Using Data Triangulation of Mother and Daughter Interviews to Enhance Research about Families

Abstract

Qualitative researchers use the term triangulation to describe the use of multiple strategies to study the same phenomenon. Although it is endorsed in social work research textbooks and contested in the literature, qualitative social work researchers are left on their own to determine how to ‘do’ triangulation. This article discusses triangulation, including recent debates around the concept. It describes two methods of data triangulation and illustrates them with examples from the study of mothers and daughters coping with a daughter’s religious intensification. From the first method, a comparative analysis of mother-daughter dyads, the authors identify and provide examples of five types of triangulated data: (1) same story, same meaning; (2) same story, different interpretations; (3) missing pieces; (4) unique information; and (5) illuminating. The second method, triangulation within groups and between groups, makes visible perspectives that are common and distinct to mothers and daughters as members of different cultural groups. The article discusses the advantages of systematic data triangulation for qualitative research and draws implications for social work research and practice.

Keywords

dyad families group qualitative research triangulation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Blaikie, Norman W. H. (1991) ‘A Critique of the Use of Triangulation in Social Research’ , Quality and Quantity 25: 115-136 .

Cicourel, Aaron V. (1974) Cognitive Sociology. New York: Free Press .

Creswell, John W. (1998) Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .

Denzin, Norman K. (1989) The Research Act, 3rd edn. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall .

Denzin, Norman K. and Lincoln, Yvonna S. (2000) ‘Introduction: The Discipline and Practice of Qualitative Research’, in Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd edn, pp. 1-28. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .

Erzberger, Christian and Prein, Gerald (1997) ‘Triangulation: Validity and Empirically-xbased Hypothesis Construction’ , Quality and Quantity 31: 141-154 .

Flick, Uwe (1992) ‘Triangulation Revisited: Strategy of Validation or Alternative?’ , Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 22(2): 175-197 .

Flick, Uwe (1998) An Introduction to Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Applications. London: Sage .

Grinnell, Richard M., Jr and Unrau, Yvonne A. (2005) Social Work Research and Evaluation: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches, 7th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press .

10.

Hammersley, Martyn and Atkinson, Paul (1995) Ethnography: Principles in Practice, 2nd edn. London: Routledge .

11.

Janesick, Valerie (1994) ‘The Choreography of Qualitative Research Design’, in Norman K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research, pp. 209-219. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .

12.

Janesick, Valerie (2000) ‘The Choreography of Qualitative Research Design: Minuets, Improvisations and Crystallization’, in Norman K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd edn, pp. 379-399. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .

13.

Kagan, Jerome (2000) Three Seductive Ideas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .

14.

Kleinman, Arthur (1988) The Illness Narratives: Suffering, Health, and the Human Condition. New York: Basic Books .

15.

Kopinak, Janice K. (1999) ‘The Use of Triangulation in a Study of Refugee Well-Being’ , Quality and Quantity 33: 169-183 .

16.

Lather, Patti (1991) Getting Smart: Feminist Research and Pedagogy With/in the Postmodern. New York: Routledge .

17.

Lincoln, Yvonna S. and Guba, Egon G. (1985) Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage .

18.

Marshall, Catherine and Rossman, Gretchen B. (1989) Designing Qualitative Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage .

19.

Morgan, David L. (1997) Focus Groups as Qualitative Research, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .

20.

Neuman, Lawrence W. (2000) Social Research Methods; Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon .

21.

Neuman, Lawrence and Kreuger, Larry W. (2003) Social Work Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Applications. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon .

22.

Padgett, Deborah K. (1998) Qualitative Methods in Social Work Research: Challenges and Rewards. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .

23.

Patton, Michael Q. (2002) Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .

24.

Perlesz, Amaryll and Lindsay, Jo (2003) ‘Methodological Triangulation in Researching Families: Making Sense of Dissonant Data’ , International Journal of Social Research Methodology 6(1): 25-40 .

25.

Richardson, Laurel (2000) ‘Writing: A Method of Inquiry’, in Norman K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd edn, pp. 923-948. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .

26.

Roer-Strier, Dorit (2001) ‘Reducing Risk for Children in Changing Cultural Contexts: Recommendations for Training and Intervention’ , Child Abuse and Neglect 25: 231-248 .

27.

Roer-Strier, Dorit and Rosenthal, Miriam K. (2001) ‘Socialization in Changing Cultural Contexts: A Search for Images of an “Adaptive Adult”’ , Social Work 46(3): 215-228 .

28.

Rubin, Allen and Babbie, Earl R. (2005) Research Methods for Social Work, 5th edn. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole .

29.

Seale, Clive (1999) ‘Quality in Qualitative Research’ , Qualitative Inquiry 5(4): 465-478 .

30.

Shaw, Ian and Gould, Nick (eds) (2002) Qualitative Research in Social Work. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .

31.

Shimoni, Rena , Este, David and Clark, Dawne E. (2003) ‘Paternal Engagement in Immigrant and Refugee Families’ , Journal of Comparative Family Studies 34(4): 555-568 .

32.

Silverman, David (1993) Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analyzing Talk, Text and Interaction. London: Sage .

33.

Tutty, Leslie M. , Rothery, Michael A. and Grinnell, Richard M. (eds) (1996) Qualitative Research for Social Workers: Phases, Steps, and Tasks. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon .