNS). The most commonly isolated slime-producing CoNS species was S. epidermidis on both types of flooring. It is concluded that vinyl flooring seems to be a more suitable colonization surface for slime-producing CoNS than ceramic tile floors. Further studies are needed to investigate bacterial strains colonized on flooring materials, which are potential pathogens for nosocomial infections.
EdmondMBWenzellRP: Organization for infection control. In: Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases (MandellGLBennetJEDolinR, eds). New York: Churchill Livingstone, 2000; pp 2988–2991.
2.
PittetDAllegranziBStorrJ: Infection control as a major World Health Organization priority for developing countries. J Hosp Infect2008; 68: 285–292.
3.
VerhoefJFluitACSchmitzFJ: Staphylococci and other Micrococcaceae. In: Infectious Disease (CohenJPowderlyWG, eds). New York: Elsevier, 2004; pp 2119–2132.
4.
KotilainenP: Association of coagulase-negative staphylococcal slime production and adherence with the development and outcome of adult septicemias. J Clin Microbiol1990; 28: 2779–2785.
5.
DavenportDSMassanariRMPfallerMA: Usefulness of a test for slime production as a marker for clinically significant infections with coagulase-negative staphylococci. J Infect Dis1986; 153: 332–339.
6.
Diaz-MitomaFHardingGKHobanDJ: Clinical significance of a test for slime production in ventriculoperitoneal shunt infections caused by coagulase-negative staphylococci. J Infect Dis1987; 156: 555–560.
7.
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Sixteenth Informational Supplement. CLSI document M100-S16. Wayne, PA, USA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2006 [ISBN 1–56238-588–7].
8.
ChristensenGDSimpsonWABisnoAL: Adherence of slime-producing strains of Staphylococcus epidermidis to smooth surfaces. Infect Immun1982; 37: 318–326.
9.
AragonDSoleML: Implementing best practice strategies to prevent infection in the ICU. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am2006; 18: 441–452.
10.
PronovostP: Interventions to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU: The Keystone Intensive Care Unit Project. Am J Infect Control2008; 36: S171.e1–S171.e5.
11.
HigueraFRosenthalVDDuarteP: The effect of process control on the incidence of central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infections and mortality in intensive care units in Mexico. Crit Care Med2005; 33: 2022–2027.
12.
KloosWEBannermanTL: Update on clinical significance of coagulase-negative staphylococci. Clin Microbiol Rev1994; 7: 117–140.
13.
GaynesRPEdwardsJRJarvisWR: Nosocomial infections among neonates in high-risk nurseries in the United States. Pediatrics1996; 98: 357–361.
14.
NayakNNagTCSatpathyG: Ultrastructural analysis of slime positive & slime negative Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates in infectious keratitis. Indian J Med Res2007125: 767–771.
15.
VogelLJacobusHSSpaargarenJ: Biofilm production by Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates associated with catheter related bacteremia. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis2000; 30: 138–141.
16.
MitchellJM: Impact on Carpet Tile in a Hospital Patient Unit Corridor: an Observational Case Study. Master of Interior Design Degree thesis, Gainesville: University of Florida, 2006.
17.
US Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Recommendations of CDC and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC). Guidelines for Environmental Infection Control in Health-care Facilities. Atlanta: US Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2003.
18.
EdmistonCESinskiSSeabrookGR: Airborne particulates in the OR environment. AORN J1999; 69: 1169–1172.
19.
BitkoverCYMarcussonERansjoU: Spread of coagulase-negative staphylococci during cardiac operations in a modern operating room. Ann Thorac Surg2000; 69: 1110–1115.
20.
DuhaimeACBonnerKMcGowanKL: Distribution of bacteria in the operating room environment and its relation to ventricular shunt infections: A prospective study. Childs Nerv Syst1991; 7: 211–214.
21.
AyliffeGA: Role of the environment of the operating suite in surgical wound infection. Rev Infect Dis1991; 13 (suppl 10): S800–S804.
22.
NoskinGABednarzPSurianoT: Persistent contamination of fabric-covered furniture by vancomycin-resistant enterococci: Implications for upholstery selection in hospitals. Am J Infect Control2000; 28: 311–313.
23.
MakiDGStolzSMWheelerS: Prevention of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection by use of an antiseptic-impregnated catheter. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med1997; 127: 257–266.
24.
DakićIMorrisonDVukoviD: Isolation and molecular characterization of Staphylococcus sciuri in the hospital environment. J Clin Microbiol2005; 43: 2782–2785.
FroggattJWJohnstonJLGalettoDW: Antimicrobial resistance in nosocomial isolates of Staphylococcus haemolyticus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother1989; 33: 460–466.
28.
KoksalFYasarHSamastiM: Antibiotic resistance patterns of coagulase-negative staphylococcus strains isolated from blood cultures of septicemic patients in Turkey. Microbiol Res2007; doi:10.1016/j.micres.2007.03.004.
29.
AlcarazLESatorresSELuceroRM: Species identification, slime production and oxacillin susceptibility in coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from nosocomial specimens. Braz J Microbiol2003; 34: 45–51.
