Intimate partner violence (IPV) is closely associated with adverse sexual and reproductive health (SRH) outcomes; yet most IPV service agencies offer limited SRH-related support. This study used a constructivist grounded theory approach to explore the perspectives of survivors and service providers on how SRH can be identified and addressed within agency settings. Data was collected through semi-structured focus groups and interviews with 29 participants, including survivors and direct service providers at IPV agencies in the Southwestern United States. Using coding and constant comparative analysis, conceptual categories were identified that describe the experiences of participants in IPV agencies and in accessing SRH care. These categories were used to construct a phased SRH assessment framework that integrates screening and assessment at multiple stages of service engagement. Grounded in survivor and provider perspectives, this framework offers a trauma-informed, practice-based resource to guide IPV agencies in strengthening SRH services and expanding cross-sector collaboration.
AndersonJCGraceKTMillerE (2017) Reproductive coercion among women living with HIV: an unexplored risk factor for negative sexual and mental health outcomes. Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome31(16): 2261–2265. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000001620
2.
Bagwell-GrayMEMessingJTBaldwin-WhiteA (2015) Intimate partner sexual violence: a review of terms, definitions, and prevalence. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse16(3): 316–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/152483801455729
3.
Bagwell-GrayMEJenSSchuetzN (2020) How intimate partner violence and intersectional identities converge to influence women’s sexual health across environmental contexts. Social Work65(4): 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swaa031
4.
BirksMMillsJ (2015) Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide. Sage.
5.
BoyceSCUysalJDeLongSM, et al. (2020) Women’s and girls’ experiences of reproductive coercion and opportunities for intervention in family planning clinics in Nairobi, Kenya: a qualitative study. Reproductive Health17: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-020-00942-7
6.
BryantACharmazK (eds) (2007) The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory. Sage.
7.
BurtonCWCarlyleKE (2015) Screening and intervening: evaluating a training program on intimate partner violence and reproductive coercion for family planning and home visiting providers. Family & Community Health38(3): 227–239. https://doi.org/10.1097/FCH.0000000000000076
CavanaughCWardK (2021) HIV/STI prevention interventions for women who have experienced intimate partner violence: a systematic review and look at whether the interventions were designed for disseminations. AIDS and Behavior25(11): 3605–3616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-021-03318-5
10.
CharmazK (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage.
11.
Chun TieYBirksMFrancisK (2019) Grounded theory research: a design framework for novice researchers. Sage Open Medicine7: 2050312118822927. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312118822927
12.
CokerAL (2007) Does physical intimate partner violence affect sexual health? A systematic review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse8(2): 149–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838007301162
13.
CreswellJWPothCN (2016) Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Sage publications.
14.
DeckerMRFlessaSPillaiRV, et al. (2017) Implementing trauma-informed partner violence assessment in family planning clinics. Journal of Women's Health26(9): 957–965. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2016.6093
15.
DichterMEOgdenSNTuepkerA, et al. (2021) Survivors’ input on health care-connected services for intimate partner violence. Journal of Women's Health30(12): 1744–1750. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2020.8585
16.
GielenACGhandourRMBurkeJG, et al. (2007) HIV/AIDS and intimate partner violence: intersecting women's health issues in the United States. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse8(2): 178–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838007301476
17.
GlaserBGStraussAL (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine de Gruyter.
GraceJElias-LambertN (2023) Let's talk about sexual health: experiences of intimate partner violence (IPV) service providers. [Conference poster session]. Council on Social Work Education Annual Program Meeting.
20.
GraceKTDeckerMRAlexanderK, et al. (2020) Reproductive coercion among Latina women and strategies for minimizing harm. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health65(5): 717. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13177
21.
HussainRKhanA (2008) Women's perceptions and experiences of sexual violence in marital relationships and its effect on reproductive health. Health Care for Women International29(5): 468–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399330801949541
22.
LoganTKShannonLColeJ (2007) Stalking victimization in the context of intimate partner violence. Violence & Victims22(6): 669–683. https://doi.org/10.1891/088667007782793147
23.
MalterudKSiersmaVDGuassoraAD (2016) Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research26(13): 1753–1760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444
24.
McGirrSABomstaHDVandegriftC, et al. (2020) An examination of domestic violence advocates’ responses to reproductive coercion. Journal of Interpersonal Violence35(9-10): 2082–2106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517701451
25.
McPhailBABuschNBKulkarniS, et al. (2007) An integrative feminist model: the evolving feminist perspective on intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women13(8): 817–841. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801207302039
MillerEDeckerMRMcCauleyHL, et al. (2011) A family planning clinic partner violence intervention to reduce risk associated with reproductive coercion. Contraception83(3): 274–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2010.07.013
28.
MooreAMFrohwirthLMillerE (2010) Male reproductive control of women who have experienced intimate partner violence in the United States. Social Science & Medicine70(11): 1737–1744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.02.009
29.
MoyaEMChávez-BaraySMMartínezO, et al. (2016) Exploring intimate partner violence and sexual health needs in the Southwestern United States: perspectives from health and human services workers. Health & Social Work41(1): e29–e37. https://doi.org/10.1093/hsw/hlv080
30.
O’Connor-TerryCBurtonDGowdaT, et al. (2022) Challenges of seeking reproductive health care in people experiencing intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence37(7-8): NP5167–NP5186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520959627
31.
ParkJNordstromSKWeberKM, et al. (2016) Reproductive coercion: uncloaking an imbalance of social power. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology214(1): 74–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.045
32.
PlummerMYoungLE (2010) Grounded theory and feminist inquiry: revitalizing links to the past. Western Journal of Nursing Research32(3): 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945909351298
33.
RamachandranDVCovarrubiasLWatsonC, et al. (2013) How you screen is as important as whether you screen: a qualitative analysis of violence screening practices in reproductive health clinics. Journal of Community Health38(5): 856–863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-013-9690-0
34.
RountreeMAPomeroyECMarsigliaFF (2008) Domestic violence shelters as prevention agents for HIV/AIDS?Health & Social Work33(3): 221–228. https://doi.org/10.1093/hsw/33.3.221
SawyerJMBradySR (2022) Applying critical grounded theory to community intervention development methodology: designing the critical difference engagement approach. International Journal of Qualitative Methods21: 16094069221141308. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221141308
37.
StockmanJKLuceaMBCampbellJC (2013) Forced sexual initiation, sexual intimate partner violence and HIV risk in women: a global review of the literature. AIDS and Behavior17(3): 832–847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-012-0361-4
38.
StumbarSWard-PetersonMLupiC (2019) A pilot project exploring medical students’ barriers to screening for intimate partner violence and reproductive coercion. PRiMER: Peer-Review Reports in Medical Education Research3: 23. https://doi.org/10.22454/PRiMER.2019.929284
39.
WoodSNKennedySRHameeduddinZ, et al. (2021) “being married doesn’t mean you have to reach the end of the world”: safety planning with intimate partner violence survivors and service providers in three urban informal settlements in Nairobi, Kenya. Journal of Interpersonal Violence36(19-20): NP10979–NP11005. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519879237
