This 12-month retrospective study compared pain relief, quality of life (QoL), treatment cost-effectiveness and complication rates in patients with acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) undergoing percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP; n = 58), percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP; n = 55), or conservative medical therapy (CMT; n = 55). After surgery, Cobb angle and vertebral height were significantly improved in the PKP group. PVP and PKP patients had significantly less pain immediately after surgery than CMT patients, but this difference disappeared between weeks 2 −8, only to return from months 6 – 12. QoL was significantly better among the surgical groups after surgery and was lower in the CMT group than in the surgical groups. Treatment times were shorter with PVP and PKP, but costs were lower with CMT. The rate of secondary fractures during follow-up was greater with CMT. Overall, PVP was considered the first choice treatment for OVCF with refractory pain.
GenantHKCooperCPoorG: Interim report and recommendation of the World Health Organization Task-Force for Osteoporosis. Osteoporosis Int1999; 10: 259–264.
2.
HichamF: The Canadian Regenerative Medicine and Nanomedicine Enterprise (CARMENE). Int J Nanomedicine2006; 1: 225–227.
3.
RiggsBLMeltonLJ3rd: The worldwide problem of osteoporosis: insights afforded by epidemiology. Bone1995; 17 (5 suppl): 505S–515S.
4.
WattsNBHarrisSTGenantHK: Treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures with percutaneous vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty. Osteoporosis Int2001; 12: 429–437.
5.
CrandallDSlaughterDHankinsPJ: Acute versus chronic vertebral compression fracture treated with kyphoplasty: early results. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)2004; 4: 418–424.
6.
EvansAJJensenMEKipKE: Vertebral compression fractures: pain reduction and improvement in functional mobility after percutaneous polymethylmethacrylate vertebroplasty—retrospective report of 245 cases. Radiology2003; 226: 366–372.
7.
MathisJMBarrJDBelkoffSM: Percutaneous vertebroplasty: A developing standard of care for vertebral compression fractures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2001; 22: 373–381.
8.
MathisJMOrtizAOZoarskiGH: Vertebroplasty versus kyphoplasty; a comparison and contrast. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2004; 25: 840–845.
9.
PhillipsFMHoECampbell-HuppM: Early radiographic and clinical results of balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)2003; 28: 2260–2267.
10.
LiebermanIHDudeneySReinhardtMK: Initial outcome and efficacy of “kyphoplasty” in the treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)2001; 26: 1631–1638.
11.
LiebermanIReinhardtMK: Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for osteolytic vertebral collapse. Clin Orthop Relat Res2003; 415 (suppl): S176–S186.
12.
LedlieJTRenfroM: Balloon kyphoplasty: one-year outcome in vertebral body height restoration. Chronic pain, and activity levels. J Neurosurg2003; 98 (1 suppl): 36–42.
13.
DudeneySLiebermanIHReinhandtMK: Kyphoplasty in the treatment of osteolytic vertebral compression fractures as a result of multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol2002; 20: 2382–2387.
MurphyKNussbaumDA: The emperor's new clothes. J Vasc Interv Radiol2005; 16: 561–562.
16.
MasalaSFioriRMassariF: Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. New equipment for malignant vertebral fractures treatment. J Exp Clin Cancer Res2003; 22 (4 suppl): 75–79.
17.
WardlawDCummingsSRVan MeirhaegheJ: Efficacy and safety of balloon kyphoplasty compared with nonsurgical care for vertebral compression fracture (FREE): A randomised controlled trial. Lancet2009; 373: 1016–1024.
18.
CoumansJVReinhardtMKLiebermanIH: Kyphoplasty for vertebral compression fractures: 1 year clinical outcomes from a prospective study. J Neurosurg2003; 99 (1 suppl): 44–50.
19.
MunkPL, Ho SGF: Vertebroplasty: an effective technique in the treatment of osteoporotic and malignant vertebral collapse. BCMJ2002; 44: 530–536.
20.
FinnernHWSykesDP: The hospital cost of vertebral fractures in the EU: estimates using national datasets. Osteoporos Int2003; 14: 429–436.
21.
De NegriPTirriTPaternosterG: Treatment of painful osteoporotic or traumatic vertebral compression fractures by percutaneous vertebral augmentation procedures: A nonrandomized comparison between vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. Clin J Pain2007; 23: 425–430.
22.
AlvarezLAlcarazMPérez-HiguerasA: Percutaneous vertebroplasty: functional improvement in patients with osteoporotic compression fractures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)2006; 31: 1113–1114.
23.
McKiernanFFaciszewskiTJensenR: Quality of life following vertebroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am2004; 86-A: 2600–2606.
24.
GillJBKuperMChinPC: Comparing pain reduction following kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Pain Physician2007; 10: 583–590.
25.
GarfinSRBuckleyRALedlieJ: Balloon kyphoplasty for symptomatic vertebral body compression fractures results in rapid, significant, and sustained improvements in back pain, function, and quality of life for elderly patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)2006; 31: 2213–2220.
26.
KobayashiKShimoyamaKNakamuraK: Percutaneous vertebroplasty immediately relieves pain of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures and prevents prolonged immobilization of patients. Eur Radiol2005; 15: 360–367.
27.
GarfinSRYuanHAReileyMA: New technologies in spine: kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for the treatment of painful osteoporotic compression fractures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)2001; 26: 1511–1515.
28.
KimDHVaccaroAR: Osteoporotic compression fractures of the spine: current options and considerations for treatment. Spine J2006; 6: 479–487.
29.
JensenMEDionJE: Percutaneous vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic compression fractures. Neuroimaging Clin N Am2000; 10: 547–568.
30.
HulmePAKrebsJFergusonSJ: Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty: A systematic review of 69 clinical studies. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)2006; 31: 1983–2001.
31.
LemkeDM: Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for treatment of painful osteoporotic compression fractures. J Am Acad Nurse Pract2005; 17: 268–276.
32.
MachinisTGFountasKNFeltesCH: Pain outcome and vertebral body height restoration in patients undergoing kyphoplasty. South Med J2006; 99: 457–460.
33.
PradhanBBBaeHWKropfMA: Kyphoplasty reduction of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: correction of local kyphosis versus overall sagittal alignment. Spine2006; 31: 435–441.
34.
TakahashiSGoldringSKatzM: Downregulation of calcitonin receptor mRNA expression by calcitonin during human osteoclast-like cell differentiation. J Clin Invest1995; 95: 167–171.
35.
YohKTanakaKIshikawaA: Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in Japanese osteoporotic patients and its improvement by elcatonin treatment. J Bone Miner Metab2005; 23: 167–173.
36.
KarsdalMAHenriksenKArnoldM: Calcitonin—a drug of the past or for the future? Physicologic inhibition of bone resorption while sustaining osteoclast numbers improves bone quality. BioDrugs2008; 22: 137–144.
37.
ChesnutCH3rdAzriaMSilvermanS: Salmon calcitonin: A review of current and future therapeutic indications. Osteoporos Int2008; 19: 479–491.
38.
KlazenCAVerhaarHJLampmannLE: VERTOS II: percutaneous vertebroplasty versus conservative therapy in patient with painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture; rationale, objectives and design of a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Trials2007; 8: 33.
39.
GrayLAJarvikJGHeagertyPJ: INvestigational Vertebroplasty Efficacy and Safety Trial (INVEST): A randomized controlled trial of percutaneous vertebroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord2007; 8: 126–132.
