The proliferation of open technologies and content in higher education is motivated
by broad embrace of a principle of sharing that is consonant with various
contemporary economic, pedagogic and policy drivers.At the same time, open
technologies and content present the possibility of a departure in the culture of
humanities research and teaching.The open frameworks celebrate and facilitate
collaborative and cooperative modes of working which are, to a degree, alien to a
traditional ‘individualist’ conception of work in the
Humanities. But such collectivity and collaboration yield new benefits to individual
humanist scholars and so are not a source for concern.
ACLS (American Council of Learned Societies) in conjunction with the Council
on Library and Information Resources
(2006) Draft Report of the American Council of Learned
Societies' Commission on Cyberinfrastructure for Humanities and Social
Sciences. Available at
http://www.acls.org/cyberinfrastructure/cyber.htm (accessed December 2005).
2.
Bailey, C.W., Jr
(2005) Open Access Bibliography: Liberating Scholarly
Literature with E-Prints and Open Access Journals.
Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries
.
3.
CiberLetras (1999–2005) Available at
http://www.lehman.cuny.edu/ciberletras (accessed January 2006).
4.
DiBona, C.
,
Ockman, S.
and
Stone, M.
, eds (1999) Open Sources: Voices from the Open Source
Revolution.
Beijing: O'Reilly
.
5.
Digital Resource Study
(2005) Center for the Study of Higher Education.
Available at http://digitalresourcestudy.berkeley.edu (accessed January 2006).
6.
doaj.org
(2006) Directory of Open Access Journals. Available at
http://www.doaj.org (accessed January 2006).
7.
Early Modern Literary Studies (1995–2005) Available
at https://purl-oclc-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/emls/emlshome.html (accessed January 2006).
8.
Esposito, J.J.
(2003)
‘The Processed Book’
,First Monday8(3). Available at
http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue8_3/esposito/index.html (accessed
December 2005).
9.
gallica.bnf.fr (n.d.) Available at http://gallica.bnf.fr (accessed
January 2006).
10.
Ginsparg, P. (1996) ‘Winners and Losers in the Global Research
Village’, unpublished manuscript. Available at
http://people.ccmr.cornell.edu/%7Eginsparg/blurb/pg96unesco.html
(accessed December 2005).
11.
Ginsparg, P. (2001) ‘Creating a Global Knowledge
Network’, unpublished manuscript. Available at
http://people.ccmr.cornell.edu/%7Eginsparg/blurb/pg01unesco.html
(accessed December 2005).
12.
Harnad, S. (2001–2003) ‘For Whom the Gate Tolls?: How and
Why to Free the Refereed Research Literature Online Through Author/Institution
Self-Archiving, Now’, unpublished manuscript. Available at
http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/%7Eharnad/Tp/resolution.htm (accessed December 2005).
13.
Horowitz, I.L.
(1991) Communicating Ideas:The Politics of Scholarly
Publishing.
New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press
.
14.
Japanese Journal of American Studies. Available at
http://wwwsoc.nii.ac.jp/jaas/periodicals/JJAS (accessed December 2005).
15.
JISC
(2005) Joint Information Systems Committee. Available
at http://www.jisc.ac.uk/index.cfm?name=pub_openaccess (accessed January 2006).
16.
Kirkwood, A.
(forthcoming) ‘Going Outside the Box: Skills Development,
Cultural Change and the Use of On-line
Resources’,Computers and Education.
17.
linux.org (1994–2006) Available at http://www.linux.org
(accessed December 2005).
18.
mellon.org (2005) Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. Available at
http://rit.mellon.org (accessed January 2006).
19.
Merton, R.K.
(1973 [1942]) ‘The Normative Structure of
Science’, in
N.W. Storer
(ed.) Merton, The Sociology of Science,pp.
267–278.
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
.
20.
MIT Report
(2005) MIT OCW Program Evaluation Findings Report.
Available at
http://ocw.mit.edu/NR/rdonlyres/90C9BC91–7819–48A0–9E9A-D6B2701C1CE5/0/MIT_OCW_2004_Program_Eval.pdf
(accessed December 2005).
21.
Odlyzko, A.M.
(1998) ‘The Economics of Electronic
Journals’, in
R. Ekman
and
R. Quandt
(eds) Technology and Scholarly Communication,pp.
380–393.
Berkeley: University of California Press
.
22.
OpenCourseWare (2005) Available at http://ocw.mit.edu/ (accessed
January 2006).
23.
philsci-archive (2003) Available at
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu (accessed January 2006)
24.
plato.stanford.edu
(1995–2006) Stanford Encyclopedia of
Philosophy. Available at http://plato.stanford.edu (accessed
February 2006).
25.
Raymond, E.
(1998)
‘The Cathedral and the Bazaar’
,First Monday3(3). Available at
http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue3_3/raymond/index.html (accessed
December 2005).
26.
Revue Flaubert (2001–2005) Available at
http://www.univ-rouen.fr/flaubert/10revue/10acc.htm (accessed January 2006).
27.
Roush,W.
(2005) ‘The Infinite
Library’,MIT Technology Review, May. Available at
http://www.technologyreview.com/articles/05/05/issue/feature_library.asp
(accessed December 2005).
28.
sakaiproject.org (2004–2006) Available at
http://www.sakaiproject.org (accessed January 2006).
29.
Schonfeld, R.C.
(2003) JSTOR: A History.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
.
30.
secm.org (2001) Society for Eighteenth-Century Music. Available at
http://www.secm.org (accessed February 2006).
31.
Smith, A.
and
Wheatley, S.
(2004)
‘American Council of Learned Societies Commission on
Cyberinfrastructure for the Humanities and Social Sciences’
. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education4(1):
115–118
.
32.
SQW Limited
(2003) ‘Economic Analysis of Scientific Research
Publishing: A Report Commissioned by the Wellcome Trust’,
Cambridgeshire. Available at
http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/assets/wtd003182.pdf (accessed December 2005).
33.
Suber, P. (2004) ‘Promoting Open Access in the
Humanities’, unpublished manuscript.Available at
http://www.earlham.edu/%7Epeters/writing/apa.htm (accessed December 2005).
34.
Varian H.
and
Kahin, B.
, eds (2000) Internet Publishing and Beyond:The Economics of
Digital Information and Intellectual Property.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
.
35.
Wellcome Trust
(2005) ‘Wellcome Trust Position Statement in
Support of Open and Unrestricted Access to Published Research’,
September. Available at http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/doc_wtd002766.html
(accessed December 2005).
36.
Willinsky, J.
(2003)
‘Scholarly Associations and the Economic Viability of Open Access Publishing’
.Journal of Digital Information4(2): article 177. Available at
http://jodi.ecs.soton.ac.uk/Articles/v04/i02/Willinsky (accessed December 2005).
37.
Willinsky, J.
(2005) The Access Principle: The Case for Open Access to
Research and Scholarship.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
.
